sudo -s
apt-get update
apt-get install -y build-essential git screen htop
wget https://www.dropbox.com/s/5q7ayx0r5djz8nk/jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7gf-linux64-barcelona.tgz
tar -xzvf jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7gf-linux64-barcelona.tgz
cd jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7gf-linux64-barcelona/linux64-barcelona-512M
screen
./jhprotominer -o ypool.net:8081 -u [UserName.Workername] -p [password] -t 4
People, should we really allow referral for 1st post? With all the cloud guides already here, that looks like spam to me...
People, should we really allow referral for 1st post? With all the cloud guides already here, that looks like spam to me...
I am wondering why people to not put miner developer donation addresses to their guides...Not necessary anymore for new miner versions that "pay for themselves" by mining the first 120 seconds for the developers I guess?
Try calculating the profits, this is pure nominal amount.Depends on how many miner installations there are.
But I am thinking that I shall probably increase this time to make it usable only by those who respect efforts put into it.That would be ok for me (as a user of your miner) if it stays in "fair" / usable boundaries.
But anyway at least mentioning the miner developer and call to stay up to date with new versions shall me mandatory, I would say. If there would be a mention of "Thanks yvg1900 for the miner referred to in this guide, follow @yvg1900 on Twitter to stay updated" - that would be perfectly enough.Completely agree!
P.S. But it is still funny how people make decisions "enough or not enough" without calculating.How can you calculate without knowing how many miners are run?
please do not treat this as an offence or push - agreed?Of course, no problem!
1) but definitely not all are using M7g line. Only fraction. Big ops do not bother updating - just fire and forget.This could (easily?) be changed by making older miners no longer compatible. (I think that happend before - for technical reasons - but could be done on purpose for financial reasons? Just a thought.)
4) Only very few restart miner often - mostly during initial selection phase - from my stats it is negligible.How about canceling the 120-second-mining-at-startup idea and creating a function to mine 30 seconds every hour into the devpool? (Which would turn out as a 30-second-startmining plus 30 seconds every following hour for the whole uptime of the miner). Restarts no longer necessary/required.
5) The outcome is that having 43000 machines connected, they all together contribute 1 mediocre machine for two months. And this perfectly matches the share value earned in practice.That brings up the question: why did you program the miner in the first place? Because you have too much sparetime and want to help other people make a fortune, or to make a fortune yourself (while having fun programming as it is your hobby)? I guess primarily the latter. If you then decide to open your program to the public you could also choose to sell it - or do as you did and give it away for free / donations. It's good to believe in the good of mankind. But as you see: it mostly doesn't work. So I think the devmining-option built into the client is a good choice. Those who do not like it can choose another mining software.
P.S. as of you being user of the miner, I would prefer explicit donation, and amount does not matter - fact is important. This is just a sign of respect, no more no less.Is it also a sign of respect to continue using your miner while "force-paying" for dev-miningtime? Disrespectful would be liking your software but only using it as long as it's completely free. (But if there are good competitors - it would be an option "evil" people could choose!)