16
KeyID / Re: *Final, guaranteed* allocation.
« on: August 08, 2014, 01:04:53 am »
Great! 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
18
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 谁能从数学上比较一下一票一投和目前的Approval Voting的区别
« on: August 04, 2014, 07:21:16 am »有人说要一票一投，有人觉得还是目前的投票方式，也就是approval voting（https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5294.0）更好。
那有没人能从数学上比较一下这两种投票方式，无论是简单的计算，还是数学模型。让大家能更加理性地探讨这两种投票方式的优劣。
假设101个代表，200w选票
一票一投，情况较为简单，应用鸽巢原理，大于200W/101选票可以铁定一个代表，帖子https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6577.0有描述。
假设1人能最多对10个不同的候选人各给1票。 设铁定支持我的人为x，这些人为让我当选，只会对我投1支持票，对其余候选人不投票，我获得x张选票；剩余的200w人因我收费高、服务不好等原因要发誓拉我下马。为了将我挤出101名外，集中选票是他们认可的101人（每人至少x+1张选票）是最好的方式。拉我下马条件为的反对者人数至少为101*（x+1）/10。反对者实际最多为（200W-x）。 101*（x+1）/10>200W-x
更一般的，假设m个代表，一票最多n头。需满足 m*(x+1)/n>(200W-x)
19
中文 (Chinese) / Re: blockchain explore(BitSuperLab出品)
« on: August 03, 2014, 01:37:21 pm »
awesome!
20
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果我是大户，会怎么做！！！！！
« on: August 03, 2014, 03:21:41 am »
对于小散户而言，PTS/AGS的初始分配的才是自己的，希望较大的初始配额。
至于以后的，跟他们关系不大，那是代表们决定的。
至于以后的，跟他们关系不大，那是代表们决定的。
22
KeyID / Re: greed delegates possible in DNS without punishment
« on: August 03, 2014, 01:46:13 am »
In detail.
23
KeyID / greed delegates possible in DNS without punishment
« on: August 03, 2014, 01:34:48 am »
Delegates will control 70% in domain names. That is a big cake.
toast said
However, this is not alway true in game theory.
Suppose 1PTS stands for 1 delegate vote only, 101 delegates. For simplicity, we only consider PTS, i.e., imagine just 2,000,000 votes.
Based on Pigeonhole principle, the person who gets more than 2,000,000/101 votes will certainly be a delegate. It is about 19802 PTS.
According coinplorer, the top 12 PTS address, is able to support 14,7,4,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1 delegates (totally 39 delegates or more), even these delegates set high-pay (100%), our vote can't change this.
If a PTS have several votes, AGS included. Similar things will happen.
Toast, could any future discipline to avoid this?
toast said
Quote
* You can vote for low-pay delegates so that they receive only a small percent (10% or less) of possible pay. The rest is destroyed.
However, this is not alway true in game theory.
Suppose 1PTS stands for 1 delegate vote only, 101 delegates. For simplicity, we only consider PTS, i.e., imagine just 2,000,000 votes.
Based on Pigeonhole principle, the person who gets more than 2,000,000/101 votes will certainly be a delegate. It is about 19802 PTS.
According coinplorer, the top 12 PTS address, is able to support 14,7,4,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1 delegates (totally 39 delegates or more), even these delegates set high-pay (100%), our vote can't change this.
If a PTS have several votes, AGS included. Similar things will happen.
Quote
* You aren't just giving 101 individuals the majority - there will be more than 101 different delegates over the course of a year, and they also want what is good for the DAC and will vote for a diverse set of delegates.Less votes for a delegate. They can support more delegates.
Toast, could any future discipline to avoid this?
25
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 建议：如果pts快照是快照后再宣布大家觉得如何？
« on: August 02, 2014, 02:06:52 pm »
个人觉得没有必要，以3i雁过拔毛式PTS 10%，PTS价格在快照前后上涨的幅度会相当有限。
27
中文 (Chinese) / 代表怎么配置？
« on: August 02, 2014, 03:58:21 am »
在Vote和DNS中代表的重要性已经非常重要了，熊版代理拉票的流程也有了。求个代理配置的技术流程。
28
中文 (Chinese) / Re: DNS的分配问题讨论
« on: August 02, 2014, 02:31:06 am »
70% was allocated to 101 delegates? The delegates control most of DNS.
29
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 建议：如果pts快照是快照后再宣布大家觉得如何？
« on: August 02, 2014, 12:02:18 am »
事后通知，存在透明度的问题，涉及到官方工作人员自证清白。现在虽然价格波动大，但快照时间是明规则。身在某朝，最讨厌潜规则。
30
General Discussion / Re: Airdrop 100% profit to bitsharestalk.org (0801 50BTSX)
« on: August 01, 2014, 07:52:18 am »
BTS: avanty
Thanks!
Thanks!
