Okay, giving this a go. Getting ~31hpm on my Macbook. (up from ~14 with the stock client)
Can you clarify when you will pay out? Thanks.
Okay, giving this a go. Getting ~31hpm on my Macbook. (up from ~14 with the stock client)
Can you clarify when you will pay out? Thanks.
valid: 16 invalid: 2 balance: 1.31244 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS_HERE hpm: 31.3429Output:Code: [Select]valid: 16 invalid: 2 balance: 1.31244 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS_HERE hpm: 31.3429
valid = the number of valid shares you have submitted
invalid = stale shares... note there is alway 1 invalid when you first start up...
balance = your balance on a pay-per-share basis
paid = total that have been sent to YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS (this feature is disabled for now... )
Eagerly awaiting the windows version of this miner. :)
valid: 5 invalid: 4 balance: 0.437479 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 27.3926
3112166ms th_a miner.cpp:45 start_work ] sending 03f48890e42b1b7d8c92c3aadd0a470531c547fb042e577b3e89f9462716f560
valid: 5 invalid: 4 balance: 0.437479 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 30.5656Okay, switched to the new version. I assume /opt stays the same and the fix was in pool_miner?
Also, I'm not sure I fully understand the output.Code: [Select]valid: 5 invalid: 4 balance: 0.437479 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 27.3926
3112166ms th_a miner.cpp:45 start_work ] sending 03f48890e42b1b7d8c92c3aadd0a470531c547fb042e577b3e89f9462716f560
valid: 5 invalid: 4 balance: 0.437479 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 30.5656
When it says sending, I assume that's a share, but then the number of valid/invalid doesn't increment. Is that correct behavior?
valid: 6 invalid: 5 balance: 0.47725 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 0
9140ms th_b miner.cpp:45 start_work ] sending 019b0c81b38e57dad43115c81ef3000ca61f3e738712400a2a1db8fa23282b5d
valid: 6 invalid: 5 balance: 0.517021 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 12.8594
valid: 6 invalid: 5 balance: 0.517021 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 13.5231
74874ms th_b miner.cpp:45 start_work ] sending 0136f33b3528ebe13b1df652398b9398f2b9b3aea0f9354e07b8870f25c7c24b
valid: 7 invalid: 5 balance: 0.556791 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 20.7333
valid: 7 invalid: 5 balance: 0.556791 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 22.7991
110167ms th_b miner.cpp:45 start_work ] sending 0155d9e82ac58633f629feeda789d9a8539899988669b017ddc6ab57cb51e5e7
valid: 7 invalid: 5 balance: 0.556791 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PsaBPVGJPVbvWXjAwMyHB43iTHqWDBM6iL hpm: 24.209attempting to connect to the-iland.net
940782ms th_a miner.cpp:103 main ] 64.90.183.137:8383
940904ms th_a miner.cpp:109 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Now I'm getting a bunch of 'cannot connect'Code: [Select]attempting to connect to the-iland.net
940782ms th_a miner.cpp:103 main ] 64.90.183.137:8383
940904ms th_a miner.cpp:109 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Is the server still down?
OK... We are good to go now. I had a data synchronization issue between the miner and pool which seems to be resolved in my testing. I also have Windows 64 binaries ready to go.
1) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
2) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/win64_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
OK... We are good to go now. I had a data synchronization issue between the miner and pool which seems to be resolved in my testing. I also have Windows 64 binaries ready to go.
1) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
2) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/win64_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
OK... We are good to go now. I had a data synchronization issue between the miner and pool which seems to be resolved in my testing. I also have Windows 64 binaries ready to go.
1) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
2) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/win64_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
thanks
how do i specifiy how many threads to use?
You are running the old client.
OK... We are good to go now. I had a data synchronization issue between the miner and pool which seems to be resolved in my testing. I also have Windows 64 binaries ready to go.
1) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
2) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/win64_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
thanks
how do i specifiy how many threads to use?
Right now it defaults to 8 for my testing which should work for everyone with a small performance hit for those with only 4 cores. I will add more options once the core functionality is tested.
Will there be a way for us to tell how many people are mining?
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D
dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
Does this work on Ubuntu?
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Says its missing MSVCP110.dll from the windows build.
Says its missing MSVCP110.dll from the windows build.
im getting this error as well on windows 8
Says its missing MSVCP110.dll from the windows build.
im getting this error as well on windows 8
I believe google can help. I didn't build the Win64 version and the guy who did is out for the night. I know you can download it.
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D
dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
Did you move the opt folder to /opt?
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D
dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
Did you move the opt folder to /opt?
Thanks for help.
First I "cp opt/local/lib/*.dylib /opt/local/lib/"
Then it told me
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
After "cp opt/local/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib /usr/lib/lib" the "System.B" error shows up.
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
I will release the source in time, for now it is my competitive edge in the mining pool business. I need some PTS to make Invictus grow and give value to everyone else's PTS :)
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
I will release the source in time, for now it is my competitive edge in the mining pool business. I need some PTS to make Invictus grow and give value to everyone else's PTS :)
Fine, then give us the x64 binaries, please.
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
I will release the source in time, for now it is my competitive edge in the mining pool business. I need some PTS to make Invictus grow and give value to everyone else's PTS :)
Fine, then give us the x64 binaries, please.
Building it, give me about 10 to 15 minutes.
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
I will release the source in time, for now it is my competitive edge in the mining pool business. I need some PTS to make Invictus grow and give value to everyone else's PTS :)
Fine, then give us the x64 binaries, please.
Building it, give me about 10 to 15 minutes.
Does this work on Ubuntu?
What version do you want a binary for?
Why give us binaries?
Just release sources for x64 linux.
I don't think there's a need to bother with 32bit versions...
I will release the source in time, for now it is my competitive edge in the mining pool business. I need some PTS to make Invictus grow and give value to everyone else's PTS :)
Fine, then give us the x64 binaries, please.
Building it, give me about 10 to 15 minutes.
Looks like I'm staying awake then. Thanks.
32 bit will be great as well thanks
32 bit will be great as well thanks
Funny thing about it, the 32 bit version would crash when I tried to build it. Didn't think anyone was still mining on 32 bit machines.
+1 Linux please Debian 7 64bit. Very nice display btw!
I got this error in OS X 10.8.4. Anyone knows how to fix it? :D
dyld: Symbol not found: ___emutls_get_address
Expected in: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib
Did you move the opt folder to /opt?
Thanks for help.
First I "cp opt/local/lib/*.dylib /opt/local/lib/"
Then it told me
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
After "cp opt/local/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib /usr/lib/lib" the "System.B" error shows up.
Ok... I will build a Qt GUI for this that will just run with a double click.
But lets try one thing first...
mv /opt to /oldopt
mv myopt to /opt
Then run it.
So after the dry run and during the reboot, will we need updated clients to access it, or will the transition be seamless. Just want to know if I need to stay up to keep the miners running.
Ubuntu 13.04 x64 Runs at 6 HPM on Digital Ocean
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
In in the pool ;) let's see what we get.
How I can specify number of threads, or it's detects it automatically?
Yikes... you just hosed your system... I can post a DL link for the original file for OS X 10.8.4 if you need it.
Yikes... you just hosed your system... I can post a DL link for the original file for OS X 10.8.4 if you need it.
Sure. That would be very kind of you. :D
Linux one working great also, I am moving all my power.
Come on guys... you need to have better luck with your hashes... I found 1 block in the first 5 minutes and nothing since....
I'm trying the linux version on Debian/Ubuntu. When trying to run it, it says:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./alphaminer)
Anyone know what package that is? There are a lot of libc's in aptitude.
hi - what is the port to be opened on firewall?
I need to convert from X shares per min to X hashes per min to calculate total pool speed... anyone care to help me out?
I'm trying the linux version on Debian/Ubuntu. When trying to run it, it says:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./alphaminer)
Anyone know what package that is? There are a lot of libc's in aptitude.
Is the GLIBC_2.14 version hardcoded into alpha miner? Debian's newest stable version available in the repos is only 2.13-38. I think that might be what it is. http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eglibc.html The apt package is eglibc-source. My system is fully up to date.
Nice and steady hashing - just what I like :D
Waiting till you get things ironed out before throwing the beasts at it.
Come on guys... you need to have better luck with your hashes... I found 1 block in the first 5 minutes and nothing since....
Wait 10 min, I'm in the way :)
I'm trying the linux version on Debian/Ubuntu. When trying to run it, it says:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./alphaminer)
Anyone know what package that is? There are a lot of libc's in aptitude.
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
I'm trying the linux version on Debian/Ubuntu. When trying to run it, it says:
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./alphaminer)
Anyone know what package that is? There are a lot of libc's in aptitude.
I figured it out. Debian, even the newest, only has GLIB 2.13. I googled to try updating it but everything failed. So I destroyed that and spun up Ubuntu. It's working now.
Yikes... you just hosed your system... I can post a DL link for the original file for OS X 10.8.4 if you need it.
Sure. That would be very kind of you. :D
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/libSystem.B.dylib
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
Please also check this.
Pool off I guess?
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
Please also check this.
Yes, as I see all computers count as one and probably do the same job, waiting for a fix.
on Win Server 2008 R2 I have a message box with: "The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b). Click OK to close" - any ideas?I installed Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3 and then it worked.
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
Please also check this.
Yes, as I see all computers count as one and probably do the same job, waiting for a fix.
Ok, so the display output parameters you see are for your address and not that instance. If you have two instances that are both using the same key, then they will both report the same totals and NOT the local totals for that client.
That is the behavior I have now... if you want a client that tracks its own stats you will need to give it a separate public key. I will look into per-connection stats.
When I have multiple computers using same payout address, the share number does not scale. Or maybe just my feeling....
I'm seeing the same thing.
Please also check this.
Yes, as I see all computers count as one and probably do the same job, waiting for a fix.
Ok, so the display output parameters you see are for your address and not that instance. If you have two instances that are both using the same key, then they will both report the same totals and NOT the local totals for that client.
That is the behavior I have now... if you want a client that tracks its own stats you will need to give it a separate public key. I will look into per-connection stats.
Back to broken pipe on latest Mac. You need to set up an auto-restart server script or something? I wasted a lot of hashing... :(He has it off for "an hour or two" to make updates. Then will come up again.
Also it will be good if miner will have only minimalistic deps (libcurl and may be some others, but not boost or qt its overkill to use boost just for communication like xolokram did)
Also it will be good if miner will have only minimalistic deps (libcurl and may be some others, but not boost or qt its overkill to use boost just for communication like xolokram did)
I built the miner using my fc, threading, multitasking, and reflection library so I could put the whole thing together quickly. I also use a binary protocol for performance and the server relies on coroutines to be entirely async. This pool was designed for speed and minimum latency.
This is also helping to test the infrastructure of BitShares itself by using many components from that. The windows exe should use static linking rather than DLLs, but this was not packaged for release.
I am sure others will design things around curl and json... that is what the market is for :)
Also it will be good if miner will have only minimalistic deps (libcurl and may be some others, but not boost or qt its overkill to use boost just for communication like xolokram did)
I built the miner using my fc, threading, multitasking, and reflection library so I could put the whole thing together quickly. I also use a binary protocol for performance and the server relies on coroutines to be entirely async. This pool was designed for speed and minimum latency.
This is also helping to test the infrastructure of BitShares itself by using many components from that. The windows exe should use static linking rather than DLLs, but this was not packaged for release.
I am sure others will design things around curl and json... that is what the market is for :)
Also seems like you use openssl or libgcrypt. I dont care about win binary, I'm interested in linux and sources for this client
3 hpm more than I get with other miners on win7
3 hpm more than I get with other miners on win7
What is your base line?
3 hpm more than I get with other miners on win7
What is your base line?
6.5 now 8.5-9. keeping an eye on the rejection rate though
I have a very low reject rate for my miners... what are you all seeing? Remember to subtract 1 for each time you have started your client.
Was getting ~17 with two instances on win64, now with the new miner ~30. Nice job and quick action bytemaster. I hope to see an all in one solution built into the qt client so I can easily get non tech friends to support the cause.
Why you use hardcoded thread number? why not simply detect them on the fly like cpuminer did?
release sources and someone will help you writing it
End of file
{"message":"End of file"}
asio asio.cpp:22 read_write_handler
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
206687ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
206825ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
It's 3 - 0 then
It's 3 - 0 then
14 - 5 with ~9.5 hpm
if balance has been reset is that mean I can expect payout? what is the payout threshold?
if balance has been reset is that mean I can expect payout? what is the payout threshold?
Right now I manually send out payouts a couple of times per day for security reasons with the new code. I will set up automatic payouts every 0.5 PTS within a day or so and eventually manual payouts will be available once I have a GUI.
I cannot send any payouts right now because all of the blocks we have found are too young.
if balance has been reset is that mean I can expect payout? what is the payout threshold?
Right now I manually send out payouts a couple of times per day for security reasons with the new code. I will set up automatic payouts every 0.5 PTS within a day or so and eventually manual payouts will be available once I have a GUI.
I cannot send any payouts right now because all of the blocks we have found are too young.
You should have received a payout unless you were one of 3 people for whom the wallet ran out of mature blocks the last time I sent out a payout.
I am going to get some sleep, I will send out a payout when I get up in a few hours.
Contact BoShen or Lighthouse if something happens with the pool and they will know how to get ahold of me ASAP.
The following accounts were not paid because they were below the minimum threshold or because the wallet is waiting for blocks to mature.
sending 310212318 to PYCbcdeCMJyGynM7zfBMSJv4eUUHHr8EVV
sending 59656215 to PYKeUGZHJvaZXNt4tr9t71pfBCK4dxiRVk
sending 39770810 to PYTKZhevrkVjRDG41R9Uj4VWk9j6JfYFW6
valid: 79 invalid: 19 balance: 1.59083 paid: 1.55106 pps: 0.0397708 address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 10.4715
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 10.4902
Why don't pay my address??
PkjmivKVXMuKZYyMR2xCJtMRcBvWApsyof
I Mined whole day!
the x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application."I'm having the same problem, tried installing Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3, but that didn't fix it.
I think I'm not understanding something very basic. My hpm is around 18, but I only seem to submit less than 1 hash per minute (i.e. when it prints "sending"). The sending events are what increment the valid counter and everything else.
I thought that what is sent is a hash that is found? But if that's true, then why does it tell me I'm hashing at 18 per minute, but only submitting less than 1 per minute?
Also - what units is the balance in? Do you need to multiply the balance by pps to convert it to PTS?
Thanks
Output:Code: [Select]valid: 16 invalid: 2 balance: 1.31244 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS_HERE hpm: 31.3429
valid = the number of valid shares you have submitted
invalid = stale shares... note there is alway 1 invalid when you first start up...
balance = your balance on a pay-per-share basis
paid = total that have been sent to YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS (this feature is disabled for now... )
Output:Code: [Select]valid: 16 invalid: 2 balance: 1.31244 paid: 0 pps: 0.0397708 address: YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS_HERE hpm: 31.3429
valid = the number of valid shares you have submitted
invalid = stale shares... note there is alway 1 invalid when you first start up...
balance = your balance on a pay-per-share basis
paid = total that have been sent to YOUR_PTS_ADDRESS (this feature is disabled for now... )
pps: is the number of PTS per share submitted ... this is the variable and pps is suspect right now...
Whenever I try to start the miner it says "The program can't start because MSVCP110.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem." Can anyone help me out?
Illegal instruction
One hash isn't one share. If you hash you and you end up with a hash low enough (starting with enough 0s) then it's considered a share, and is sent to the server.
Thanks for the response, Nine Lives. That explains the "shares," although I'm not quite sure why this intermediary is needed. I.e. why not just denote balances in terms of PTS, i.e. scale shares so that PPS=1?
But is there something wrong with my system in that my hpm is 18, yet I send less than 1 hash per minute?
When ever I run the POOL_MINER.EXE (windows x64) it runs the benchmark for a while and displays a hashrate but after that it closes and does nothing else. I'm not sure if its a bug or there is some step that I am supposed to do before running the miner :(
How do I run miner in ubuntu?
I used wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
and then typed linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 the-iland.net myptsadress in console
and it says "command not found".
Run :
POOL_MINER.EXE the-iland.net <your protoshares address>
Now there is many disconnects from pool =\
Also i dont see any payout
Thank you it works. :)How do I run miner in ubuntu?
I used wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
and then typed linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 the-iland.net myptsadress in console
and it says "command not found".
inside the folder where you downloaded the miner (from terminal) :
chmod +x linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 the-iland.net <pts addr> &
3) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
Quote3) http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
ending doesn't exist i guess
Trying to get this running on OSX 10.6.8 but having no luck
I copied libgcc directory & libstdc++.6.dylib file to my /opt/local/lib
But when i try to run the miner i keep gettingCode: [Select]Illegal instruction
Hi bytemaster.
Any help here would be appreciated.Trying to get this running on OSX 10.6.8 but having no luck
I copied libgcc directory & libstdc++.6.dylib file to my /opt/local/lib
But when i try to run the miner i keep gettingCode: [Select]Illegal instruction
Hi bytemaster.
Any help here would be appreciated.Trying to get this running on OSX 10.6.8 but having no luck
I copied libgcc directory & libstdc++.6.dylib file to my /opt/local/lib
But when i try to run the miner i keep gettingCode: [Select]Illegal instruction
32 bit machine?
Hi bytemaster.
Any help here would be appreciated.Trying to get this running on OSX 10.6.8 but having no luck
I copied libgcc directory & libstdc++.6.dylib file to my /opt/local/lib
But when i try to run the miner i keep gettingCode: [Select]Illegal instruction
32 bit machine?
Yep.
Drat and double drat. But thanks for letting me know.Hi bytemaster.
Any help here would be appreciated.Trying to get this running on OSX 10.6.8 but having no luck
I copied libgcc directory & libstdc++.6.dylib file to my /opt/local/lib
But when i try to run the miner i keep gettingCode: [Select]Illegal instruction
32 bit machine?
Yep.
ALl binaries provided are 64 bit only, no plans to support 32 bits.
version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?
According to my wallet I have paid out a total of 586 PTS divided among several hundred people.your mean miner display balance num is wrong?? is 3x?
I received a transaction for my own miner on the pool which earned 9PTS...
When you saw the connection drop and reconnect that was due to me processing payments.
There was a brief period where the PPS was calculated wrong and I was paying you all 3x what I should have, a full 0.1 PTS per share. I lost money there, but hey it was my mistake.
This pool is still an experiment, don't mine here unless you are willing to take the risk that my software has bugs that could cause problems. I will make my best effort to see everyone gets paid even if I lose some, but there is still potential of data corruption that would make it hard for me to know what to pay out. After all it was written in the middle of the night by a coder strung up on caffeinated beverages.
Disclaimer aside, it appears to be working well from this end.
version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?
Are you on Debian x64?
According to my wallet I have paid out a total of 586 PTS divided among several hundred people.your mean miner display balance num is wrong?? is 3x?
I received a transaction for my own miner on the pool which earned 9PTS...
When you saw the connection drop and reconnect that was due to me processing payments.
There was a brief period where the PPS was calculated wrong and I was paying you all 3x what I should have, a full 0.1 PTS per share. I lost money there, but hey it was my mistake.
This pool is still an experiment, don't mine here unless you are willing to take the risk that my software has bugs that could cause problems. I will make my best effort to see everyone gets paid even if I lose some, but there is still potential of data corruption that would make it hard for me to know what to pay out. After all it was written in the middle of the night by a coder strung up on caffeinated beverages.
Disclaimer aside, it appears to be working well from this end.
version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?
Are you on Debian x64?
yes
Question: is it better to use the same wallet address on all my mining machines or different addresses? Or it doesn't matter?
Ta
./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0)
Throw location unknown (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)
Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::thread_resource_error> >
std::exception::what: boost::thread_resource_error: Resource temporarily unavailable
version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?
Are you on Debian x64?
yes
from terminal :
sudo editor /etc/apt/sources.list
add this line :
"deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free" (no quotes)
run :
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev
it'll ask you a few questions about restarting processes. go ahead and let it restart them
worked on my debian 7 x64 stable
Inoticed not all my computers using the same address dont have the #of valids and invalids. i have like 7 computers running..is this a bug?
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
I've just had a few breaks in connection to the pool on all my servers in different locations. Is the pool server ok? Is anyone else experiencing this?
I've just had a few breaks in connection to the pool on all my servers in different locations. Is the pool server ok? Is anyone else experiencing this?
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
I've just had a few breaks in connection to the pool on all my servers in different locations. Is the pool server ok? Is anyone else experiencing this?
As bytemaster write before you get connection problem when pool proceed payouts, don't worry.
PS: I get all expected payments, thanks!
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Question,
Is it better to use one wallet address for all my servers that are mining or give each its own address? Or does it not matter? Just curious if this makes any difference.
I've just had a few breaks in connection to the pool on all my servers in different locations. Is the pool server ok? Is anyone else experiencing this?
All connection drops are me resetting the pool for small fixes or to make payments.
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Acording my calculation, for 1 hour at this pool I get same amount as for 6 hours at http://54.238.185.113/ Great job!!!
Thanks!I've just had a few breaks in connection to the pool on all my servers in different locations. Is the pool server ok? Is anyone else experiencing this?
All connection drops are me resetting the pool for small fixes or to make payments.
Thank you.
Do you have a donate address?
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Acording my calculation, for 1 hour at this pool I get same amount as for 6 hours at http://54.238.185.113/ Great job!!!
Perhaps I should raise my fees! Either that or I am going to go broke by over-paying for hash power.
ok i'm running alpha on 7 computers withone payout address.... each computer is on a different valid# and balance... i'm guessing eachof them is workign on a different hash and then once it sending it updates and pulls a new hash to solve? and hence all my computers have different valids?
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Acording my calculation, for 1 hour at this pool I get same amount as for 6 hours at http://54.238.185.113/ Great job!!!
Perhaps I should raise my fees! Either that or I am going to go broke pay over-paying for hash power.
Perhaps I should raise my fees! Either that or I am going to go broke pay over-paying for hash power.
Please confirm that you all have been receiving expected payments.
Acording my calculation, for 1 hour at this pool I get same amount as for 6 hours at http://54.238.185.113/ Great job!!!
Perhaps I should raise my fees! Either that or I am going to go broke pay over-paying for hash power.
I think you need to lookout for you and your business. Increase the fee's if you must, as long as we all benefit like this and no-one else challengers your hard work :)
@bytemaster can you post stat about how much blocks we found last hour?
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Quoteattempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
any suggestion about!? pls help me
@bytemaster: It's also will be a nice idea if you will reward the address which find block for 3-5-x% of block rewards, it's will reward miners luck and make miner which find block more happy. ;-)
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
chmod +x linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 the-iland.net <pts addr>
@bytemaster: It's also will be a nice idea if you will reward the address which find block for 3-5-x% of block rewards, it's will reward miners luck and make miner which find block more happy. ;-)
I could only do that by increasing fees on everyone else...
I am thinking that 10% may not be enough because I am still loosing ground somehow... any objections if I reduce the reward to 50% until I gather more stats about actual earnings? If it really is giving you 6x other pools then perhaps this is why :)
Either that or exceptionally bad luck.. haven't found any blocks in a while, yet I keep having to pay out :)
Quoteattempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
any suggestion about!? pls help me
Does it persist or just a one time event?
@bytemaster: It's also will be a nice idea if you will reward the address which find block for 3-5-x% of block rewards, it's will reward miners luck and make miner which find block more happy. ;-)
I could only do that by increasing fees on everyone else...
I am thinking that 10% may not be enough because I am still loosing ground somehow... any objections if I reduce the reward to 50% until I gather more stats about actual earnings? If it really is giving you 6x other pools then perhaps this is why :)
Either that or exceptionally bad luck.. haven't found any blocks in a while, yet I keep having to pay out :)
Wait, so I just came back, and now the PPS is half of what it was, /and/ you are taking a 50% fee? That doesn't seem entirely fair.
valid: 44 invalid: 19 balance: 0.455091 paid: 1.19114 pps: 0.0192217 address: xxxxx hpm: 12.655
Wait, so I just came back, and now the PPS is half of what it was, /and/ you are taking a 50% fee? That doesn't seem entirely fair.
+1
Quotevalid: 44 invalid: 19 balance: 0.455091 paid: 1.19114 pps: 0.0192217 address: xxxxx hpm: 12.655
over 40% invalid? is it normal!?
i think you forgot to factor in orphan blocks
i think you forgot to factor in orphan blocks
what do you mean!? is it answer on my previous question!?
Wait, so I just came back, and now the PPS is half of what it was, /and/ you are taking a 50% fee? That doesn't seem entirely fair.
+1
Wait, so I just came back, and now the PPS is half of what it was, /and/ you are taking a 50% fee? That doesn't seem entirely fair.
+1
bytemaster?
i think you forgot to factor in orphan blocks
what do you mean!? is it answer on my previous question!?
There are several factors at play here... that affect the results.
1) I am paying a flat rate for hash power, I need to make sure I can turn that hash power into revenue so I can pay.
2) Stale (invalid) shares occur when I receive a share after I have received a new block and thus make the share invalid.
3) Orphan blocks are blocks that I thought I mined, so I paid as valid share, but in the end I didn't get to keep.
So, if 1 out of every 2-3 blocks is an orphan then there is a 33 to 50% loss on my part unless I adjust the PPS to compensate. My goal is to offer the highest return for your mining power and to provide you with the most mining power. Obviously, if you find a better deal some place else let me know and I will try to improve things on my side.
I am trying to avoid promising fees I cannot deliver with mined results.
PPS has been adjusted up, the last move was a bit drastic as I was getting scared watching PTS flow out at over 1 PTS / minute....
This is still within the first 24 hours of launch, I am still learning things.
please help run an error
I am trying to avoid promising fees I cannot deliver with mined results.
PPS has been adjusted up, the last move was a bit drastic as I was getting scared watching PTS flow out at over 1 PTS / minute....
This is still within the first 24 hours of launch, I am still learning things.
I can not find themplease help run an error
Look for the previous messages at this thread.
I am trying to avoid promising fees I cannot deliver with mined results.
PPS has been adjusted up, the last move was a bit drastic as I was getting scared watching PTS flow out at over 1 PTS / minute....
This is still within the first 24 hours of launch, I am still learning things.
I am trying to avoid promising fees I cannot deliver with mined results.
PPS has been adjusted up, the last move was a bit drastic as I was getting scared watching PTS flow out at over 1 PTS / minute....
This is still within the first 24 hours of launch, I am still learning things.
+1
Is there server ok? All has stopped?
I am trying to avoid promising fees I cannot deliver with mined results.
PPS has been adjusted up, the last move was a bit drastic as I was getting scared watching PTS flow out at over 1 PTS / minute....
This is still within the first 24 hours of launch, I am still learning things.
+1
Is there server ok? All has stopped?
sending 03a5c323a8124bddda366dbcdca5802f2fa2cb3b7b06ec89f6e8a99c03966c39
sending 0128e0a27e9fb694adba26d98ff73489667c123003ffbb175ea63f0132d7c173
sending 02ff606dfd116a5dfd8e4743fe57dfe4fb61b7bdec87124423f8053bdb75a5cd
sending 01a7f80c63365524984ac0cca768a4ee27f6b5b4d0d0ec8f7306141ccbcb5591
sending 0243e5bd0ac7e6359a8e036eabc5821466d98a38d024f3d9d654f9a1e9f1f9c8
unspecified
An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
{"message":"An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host"}
asio asio.cpp:28 fc::asio::detail::read_write_handler
attempting to connect to the-iland.net valid: 9 invalid: 9 balance: 0.184208 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address:
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
I can not find themplease help run an error
Look for the previous messages at this thread.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
It shows it go to 0 immediately after reconnecting, but it comes back.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
It shows it go to 0 immediately after reconnecting, but it comes back.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
It shows it go to 0 immediately after reconnecting, but it comes back.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
yes had same issue but comes back
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
valid: 49 invalid: 22 balance: 0.557606 paid: 1.19114 pps: 0.0256289 address: xxxx hpm: 9.30676
Quotevalid: 49 invalid: 22 balance: 0.557606 paid: 1.19114 pps: 0.0256289 address: xxxx hpm: 9.30676
when using more computers on same PTS payout address .. then hpm is of all computers which mine on this address!?
Thank God... I almost had a heart attack.... the database code and accounting should be robust :)
Thank God... I almost had a heart attack.... the database code and accounting should be robust :)
no guys mine is re-started from 0 :
(http://i.imgur.com/v3ifdjw.png)
if you don't belive me master, you alredy payed me twice, so i can send you the address+ transaction log of wallet! :S
Is there a way to adjust how many cores it's using yet? Love this pool/miner but it's murdering my GPU's hashrates using all cores. Need at least 1 free core.
sending 02dbf2018bba229be1f8d0f5f8974fb373d2576e8755443a4d37adabc3e14490
Thank God... I almost had a heart attack.... the database code and accounting should be robust :)
no guys mine is re-started from 0 :
(http://i.imgur.com/v3ifdjw.png)
if you don't belive me master, you alredy payed me twice, so i can send you the address+ transaction log of wallet! :S
I see your two previous transactions... do you have a record of what your balance was prior to the crash?
Thank God... I almost had a heart attack.... the database code and accounting should be robust :)
no guys mine is re-started from 0 :
if you don't belive me master, you alredy payed me twice, so i can send you the address+ transaction log of wallet! :S
I see your two previous transactions... do you have a record of what your balance was prior to the crash?
i don't have a screen but it was 0.90
Quotevalid: 49 invalid: 22 balance: 0.557606 paid: 1.19114 pps: 0.0256289 address: xxxx hpm: 9.30676
when using more computers on same PTS payout address .. then hpm is of all computers which mine on this address!?
HPM is a local calculation, everything else is global.
Thank God... I almost had a heart attack.... the database code and accounting should be robust :)
no guys mine is re-started from 0 :
if you don't belive me master, you alredy payed me twice, so i can send you the address+ transaction log of wallet! :S
I see your two previous transactions... do you have a record of what your balance was prior to the crash?
i don't have a screen but it was 0.90
I'll take your word for it because I did have an expected hang/crash that could have been in the middle of updating your record. Sent you some PTS.
530 connections
Paying out 300 PTS / hour right now.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
Error starting the application 0xc000007b pleas help, really hard to help :(
530 connections
Paying out 300 PTS / hour right now.
Dang... second hang... I think I need to start a second pool server because one server is becoming overloaded with connections.
my balance & Paid is went to 0 omg
I hope you are kidding... anyone else experience this?
I lost the balance on one machine too, a desktop (OS X). The balance dropped from 1.98854 PTS to 0, the # of valid and # invalid also went to 0, but the paid went up by only .0397708, so I really only lost 1.710144. I still have the terminal log that I can send you if it helps you troubleshoot.
This one was a desktop machine. I have no idea whether it happened on any servers since I can't see that output the way I have it set up, but I won't worry about those. (edit: I do have server logs of stdout...I may go through those when i have time)
So what are the fees etc now?
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
Aborted (core dumped)Code: [Select]terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
Aborted (core dumped)
has anyone same error before?
That would be due to lack of memory?
Can everyone confirm automatic payments working at 1 PTS?
That would be due to lack of memory?
i don't know new installed droplet on DO (2Gb/2CPU) its just went fine in past .. but now i get this error ... strange...
That would be due to lack of memory?
i don't know new installed droplet on DO (2Gb/2CPU) its just went fine in past .. but now i get this error ... strange...
Can everyone confirm automatic payments working at 1 PTS?
According log it's works but I doesn't get a payments yet:
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 19.3831
valid: 3947 invalid: 1312 balance: 0.589465 paid: 154.776 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 20.0841
sending 01396d5061564af001afcc564ef8a6e6e7bb5ab140f794eb4fc142aa4c1ce3e1
valid: 3957 invalid: 1313 balance: 0.845754 paid: 154.776 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 20.558
valid: 3958 invalid: 1313 balance: 0.871383 paid: 154.776 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 20.2847
sending 03fe405eac901e4f01b2682e60137c2e55c884fcfcb0c36e2dcde47c6c3f2789
valid: 3984 invalid: 1314 balance: 0.512578 paid: 155.801 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 20.6012
sending 00cb414d72bb8feaaed8242fa93f4aefeac1f86373d72d981f3838b6c0582fa1
valid: 3998 invalid: 1314 balance: 0.871383 paid: 155.801 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 20.9936
sending 02c9d24710b10c0ff0fa269e64e118ce5ec7e7418e92b60bbd1ac51f8f73f847
valid: 4052 invalid: 1314 balance: 0.205031 paid: 157.851 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 19.7402
sending 014b59778777174700fca7826009b442313059c4496ecf61a36d671ee55d7ab5
valid: 4112 invalid: 1314 balance: 0.717609 paid: 158.876 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 18.3174
sending 006c9abd7aedd84816ba8a6dc32fb5c49f949d7ebe51f54ab0d424c8e31a0479
valid: 4168 invalid: 1314 balance: 0.102516 paid: 160.927 pps: 0.0256289
address: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZBjBs hpm: 18.3427
]attempting to connect to the-iland.net
481390ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
481470ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Can everyone confirm automatic payments working at 1 PTS?
According log it's works but I doesn't get a payments yet:
Let me know when the payments come in (or not)... I disabled auto pay until we have more info.
Can everyone confirm automatic payments working at 1 PTS?
Is there a way to adjust how many cores it's using yet? Love this pool/miner but it's murdering my GPU's hashrates using all cores. Need at least 1 free core.
New binaries will be out later today :)
Is miner auto recognizing all cores we have?
Hey everyone automatic payments have been turned off until I can put in place some more checks.
It has come to my attention that there may be a few cases of mismatch between the balance being reported as paid and what was actually received at your address. If this is the case I should have unexpected profits in my wallet. I will distribute these unexpected profits proportional to shares found once the alpha testing is over. It is not perfect, but I don't want to profit from my bugs either.
Thank you all so much for your understanding and support as I am developing my pool... hopefully most issues will be resolved shortly and we can move on toward reliable operation.
Is miner auto recognizing all cores we have?
It has hardcoded number of threads = 8
Is miner auto recognizing all cores we have?
It has hardcoded number of threads = 8
My question was: May I reduce the number ot cores mining PTS?
I get a payment, but only for amount which I get after auto payout was disabled.
Is miner auto recognizing all cores we have?
It has hardcoded number of threads = 8
Is miner auto recognizing all cores we have?
It has hardcoded number of threads = 8
Are there any way to use 12 threads? Or the only way is disabling hipertheating and losing performance?
I tried the typical commands for adjust the number of thrads but no luck
sorry for my ignorance :-[
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.358805 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: Ps
tNp267B1eEJx1RkTkZYhmtPLuY9NcHoD hpm: 19.1893
sending 0151e9cb779c4354c988b1ceaa3b936fc0e523f2b065d26437c8237ede3a9335
valid: 15 invalid: 9 balance: 0.384433 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: Ps
tNp267B1eEJx1RkTkZYhmtPLuY9NcHoD hpm: 21.2335
eof
End of file
{"message":"End of file"}
asio asio.cpp:22 fc::asio::detail::read_write_handler
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
2373383ms th_b miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.
183.137:8384
2374625ms th_b miner.cpp:114 main ] unspec
ified
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it
{"message":"No connection could be made because the target machine actively
refused it"}
asio asio.cpp:55 fc::asio::detail::error_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
2379630ms th_b miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.
183.137:8384
2380875ms th_b miner.cpp:114 main ] unspec
ified
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it
{"message":"No connection could be made because the target machine actively
refused it"}
asio asio.cpp:55 fc::asio::detail::error_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
2385880ms th_b miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.
183.137:8384
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: hpm: 0
valid: 15 invalid: 10 balance: 0.384433 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: P
stNp267B1eEJx1RkTkZYhmtPLuY9NcHoD hpm: 0
This miner isn't working so well for me. I get tons of invalids and I often get this connection error which might play a part in my high invalids.
Every time a payment is sent out, hps drops. Not by a large amount but it does.
Would it be better if payments were sent at a set time once or twice a day?
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.358805 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: Ps
.........
This miner isn't working so well for me. I get tons of invalids and I often get this connection error which might play a part in my high invalids.
This is normal. You will find it now being more stable. Everytime payment is made there is a short glitch. This will get better I believe. I do not see your log abnormal.
the x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
I'm getting a constant 2.6:1 valid/invalid ratio...
Is anyone experiencing similar? Any recommendations on how to fix this?
the x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
I've looked but no decision had not foundthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
Look previous posts at previous 2-3 pages.
Edit: Or type 0xc000007b at the search at the top right corner and you get answer.
I've looked but no decision had not foundthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
Look previous posts at previous 2-3 pages.
Edit: Or type 0xc000007b at the search at the top right corner and you get answer.
try does not workI've looked but no decision had not foundthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
Look previous posts at previous 2-3 pages.
Edit: Or type 0xc000007b at the search at the top right corner and you get answer.
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg2281#msg2281
try does not workI've looked but no decision had not foundthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
Look previous posts at previous 2-3 pages.
Edit: Or type 0xc000007b at the search at the top right corner and you get answer.
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg2281#msg2281
valid: 37 invalid: 43 FYI
the x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
there does not start, so no luckthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
You get it working?
there does not start, so no luckthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
You get it working?
@bytemaster, please add flowing message to main topic:
For Windows version of miner please install Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2012 Update 3 from: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679
Without this redistributable you will get errors like "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." or "The program can't start because MSVCP110.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem."
valid: 106 invalid: 53 balance: 0.486949 paid: 2.18326 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.4785
valid: 106 invalid: 53 balance: 0.486949 paid: 2.18326 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.4506
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.486
sending <hash_here>
valid: 1 invalid: 1 balance: 0.0256289 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.616
valid: 1 invalid: 1 balance: 0.0256289 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.5442
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0256289 address: <address here> hpm: 11.3752
sendthere does not start, so no luckthe x64 windows miner isn't working for me, "The application was unable to start correctly (0x000007b). Click OK to close the application." tried everything I could, did not help, help with running WIN 7 x64
You get it working?
Can you PM me the screenshot how it's looks, I will try to help you.
Wait a couple of hours.
I like the program but I want to run on 6 threads so I can have 2 free for other stuff.
Any idea how I can do this?
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty. Enjoy your increased revenue.
I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty. Enjoy your increased revenue.
I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.
cool but if i look now i get more invalids and at the end the same revenue like before^^
I am going to setup a second pool... this one has 823 connections and I suspect that increases the latency.
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty. Enjoy your increased revenue.
I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.
cool but if i look now i get more invalids and at the end the same revenue like before^^
None of my clients have increased the invalids... in fact, since the last reset I have only had 1 invalid.
I am going to setup a second pool... this one has 823 connections and I suspect that increases the latency.
ok cool - sry don't want to bother you but have another question ... is it better to use 1 different PTS payout address for each mininig device ... or doesn't it matter wether i use 1 PTS for 4 devices or not ?
please let me set a minimum payout amount.
atm i am getting 0.4PTS per payout... i'd prefer to get only a payout when i have 5PTS or more.
please let me set a minimum payout amount.
atm i am getting 0.4PTS per payout... i'd prefer to get only a payout when i have 5PTS or more.
I send out a payout anytime the total balance I owe miners equals the number of connections. In theory this should average 1 PTS per user. When I do payouts I clear my books, but if anyone else thinks like you I can put a check in there for a minimum payout amount.
Great news... I have worked through many bugs on the server side and can now offer the pool with just 3% fee from expected return for your hash rate given the difficulty. Enjoy your increased revenue.
I also just paid out over 200 PTS to miners.
cool but if i look now i get more invalids and at the end the same revenue like before^^
None of my clients have increased the invalids... in fact, since the last reset I have only had 1 invalid.
ok you a mining on ubuntu ? i have ca. 60 hpm and with this 1 PTS payout per hours ... can you confirm this is usual rate!?
Pool http://54.238.185.113/ stop working, we should get all blocks now!!! :)
where can you see your balance?
all I have is vl:30 RJ:5 ST:0
no balance
Pool back live and die again :(
Ok... so we found the limit, at 1000 nodes I crash :) Working on a solution.
how do you run this thing? Everytime i run it it just does a benchmark test then go away
I am rate-limiting connection attempts now, so it is taking a while for all 1000 nodes to reconnect...
I am rate-limiting connection attempts now, so it is taking a while for all 1000 nodes to reconnect...
You can just increase tcp/ip stack buffers =D so it may help under high connection count load
:-( not sure what that means I made a bat file with the name of exe and then that code after it and nothing happens
Is this an OS option? How do I do that?
So whathappens whenyou make a new pool is it all connected? meaning the shares etc?
And Again...(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--bwUKm2LaCU/UGxBSrclenI/AAAAAAAAAK8/ET0a3bDEe0I/s320/doc.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/3vGnb6C.png)
:(
Has the variable multicore version come out yet? I don't want to miss it. Good job handling all this stuff very quickly btw, Bytemaster. kudos.
When I check http://54.238.185.113/ gets 6-8 blocks of each 10 blocks in the network. How much our pool has?
So far this pool has paid out 2541 PTS in its first 24 hours worth almost $3000
Question..
Should I hold on to my PTS or sell asap?
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... :-[
Pool down?
Pool down?
Yep.. we hit 1000 again, I will have a new node up at 162.243.54.126 in about 5 minutes.
Fixed the 1000 node limit, currently sitting at 1130 and counting...
10% CPU usage... we are good to go.
@bytemaster: Can you modify your miner for support solo mining with a wallet? It's gives big advantages to the network.
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... :-[
Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?
@bytemaster: Can you modify your miner for support solo mining with a wallet? It's gives big advantages to the network.
Eventually... but at the rate difficulty is going up solo will not be a happening thing even with my faster miner.
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... :-[
Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?
Anyone? What is the experience with the other pools like?
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... :-[
Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?
Anyone? What is the experience with the other pools like?
Great job! but now this pool seems to be paying out just as much as the other pool.. definitely not 2 times like i mentioned before... :-[
Did the other pool get a faster miner? Because I am paying out at the theoretical average value per hash -3% so perhaps the other pool was having a lucky streak and their variance gave higher yields? Can others provide feedback? Am I calculating the PPS wrong?
Anyone? What is the experience with the other pools like?
I was making just above 3pts in 1 hour with the other pools and now i'm making under 3pts with yours and that was timed form the last payment at8:27 to 9:27 mybalance was 2.59363
Difficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same :)
Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retarget
Difficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same :)
Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retarget
Only block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.
Difficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same :)
Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retarget
Only block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.
@bytemaster: Do you plan to update the wallet and make re-target every 2016 as planed? Or we stay as is?
Difficulty adjusted from 0.00001526 to ... and stay same :)
Edit: Reward was dropped by 5%, 2016 block to next retarget
Only block rewards is retargeted. Difficulty will retarget in 2016 blocks.
@bytemaster: Do you plan to update the wallet and make re-target every 2016 as planed? Or we stay as is?
I am going to keep it as is, no need to introduce a fork and people don't seem to mind the faster block production.
Great work Bytemaster! I really appreciate your efforts and think you got a good thing started.
a comment and a question:
Comment:
When you get a chance please add time stamps to the sending notifications on the client. That would really help me figure out my productivity.
Question:
I'm running the linux client with no problems but the mac client will not start.
complains about libstdc++.6.dylib
dylib: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
referenced from pool_miner
expected in /usr/lib/libstdc++6.dylib
seems strange since you have the lib in the tar.gz but it isn't looking for it there. That lib also exists in /usr/lib/ but maybe yours is modified?
Any help you guys can provide would be appreciated because this is a mbpr that hashes at 20 hpm with bitcoind
Another quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.
is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?
Another quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.
is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?
Not using the GPU... so far I cannot figure out a way to make that work.
He's working on editing the miner so that you can set the # of processes used. Instead of being optimized for 8. I'm anxiously awaiting it too so I can use a machine with more than 8. @bytemaster, Do you think it will be available tonight?
Another quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.
is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?
Another quick question. besides hopefully a way to limit CPU usage somehow. I also use my GPU to mine scrypt coins (cgminer) and I've noticed when running your miner the has rate for that program gets halved.
is your program somehow using GPU at all? or is the CPU being bogged down so much causing the slow down on the cgminer?
If using windows, right click pool_miner in the task manager > select affinity > leave a core open and see if your hash for cgminer goes up.
US centralHe's working on editing the miner so that you can set the # of processes used. Instead of being optimized for 8. I'm anxiously awaiting it too so I can use a machine with more than 8. @bytemaster, Do you think it will be available tonight?
What time zone are you in?
US centralHe's working on editing the miner so that you can set the # of processes used. Instead of being optimized for 8. I'm anxiously awaiting it too so I can use a machine with more than 8. @bytemaster, Do you think it will be available tonight?
What time zone are you in?
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
I feel something wrong with your server. My 8 core xeon server gives me 30hpm.
Bytemaster, Thanks for helping out with the mac client. I didn't notice that README file in the tar file. dooh!
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
Just to be clear for other mac users:
To run the alpha-miner client
----------------------------------------
once you've downloaded the file from the 1st page of this archive, double click on it to extract the files from the archive
then open up a terminal window
cd to the directory with your pool-miner file in it.
type the following: sudo cp -R opt/local /opt/
you will have to enter an admin password before the files will copy.
then run the program.... type: ./pool-miner the-iland.net <your PTS address here>
I hope this helps someone else out.
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
I feel something wrong with your server. My 8 core xeon server gives me 30hpm.
Server does not calculate hash rate, that is all calculated locally from actual hashes found.
Question..
Should I hold on to my PTS or sell asap?
I am going for as much as I can get. I am actively doing things to add value to the currency, it can only go up from here. Your actual milage may vary. Think of this like stock in the ideas of Invictus Innovations and the potential future value of those ideas.
Question..
Should I hold on to my PTS or sell asap?
I am going for as much as I can get. I am actively doing things to add value to the currency, it can only go up from here. Your actual milage may vary. Think of this like stock in the ideas of Invictus Innovations and the potential future value of those ideas.
Can you post updated block stat for last 2 hours, very interesting :)
Question..
Should I hold on to my PTS or sell asap?
I am going for as much as I can get. I am actively doing things to add value to the currency, it can only go up from here. Your actual milage may vary. Think of this like stock in the ideas of Invictus Innovations and the potential future value of those ideas.
Can you post updated block stat for last 2 hours, very interesting :)
I don't have hourly stats, just summary... but since I started the pool I have paid out 7500 PTS
I have 2700 machines mining on my pool
I have 700 pool shares per minute which I estimate equates to 60K HPM
US centralHe's working on editing the miner so that you can set the # of processes used. Instead of being optimized for 8. I'm anxiously awaiting it too so I can use a machine with more than 8. @bytemaster, Do you think it will be available tonight?
What time zone are you in?
Ok.. working on Mac version first, then Linux... windows may be in the morning.
where is PTS ?
(http://oi39.tinypic.com/11j7vko.jpg)
bytemaster,
I think the problem occurs when adding or removing another miner using the same pts address. I experienced it in both cases (adding and removing). I've since switched to unique addresses for each miner. When using unique addresses I have not seen the balance / paid reset to 0. My experience is across 15 linux miners.
I hope this information hopes a little bit.
bytemaster,
I think the problem occurs when adding or removing another miner using the same pts address. I experienced it in both cases (adding and removing). I've since switched to unique addresses for each miner. When using unique addresses I have not seen the balance / paid reset to 0. My experience is across 15 linux miners.
I hope this information hopes a little bit.
I can confirm this. I had to reconnect my 5 server miners that use the same address, and my balance of 4.3 PTS got reset to 0.
DO NOT USE THE SAME ADDRESS FOR MULTIPLE MINERS!
bytemaster,
I think the problem occurs when adding or removing another miner using the same pts address. I experienced it in both cases (adding and removing). I've since switched to unique addresses for each miner. When using unique addresses I have not seen the balance / paid reset to 0. My experience is across 15 linux miners.
I hope this information hopes a little bit.
I can confirm this. I had to reconnect my 5 server miners that use the same address, and my balance of 4.3 PTS got reset to 0.
DO NOT USE THE SAME ADDRESS FOR MULTIPLE MINERS!
I will have a fix for this ASAP! Good detective work guys.
wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 -O linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
cd linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
./pool_miner the-iland.net xxMy-Adressxx
it still doesn't work.
Do i need to compile it?
I'm on ubuntu 13.10 x64
i download it with
wget http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
But when i use
cd linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
"not a directory"
./pool_miner the-iland.net xxMy-Adressxx
"no such file or directory"
************** ATTENTION *******************perhaps you should address those of us who are still having problems with your supplied miner before jumping into a new fork, seems rather discriminatory that others are mining just fine, but the rest of us with issues are just left out to dry. win64 users have been mentioning the 0x0000 problem and the msvcp issue all to no avail.
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
************** ATTENTION *******************perhaps you should address those of us who are still having problems with your supplied miner before jumping into a new fork, seems rather discriminatory that others are mining just fine, but the rest of us with issues are just left out to dry. win64 users have been mentioning the 0x0000 problem and the msvcp issue all to no avail.
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
Bytemaster, Thanks for helping out with the mac client. I didn't notice that README file in the tar file. dooh!
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
Just to be clear for other mac users:
To run the alpha-miner client
----------------------------------------
once you've downloaded the file from the 1st page of this archive, double click on it to extract the files from the archive
then open up a terminal window
cd to the directory with your pool-miner file in it.
type the following: sudo cp -R opt/local /opt/
you will have to enter an admin password before the files will copy.
then run the program.... type: ./pool-miner the-iland.net <your PTS address here>
I hope this helps someone else out.
Here's a 2nd method too for Mac users. Someone already hosed their computer earlier when they screwed up the cp command.
Open terminal, type "open /", press enter. (Finder will open)
Drag Alphaminer's 'opt' directory and pool_miner into this location. Enter your admin password when prompted.
In terminal, start the miner using: cd / && ./pool_miner the-iland.net <your PTS address here without brackets>
Bytemaster, Thanks for helping out with the mac client. I didn't notice that README file in the tar file. dooh!
pool-miner is running good now... getting 31.3 hpm on this MacBook Pro Retina! that is nearly twice as fast as my 16 core xeon Dell Poweredge server... amazing.
Just to be clear for other mac users:
To run the alpha-miner client
----------------------------------------
once you've downloaded the file from the 1st page of this archive, double click on it to extract the files from the archive
then open up a terminal window
cd to the directory with your pool-miner file in it.
type the following: sudo cp -R opt/local /opt/
you will have to enter an admin password before the files will copy.
then run the program.... type: ./pool-miner the-iland.net <your PTS address here>
I hope this helps someone else out.
Here's a 2nd method too for Mac users. Someone already hosed their computer earlier when they screwed up the cp command.
Open terminal, type "open /", press enter. (Finder will open)
Drag Alphaminer's 'opt' directory and pool_miner into this location. Enter your admin password when prompted.
In terminal, start the miner using: cd / && ./pool_miner the-iland.net <your PTS address here without brackets>
I cannot copy to root, I get an error message saying "you cannot replace opt because it's invisible"
Well I have set osx to show all invisibles, no opt in root but cannot copy to there. I'm stuck. Halp?
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
what about Linux version?
meh...recompile manually all instances..
Pack them once and then redistribute to other instancesim not a linux guy at all, and i have other things to do..
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
Is the pool already updated to the new fork? I got these error and I didn't reuse the address at that moment.
"
valid: 14 invalid: 2 balance: 0.513083 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.40007
valid: 14 invalid: 2 balance: 0.513083 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.44454
valid: 15 invalid: 2 balance: 0.549732 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.55342
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.55769
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.60194
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: PgRPEXP4NUR54ysGjViJjuVsa8TfuzAPSf hpm: 9.57349
"
attempting to connect to the-iland.net
725862ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
725870ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
^C
Quoteattempting to connect to the-iland.net
725862ms th_a miner.cpp:108 main ] 64.90.183.137:8384
725870ms th_a miner.cpp:114 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
^C
what's the problem?
Pool down for a moment while I update to 0.2.0 backend... be back shortly.
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
When's it out Master?
unable to connect....
why?
help me ~~~~~
************** ATTENTION *******************
We are preparing a hard fork that would allow the difficulty to increase by 32x every 4032 blocks. This is the fork that will be honored by Invictus Innovations as the foundation of future block chains.
We will post new Windows and Mac binaries within the next several hours, hopefully before the next difficulty adjustment.
Those in my pool will automatically be updated to join the new fork.
I believe that there is enough hash power and market forces to support such a fork.
If there are any solid objections, speak now.
When's it out Master?
Windows and Mac binaries are posted now at our website.
Building on mining pool server now, unfortunately not enough memory on the box to compile and run the pool at the same time.
POOL_MINER.exe software can't connect the server....unable to connect....
why?
help me ~~~~~
You could read the past couple of posts.... and know exactly why.
unable to connect....
why?
help me ~~~~~
You could read the past couple of posts.... and know exactly why.
Building on mining pool server now, unfortunately not enough memory on the box to compile and run the pool at the same time.
POOL_MINER.exe software can't connect the server....unable to connect....
why?
help me ~~~~~
You could read the past couple of posts.... and know exactly why.
I am moving the pool to 192.241.150.158 as part of this transition... so I can clone/scale as necessary.
The pool machine was being overloaded anyway, please take some time to update your miner scripts to point at the new pool location.
I am moving the pool to 192.241.150.158 as part of this transition... so I can clone/scale as necessary.
The pool machine was being overloaded anyway, please take some time to update your miner scripts to point at the new pool location.
the current script only needed (for example)
POOL_MINER.EXE the-iland.net Pdr84TXMcFSLPL2LezDQtrREfnXmBHGFkj
so will it be this \/\/ now?
POOL_MINER.EXE 192.241.150.158 Pdr84TXMcFSLPL2LezDQtrREfnXmBHGFkj
New pool is active at: 192.241.150.158
Working on updating the-iland...
valid: 87 invalid: 48 balance: 3.18845 paid: 0
When will I get paid?
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
early bird gets worm
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
early bird gets worm
At the rate we were going 50% of the money supply would have been mined out in the first 2 weeks... not only is this bad for late comers, it was bad for Invictus because our mining strategy was based upon a longer mining window. Perhaps that is selfish, but Invictus is ultimately the one providing backing to ProtoShares. THe chain was operating outside of spec, this is a bug fix.
NEW POOL SERVER: 192.241.150.158
./pool_miner 192.241.150.158 YOURKEY
For those who skim and didn't catch my earlier post.
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
early bird gets worm
At the rate we were going 50% of the money supply would have been mined out in the first 2 weeks... not only is this bad for late comers, it was bad for Invictus because our mining strategy was based upon a longer mining window. Perhaps that is selfish, but Invictus is ultimately the one providing backing to ProtoShares. THe chain was operating outside of spec, this is a bug fix.
Ah gotcha. well thats alright with me. I'm just excited to be part of a new "type" of coin all the different altcoins have some potential but ultimately I dont see them being better than the original of that "type" of coin. so the introduction of SHA512 to the mix is cool to me, and then can't wait for the bitshare...merger, changeover, w/e you wanna call it. I think thats supposed to be in Jan of 2014?
NEW pool got many rejects
after pool upgrade,will switch back to iland.net?????
NEW POOL SERVER: 192.241.150.158
./pool_miner 192.241.150.158 YOURKEY
For those who skim and didn't catch my earlier post.
Hard forking like this is pretty messed up considering it gives a huge advantage to the initial miners, like magnitudes worth. This is wrong. If anything the fork should be a brand new blockchain.
early bird gets worm
At the rate we were going 50% of the money supply would have been mined out in the first 2 weeks... not only is this bad for late comers, it was bad for Invictus because our mining strategy was based upon a longer mining window. Perhaps that is selfish, but Invictus is ultimately the one providing backing to ProtoShares. THe chain was operating outside of spec, this is a bug fix.
Ah gotcha. well thats alright with me. I'm just excited to be part of a new "type" of coin all the different altcoins have some potential but ultimately I dont see them being better than the original of that "type" of coin. so the introduction of SHA512 to the mix is cool to me, and then can't wait for the bitshare...merger, changeover, w/e you wanna call it. I think thats supposed to be in Jan of 2014?
BitShares will come as soon as we can, but we are not going to rush it because there is too much on the line. Keyhotee ID launches Jan 01. BitShares beta will probably be closer to march unless I can get some good devs to join the team! The point of ProtoShares was to bootstram the community and give everyone an interest in the success of BitShares :)
All of my unpaid (and paid) balances were wiped clean upon transition, even though I'm not sticking multiple miners on the same address anymore. Is this the same for everyone?
All of my unpaid (and paid) balances were wiped clean upon transition, even though I'm not sticking multiple miners on the same address anymore. Is this the same for everyone?
I migrated the database and have a backup of the state it was when I shut down. I will make you whole if you provide me your pub key.
All of my unpaid (and paid) balances were wiped clean upon transition, even though I'm not sticking multiple miners on the same address anymore. Is this the same for everyone?Have same problem. 3h hours of mining reseted.
I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
It's hard to deploy different address for every nodes.I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.
valid: 4745 invalid: 1469 balance: 6.48684 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.95413
valid: 4758 invalid: 1487 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97553
valid: 4758 invalid: 1489 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00936
valid: 4761 invalid: 1496 balance: 7.07322 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97668
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00857
valid: 3 invalid: 3 balance: 0.109946 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.96984
sending 0120b750e69366bef5e1da4984dc92c5625fa9e142ddd440205dc1de44c27e91
I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.
do someone have a mirror for the downloads?
It's hard to deploy different address for every nodes.I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.Code: [Select]
valid: 4745 invalid: 1469 balance: 6.48684 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.95413
valid: 4758 invalid: 1487 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97553
valid: 4758 invalid: 1489 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00936
valid: 4761 invalid: 1496 balance: 7.07322 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97668
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00857
valid: 3 invalid: 3 balance: 0.109946 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.96984
sending 0120b750e69366bef5e1da4984dc92c5625fa9e142ddd440205dc1de44c27e91
The stats been wiped after I added batch of nodes. :(
Is the linux binary updated to work with this new pool and the hard fork?
Is there still a need to use a new address per machine?
wtf is going on here?
Is the linux binary updated to work with this new pool and the hard fork?
Is there still a need to use a new address per machine?
wtf is going on here?
No need to change anything other than the server IP...
There is still the random bug with clearing balances which I am frantically searching for the root cause of.
All of my unpaid (and paid) balances were wiped clean upon transition, even though I'm not sticking multiple miners on the same address anymore. Is this the same for everyone?
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
It's hard to deploy different address for every nodes.I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.Code: [Select]
valid: 4745 invalid: 1469 balance: 6.48684 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.95413
valid: 4758 invalid: 1487 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97553
valid: 4758 invalid: 1489 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00936
valid: 4761 invalid: 1496 balance: 7.07322 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97668
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00857
valid: 3 invalid: 3 balance: 0.109946 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.96984
sending 0120b750e69366bef5e1da4984dc92c5625fa9e142ddd440205dc1de44c27e91
The stats been wiped after I added batch of nodes. :(
Darn it... I don't know what is causing that because it didn't wipe my stats when I moved my client.
It's hard to deploy different address for every nodes.I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.Code: [Select]
valid: 4745 invalid: 1469 balance: 6.48684 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.95413
valid: 4758 invalid: 1487 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97553
valid: 4758 invalid: 1489 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00936
valid: 4761 invalid: 1496 balance: 7.07322 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97668
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00857
valid: 3 invalid: 3 balance: 0.109946 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.96984
sending 0120b750e69366bef5e1da4984dc92c5625fa9e142ddd440205dc1de44c27e91
The stats been wiped after I added batch of nodes. :(
Darn it... I don't know what is causing that because it didn't wipe my stats when I moved my client.
All nodes up running now, the stats continued from that wiped out, I don't get that 7.07322 balance in my wallet.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
address: PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH
1st wipeout balance: unknown (about 1.3PTS)
2nd wipeout balance: 0.549732
3rd wipeout balance: 0.0366488
It's hard to deploy different address for every nodes.I've added 100+ nodes with same address, is that OK? :)
I wouldn't. Myself and at least one other had balances wiped out when doing that. For me there was a crash that occurred which may have been a cause.Code: [Select]
valid: 4745 invalid: 1469 balance: 6.48684 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.95413
valid: 4758 invalid: 1487 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97553
valid: 4758 invalid: 1489 balance: 6.96327 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00936
valid: 4761 invalid: 1496 balance: 7.07322 paid: 155.5 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.97668
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 7.00857
valid: 3 invalid: 3 balance: 0.109946 paid: 0 pps: 0.0366488 address: Pm8WVX1EmKNfW5X7gNMJjsEtv8juYM5kMB hpm: 6.96984
sending 0120b750e69366bef5e1da4984dc92c5625fa9e142ddd440205dc1de44c27e91
The stats been wiped after I added batch of nodes. :(
Darn it... I don't know what is causing that because it didn't wipe my stats when I moved my client.
All nodes up running now, the stats continued from that wiped out, I don't get that 7.07322 balance in my wallet.
Sent you a payment... please confirm receipt.
Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i have deleted my worker in DO instance and now cant restore from http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
this link is dead, so i cant restore my worker.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
address: PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH
1st wipeout balance: unknown (about 1.3PTS)
2nd wipeout balance: 0.549732
3rd wipeout balance: 0.0366488
any news on mirror?Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i have deleted my worker in DO instance and now cant restore from http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
this link is dead, so i cant restore my worker.
Sorry, server is overloaded... let me find a mirror for you.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
HI
my address is PuPhu6mh6WLbi6JQxN5MXYUUjtynvVg9hx
i got my balance wiped 3 times
4.3 PTS
1.?
0.?
now i have
1.53 PTS
I have 3 clients connected using same payout address
is this causing that problem?
should i change it?
thanks
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
HI
my address is PuPhu6mh6WLbi6JQxN5MXYUUjtynvVg9hx
i got my balance wiped 3 times
4.3 PTS
1.?
0.?
now i have
1.53 PTS
I have 3 clients connected using same payout address
is this causing that problem?
should i change it?
thanks
No that is not causing the problem... because addresses get wiped with only one client... :'(
any news on mirror?Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i have deleted my worker in DO instance and now cant restore from http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
this link is dead, so i cant restore my worker.
Sorry, server is overloaded... let me find a mirror for you.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
address: PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH
1st wipeout balance: unknown (about 1.3PTS)
2nd wipeout balance: 0.549732
3rd wipeout balance: 0.0366488
Payment sent, please confirm.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
address: PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH
1st wipeout balance: unknown (about 1.3PTS)
2nd wipeout balance: 0.549732
3rd wipeout balance: 0.0366488
Payment sent, please confirm.
Another 2 wipeout just happened (both are 0.0732976PTS): one of the address is PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH .
Don't bother paying me, I hope you fix it soon.
Thanks, that worksany news on mirror?Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK
i have deleted my worker in DO instance and now cant restore from http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
this link is dead, so i cant restore my worker.
Sorry, server is overloaded... let me find a mirror for you.
Linux alpha miner 0.1.0:
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
Pe9ZT9Si6cpzJwqibiisbCbyfQ6JhQVcJK ~ 0.4Worker restored, balance in place, all is ok.
i have deleted my worker in DO instance and now cant restore from http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0
this link is dead, so i cant restore my worker.
ANYONE WITH A CLEARED BALANCE SEND ME A PM WITH YOUR PTSADDRESS AND I WILL BE ABLE TO RECOVER YOUR FUNDS
I have a backup of the balances as of the shutdown of the last pool.... and I have the ability to verify that you do not scam me.
Also send me your last known balance output so I can compare.
address: PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH
1st wipeout balance: unknown (about 1.3PTS)
2nd wipeout balance: 0.549732
3rd wipeout balance: 0.0366488
Payment sent, please confirm.
Another 2 wipeout just happened (both are 0.0732976PTS): one of the address is PvZG3MhXga8pD59RUkG91RHgcP4x9Tn5UH .
Don't bother paying me, I hope you fix it soon.
Are you using my IP address to track balance? 'Cos I just switch off my VPN, then the wipeout happened.
@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
Peoples!!! Give bytemaster time to finish with a fork and pools, and then he will be able to start resolving issues and make gui for a pool!
@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
Peoples!!! Give bytemaster time to finish with a fork and pools, and then he will be able to start resolving issues and make gui for a pool!
I second it.
@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
Peoples!!! Give bytemaster time to finish with a fork and pools, and then he will be able to start resolving issues and make gui for a pool!
I second it.
I can provide a JSON RPC interface to my pool if someone wants to build a web front end... Otherwise, I have higher priorities (Keyhotee and BitShares).
I can pay someone in PTS to build a pool interface... contact me for details.
I need your PTS address.@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
Peoples!!! Give bytemaster time to finish with a fork and pools, and then he will be able to start resolving issues and make gui for a pool!
I second it.
I can provide a JSON RPC interface to my pool if someone wants to build a web front end... Otherwise, I have higher priorities (Keyhotee and BitShares).
I can pay someone in PTS to build a pool interface... contact me for details.
hi can you answer my pm
i lost more than 7pts due to wiped stats
my ip is same i am writing there
thanks
My node connections drop from 300 to 150, 50% of my clients doesn't update a wallet yet.
Minimal payout?
Minimal payout?
Don't be lazy to read previous posts:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg3203#msg3203
I need your PTS address.@bytemaster, is there any web frontend yet?
Peoples!!! Give bytemaster time to finish with a fork and pools, and then he will be able to start resolving issues and make gui for a pool!
I second it.
I can provide a JSON RPC interface to my pool if someone wants to build a web front end... Otherwise, I have higher priorities (Keyhotee and BitShares).
I can pay someone in PTS to build a pool interface... contact me for details.
hi can you answer my pm
i lost more than 7pts due to wiped stats
my ip is same i am writing there
thanks
Minimal payout?
Don't be lazy to read previous posts:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg3203#msg3203
I will reduce the minimal payout to 1 PTS now that things are slower... will start paying out once network is stable.
New PPS: 0.00462285
New PPS: 0.00462285
pps is 0.004.. or 0.04..?
Do the Mac and Windows clients work as wallets (correct addresses, etc) as long as they are not used directly for mining? The wallets still cannot be downloaded. Wondering if I can use the old one safely for now.I found mirror for new wallets here:
I think I am suffering a case of PTS Disorder:o
New PPS: 0.00462285
pps is 0.004.. or 0.04..?
0.00439171
Difficulty went up by 8xNew PPS: 0.00462285
pps is 0.004.. or 0.04..?
0.00439171
almost 10x less that 2 hrs ago? what happened?
New PPS: 0.00462285
pps is 0.004.. or 0.04..?
0.00439171
almost 10x less that 2 hrs ago? what happened?
Ok.. so we are still getting 40 second blocks LOL orphans were hiding a TON of hash power. This alone confirms my opinion that doing the fork was the right thing because it makes block rewards more fair rather than based upon latency.
Ok.. so we are still getting 40 second blocks LOL orphans were hiding a TON of hash power. This alone confirms my opinion that doing the fork was the right thing because it makes block rewards more fair rather than based upon latency.Good news
mirror for 0.2.0 client ploxWin/Mac Client Mirrors Here:
sry was outside today ... all my devices throws error since a few hours is recognize! What happens!?
sry was outside today ... all my devices throws error since a few hours is recognize! What happens!?
IP changed. It's now 192.241.150.158
Is it ok to use the same protoshares address on multiple instances of pool_miner?You should be fine either way.
ok thx is there a new alpha verion out too? or just the old one with new pool address!?
Negative. Just see the Linux miner theremirror for 0.2.0 client ploxWin/Mac Client Mirrors Here:
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/
sry was outside today ... all my devices throws error since a few hours is recognize! What happens!?
IP changed. It's now 192.241.150.158
ok thx is there a new alpha verion out too? or just the old one with new pool address!?
sry was outside today ... all my devices throws error since a few hours is recognize! What happens!?
IP changed. It's now 192.241.150.158
ok thx is there a new alpha verion out too? or just the old one with new pool address!?
Old miners work at new address.... working on new miners, but obviously other things came up in the past several hours....
what's wrong ? i see the balance change to 0, but receive nothing！
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0
valid: 60 invalid: 17 balance: 1.00588 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 0
sending 00b0fbc02097d46f3386a9127de5e1d09dc9b2403bb
valid: 61 invalid: 17 balance: 1.01027 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 5.49291
valid: 66 invalid: 19 balance: 1.03223 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.8483
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0 zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.1201
sending 01da36527da4e2bfc58f5277cc104f637b4a0dd5f5d
valid: 5 invalid: 5 balance: 0.0219586 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.0035
sending 018b6d6618d545bb0ae3e847bb0493a7d62b940d235
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.0614839 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2389
valid: 26 invalid: 12 balance: 0.114184 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2836
sending 00feb7e20291c21240af4a8ce4d2fd7f7df2fcea2c4
valid: 133 invalid: 27 balance: 0.584097 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 10.8211
what's wrong ? i see the balance change to 0, but receive nothing！
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0
valid: 60 invalid: 17 balance: 1.00588 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 0
sending 00b0fbc02097d46f3386a9127de5e1d09dc9b2403bb
valid: 61 invalid: 17 balance: 1.01027 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 5.49291
valid: 66 invalid: 19 balance: 1.03223 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.8483
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0 zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.1201
sending 01da36527da4e2bfc58f5277cc104f637b4a0dd5f5d
valid: 5 invalid: 5 balance: 0.0219586 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.0035
sending 018b6d6618d545bb0ae3e847bb0493a7d62b940d235
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.0614839 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2389
valid: 26 invalid: 12 balance: 0.114184 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2836
sending 00feb7e20291c21240af4a8ce4d2fd7f7df2fcea2c4
valid: 133 invalid: 27 balance: 0.584097 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 10.8211
IRS seized your pool funds... take it up with them.
This is my #1 priority to resolve right now.
what's wrong ? i see the balance change to 0, but receive nothing！
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0
valid: 60 invalid: 17 balance: 1.00588 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 0
sending 00b0fbc02097d46f3386a9127de5e1d09dc9b2403bb
valid: 61 invalid: 17 balance: 1.01027 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 5.49291
valid: 66 invalid: 19 balance: 1.03223 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.8483
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0 zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.1201
sending 01da36527da4e2bfc58f5277cc104f637b4a0dd5f5d
valid: 5 invalid: 5 balance: 0.0219586 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.0035
sending 018b6d6618d545bb0ae3e847bb0493a7d62b940d235
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.0614839 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2389
valid: 26 invalid: 12 balance: 0.114184 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2836
sending 00feb7e20291c21240af4a8ce4d2fd7f7df2fcea2c4
valid: 133 invalid: 27 balance: 0.584097 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 10.8211
IRS seized your pool funds... take it up with them.
This is my #1 priority to resolve right now.
very funny
wasted 40hps total (6 hours)
i didnt get any payout
lost many hashes due to pool fail and lack of redirect too
pts pool didnt get any block from 2 hours
beeer needs 200 shares to get 0.01 pts
your pool is cheating and not working
solo mining is waste of energy
what coin i should mine now ?
pts is doomed at the moment
i'm finding that the balance is going up a lot slower.. i thought you increased the pps
very funny
wasted 40hps total (6 hours)
i didnt get any payout
lost many hashes due to pool fail and lack of redirect too
what's wrong ? i see the balance change to 0, but receive nothing！
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0
valid: 60 invalid: 17 balance: 1.00588 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 0
sending 00b0fbc02097d46f3386a9127de5e1d09dc9b2403bb
valid: 61 invalid: 17 balance: 1.01027 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 5.49291
valid: 66 invalid: 19 balance: 1.03223 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.8483
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 pps: 0 zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.1201
sending 01da36527da4e2bfc58f5277cc104f637b4a0dd5f5d
valid: 5 invalid: 5 balance: 0.0219586 paid: 0 sLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.0035
sending 018b6d6618d545bb0ae3e847bb0493a7d62b940d235
valid: 14 invalid: 9 balance: 0.0614839 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2389
valid: 26 invalid: 12 balance: 0.114184 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 12.2836
sending 00feb7e20291c21240af4a8ce4d2fd7f7df2fcea2c4
valid: 133 invalid: 27 balance: 0.584097 paid: PsLG9fzc5zTimWjkNb5gV1jWd3AxzPXEBe hpm: 10.8211
IRS seized your pool funds... take it up with them.
This is my #1 priority to resolve right now.
very funny
wasted 40hps total (6 hours)
i didnt get any payout
lost many hashes due to pool fail and lack of redirect too
pts pool didnt get any block from 2 hours
beeer needs 200 shares to get 0.01 pts
your pool is cheating and not working
solo mining is waste of energy
what coin i should mine now ?
pts is doomed at the moment
i'm finding that the balance is going up a lot slower.. i thought you increased the pps
When the difficulty increases the average number of shares it takes to find a block also increases.
PPS = BLOCK_REWARD / AVERAGE_SHARES_TO_FIND_BLOCK
My fee was 3% and now that things have calmed down a bit I am going to adjust to 0% for a while.
Are payment automatic now?
Are payment automatic now?
I am about to issue payments... and turn on automatic payments. There will be a disconnect.
Are payment automatic now?
I am about to issue payments... and turn on automatic payments. There will be a disconnect.
it will be 1pts the payout?
it has to be 1pts else you have to pay .0001 fee....
Are payment automatic now?
I am about to issue payments... and turn on automatic payments. There will be a disconnect.
it will be 1pts the payout?
I am thinking 0.5 PTS given the difficulty.
@bytemaster why not include payments to next block as other pools like eligius did for btc? So it will be zerro commision
is that for the protoshare-qt? or new ip for alpha miner
also have payments gone out?
@bytemaster why not include payments to next block as other pools like eligius did for btc? So it will be zerro commision
Time & Money :) I will get there, but remember I built this thing in a day, tested for a day, and am just now in my 3-4th day of using this pool.
I am looking for someone to hire to manage the Invictus Pool because I do not want to be in the pool business personally. I do it because it is the easiest way to make money for the company right now.
Are payment automatic now?
I am about to issue payments... and turn on automatic payments. There will be a disconnect.
it will be 1pts the payout?
I am thinking 0.5 PTS given the difficulty.
btw first of new diff was
pps:0.0366488
now
pps: 0.00439171
it should be
pps: 0.0439171
@bytemaster why not include payments to next block as other pools like eligius did for btc? So it will be zerro commision
Time & Money :) I will get there, but remember I built this thing in a day, tested for a day, and am just now in my 3-4th day of using this pool.
I am looking for someone to hire to manage the Invictus Pool because I do not want to be in the pool business personally. I do it because it is the easiest way to make money for the company right now.Are payment automatic now?
I am about to issue payments... and turn on automatic payments. There will be a disconnect.
it will be 1pts the payout?
I am thinking 0.5 PTS given the difficulty.
btw first of new diff was
pps:0.0366488
now
pps: 0.00439171
it should be
pps: 0.0439171
So? any reply?
all my computers have different valids all using the same payout address... alot of them dont seem to be updating and staying sync...is there a server problem?
The difficulty went up 8x, so the reward went down 8x. I don't see where you're confused.
The difficulty went up 8x, so the reward went down 8x. I don't see where you're confused.
so we will mining more to get less ?
and how to make that work in 7 threads instead of 8
it has to be 1pts else you have to pay .0001 fee....
thank you
The difficulty went up 8x, so the reward went down 8x. I don't see where you're confused.
so we will mining more to get less ?
Correct. That is what happens when the difficulty retargets with all crypto-coins. It's just far more drastic in the first month or so of a coin's existance.
and how to make that work in 7 threads instead of 8
If you're on windows I've answered this more comprehensively somewhere in this thread, but hit ctrl-shift-escape, select processess, right click on POOL_MINER.exe, select "set affinity" and uncheck one of your cores.
Does pool down again?yep
Does pool down again?
I would like to make sure all nodes are on the same network.. I have created a new super node because the-iland is down...
addnode=192.241.139.62
This should support 10K connections and make sure no one is left in an disconnected sub-branch.
When downloading the new wallet, do we have to delete old data files?
i see he adjused the pps a little better now to .00452754
12122 2013-11-11 02:43:25 2 441.97155389 0.00012097 535033.81321705 2.2013 5.44117 22.8622%
12121 2013-11-11 02:41:38 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534997.05862253 2.20113 5.43993 22.8393%
12120 2013-11-11 02:32:10 7 2242.02404723 0.00012097 534960.30402801 2.19471 5.43336 22.8921%
12119 2013-11-11 02:21:09 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534923.54943349 2.19323 5.42571 22.742%
12118 2013-11-11 02:04:51 8 961.24680399 0.00012097 534886.79483897 2.18206 5.41439 22.833%
12117 2013-11-11 01:56:03 3 93.96713762 0.00012097 534850.04044444 2.17686 5.40828 22.8555%
12116 2013-11-11 01:48:41 2 116.75459452 0.00012097 534813.28584992 2.17228 5.40316 22.8831%
12115 2013-11-11 01:41:29 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534776.5312554 2.16744 5.39816 22.9236%
12114 2013-11-11 01:27:45 2 122.49209452 0.00012097 534739.77666088 2.15806 5.38862 23.0016%
12113 2013-11-11 01:23:55 Ok... so everyone knows what has happened in the past hour. protoshared shutdown on my mining pool... and I didn't detect it. The pool mined no blocks and the block rate fell to something close to 10 minutes.Code: [Select]12122 2013-11-11 02:43:25 2 441.97155389 0.00012097 535033.81321705 2.2013 5.44117 22.8622%
12121 2013-11-11 02:41:38 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534997.05862253 2.20113 5.43993 22.8393%
12120 2013-11-11 02:32:10 7 2242.02404723 0.00012097 534960.30402801 2.19471 5.43336 22.8921%
12119 2013-11-11 02:21:09 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534923.54943349 2.19323 5.42571 22.742%
12118 2013-11-11 02:04:51 8 961.24680399 0.00012097 534886.79483897 2.18206 5.41439 22.833%
12117 2013-11-11 01:56:03 3 93.96713762 0.00012097 534850.04044444 2.17686 5.40828 22.8555%
12116 2013-11-11 01:48:41 2 116.75459452 0.00012097 534813.28584992 2.17228 5.40316 22.8831%
12115 2013-11-11 01:41:29 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534776.5312554 2.16744 5.39816 22.9236%
12114 2013-11-11 01:27:45 2 122.49209452 0.00012097 534739.77666088 2.15806 5.38862 23.0016%
12113 2013-11-11 01:23:55
When I fixed it we are back to 1 minute intervals. Needless to say, all payouts for the past hour have been out of my own pocket... cannot afford much more of that going on you all mine too hard!
I am working to add better alarms to these kinds of problems. That said, I would appreciate if you all would call everything square on balances not paid? I will pay anyone who insists.
Ok... so everyone knows what has happened in the past hour. protoshared shutdown on my mining pool... and I didn't detect it. The pool mined no blocks and the block rate fell to something close to 10 minutes.
When I fixed it we are back to 1 minute intervals. Needless to say, all payouts for the past hour have been out of my own pocket... cannot afford much more of that going on you all mine too hard!
I am working to add better alarms to these kinds of problems. That said, I would appreciate if you all would call everything square on balances not paid? I will pay anyone who insists.
Ok... so everyone knows what has happened in the past hour. protoshared shutdown on my mining pool... and I didn't detect it. The pool mined no blocks and the block rate fell to something close to 10 minutes.Code: [Select]12122 2013-11-11 02:43:25 2 441.97155389 0.00012097 535033.81321705 2.2013 5.44117 22.8622%
12121 2013-11-11 02:41:38 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534997.05862253 2.20113 5.43993 22.8393%
12120 2013-11-11 02:32:10 7 2242.02404723 0.00012097 534960.30402801 2.19471 5.43336 22.8921%
12119 2013-11-11 02:21:09 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534923.54943349 2.19323 5.42571 22.742%
12118 2013-11-11 02:04:51 8 961.24680399 0.00012097 534886.79483897 2.18206 5.41439 22.833%
12117 2013-11-11 01:56:03 3 93.96713762 0.00012097 534850.04044444 2.17686 5.40828 22.8555%
12116 2013-11-11 01:48:41 2 116.75459452 0.00012097 534813.28584992 2.17228 5.40316 22.8831%
12115 2013-11-11 01:41:29 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534776.5312554 2.16744 5.39816 22.9236%
12114 2013-11-11 01:27:45 2 122.49209452 0.00012097 534739.77666088 2.15806 5.38862 23.0016%
12113 2013-11-11 01:23:55
When I fixed it we are back to 1 minute intervals. Needless to say, all payouts for the past hour have been out of my own pocket... cannot afford much more of that going on you all mine too hard!
I am working to add better alarms to these kinds of problems. That said, I would appreciate if you all would call everything square on balances not paid? I will pay anyone who insists.
I don't mind loosing past hour dude, but I had 9 PTS coming since last payment. You can check this. Is everything but -1hr coming?
Ok... so everyone knows what has happened in the past hour. protoshared shutdown on my mining pool... and I didn't detect it. The pool mined no blocks and the block rate fell to something close to 10 minutes.Code: [Select]12122 2013-11-11 02:43:25 2 441.97155389 0.00012097 535033.81321705 2.2013 5.44117 22.8622%
12121 2013-11-11 02:41:38 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534997.05862253 2.20113 5.43993 22.8393%
12120 2013-11-11 02:32:10 7 2242.02404723 0.00012097 534960.30402801 2.19471 5.43336 22.8921%
12119 2013-11-11 02:21:09 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534923.54943349 2.19323 5.42571 22.742%
12118 2013-11-11 02:04:51 8 961.24680399 0.00012097 534886.79483897 2.18206 5.41439 22.833%
12117 2013-11-11 01:56:03 3 93.96713762 0.00012097 534850.04044444 2.17686 5.40828 22.8555%
12116 2013-11-11 01:48:41 2 116.75459452 0.00012097 534813.28584992 2.17228 5.40316 22.8831%
12115 2013-11-11 01:41:29 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534776.5312554 2.16744 5.39816 22.9236%
12114 2013-11-11 01:27:45 2 122.49209452 0.00012097 534739.77666088 2.15806 5.38862 23.0016%
12113 2013-11-11 01:23:55
When I fixed it we are back to 1 minute intervals. Needless to say, all payouts for the past hour have been out of my own pocket... cannot afford much more of that going on you all mine too hard!
I am working to add better alarms to these kinds of problems. That said, I would appreciate if you all would call everything square on balances not paid? I will pay anyone who insists.
I don't mind loosing past hour dude, but I had 9 PTS coming since last payment. You can check this. Is everything but -1hr coming?
I am just asking for donations to help cover costs and debugging.
I will honor every commitment unless you all choose to consider any losses donations.
Ok... so everyone knows what has happened in the past hour. protoshared shutdown on my mining pool... and I didn't detect it. The pool mined no blocks and the block rate fell to something close to 10 minutes.Code: [Select]12122 2013-11-11 02:43:25 2 441.97155389 0.00012097 535033.81321705 2.2013 5.44117 22.8622%
12121 2013-11-11 02:41:38 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534997.05862253 2.20113 5.43993 22.8393%
12120 2013-11-11 02:32:10 7 2242.02404723 0.00012097 534960.30402801 2.19471 5.43336 22.8921%
12119 2013-11-11 02:21:09 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534923.54943349 2.19323 5.42571 22.742%
12118 2013-11-11 02:04:51 8 961.24680399 0.00012097 534886.79483897 2.18206 5.41439 22.833%
12117 2013-11-11 01:56:03 3 93.96713762 0.00012097 534850.04044444 2.17686 5.40828 22.8555%
12116 2013-11-11 01:48:41 2 116.75459452 0.00012097 534813.28584992 2.17228 5.40316 22.8831%
12115 2013-11-11 01:41:29 1 36.75459452 0.00012097 534776.5312554 2.16744 5.39816 22.9236%
12114 2013-11-11 01:27:45 2 122.49209452 0.00012097 534739.77666088 2.15806 5.38862 23.0016%
12113 2013-11-11 01:23:55
When I fixed it we are back to 1 minute intervals. Needless to say, all payouts for the past hour have been out of my own pocket... cannot afford much more of that going on you all mine too hard!
I am working to add better alarms to these kinds of problems. That said, I would appreciate if you all would call everything square on balances not paid? I will pay anyone who insists.
I don't mind loosing past hour dude, but I had 9 PTS coming since last payment. You can check this. Is everything but -1hr coming?
I am just asking for donations to help cover costs and debugging.
I will honor every commitment unless you all choose to consider any losses donations.
Same here don't see a payment yet from the last payout. I updated and am using the new wallet. Address is below in my signature.
It says I have been paid out 2.6 pts and I have not received anything yet. please check PfuFsJC6udaX2AErjyCxbcvWE63kwVrjhn
you can't expect pts to work when there is a lot of bs going on, if you started mining on day one you could have 1000,s of coins, and now down to 2 a day, and so on. over 500,000 coins released within 5 days. They are not going to be worth jack at this rate of manipulation.
all my mining was for nothing , how can this be fair????
It says I have been paid out 2.6 pts and I have not received anything yet. please check PfuFsJC6udaX2AErjyCxbcvWE63kwVrjhn
you can't expect pts to work when there is a lot of bs going on, if you started mining on day one you could have 1000,s of coins, and now down to 2 a day, and so on. over 500,000 coins released within 5 days. They are not going to be worth jack at this rate of manipulation.
all my mining was for nothing , how can this be fair????
There has been no manipulation. We released the chain and had 0 premine. Our own mining hardware has not even arrived yet due to shipping delays and the accelerated mining schedule and crazy demand meant that many of you actually mined more than we did. So I was mining with about 100 DO instances and about one dozen computers I could dig up. I rush to put together a mining pool to handle this demand and attempt to earn something and then you accuse me of manipulating things. Please! In the mean time I am attempting to honor PPS hashes at a loss to support the community.
Oh, and I am a bit grumpy from lack of sleep.... I will return to my regularly cheerful self in a bit.
I just don't understand how over 500k of pts can be released within 5 days when the total amount of pts is suppose to be 2 million over 2 years. that is 25% in 5 days???
It says I have been paid out 2.6 pts and I have not received anything yet. please check PfuFsJC6udaX2AErjyCxbcvWE63kwVrjhn
you can't expect pts to work when there is a lot of bs going on, if you started mining on day one you could have 1000,s of coins, and now down to 2 a day, and so on. over 500,000 coins released within 5 days. They are not going to be worth jack at this rate of manipulation.
all my mining was for nothing , how can this be fair????
It says I have been paid out 2.6 pts and I have not received anything yet. please check PfuFsJC6udaX2AErjyCxbcvWE63kwVrjhn
you can't expect pts to work when there is a lot of bs going on, if you started mining on day one you could have 1000,s of coins, and now down to 2 a day, and so on. over 500,000 coins released within 5 days. They are not going to be worth jack at this rate of manipulation.
all my mining was for nothing , how can this be fair????
I think bytemaster deserves a +1 for effort today 8)That's true.
I just don't understand how over 500k of pts can be released within 5 days when the total amount of pts is suppose to be 2 million over 2 years. that is 25% in 5 days???
PPS Now: 0.188856
Nice.
I think bytemaster deserves a +1 for effort today 8)
+1I think bytemaster deserves a +1 for effort today 8)That's true.
its currently down
It was up for a while, but down again now...
PPS Now: 0.188856
Nice.
woah man +11
@bytemaster: thx man ...
Thanks for the hard work bytemaster, though I am unhappy about the fork, and I'm pretty sure I'm missing a bunch of pts. I understand though it's an alpha.
I have over 1200 HPM across 90 machines. If anyone here can explain how to quickly open my own pool ip and then I'll simply direct my machines to there using the pool_miner, that would help because I'm losing way too much money when the pool is down.
If someone wants to help I'll give them the first block I mine.
Thanks for the hard work bytemaster, though I am unhappy about the fork, and I'm pretty sure I'm missing a bunch of pts. I understand though it's an alpha.
I have over 1200 HPM across 90 machines. If anyone here can explain how to quickly open my own pool ip and then I'll simply direct my machines to there using the pool_miner, that would help because I'm losing way too much money when the pool is down.
If someone wants to help I'll give them the first block I mine.
Will the alpha pool's miner work on any other pools? no strength to batch reconfigure 90 machines...
Sad to see the pool go down for now, is my absolute favorite :D But do what you have to do bytemaster, get some rest, and I will be very happy if you get it back up and running sometime, no stress ;)+1 :)
I know the pool is down, but can someone explain to me how you get this running on Linux?
sudo wget bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
sudo tar xsfv linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
sudo screen -dmS alphaminer ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 192.241.150.158 <My PTS Addr>
sudo screen -r alphaminer
I know the pool is down, but can someone explain to me how you get this running on Linux?
This is what I did on my Ubuntu server: (From my /opt/miners/alphaminer directory)Code: [Select]sudo wget bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
sudo tar xsfv linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0.tar.gz
sudo screen -dmS alphaminer ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0 192.241.150.158 <My PTS Addr>
sudo screen -r alphaminer
Looking forward to seeing a re-energized bytemaster after this crazy couple of days.
Looking forward to seeing a re-energized bytemaster after this crazy couple of days.
Guys, too many things are going wrong and I am losing money running this right now. I need sleep and a day without pressure to get this back up, tested, and reliable.
Please mine someplace else until I post back.
Issues to be resolved:
- balances being cleared
- protosharesd randomly crashing
- pool server not detecting the crash.
I cannot sleep with this code running, nor should I ask you to risk your hash power on it. I will let you know when I have a working pool with these bugs resolved.
It is close, I just need sleep.
I have your balances and will pay them out. My apologies for any lost hashing time.
Regards,
Dan
The alpha miner is down while Bytemaster sleeps,Guys, too many things are going wrong and I am losing money running this right now. I need sleep and a day without pressure to get this back up, tested, and reliable.
Please mine someplace else until I post back.
Issues to be resolved:
- balances being cleared
- protosharesd randomly crashing
- pool server not detecting the crash.
I cannot sleep with this code running, nor should I ask you to risk your hash power on it. I will let you know when I have a working pool with these bugs resolved.
It is close, I just need sleep.
I have your balances and will pay them out. My apologies for any lost hashing time.
Regards,
Dan
COME back GOD!!!
что с пулом ?спит
Hello everyone... the reason I shut down the pool is due to a bug in protosharesd that causes it to randomly crash. Others are experiencing this bug since the fork and we are unable to determine the exact cause. I have started a 1 BTC bounty to help identify and resolve the issues associated with the command line version crashing on linux.
Anyway.. I will be away from my computer for a couple of hours, but I (and others) need this fix urgently because we cannot keep our linux server processes going.
Hello everyone... the reason I shut down the pool is due to a bug in protosharesd that causes it to randomly crash. Others are experiencing this bug since the fork and we are unable to determine the exact cause. I have started a 1 BTC bounty to help identify and resolve the issues associated with the command line version crashing on linux.OH,,,,NO~~~~~~~~~~~~``
Anyway.. I will be away from my computer for a couple of hours, but I (and others) need this fix urgently because we cannot keep our linux server processes going.
Hello everyone... the reason I shut down the pool is due to a bug in protosharesd that causes it to randomly crash. Others are experiencing this bug since the fork and we are unable to determine the exact cause. I have started a 1 BTC bounty to help identify and resolve the issues associated with the command line version crashing on linux.
Anyway.. I will be away from my computer for a couple of hours, but I (and others) need this fix urgently because we cannot keep our linux server processes going.
Hello everyone... the reason I shut down the pool is due to a bug in protosharesd that causes it to randomly crash. Others are experiencing this bug since the fork and we are unable to determine the exact cause. I have started a 1 BTC bounty to help identify and resolve the issues associated with the command line version crashing on linux.
Anyway.. I will be away from my computer for a couple of hours, but I (and others) need this fix urgently because we cannot keep our linux server processes going.
Confirmed. Happening on my protosharesd as well.
Weird thing is, I coulnd't even compile at first. I had to search and replace this file all occurrences of "TIME_UTC" with "TIME_UTC_", as Snard's suggested on irc :
/usr/include/boost/thread/xtime.hpp
Can the bug be somehow related? Debian 7 x64, btw. I got protosharesd to compile on ubuntu 13.04 x64 with no problems, but it crashes.
I'll check if protosharesd also crashes on my debian.
edit:
Here's what I have :
Ubuntu 13.04 - protosharesd compiled normally and now crashes every few minutes
Debian 7 - Was unable to compile both protosharesd and protoshares-qt, edited above file, now compiles normally and does not crash
Do I get a btc? :)
i think i've figured out the problem, just need someone with a ready linux box to test out my theory. PM me if you have one.
i think i've figured out the problem, just need someone with a ready linux box to test out my theory. PM me if you have one.
You can create a droplet for a few cents an hour to test it.
Sorry to drop this noobish question on you, but it is something fundamental that I am just not sure of :D
When pool mining (or expecting any other transfers) does the client have to be open, running and correctly synced? Do the coins still arrive if client is not running? What if client is running but lost sync? So far I have been keeping client open at all times and making sure it stayed synced just to be safe ;D
EDIT: In case I wasn't clear, with client I mean the qt client, or wallet.
Sorry to drop this noobish question on you, but it is something fundamental that I am just not sure of :D
When pool mining (or expecting any other transfers) does the client have to be open, running and correctly synced? Do the coins still arrive if client is not running? What if client is running but lost sync? So far I have been keeping client open at all times and making sure it stayed synced just to be safe ;D
EDIT: In case I wasn't clear, with client I mean the qt client, or wallet.
Wallet doesn't have to be open. Look at the wallet as an image of whats on the network. Its looks at your account and updates. That data is held on the infrastructure so no, you don't need your wallet open but good to update once a day i suggest.
come back sir! :'(
+10000...0000000000000come back sir! :'(
+100
ok, it's been more than thirty minutes since arubi tried what i asked him to do, since then it has been more than twenty minutes without it crashing. I'll wait an additional 30 minutes for a response from hm again, but i am sure this temporary fix has resolved the issue of crashing. however, i need bytemaster to also confirm this, then we can implement the patch quickly.
not yet it seems. this run was longer than before so we are on the right track. the issue is rouge peers, if you run it while connecting to functional clients that are on the right fork it seems to work.ok, it's been more than thirty minutes since arubi tried what i asked him to do, since then it has been more than twenty minutes without it crashing. I'll wait an additional 30 minutes for a response from hm again, but i am sure this temporary fix has resolved the issue of crashing. however, i need bytemaster to also confirm this, then we can implement the patch quickly.
good job! (+ 1BTC bounty?) :)
not yet it seems. this run was longer than before so we are on the right track. the issue is rouge peers, if you run it while connecting to functional clients that are on the right fork it seems to work.ok, it's been more than thirty minutes since arubi tried what i asked him to do, since then it has been more than twenty minutes without it crashing. I'll wait an additional 30 minutes for a response from hm again, but i am sure this temporary fix has resolved the issue of crashing. however, i need bytemaster to also confirm this, then we can implement the patch quickly.
good job! (+ 1BTC bounty?) :)
just need to patch it to refuse connections from the old chain. if i can get my box working , i'll do it myself.
they all work until one attempts to cross chains into the other. i have two windows boxes running the different ones, yet at some point one reported being connected to the other. i intend to try running them in a closed net just to make sure. they also report being on different block numbers, lets all post here current block numbers and cross check.
mine states 12301 for version 2
12400 on the older one
they all work until one attempts to cross chains into the other. i have two windows boxes running the different ones, yet at some point one reported being connected to the other. i intend to try running them in a closed net just to make sure. they also report being on different block numbers, lets all post here current block numbers and cross check.
mine states 12301 for version 2
12400 on the older one
interesting
Does anyone know if there is a way to force the client miner to only use nodes listed in protoshares.conf?
Does USE_UPNP=- do that?
The idea being that, in the interim, use only peers known to be on the correct chain.
Does anyone know if there is a way to force the client miner to only use nodes listed in protoshares.conf?
Does USE_UPNP=- do that?
The idea being that, in the interim, use only peers known to be on the correct chain.
start it with connect = IPADDRESSEHERE
Hi guys. Are we up yet?
Well I atleast can´t conect ...was there anything anounced that the server would go down?Yes:
Well I atleast can´t conect ...was there anything anounced that the server would go down?Yes:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg3590#msg3590
Ok, I am back! Lets get this all fixed!
Ok, I am back! Lets get this all fixed!
I feel much better, thank you all for your kind words and support. I have read that someone has a patch for protosharesd that may work, but I haven't found the link to it?
Ok, I am back! Lets get this all fixed!
Ok, I am back! Lets get this all fixed!
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
You should still be careful though, since your pool is so large. I don't know about the mac client, but my windows wallet crashes every few hours when I'm mining, and even when I'm not, it occasionally stops receiving the block chain, and mines orphans continuously until I restart it. This is true for both the first and second versions.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
You should still be careful though, since your pool is so large. I don't know about the mac client, but my windows wallet crashes every few hours when I'm mining, and even when I'm not, it occasionally stops receiving the block chain, and mines orphans continuously until I restart it. This is true for both the first and second versions.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
i think a checkpoint is a step in the right direction, but when someone starts the current client they run the risk on syncing the wrong chain since it's all the same up to now. we need to make a clear distinction in the next one and ensure that it refuses to connect to older versions, otherwise we run the risk of having three versions of clients out there.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
i think a checkpoint is a step in the right direction, but when someone starts the current client they run the risk on syncing the wrong chain since it's all the same up to now. we need to make a clear distinction in the next one and ensure that it refuses to connect to older versions, otherwise we run the risk of having three versions of clients out there.
I agree. So we need to have a two phased release. One with a partial solution that increments the client version number and then uses the checkpoint validation. Then after that has been widely distributed, the next version should only talk to clients that are using the new version.
Can you recommend how to do these version numbers. I am not terribly familiar with all the inner workings of the Bitcoin Qt implementation.
byte or Amazon, will you escrow for me please?I would normally, but am too busy right now.
byte or Amazon, will you escrow for me please?
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
i think a checkpoint is a step in the right direction, but when someone starts the current client they run the risk on syncing the wrong chain since it's all the same up to now. we need to make a clear distinction in the next one and ensure that it refuses to connect to older versions, otherwise we run the risk of having three versions of clients out there.
I agree. So we need to have a two phased release. One with a partial solution that increments the client version number and then uses the checkpoint validation. Then after that has been widely distributed, the next version should only talk to clients that are using the new version.
Can you recommend how to do these version numbers. I am not terribly familiar with all the inner workings of the Bitcoin Qt implementation.
Good news everyone... initial testing with hosting protosharesd on my mac shows things are working.
I have also made some improvements to the miner to support more threads, and best of all, mine 30% faster. I will be releasing the new miner and pool within the hour.
Still waiting on word from FreeTrade on his progress with the checkpoint update.
Ok, it appears that crash may be limited to linux only. FreeTrade is working to add a checkpoint right after the fork and hopefully that will fix that issue.
In the mean time, I am going to work on a hack to allow me to host protosharesd from my mac client and if that works without crashing then the pool will be up soon.
ok, so i'm guessing issue addressed?
how are the adjustments to retarget working out?
protoshares-qt client crashes on windows 64 when mining
Is it possible to get the Protshares-QT OSX Client connected to a "working" peer at the moment?
I just keep getting "connection timeout" on each connect in my debug.log
Is it possible to get the Protshares-QT OSX Client connected to a "working" peer at the moment?
I just keep getting "connection timeout" on each connect in my debug.log
Because of the linux client crash, all of our seed nodes are down :(
Good news is that I have a fix and am deploying it now.
Is everything fixed now?
Hello Byte~~~~~
Could you make sure PYoeV73D2VsY8HQYmHXECoFUksoxzW9vxA got the payments?
i feel that I am missing some :(
Let me know
thanks buddy!
Is everything fixed now?
Yes, things are fixed and I am configuring the pool now. New pool requires new miners because of fixes. Good news is that new miners should be slightly faster... earlier claims of 30% were slightly higher than reality because the sample size of my test was too small... but it should be better than before.
Other changes:
1) Increasing the Share Size... they will now be 0x00 instead of 0x03 so it will take about 4x longer to find each share, but they pay more. The result is lower bandwidth and processing time for server and fewer stales.
2) Rather than storing your balance, I now store total earned and total paid and your balance is the difference between these two.
3) Added ability to specify thread count.
A few other minor things, but will post executable download links with signatures soon :)
Yes, things are fixed and I am configuring the pool now. New pool requires new miners because of fixes.
QuoteYes, things are fixed and I am configuring the pool now. New pool requires new miners because of fixes.
New miners.
Is everything fixed now?
Yes, things are fixed and I am configuring the pool now. New pool requires new miners because of fixes. Good news is that new miners should be slightly faster... earlier claims of 30% were slightly higher than reality because the sample size of my test was too small... but it should be better than before.
Other changes:
1) Increasing the Share Size... they will now be 0x00 instead of 0x03 so it will take about 4x longer to find each share, but they pay more. The result is lower bandwidth and processing time for server and fewer stales.
2) Rather than storing your balance, I now store total earned and total paid and your balance is the difference between these two.
3) Added ability to specify thread count.
A few other minor things, but will post executable download links with signatures soon :)
My finger ir raring to push and goooooooooooooooo..
PS, is the miner the same?
Please double check my math on the PPS amount.
MAX_HASH = 0xfffffff....
SHARE_TARGET 0x00fffff.................
BLOCK_TARGET 0x0000204aa5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHARE_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / SHARE_TARGET
BLOCK_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / BLOCK_TARGET
RATIO = SHARE_DIFFICULTY / BLOCK_DIFFICULTY
PPS = RATIO * REWARD
PPS = 0.00120266
or..................
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
I am going to go with the last one unless someone can show me my math is wrong?
Is pool ready?
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
This. Less complicated.
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
This. Less complicated.
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.By the way, I am not going to release the final binaries until I have at least 5 volunteer testers...
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
How long do you want to trial this? Just an estimate so we know when to go to bed ;)
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.By the way, I am not going to release the final binaries until I have at least 5 volunteer testers...
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
I can test windows and linux. Don't have a mac to test with :(
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
I can test windows and linux. Don't have a mac to test with :(
Ok, building linux for testing.
I can test windows and linux. Don't have a mac to test with :(
Ok, building linux for testing.
geico geckoI am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
Coyote~ Fighting~
I hope everything goes fine. I will also add download link from forum server.
edit: http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Throw location unknown (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)
Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::bad_lexical_cast> >
std::exception::what: bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target
Error:Code: [Select]Throw location unknown (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)
Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::bad_lexical_cast> >
std::exception::what: bad lexical cast: source type value could not be interpreted as target
I am posting the mac miner first, for testing purposes only. Anything mined with it will be kept by me until I confirm things are working.
If this works, then I will release linux and windows miners, reset the database and then we will be good to go.
https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
DONATION ADDRESS: PvPAR8vfmkti91wwtacEjgZ1XMLuQ94GKK
SHA1: 48d092fd412b0f263bd84b4caa76b5cb9f1d3cfc
IA5UwsGVsa28Cy9JrWnrOum4BN/60M//o1u0d3W8/q05cRcRCpA2qrA4xT1ag7rZSceeDHKT1SvurstGPus5WZE=
Note... use the existing /opt folder from the prior downloads.
This is a test release ONLY... any mining will be kept by me until windows and linux binaries are released.
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PTSADDR [THREADS=HARDWARE]
Lets hash this out.. :)
I'm testing mac and linux now. mac client is getting about 44 hpm... that was about 30 with older client.
I also got the boost error but only if I tried to specify THREADS=
Chucking a few more linux clients on for you.
Have not found anything on mac client as yet but seems to be stable still.
I might have the per-share difficulty too high, perhaps I should lower it.
FIxed one more bug in linux client... darn it :)
Thanks for your help testing it. Fetch again and you should start finding things :)
Linux Miner has been fixed and updated..
01e4706d861f71fc4179346a30ddd9f316b7e6a1
Linux Miner has been fixed and updated..
01e4706d861f71fc4179346a30ddd9f316b7e6a1
where to find the linux update!?
how long ago?
i literally just wgot it 5 mins ago...?
FIxed one more bug in linux client... darn it :)
Thanks for your help testing it. Fetch again and you should start finding things :)
Same link for fetching or is there a new verison #?
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?
Linux requires a certificate.
wget --no-check-certificate https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
tar -xvzf linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Correct... I just updated it with the reduced share difficulty... give it a try.
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Correct... I just updated it with the reduced share difficulty... give it a try.
Dan, you may want to consider changing the version name to 0.2 as it might get confusing. I mean for public release.
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Correct... I just updated it with the reduced share difficulty... give it a try.
Dan, you may want to consider changing the version name to 0.2 as it might get confusing. I mean for public release.
I thought changing the name from 'alpha' to 'coyote' would make sense.
How to run https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz on Ubuntu?probably just download with http:
Linux requires a certificate.
http://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Correct... I just updated it with the reduced share difficulty... give it a try.
Dan, you may want to consider changing the version name to 0.2 as it might get confusing. I mean for public release.
I thought changing the name from 'alpha' to 'coyote' would make sense.
What's going on?
Is the pool up?
What's going on?
Is the pool up?
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.00055766 paid: 0 earned: 0.00055766 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 5.71088
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 6.48183
Quotevalid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.00055766 paid: 0 earned: 0.00055766 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 5.71088
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PpJhLJN6XhG7JL8GiAdEmeHbcPTyQsWkSf hpm: 6.48183
just happend...
Anyone care to report old vs new hash rates... make sure you let it run for about 5 minutes before you call the number because it takes a while to average out.
Yep... I said you can ignore that, you balance will be fixed next display update.. That currently happens when ever a block is found on the network.
What's going on?
Is the pool up?
We are doing voluntary alpha testing of the latest code pool.. No shares can be earned right now, but if you would like to try the new miner while I test the pool you may. Looks like we may be good to go very soon now.
Please double check my math on the PPS amount.
MAX_HASH = 0xfffffff....
SHARE_TARGET 0x00fffff.................
BLOCK_TARGET 0x0000204aa5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHARE_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / SHARE_TARGET
BLOCK_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / BLOCK_TARGET
RATIO = SHARE_DIFFICULTY / BLOCK_DIFFICULTY
PPS = RATIO * REWARD
PPS = 0.00120266
or..................
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
I am going to go with the last one unless someone can show me my math is wrong?
seems good.
how much fee?
Please double check my math on the PPS amount.
MAX_HASH = 0xfffffff....
SHARE_TARGET 0x00fffff.................
BLOCK_TARGET 0x0000204aa5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHARE_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / SHARE_TARGET
BLOCK_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / BLOCK_TARGET
RATIO = SHARE_DIFFICULTY / BLOCK_DIFFICULTY
PPS = RATIO * REWARD
PPS = 0.00120266
or..................
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
I am going to go with the last one unless someone can show me my math is wrong?
seems good.
how much fee?
Displayed in client: 3%
If I am calculating that wrong let me know.
Note: New share target difficulty is 0x03fffffffff
It`s normal?
(http://i60.fastpic.ru/thumb/2013/1112/eb/ec028ea1e5498ac2054419acffb096eb.jpeg) (http://fastpic.ru/view/60/2013/1112/ec028ea1e5498ac2054419acffb096eb.jpg.html)
We expecting another update to the linux client soon or are we good to go? Are the display issues (0 balance) on your end or in the client?
Once you finish, bytemaster, will we be mining on the old ip address? (192.241.150.158)
In other words, can I start the coyote miner working on that address and hope it will connect at some point during the night?
Thanks.
So I suppose I can't set it up now to keep going overnight, as there's something else running on the server now?
So I suppose I can't set it up now to keep going overnight, as there's something else running on the server now?
Go ahead.. I am good for calling the server live and will honor everything earned during this past hour of testing, thanks everyone.
Please double check my math on the PPS amount.
MAX_HASH = 0xfffffff....
SHARE_TARGET 0x00fffff.................
BLOCK_TARGET 0x0000204aa5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
SHARE_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / SHARE_TARGET
BLOCK_DIFFICULTY = MAX_HASH / BLOCK_TARGET
RATIO = SHARE_DIFFICULTY / BLOCK_DIFFICULTY
PPS = RATIO * REWARD
PPS = 0.00120266
or..................
SHARE_TARGET / BLOCK_TARGET * REWARD = 0.00120736
I am going to go with the last one unless someone can show me my math is wrong?
seems good.
how much fee?
Displayed in client: 3%
If I am calculating that wrong let me know.
Note: New share target difficulty is 0x03fffffffff
Why does the miner show pps: 0.00027883, but the above says 0.00120736? (nearly 4-5x difference)
BTW, I don't understand your math or 0x03fffffffff numbers so I can't check your calculations.
attempting to connect to 192.241.150.158
3231125ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 192.241.150.158:8485
3231205ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
a
anybody else getting connection problems under linux?Code: [Select]attempting to connect to 192.241.150.158
3231125ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 192.241.150.158:8485
3231205ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
a
anybody else getting connection problems under linux?Code: [Select]attempting to connect to 192.241.150.158
3231125ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 192.241.150.158:8485
3231205ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
a
Wrong IP:
USE IP: 162.243.67.4
When we can expect Windows version ready? ::)
When we can expect Windows version ready? ::)
Uploading it now.... about 5 minutes.
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
Anyone care to report old vs new hash rates... make sure you let it run for about 5 minutes before you call the number because it takes a while to average out.12-->17 on my new mac mini (i5)
No blocks yet... pick better hashes people!@
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
No blocks yet... pick better hashes people!@
Which port use the miner? Please add port as command line param to latter versions.
No blocks yet... pick better hashes people!@
Which port use the miner? Please add port as command line param to latter versions.
No blocks yet... pick better hashes people!@
Which port use the miner? Please add port as command line param to latter versions.
Port: 8485
I changed the port to prevent use of old miners... it is my poor-mans version control :)
No blocks yet... pick better hashes people!@
Which port use the miner? Please add port as command line param to latter versions.
Port: 8485
I changed the port to prevent use of old miners... it is my poor-mans version control :)
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
any linux version?
47 -> 54 (i7 980)
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
By default it uses the same number of cores as your hardware. If you want less, you can specify the number as a 3rd command line argument.
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
By default it uses the same number of cores as your hardware. If you want less, you can specify the number as a 3rd command line argument.
As I can see each core loaded up to 50%, it's a good idea to specify x2 threads to load all cores to 100%?
@bytemaster: Please let's us know when we find 1st block.
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
Does anyone here know how I set the miner to autorun every time Windows 8 starts?
An additional code to minimize it to system tray would be great too!
P.s. I'm a Linux fan and a Win ignorant.
Windows Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
Yes, the windows client has a different version number... like everyone has been requesting, in the future they will all be 0.3.x...
Does anyone here know how I set the miner to autorun every time Windows 8 starts?
An additional code to minimize it to system tray would be great too!
P.s. I'm a Linux fan and a Win ignorant.
my balance just went to zero.
block found?
valid: 102 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0284407 paid: 0 earned: 0.0284407 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PcwZAWScgJEyyy3L9zG5BL8YwPNnF68dXD hpm: 24.7042
hpm: 24.7191
valid: 140 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0390362 paid: 0 earned: 0.0390362 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PcwZAWScgJEyyy3L9zG5BL8YwPNnF68dXD hpm: 24.8593
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3% address: PcwZAWScgJEyyy3L9zG5BL8YwPNnF68dXD hpm: 24.7946
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
By default it uses the same number of cores as your hardware. If you want less, you can specify the number as a 3rd command line argument.
As I can see each core loaded up to 50%, it's a good idea to specify x2 threads to load all cores to 100%?
Odd it works for me... do what ever gives you the highest HPM after about 5 minutes of run time. How many cores do you have?
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
By default it uses the same number of cores as your hardware. If you want less, you can specify the number as a 3rd command line argument.
As I can see each core loaded up to 50%, it's a good idea to specify x2 threads to load all cores to 100%?
Odd it works for me... do what ever gives you the highest HPM after about 5 minutes of run time. How many cores do you have?
32 core, it's works if I specify 32 in command line and crash when I specify more than 32 :(
How many cores is this set for? 8 as before?
Any availability on thread / core selection?
By default it uses the same number of cores as your hardware. If you want less, you can specify the number as a 3rd command line argument.
As I can see each core loaded up to 50%, it's a good idea to specify x2 threads to load all cores to 100%?
Odd it works for me... do what ever gives you the highest HPM after about 5 minutes of run time. How many cores do you have?
32 core, it's works if I specify 32 in command line and crash when I specify more than 32 :(
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Just curious, are we starting fresh with the new pool and client(s)? I'm not seeing what was earned from before you took the pool down yesterday. Should I? (It was around 14 or so hours of mining.) If not, no worries, I will chock it up to being "alpha". Oh and thanks for all your hard work on this, I'm glad you got some rest and came back guns blazing. 8)
rrrrg do i need to update again?
Can u change version numbers please? I don't know if i'm on the right one or not.
Just curious, are we starting fresh with the new pool and client(s)? I'm not seeing what was earned from before you took the pool down yesterday. Should I? (It was around 14 or so hours of mining.) If not, no worries, I will chock it up to being "alpha". Oh and thanks for all your hard work on this, I'm glad you got some rest and came back guns blazing. 8)
I decided to start with a clean slate so I could take my time sorting through the old messy stuff. The reality is I lost more from the alpha than you all combined did.
We found our first block guys! We are in business :)
We found our first block guys! We are in business :)
Yaaaaa!!!
Thus far on my servers:
(http://s22.postimg.org/8ns8iotvl/mine_servers.png)
Thus far on my servers:
(http://s22.postimg.org/8ns8iotvl/mine_servers.png)
lol...holy God....I'll never get enough shares!!! how you have so much stuff!?!?!?!
Thus far on my servers:
(http://s22.postimg.org/8ns8iotvl/mine_servers.png)
lol...holy God....I'll never get enough shares!!! how you have so much stuff!?!?!?!
I managing many servers for a living ;)
Balance resets to Zero then comes back.. Cosmetic? Or due to new block?When a new block comes in I have to quickly message every client with fresh work. I skip the database query to minimize latency.
invalid request
Everytime you get a new block? When are you planning to sleep?
Thus far on my servers:
(http://s22.postimg.org/8ns8iotvl/mine_servers.png)
lol...holy God....I'll never get enough shares!!! how you have so much stuff!?!?!?!
I managing many servers for a living ;)
so does this mean the people your "serving" (pun intended) are now getting less than expected power/use/however you want to measure
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Yes, 24 works :)
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Yes, 24 works :)
Ok, I run 3 instances of miner, now 90-100% load of all cores :)
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Yes, 24 works :)
Ok, I run 3 instances of miner, now 90-100% load of all cores :)
How many HPM do you get with 32 cores?
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Yes, 24 works :)
Ok, I run 3 instances of miner, now 90-100% load of all cores :)
How many HPM do you get with 32 cores?
Even I am having a hard time believing the current PPS number... someone please check my math because I do not want to be blamed for getting that wrong :)
LOL... I should have mentioned a hard coded limit.. never imaged a 32 core machine :)
I will investigate increasing it. Does 24 work?
Yes, 24 works :)
Ok, I run 3 instances of miner, now 90-100% load of all cores :)
How many HPM do you get with 32 cores?
I'm guessing 60-70?
can't download filesQuoteinvalid request
bytemaster are you going to set a start time for official mining to start or just when you feel the miners are solid and ready to go?
bytemaster are you going to set a start time for official mining to start or just when you feel the miners are solid and ready to go?
Things seem to be working perfectly, so I consider it live and am honoring all test shares as well.
bytemaster are you going to set a start time for official mining to start or just when you feel the miners are solid and ready to go?
Things seem to be working perfectly, so I consider it live and am honoring all test shares as well.
Even I am having a hard time believing the current PPS number... someone please check my math because I do not want to be blamed for getting that wrong :)
I feel like the balance is increasing slower than it did before the update, though I don't think the difficulty has risen. I of course am most likely wrong.
I think you should wait till we get a few blocks, and see if your payouts are in line with the block rewards (- fees), and adjust the pps accordingly.
can't download filesQuoteinvalid request
Try these alternative download links:
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
wget --no-check-certificate https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
--2013-11-11 18:15:25-- https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Resolving the-iland.net (the-iland.net)... 64.90.183.137
Connecting to the-iland.net (the-iland.net)|64.90.183.137|:443... connected.
WARNING: cannot verify the-iland.net's certificate, issued by â/C=US/ST=Virginia/O=The iLand Nation/CN=the-iland.net/emailAddress=admin@the-iland.netâ:
Self-signed certificate encountered.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 NOT FOUND
2013-11-11 18:15:25 ERROR 404: NOT FOUND.
bytemaster are you going to set a start time for official mining to start or just when you feel the miners are solid and ready to go?
Things seem to be working perfectly, so I consider it live and am honoring all test shares as well.
Very well done guys.
I'm off to bed. Chat soon.
can't download filesQuoteinvalid request
Try these alternative download links:
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/mac_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/coyote_miner_0.2.3.zip
So is this linux version above newer or older then what is on the OP, I just want to make sure I have the current version. I'm trying to wget the one on the OP and I'm getting a 404 NOT FOUNDCode: [Select]wget --no-check-certificate https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
--2013-11-11 18:15:25-- https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Resolving the-iland.net (the-iland.net)... 64.90.183.137
Connecting to the-iland.net (the-iland.net)|64.90.183.137|:443... connected.
WARNING: cannot verify the-iland.net's certificate, issued by â/C=US/ST=Virginia/O=The iLand Nation/CN=the-iland.net/emailAddress=admin@the-iland.netâ:
Self-signed certificate encountered.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 NOT FOUND
2013-11-11 18:15:25 ERROR 404: NOT FOUND.
Thus far on my servers:
(http://s22.postimg.org/8ns8iotvl/mine_servers.png)
lol...holy God....I'll never get enough shares!!! how you have so much stuff!?!?!?!
I managing many servers for a living ;)
so does this mean the people your "serving" (pun intended) are now getting less than expected power/use/however you want to measure
Kind of yes and no. These selected servers are wayyyyyyyy over powered for what it does. No way will I allow them to not do its job or I don't get paid..
PS. I own all of them BTW.
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
I think our balances are going to say zero alot.
I'm hitting you with over 1000 hpm alone :-)
I think our balances are going to say zero alot.
I'm hitting you with over 1000 hpm alone :-)
Cloud servers?
Anyone know what hpm a 32 core processor gives?
I think our balances are going to say zero alot.
I'm hitting you with over 1000 hpm alone :-)
Cloud servers?
Anyone know what hpm a 32 core processor gives?
Found typo in calculation... fixed PPS is now: 0.00878342
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
Found typo in calculation... fixed PPS is now: 0.00878342
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
I am trying ypool (they have windows version only). It uses collisions/min to measure, not sure it is same as hpm. But the earning ratio looks higher than coyote.
I will run longer to see. 1c PTS/hour is just to low to cover electricity of my 4770k.
Can anyone give me the average PTS / hour you are getting from the other pools?
I am trying ypool (they have windows version only). It uses collisions/min to measure, not sure it is same as hpm. But the earning ratio looks higher than coyote.
I will run longer to see. 1c PTS/hour is just to low to cover electricity of my 4770k.
What is Ypool? Thread anywhere on it?
Bytemaster, is there still an issue using the same payment address with multiple instances?
Bytemaster, is there still an issue using the same payment address with multiple instances?No
root@localhost:~# wget http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
--2013-11-12 02:59:24-- http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
Resolving bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)... 174.120.146.106
Connecting to bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)|174.120.146.106|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3711475 (3.5M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz'
100%[======================================>] 3,711,475 1.55M/s in 2.3s
2013-11-12 02:59:27 (1.55 MB/s) - `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz' saved [3711475/3711475]
root@localhost:~# tar xsfv linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
coyote_miner
root@localhost:~# cd coyote_miner
-bash: cd: coyote_miner: Not a directory
root@localhost:~#
Hey can someone help me out? I still can't get it to run? This is what I'm doingCode: [Select]root@localhost:~# wget http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
--2013-11-12 02:59:24-- http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
Resolving bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)... 174.120.146.106
Connecting to bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)|174.120.146.106|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3711475 (3.5M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz'
100%[======================================>] 3,711,475 1.55M/s in 2.3s
2013-11-12 02:59:27 (1.55 MB/s) - `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz' saved [3711475/3711475]
root@localhost:~# tar xsfv linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
coyote_miner
root@localhost:~# cd coyote_miner
-bash: cd: coyote_miner: Not a directory
root@localhost:~#
What am I doing wrong? Shouldn't there be a new directory their?
Hey can someone help me out? I still can't get it to run? This is what I'm doingCode: [Select]root@localhost:~# wget http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
--2013-11-12 02:59:24-- http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
Resolving bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)... 174.120.146.106
Connecting to bitsharestalk.org (bitsharestalk.org)|174.120.146.106|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3711475 (3.5M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz'
100%[======================================>] 3,711,475 1.55M/s in 2.3s
2013-11-12 02:59:27 (1.55 MB/s) - `linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz' saved [3711475/3711475]
root@localhost:~# tar xsfv linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
coyote_miner
root@localhost:~# cd coyote_miner
-bash: cd: coyote_miner: Not a directory
root@localhost:~#
What am I doing wrong? Shouldn't there be a new directory their?
There have any differents with "http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz" and "Linux Miner: https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz "?
bytemaster?sir
So whats the Pool's HPM looking like Byte? and could you also tell us Network HPM?
bytemaster: How is your server holding up with this load? how much load do you have?
C:\Users\slim\Desktop\ptsminer\coyote_miner_0.2.3>coyote_miner.exe 162.243.67.4
PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
2393848ms th_b miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.24
3.67.4:8485
pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3%
eofpm: 15.4908
End of file
{"message":"End of file"}
asio asio.cpp:22 fc::asio::detail::read_write_handler
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
2423488ms th_b miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.24
3.67.4:8485
hpm: 20.683
pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 20.4832
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.6321
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 14.1961
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 14.1348
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.5025
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.8756
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.9847
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.4436
20131112T024725.006031 005806ffdad9dbcbf7c09fab7b6ad69e6c056b8a3498a9eefaa4c066a
78df4df
valid: 1 invalid: 0 balance: 0.00878342 paid: 0 earned: 0.00878342 pps: 0
.00878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.2368
20131112T024744.147612 019706114645f9b139ec07080160476d718d43df99824f9bd79d04a7a
44f49ee
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.1682
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 11.9727
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 11.9887
20131112T025038.656421 02c7ca9d0d7265244891d91a73abddf72e23602bb6a3b86603386f8a0
d1fa1b8
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.3188
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.5535
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.0649
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.9458
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6056
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6439
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.8652
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.7416
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.7063
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3771
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3927
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3137
20131112T030717.677263 01f3ff611b86b87263ea720d7e84222f2b605f793ab695da59c39d231
da66f97
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2697
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.1828
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.1268
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2713
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2222
20131112T031209.500304 02b6c75283c9d3eac2636806da9c3999719d3ccd0a755ba27964a2b2f
16194af
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3036
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6688
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.4546
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2868
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2793
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2845
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2348
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2289
hpm: 13.0915Code: [Select]C:\Users\slim\Desktop\ptsminer\coyote_miner_0.2.3>coyote_miner.exe 162.243.67.4
PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
2393848ms th_b miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.24
3.67.4:8485
pps: 0.00027883 fee: 3%
eofpm: 15.4908
End of file
{"message":"End of file"}
asio asio.cpp:22 fc::asio::detail::read_write_handler
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
2423488ms th_b miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.24
3.67.4:8485
hpm: 20.683
pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 20.4832
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.6321
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 14.1961
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 14.1348
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.5025
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.8756
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.9847
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.4436
20131112T024725.006031 005806ffdad9dbcbf7c09fab7b6ad69e6c056b8a3498a9eefaa4c066a
78df4df
valid: 1 invalid: 0 balance: 0.00878342 paid: 0 earned: 0.00878342 pps: 0
.00878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.2368
20131112T024744.147612 019706114645f9b139ec07080160476d718d43df99824f9bd79d04a7a
44f49ee
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.1682
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 11.9727
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 11.9887
20131112T025038.656421 02c7ca9d0d7265244891d91a73abddf72e23602bb6a3b86603386f8a0
d1fa1b8
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.3188
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.5535
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.0649
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 12.9458
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6056
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6439
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.8652
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0263503 paid: 0 earned: 0.0263503 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.7416
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.7063
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3771
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3927
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3137
20131112T030717.677263 01f3ff611b86b87263ea720d7e84222f2b605f793ab695da59c39d231
da66f97
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2697
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.1828
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.1268
valid: 4 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0351337 paid: 0 earned: 0.0351337 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2713
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2222
20131112T031209.500304 02b6c75283c9d3eac2636806da9c3999719d3ccd0a755ba27964a2b2f
16194af
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.3036
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.6688
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.4546
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2868
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2793
valid: 5 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0439171 paid: 0 earned: 0.0439171 pps: 0.0
0878342 fee: 3% address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2845
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2348
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3%
address: PcoC1TW21QBRors1kc9M9kxuGvMDZ3r2yn hpm: 13.2289
hpm: 13.0915
my valid shares are going to 0 and 5 and 0.. wtf? is this normal?
So whats the Pool's HPM looking like Byte? and could you also tell us Network HPM?
804 connections with 268 shares per minute submitted right now... earning about 2.3 PTS per minute or a block every 10 minutes or so.
The numbers the new client are showing are meaningless right now? Right? Is there any change of getting at lease a json feed to check are progress?
So whats the Pool's HPM looking like Byte? and could you also tell us Network HPM?
804 connections with 268 shares per minute submitted right now... earning about 2.3 PTS per minute or a block every 10 minutes or so.
I'm trying to publicize your pool
ypool looks like their client is faster, can anyone do a comparison for me.
I looked at their code and it was incomprehensible to me at a quick glance.
@bytemaster seems like you have poor parallelized code, on 24 core machine it gives only ~50-70% load =\
@bytemaster seems like you have poor parallelized code, on 24 core machine it gives only ~50-70% load =\
You have lower latencies. There is some overhead associated with synchronizing threads and when you divide the 2^26 search space into 24 threads, you amplify the amount of time spent in single threaded code. Try running 3 instances at 8 cores.
@bytemaster seems like you have poor parallelized code, on 24 core machine it gives only ~50-70% load =\
You have lower latencies. There is some overhead associated with synchronizing threads and when you divide the 2^26 search space into 24 threads, you amplify the amount of time spent in single threaded code. Try running 3 instances at 8 cores.
By the way, if you have studied my fc library, you will know that my code is entirely lock-free and very well paralyzed. It looks like I will have to do higher-level division to simulate 3 processes in one. I just don't have a 24 or 32 core machine to try it on :)
ypool looks like their client is faster, can anyone do a comparison for me.
I looked at their code and it was incomprehensible to me at a quick glance.
@bytemaster seems like you have poor parallelized code, on 24 core machine it gives only ~50-70% load =\
You have lower latencies. There is some overhead associated with synchronizing threads and when you divide the 2^26 search space into 24 threads, you amplify the amount of time spent in single threaded code. Try running 3 instances at 8 cores.
By the way, if you have studied my fc library, you will know that my code is entirely lock-free and very well paralyzed. It looks like I will have to do higher-level division to simulate 3 processes in one. I just don't have a 24 or 32 core machine to try it on :)
fc is boost based lib, better parallelization may be occured using omp for example. I have also 48 and 64 core machines. So i can test on it.
PS why you dont release miner code?
its dropping values again....
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i h
m: 50.7146
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i hpm: 47.6874
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i hpm: 39.8898
@bytemaster about numbers
24 cores Opteron 6174 ~60hpm (poor parallelization =\)
4 core Core i5 750 ~37hpm (no parallelization penalty)
I can try algo on intel mic but it seems to me i get parallelization bottleneck (it has ~226 threads)
its dropping values again....
valid: 2 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0175668 paid: 0 earned: 0.0175668 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i h
m: 50.7146
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i hpm: 47.6874
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00878342 fee: 3% address: PqTfs2QNpJjBf8ijLBNBydCRH2g6PmRJ9i hpm: 39.8898
Nope, we just found 2 blocks before you found 2 shares :) I really need to fix this because this will always keep coming up. That is safe to ignore.
Pools seems down againNope... working just fine.
I have 1000+ servers,
you pool server can handle it?
its working nice,
CPU is 80-100% on i7 6 core
hpm value reaches 60, but it looks that it isnt finding hashes faster....
also missing a timestart field in output
I have 1000+ servers,
you pool server can handle it?
I can set up a dedicated pool for you if you have that many nodes. THe main pool could handle it, but it is just easier to have your own pool.
cd /webroot/
wget https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz --no-check-certificate
sudo chmod +x /webroot/coyote_miner
/webroot/coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 <my key>
ypool.net doesn't look good for me (I try to mine at ypool with 1 computer), I will stay with our pool and wait results from other peoples :)
how do you overwrite the default setting of using all cores? I read you mentioned it somewhere but I failed to find that post again. Something like change the 3rd line or something. -_-
how do you overwrite the default setting of using all cores? I read you mentioned it somewhere but I failed to find that post again. Something like change the 3rd line or something. -_-
Optional extra 3rd argument to miner is the number of threads to use.
Add a number after the address
./coyote_miner <pools ip address> <address> 8
chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 <my address>-bash: ./coyote_miner: No such file or directoryCan anyone help me ?
I tried to run coyote_miner on my debian 32-bit serverCode: [Select]chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 <my address>
then I am getting this errorCode: [Select]-bash: ./coyote_miner: No such file or directory
but I already checked that coyote_miner is in the correct directory
that is the default number of threads?
that is the default number of threads?
Default number is "hardware limit" I think byte called it. So if you have 8 threads, 8. If you have 16, 16. Though it may have an upper bound at like 24??
Can anyone help me ?
I tried to run coyote_miner on my debian 32-bit serverCode: [Select]chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 <my address>
then I am getting this errorCode: [Select]-bash: ./coyote_miner: No such file or directory
but I already checked that coyote_miner is in the correct directory
This may not be the answer, but try "chmod 777 coyote_miner" I know that may be bad form but if you're root that is probably why.
64 bit only, sorry.Can anyone help me ?
I tried to run coyote_miner on my debian 32-bit serverCode: [Select]chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 <my address>
then I am getting this errorCode: [Select]-bash: ./coyote_miner: No such file or directory
but I already checked that coyote_miner is in the correct directory
This may not be the answer, but try "chmod 777 coyote_miner" I know that may be bad form but if you're root that is probably why.
Done that, still getting the same error
I tried to run it as root and normal user, and it gives me the same error
Or is it because I am using 32-bit OS?
@bytemaster: Can you update us with pool stat? How many block we found :)
@bytemaster: Can you update us with pool stat? How many block we found :)
So far the miners have earned about 1000 PTS total.
1500 connections to main pool.
1058 connections to private pool A
Setting up another private pool for another individual with 1000+ nodes.
The increased hash power is really affecting block rates... wow!
another exciting thing is the stability. I've got 80 servers running coyote since the beginning and not a single crash.
I'm seeing about 5% crashes per hour on ptsminer against beeeer pool.
another exciting thing is the stability. I've got 80 servers running coyote since the beginning and not a single crash.
I'm seeing about 5% crashes per hour on ptsminer against beeeer pool.
that is the default number of threads?
Default number is "hardware limit" I think byte called it. So if you have 8 threads, 8. If you have 16, 16. Though it may have an upper bound at like 24??
For me it's work up to 32, from 33 it's crashes
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?
I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete. Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.
Standards are nice.
Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning. I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.
whats the difference between field balance and earned? two identical values
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?
I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete. Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.
Standards are nice.
Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning. I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.
где баланс pts c пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?
that is the default number of threads?
Default number is "hardware limit" I think byte called it. So if you have 8 threads, 8. If you have 16, 16. Though it may have an upper bound at like 24??
For me it's work up to 32, from 33 it's crashes
how many cores does your machine have? and what have you found to be optimal?
где баланс pts c пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?
Try this new IP: 162.243.67.4
How to set number of used cores?
(crashing on 2-core PC's with 2Gb, I want to set 1 core to use)
coyote_miner.exe 162.243.67.4 YourAddress 1
my hash might say almost 20, but i get half as many accepts... almost 2 min between accepts and less than a min between with any of the other pools...
Well, I saw the old IP and figured... (google translate is universal right?) ;Dгде баланс pts c пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?
Try this new IP: 162.243.67.4
LOL, nice Q/A, question in Russian, answer in English. :)
How to set number of used cores?
(crashing on 2-core PC's with 2Gb, I want to set 1 core to use)
Put number of cores at end.Code: [Select]coyote_miner.exe 162.243.67.4 YourAddress 1
Я прошу прощения, я сделал предположение:Well, I saw the old IP and figured... (google translate is universal right?) ;Dгде баланс pts c пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?
Try this new IP: 162.243.67.4
LOL, nice Q/A, question in Russian, answer in English. :)
Ok, we are back in orphan territory now, perhaps as much as 10% now... I am going to have to increase fees otherwise I will not have the PTS to pay due to orphans.
Fees are going up to 10% until the next difficulty adjustment or the number of orphans increases even more.
Note to new windows client users, you must change the address listed in the .bat file or you will be mining to our donation address and the balance you see is the total for all people mining to the donation address.
linux download url: invalid request
linux download url: invalid requesthttps://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Note to new windows client users, you must change the address listed in the .bat file or you will be mining to our donation address and the balance you see is the total for all people mining to the donation address.
?? Is it not enough to add it to the exe target? \coyote_miner_0.2.3\coyote_miner.exe 162.243.67.4 PTS Address
linux download url: invalid requesthttps://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
1680627ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.243.67.4:8485
1680630ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
QuoteBroken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
1680627ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.243.67.4:8485
1680630ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Pool down
now fee 10% ?
now fee 10% ?
Orphans are high again, I don't get to keep that, I am just earning less so I pass it along.
Your HPM should be positive... unless you are on a VERY slow machine ... you have not found any shares yet.
Is something up with the Mac-client, my other computers (all linux based), are running fine and getting some output from the client.
The mac-client looks like it is running, but when I got up the morning, every line looks like this
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957
I know about the bug that zero's out sometime, but every single line is like this.
I'am running the new client.
I will be leaving this running for the next several hours, up to 16 hours, if the pool goes down will it crash on my end and need to be refreshed or being connected just run itself with nothing doing on my part?
p.s. thanx for the new windows directions.
QuoteBroken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
attempting to connect to 162.243.67.4
1680627ms th_a miner.cpp:117 main ] 162.243.67.4:8485
1680630ms th_a miner.cpp:123 main ] unspecified
Broken pipe
{"message":"Broken pipe"}
asio asio.cpp:28 read_write_handler
Unable to connect
Pool down
I just paid out 25% of every balance over 4 PTS which amounted to about 200 PTS.
I backed up balances database
I updated fee to 10%
I'm running the miner on a bunch of diff servers using the same PTS address. Sometimes the status line comes back with:
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10% address: PTSADDRESS hpm: XXX
then the next status line shows the correct counts. Is this an issue or expected? Should I use a diff PTS address for each miner?
now fee 10% ?
Orphans are high again, I don't get to keep that, I am just earning less so I pass it along.
OK, sorry I am a newbie.
I wonder if this seems normal?
(http://i.imgur.com/y0CFAx0.png)
should we expect to see something higher than 0 straight away?
We currently have 48 second blocks... if your machine is slower than 48 seconds to find the first hash it will always reset the search prior to finding anything. In effect, until the block rate slows down to 5 minutes your machine is too slow to run this proof of work.
I updated fee to 10%
Is there any problems with having several miners on the same payoutaddress? Just put 9 rigs on the same.....No. It's fine. He mentioned this a page or two back.
QuoteI updated fee to 10%
woah ...
------
bytemaster got about 2PTS from yesterday wiped from address Pvk4zKDp2ikXXsWbuhBHWq493iSQ4atFBX!
Can you pls check this when you got time ... i know 2 PTS not much for you but it was still 3 hours of mining for me.
Hope there is any chance of recovering those ...
thx for your effort
hehe sure no problem get some sleep and recover yourself ..QuoteI updated fee to 10%
woah ...
------
bytemaster got about 2PTS from yesterday wiped from address Pvk4zKDp2ikXXsWbuhBHWq493iSQ4atFBX!
Can you pls check this when you got time ... i know 2 PTS not much for you but it was still 3 hours of mining for me.
Hope there is any chance of recovering those ...
thx for your effort
I will look into it after I get some sleep.
my shot
(http://v1.freep.cn/3tb_131112182250jtw2512293.png)
my shot
(http://v1.freep.cn/3tb_131112182250jtw2512293.png)
can i ask which system you're using? Cause i have 100hpm but only 1/4 of valid shares...
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool! We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now. Should I do something to encourage diversification?
release the source for coyote
and when is the pool paying?
It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?
I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete. Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.
Standards are nice.
Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning. I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. 172.29.0.1 0.0% 23 18.3 18.4 17.4 20.5 0.6
2. host.colocrossing.com 0.0% 23 18.7 18.3 17.5 19.7 0.3
3. 173.245.71.177 0.0% 23 18.5 21.1 17.8 30.0 3.7
4. xe-2-3-0.cr1.sjc1.us.nlayer.net 0.0% 23 19.2 21.4 17.8 55.5 8.5
5. xe-1-2-1.cr1.ewr1.us.nlayer.net 0.0% 23 87.1 90.3 86.6 120.8 8.8
6. ae2-60g.cr1.nyc2.us.nlayer.net 0.0% 23 86.9 89.6 86.8 103.7 4.4
7. vlan-77.ar2.nyc3.us.nlayer.net 0.0% 22 90.5 93.0 89.2 112.0 6.8
8. as62567.xe-3-0-6.ar2.nyc3.us.nl 0.0% 22 91.0 95.5 90.6 110.7 6.3
9. 192.241.164.242 0.0% 22 89.6 92.0 89.2 109.2 4.7
10. 162.243.67.4 95.2% 22 138.1 138.1 138.1 138.1 0.0
I forget, whats the schedule for difficulty updates now? And it can be as much as 32x each time right?that's my understanding…32x per 2100 blocks or so...
Anyone else losing connectivity quite a bit all of a sudden? We have a few different IP options right? I'm using 162.243.67.4. What are the others?
HELP
I have a mac and window, I happily set up the window with the new coyotte miner. I extrated the targz and put the miner to /opt/coyote_miner. then i try to run it with the ip and the address behind. Also tried the method previously mentioned with "cd ./&&./ coyotte_miner"(not exactly, but sth like that).
While both have failed with this following thing:
dyld Symbol not found: __...............Prime_rehash_policy.......
Referenced from: /opt/coyotte_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
Trace/BPT trap 5
logout
Might anyone help me with some command or point what I am doing wrong. Thanks
How long has it been down?
Since admin go to sleep - ddos starts immediatly >:(How long has it been down?
How long has it been down?
I'm back... I do not have access to the server, it is not responding to pings!
./coyote_miner: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./coyote_miner)
Hey,
i am trying to start your linux miner on debian wheezy but i am getting this error:Code: [Select]./coyote_miner: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./coyote_miner)
Any ideas how to fix it?
Hey,
i am trying to start your linux miner on debian wheezy but i am getting this error:Code: [Select]./coyote_miner: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./coyote_miner)
Any ideas how to fix it?
(http://the-iland.net/static/cpu_history.png)
Looks like DDOS attack on the pool and now I cannot access it from outside of DO's network.
Byte, payments coming through. Got two now? Is that you paying?
I believe everyone has been paid, all balances report 0 right now.
I believe everyone has been paid, all balances report 0 right now.
I have an idea!
Hopefully the pool will be backup within 10 minutes.
I have an idea!
Hopefully the pool will be backup within 10 minutes.
I am attempting to do a port forward from a bunch of different machines, but running into some trouble.
ssh root@localhost -g -L 1337:ptsmine.beeeeer.org:1337 -N
i did not get paid i had lke 12pts in my balance PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr
I had approx 400hpm going there...Please look in to this
I am attempting to do a port forward from a bunch of different machines, but running into some trouble.
i did not get paid i had lke 12pts in my balance PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr
I had approx 400hpm going there...Please look in to this
Anyone else not get payment? Your address is not in my logs.
well i was running it on like 20 computers.. so my approx could be worng as ll computers dont update at the same time...I have not recieved a payment since alpha
pls tell me ,this pool's fee is 10% or free ,now??
i'm telling you i have not recieved a payment since alpha... I have been a faithful alpha tester since the beginning.
I have no transaction on protshare qt since alpha. for coyote.
So i cant understand why your logs willsay you paid me when i did not recieve any payments while coypte was launched.
in Alpha i did over 50pts...
this my last transaction i recieved from you
Status: 828 confirmations
Date: 11/10/2013 18:11
From: unknown
To: PZ3xhpqm3eqxhdjZT655cfArSNUAzPjkhV (own address, label: Alpha Miner)
Credit: 3.88477 PTS
Net amount: +3.88477 PTS
Transaction ID: b8bdf981624e4a73b6b59e15d7d56689cf8ea833c935c73eea01ed33fd15c628
this my last transaction i recieved from you
Status: 828 confirmations
Date: 11/10/2013 18:11
From: unknown
To: PZ3xhpqm3eqxhdjZT655cfArSNUAzPjkhV (own address, label: Alpha Miner)
Credit: 3.88477 PTS
Net amount: +3.88477 PTS
Transaction ID: b8bdf981624e4a73b6b59e15d7d56689cf8ea833c935c73eea01ed33fd15c628
this my last transaction i recieved from you
Status: 828 confirmations
Date: 11/10/2013 18:11
From: unknown
To: PZ3xhpqm3eqxhdjZT655cfArSNUAzPjkhV (own address, label: Alpha Miner)
Credit: 3.88477 PTS
Net amount: +3.88477 PTS
Transaction ID: b8bdf981624e4a73b6b59e15d7d56689cf8ea833c935c73eea01ed33fd15c628
btsblock.com is down, does anyone else have a way to quickly verify the trx IDS below:
20131112T072803.846542, PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr, 207058663, 9c416b85e9240395b06c218a53f41e36ddb64922bc7b96c05d0ee9737c745d07
20131112T094757.821692, PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr, 273055284, dd94db393c2a8a95a0f56745eddba2c5007f84ace8bf3fc295f587d76e003aaf
20131112T141004.725501, PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr, 290769426, 0931b4045fa98aa8a8de17be80867b20d2cdf51cdbf8e8000ecc916f7b12f335
20131112T141143.745101, PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr, 872308281, fd720aa3e5696615095e1ffe932297b78cccbf735718fe40fbf7636f32bf57fb
Make sure your node is fully connected to the network. Perhaps rescan?
is there a version 3 of protshare qt?
I juts recieved a payment form beeer pool
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 11/12/2013 11:00
From: unknown
To: PiVtAzYjZ1ssWagMvf3V4UFPhFSMTGkfQr (own address, label: ptsminer)
Credit: 1.18360019 PTS
Net amount: +1.18360019 PTS
Transaction ID: 2f4d0817cbc2ca711b7ccfb60aff9986030f9da0bb581f3ada470e0a2ac42416
First i will like to apologize... I was looking for the Alpha Miner Address it some how coming under ptsminer now..
All payments have been recieved
Sorry again for al the confusion
30% fee now?
Well, that is one way to redistribute the load to other pools. :o30% fee now?
WOW.. 30%???
30% fee now?
WOW.. 30%???
30% fee now?
WOW.. 30%???
Darn it... wrong pool! Back to 10%.
I have a pool in Russia that is getting 30% orphans... I reset the wrong one by accident... I will lower the fee to 5% for a while to make up for that, sorry!
Does anyone have a guide on setting this pool up on linux please? I'll be using putty on a remote server.
bytemaster do we have a failsafe now for ddos attacks
My balance resets to 0 after each share I make. Can you explain and update this in first post so other people will understand as well?Every time a block is found it prints that, it is safe to ignore.
valid: 1 invalid: 0 balance: 0.00860232 paid: 0 earned: 0.00860232 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: [removed] hpm: 50.4834
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: [removed] hpm: 50.3635
Does anyone have a guide on setting this pool up on linux please? I'll be using putty on a remote server.
wget http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
tar xsfv linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 YOURADDR
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 64.8988
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 41.9659
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 32.5036
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 31.0205
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 32.1711
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 29.2711
this my last transaction i recieved from you
Status: 828 confirmations
Date: 11/10/2013 18:11
From: unknown
To: PZ3xhpqm3eqxhdjZT655cfArSNUAzPjkhV (own address, label: Alpha Miner)
Credit: 3.88477 PTS
Net amount: +3.88477 PTS
Transaction ID: b8bdf981624e4a73b6b59e15d7d56689cf8ea833c935c73eea01ed33fd15c628
http://btsblock.com/ but it seems slow or down
15 of the last 20 blocks goto ypool.... deversification?
Is it possible that the pool is finding 6 blocks in under a minute?Code: [Select]valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 64.8988
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 41.9659
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 32.5036
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 31.0205
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 32.1711
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00860232 fee: 5% address: Pnh3Zuy4bKxUioCjMFJhaT3W5RYUpD8pWd hpm: 29.2711
Does anyone have a guide on setting this pool up on linux please? I'll be using putty on a remote server.Try this.
I just paid everyone their balances... happy mining!Thank you sir! 8)
Does anyone have a guide on setting this pool up on linux please? I'll be using putty on a remote server.Try this.
cd ~
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev
sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
wget --no-check-certificate https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
tar -xvzf linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
mkdir -p bin
cd bin
wget --no-check-certificate http://bitsharestalk.org/PubDownloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
tar zxvf linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz
chmod +x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
thanks bytemaster.
any chance we will see payment from the mining pool yesterday morning? Previous pool...
Fee 10% now?
When was linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz released? Is this a required update as I am using the last one issued under 1.0.
When was linux_coyote_miner.0.2.3.tar.gz released? Is this a required update as I am using the last one issued under 1.0.
Amazon just renamed it to match the windows version, it is the same as 0.1.0 :)
c6b9f6a
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0244487 paid: 0 earned: 0.0244487 pps: 0.0
0814957 fee: 10% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 14.4748
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.8789
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.9417
hpm: 14.3566http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg5006#msg5006Code: [Select]c6b9f6a
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0244487 paid: 0 earned: 0.0244487 pps: 0.0
0814957 fee: 10% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 14.4748
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.8789
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.9417
hpm: 14.3566
Ehm...
Oh thanks, sorry for asking but over 20+ pages in 2 days is hard to find what are you looking forhttp://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg5006#msg5006Code: [Select]c6b9f6a
valid: 3 invalid: 0 balance: 0.0244487 paid: 0 earned: 0.0244487 pps: 0.0
0814957 fee: 10% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 14.4748
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.8789
valid: 0 invalid: 0 balance: 0 paid: 0 earned: 0 pps: 0.00814957 fee: 10
% address: PZTEhzwzLiVREiYHLRrJudCzHXb1uu2RDJ hpm: 13.9417
hpm: 14.3566
Ehm...
I just found that for Referral Bonus we need your e-mail, but I will post you name :) if you will do registration and you will find your name in Referral Bonus you know what to do with it :)
Hi guys.. need some help. I'm a Windows guy and I've just invested in some new hardware based on linux. Its expensive but what the hell.
Spec:
Debian 7.0 x64
Will someone help me setup via putty please?
Thank you.
PS. I have putty ready.
Hi guys.. need some help. I'm a Windows guy and I've just invested in some new hardware based on linux. Its expensive but what the hell.
Spec:
Debian 7.0 x64
Will someone help me setup via putty please?
Thank you.
PS. I have putty ready.
Try this:
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=236.msg5114#msg5114
Does anyone have a guide on setting this pool up on linux please? I'll be using putty on a remote server.Try this.
cd ~
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y git make g++ build-essential libminiupnpc-dev
sudo apt-get install -y libboost-all-dev libdb++-dev libgmp-dev libssl-dev dos2unix
wget --no-check-certificate https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
tar -xvzf linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
chmod u+x coyote_miner
./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
Got this error: ./coyote_miner: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./coyote_miner)
Got this error: ./coyote_miner: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./coyote_miner)
http://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=479.msg4680#msg4680
Hey everyone... I am going to get some sleep. If there is any problem with the pool PM user Stan or Lighthouse and they will be able to reach me.
Hey everyone... I am going to get some sleep. If there is any problem with the pool PM user Stan or Lighthouse and they will be able to reach me.
If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
I just found that for Referral Bonus we need your e-mail, but I will post you name :) if you will do registration and you will find your name in Referral Bonus you know what to do with it :)
If we can identify who it was we will credit it. It is all manual so lots of room to adjust.
Can anyone explain what this keyhotee referral bonus is that people are talking about?
If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
I've found one instant is only using 50% CPU (8 core).
If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
i'd suggest installing screen
apt-get install screen
if you start it you'll see a normal shell
use strg+a c to create another
strg+a n to switch between shells
with strag+a d you can detach: you may end putty and your miner continue to work
with screen -r you'll attach again
If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]I don't know if running multiple instances is supported but if it is, it might help to use a tool called 'screen', if it is not installed: apt-get install screen
screen -dmS coyote1 ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]screen -dmS coyote2 ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]then you can type 'screen -r coyote2' and it will connect to that session.run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS] 8If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
i'd suggest installing screen
apt-get install screen
if you start it you'll see a normal shell
use strg+a c to create another
strg+a n to switch between shells
with strag+a d you can detach: you may end putty and your miner continue to work
with screen -r you'll attach again
Problem is, I have 8 cores and one session is only using 50% CPU. Why? How can i push it in one instances? Or do i need to run two? I don't mind having two puttys for now till I learn more.
run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS] 8If i wanted to run multiple instances, do i run putty again and run: ./coyote_miner 162.243.67.4 [PTS ADDRESS]
i'd suggest installing screen
apt-get install screen
if you start it you'll see a normal shell
use strg+a c to create another
strg+a n to switch between shells
with strag+a d you can detach: you may end putty and your miner continue to work
with screen -r you'll attach again
Problem is, I have 8 cores and one session is only using 50% CPU. Why? How can i push it in one instances? Or do i need to run two? I don't mind having two puttys for now till I learn more.
(note the 8 on the end, try that)
Is this pool online right now? IRC bot isn't responding ...?
./coyote_miner: cannot execute binary file
How to do On centos 6.3...
:'(
./coyote: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: bad ELF interpreter:
PLZ help me
haven't gotten a payout in a while, what is the min payout here again?
I downloaded the ProtoShares wallet. It linked on its own. I clicked mine! It Started! Works fine on my HP p6000 4 core AMD 6g ram. I have not seen any pts show up in the wallet yet.
sorry i will leave your forum.Now that you have the ProtoShares wallet setup, you might have better luck downloading the Coyote Miner and joining the pool to earn PTS. Solo mining can be quite hard at this point. Check out page 1 for more information.
Is Coyote miner closed source?This is the only information I have seen on that question:
With or without 8 I'm getting 16.1772hpm That's not right :(The linux client it should use all of the cores you have available. No need to run multiple instances.
I'll try adding 16 to the end or multiple instances
With or without 8 I'm getting 16.1772hpm That's not right :(The linux client it should use all of the cores you have available. No need to run multiple instances.
I'll try adding 16 to the end or multiple instances
What is the output of (syntax may very a bit by distro):
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -c "^processor"
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "^model name" | uniq
If I had to guess the 50% is because of the block time (start, stop, start etc). I will check with mine to confirm..
Edit: Hmm a lot of mine are doing the same. Using ~55% of the CPU per thread.
How to do On centos 6.3...
:'(
./coyote: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: bad ELF interpreter:
PLZ help me
I yet to get this pool to work with centos.
Down?I am... or was.. now back..
I trust you all got your latest payouts OK :)
Down?I am... or was.. now back..
Down?I am... or was.. now back..
PS. I cant get over 50% of CPU use on Ubuntu. Someone else confirms the same. I also tried Deb. I goto go get some sleep. Please can someone confirm. Thanks
Even on two inst its the same. 20hpm on one inst 50% CPU, then two inst @ 10hpm each and still 50% cpu.
EDIT: However, I'm relying on the graph online to show CPU usage.
Even on two inst its the same. 20hpm on one inst 50% CPU, then two inst @ 10hpm each and still 50% cpu.
EDIT: However, I'm relying on the graph online to show CPU usage.
Run your two instances in tmux or screen. Then at a normal shell prompt, type top and press enter.
Once top comes up, press the 1 key to see the usage for each processor. My guess is that your using it all.
Blocks are flying by too fast again. There is someone with either a perfect algo or some serious clusters involved now. Probably someone in China
Blocks are flying by too fast again. There is someone with either a perfect algo or some serious clusters involved now. Probably someone in China
The number of connections to my pools have doubled. And ypool is dominating right now with their 5x miner. Fortunately a difficulty adjustment on the order of 8x+ is coming in about 16 hours.
I thought I would mention this, a Chinese fiat/PTS exchange trading at 17.45 CYN => $2.86
http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=pts
With an average PC able to earn 2-3 PTS /day right now, there is a 3x profit over cost of electricity to mine. After the next difficulty adjustment we may be approaching the cost of electricity which should slow things down a bit.
Either top or ideally htop (break down by thread)
Either top or ideally htop (break down by thread)
Sorry pal.
I didn't get it.
Would you elaborate more on that please.
I'm a damn poor noobie...
I thought I would mention this, a Chinese fiat/PTS exchange trading at 17.45 CYN => $2.86
http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=pts
With an average PC able to earn 2-3 PTS /day right now, there is a 3x profit over cost of electricity to mine. After the next difficulty adjustment we may be approaching the cost of electricity which should slow things down a bit.
that is unless the price goes up!!!
And it will :) I have solid intelligence that a top 3 BTC exchange will be listing PTS within a week. Note: we did not partner with them... they are doing this on their own initiative.
Either top or ideally htop (break down by thread)
Sorry pal.
I didn't get it.
Would you elaborate more on that please.
I'm a damn poor noobie...
'top' and 'htop' are both commands you can type in linux that will show you the processes that are running as well as more advanced info.
if you are running ubuntu or debian, and htop is not installed type: sudo apt-get install htop
I thought I would mention this, a Chinese fiat/PTS exchange trading at 17.45 CYN => $2.86
http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=pts
With an average PC able to earn 2-3 PTS /day right now, there is a 3x profit over cost of electricity to mine. After the next difficulty adjustment we may be approaching the cost of electricity which should slow things down a bit.
that is unless the price goes up!!!
And it will :) I have solid intelligence that a top 3 BTC exchange will be listing PTS within a week. Note: we did not partner with them... they are doing this on their own initiative.
who can tell me the "3BCT" address?thanks.I thought I would mention this, a Chinese fiat/PTS exchange trading at 17.45 CYN => $2.86
http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=pts
With an average PC able to earn 2-3 PTS /day right now, there is a 3x profit over cost of electricity to mine. After the next difficulty adjustment we may be approaching the cost of electricity which should slow things down a bit.
that is unless the price goes up!!!
And it will :) I have solid intelligence that a top 3 BTC exchange will be listing PTS within a week. Note: we did not partner with them... they are doing this on their own initiative.
who can tell me the "3BCT" address?thanks.I thought I would mention this, a Chinese fiat/PTS exchange trading at 17.45 CYN => $2.86
http://www.btc38.com/trade.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=pts
With an average PC able to earn 2-3 PTS /day right now, there is a 3x profit over cost of electricity to mine. After the next difficulty adjustment we may be approaching the cost of electricity which should slow things down a bit.
that is unless the price goes up!!!
And it will :) I have solid intelligence that a top 3 BTC exchange will be listing PTS within a week. Note: we did not partner with them... they are doing this on their own initiative.
Blocks are flying very quickly again with a lot of blocks being lost as orphans. I am going to have to increase the effective difficulty or lose money, fees are going up to 15% until the next difficulty increase, then I will restore 5% fees. Thank you for understanding.
Blocks are flying very quickly again with a lot of blocks being lost as orphans. I am going to have to increase the effective difficulty or lose money, fees are going up to 15% until the next difficulty increase, then I will restore 5% fees. Thank you for understanding.
I would guess your next chain will have an very high starting difficulty and simply let the algorithm lower it down over time? :D
Blocks are flying very quickly again with a lot of blocks being lost as orphans. I am going to have to increase the effective difficulty or lose money, fees are going up to 15% until the next difficulty increase, then I will restore 5% fees. Thank you for understanding.
I have concluded that I need to exit the fixed-price per-share market and adopt a model similar to the other pools. I am looking for someone who would like to run a traditional pool on behalf of Invictus and split the fees. Please contact me if you would like to set that up.
bytemaster, my >7PTS already gone ?
it is 6th time i write about this, here and PM
bytemaster, 15% ... really? If you need this to pay orphans, you should consider another payout system.
bytemaster, 15% ... really? If you need this to pay orphans, you should consider another payout system.
I am actively working on a new payout system that accounts for only blocks I find. It is just as stressful for me when I am losing money left and right. If we weren't finding blocks every 30 seconds this wouldn't really be an issue.
I have set up a secondary pool, the primary pool is having some trouble with the load: 192.241.139.62
I would appreciate it if some people would switch over to it. Thanks.
bytemaster, 15% ... really? If you need this to pay orphans, you should consider another payout system.
I am actively working on a new payout system that accounts for only blocks I find. It is just as stressful for me when I am losing money left and right. If we weren't finding blocks every 30 seconds this wouldn't really be an issue.
I have set up a secondary pool, the primary pool is having some trouble with the load: 192.241.139.62
I would appreciate it if some people would switch over to it. Thanks.
Doing it now
You will have two independent balances, you will not lose anything.
You will have two independent balances, you will not lose anything.
i lost >7PTS 2 days ago.
can you finally check pms ?
Bytemaster do you have a donation address? Would like to send some PTS your way for the new payout system effort.
Good news... I am working on binaries that I think can compete with ypool in CPM/HPM performance... Will report back when I am done testing.Looking forward to playing with that. 8)
Good news... I am working on binaries that I think can compete with ypool in CPM/HPM performance... Will report back when I am done testing.Looking forward to playing with that. 8)
Any word on ypool's performance on a 3.4 Ghz i7 iMac? I am seeing 100 HPM.
Good news... I am working on binaries that I think can compete with ypool in CPM/HPM performance... Will report back when I am done testing.
I can tell you on a i7 2600k i am getting 116 col/m with ypool.
does Getwork protocol also mean you can use it for solo mining?
totally stopping ? :o
ETA on shutdown?
Unfortunately, ypool does not have a linux client as of yet.
Unfortunately, ypool does not have a linux client as of yet.
Pool down...
???
git clone https://github.com/Tydus/jhProtominer -b linux-port ; cd jhProtominer/src/jhProtominer ;make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native"
./jhProtominer -o ypool.net -u yago.propinas -p x -m512 -t 4
It is back up! Sorry power outage killed my internet at the wrong time.
It is back up! Sorry power outage killed my internet at the wrong time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLo-ylNPXyE
???
git clone https://github.com/Tydus/jhProtominer -b linux-port ; cd jhProtominer/src/jhProtominer ;make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native"
./jhProtominer -o ypool.net -u yago.propinas -p x -m512 -t 4
Getting an error stating the cpu is not supported.
???
git clone https://github.com/Tydus/jhProtominer -b linux-port ; cd jhProtominer/src/jhProtominer ;make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native"
./jhProtominer -o ypool.net -u yago.propinas -p x -m512 -t 4
Getting an error stating the cpu is not supported.
When I open the application the windows pops up and shuts down after 1 sec, any idea?
When I open the application the windows pops up and shuts down after 1 sec, any idea?
No idea at all, I open mine through the batch file, open that up.
I just want everyone to know that 1 out of 3 blocks I find is orphaned. As a result even with a 30% fee I might not break even. At this point the pool is a public service.ypool is too carzy now~!It'bad to Protoshares,almost 95% blocks in ypool and fee is carzy high!
I suspect that if you look at the PTS per hash that you get from other pools you will see the same thing. They only pay you for the blocks found. I am doing the same thing.
I will continue to monitor the situation carefully.
I just want everyone to know that 1 out of 3 blocks I find is orphaned. As a result even with a 30% fee I might not break even. At this point the pool is a public service.
I suspect that if you look at the PTS per hash that you get from other pools you will see the same thing. They only pay you for the blocks found. I am doing the same thing.
I will continue to monitor the situation carefully.
Payments made.All work. Fee 30% for a long time?
Payments made.
I just want everyone to know that 1 out of 3 blocks I find is orphaned. As a result even with a 30% fee I might not break even. At this point the pool is a public service.
I suspect that if you look at the PTS per hash that you get from other pools you will see the same thing. They only pay you for the blocks found. I am doing the same thing.
I will continue to monitor the situation carefully.
Our friends at Ypool are grabbing all the blocks because they are filled with botnets. I know you say that PTS were designed to be bot proof, but that does not appear to be the case. Ypool is down now. Otherwise I would post some examples of the hashrates certain users are getting. Some of these are confirmed bots.
The owner of pools that allow botnets are only doing it out of greed. These botnets steal the vast majority of the PTS from each block and then those of us who are mining legitimately are left with leftovers.
Payments made.
Was there a min payout?
Payments made.
Was there a min payout?
.01 PTS
How do you tell the difference between a botnet and 1000 EC2 instances?
If what you say is true, I would guess that ypool and its users are responsible for the DDOS attack against my pool the other day.
It is a shame that pre-mining is considered so bad. In the future, it may be better to design a GPU-friendly algorithm. That should at least slow-down the bot nets.
miyayi 468.000000 0.061261If I am reading that right, 468 Shares earns .062161 PTS the PPS for ypool is .00013
Keep in mind, botnets are not free either. The "owners" of these botnets face opportunity cost like everyone else.
They mine and dump and so the botnets may profit, they do so at the expense of Invictus which would be ridiculed for pre-mining if we had simply sold into the market.
Is it possible to mine multiple pc with one wallet adress on this miner?
wget https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz Connecting to the-iland.net (the-iland.net)|64.90.183.137|:443... connected.
ERROR: cannot verify the-iland.net's certificate, issued by ‘/C=US/ST=Virginia/O=The iLand Nation/CN=the-iland.net/emailAddress=admin@the-iland.net’:
Self-signed certificate encountered.
To connect to the-iland.net insecurely, use `--no-check-certificate'.when try to wget the coyote miner fromCode: [Select]wget https://the-iland.net/static/downloads/linux_coyote_miner.0.1.0.tar.gz
i get this messageCode: [Select]Connecting to the-iland.net (the-iland.net)|64.90.183.137|:443... connected.
ERROR: cannot verify the-iland.net's certificate, issued by ‘/C=US/ST=Virginia/O=The iLand Nation/CN=the-iland.net/emailAddress=admin@the-iland.net’:
Self-signed certificate encountered.
To connect to the-iland.net insecurely, use `--no-check-certificate'.
anybody wiht same issue before!?
I just want everyone to know that 1 out of 3 blocks I find is orphaned. As a result even with a 30% fee I might not break even. At this point the pool is a public service.
I suspect that if you look at the PTS per hash that you get from other pools you will see the same thing. They only pay you for the blocks found. I am doing the same thing.
I will continue to monitor the situation carefully.
Our friends at Ypool are grabbing all the blocks because they are filled with botnets. I know you say that PTS were designed to be bot proof, but that does not appear to be the case. Ypool is down now. Otherwise I would post some examples of the hashrates certain users are getting. Some of these are confirmed bots.
The owner of pools that allow botnets are only doing it out of greed. These botnets steal the vast majority of the PTS from each block and then those of us who are mining legitimately are left with leftovers.
How do you tell the difference between a botnet and 1000 EC2 instances?
If what you say is true, I would guess that ypool and its users are responsible for the DDOS attack against my pool the other day.
It is a shame that pre-mining is considered so bad. In the future, it may be better to design a GPU-friendly algorithm. That should at least slow-down the bot nets.
I started a new thread to gauge interest in a new pool that pays once per day proportional to ACTUAL shares earned and charges a 3% fee. It would also use my new faster miner.
This thread will be left for my fixed price pool...
or the pool should ask the user how many ip's are being used for submitting shares.
If >100 then a solid explanation should be made. Otherwise if not confirmed, everything above the first 10 ip's should be discarded...
Same trick can be done in some formula for submitted shares / minute.
Where are the links and what are the current revision numbers? (And thanks for your continued progress)
Are you sure your miner is still doing hpm and not cpm? Because numbers are pretty close to my cpm with other mines and hpm would make yours alot faster...
old pool still running??what time to pay ?? amost 10 pts in old pool balance?? wallet:PiJgNrw6vuEEqz2gzdtyNVXgLbiLpQ7RvaAre you sure your miner is still doing hpm and not cpm? Because numbers are pretty close to my cpm with other mines and hpm would make yours alot faster...
CPM == HPM by my view of things :)
old pool still running??what time to pay ?? amost 10 pts in old pool balance?? wallet:PiJgNrw6vuEEqz2gzdtyNVXgLbiLpQ7RvaAre you sure your miner is still doing hpm and not cpm? Because numbers are pretty close to my cpm with other mines and hpm would make yours alot faster...
CPM == HPM by my view of things :)
THere are still 1000+ nodes connected to the old pool... *shakes head*.... I guess I will pay everyone there now.We could use those nodes on the new pool! Why not give them 24 hours notice and then stop the old pool service?
THere are still 1000+ nodes connected to the old pool... *shakes head*.... I guess I will pay everyone there now.We could use those nodes on the new pool! Why not give them 24 hours notice and then stop the old pool service?
thanks bytemaster.
any chance we will see payment from the mining pool yesterday morning? Previous pool...
I am working on that one... the database is a real mess and I don't know how to sort it out fairly :(
In total the pool had only a couple hundred PTS on its balance sheet, and everyone was paid up within 5 PTS because of automatic payments (pre-fork).
Post-fork, a lot of balances accrued but due to the crashes I was fighting I didn't earn much :(
thanks bytemaster.
any chance we will see payment from the mining pool yesterday morning? Previous pool...
I am working on that one... the database is a real mess and I don't know how to sort it out fairly :(
In total the pool had only a couple hundred PTS on its balance sheet, and everyone was paid up within 5 PTS because of automatic payments (pre-fork).
Post-fork, a lot of balances accrued but due to the crashes I was fighting I didn't earn much :(
Bytemaster: Did you ever make any progress on this database from alpha pool that crashed? At the time I had 17 computers mining 17 different PTS addresses. I believe I have between 40 and 80 PTS combined balance on that pool.
I recognize you are a busy man but I'm hoping you can get this straightened out eventually. The couple hundred PTS in that database are now worth thousands to the people that mined them.
Here are the 17 addresses I was mining:
PkV84vU2FYauFQHGgthBChuoRHPZeWJzvw
PcwZAWScgJEyyy3L9zG5BL8YwPNnF68dXD
PfkBrBCfnS5N7pVoCR6fR4YPcjnLQjMUEq
PgCP4azTyUVFZwwQCmLNHL7vkMUdomEoDi
Pdmv9MJyoZvyNVpZmnPKAJzoYvTyRAxAzf
PvKUHTrXChx4adLLWTbUQUpAtMeUrbTjTK
PexR1dzYAYz6nyXASYQTypLEQ61aVGGV38
PjwiDcenggFkzS9aFeczrjbop76FDZ6PxF
PuwYci4psLbjAGzMF9XbcVPjZoF3ubstXn
PdGhDow5u1Ej1skWc19jpZU4rHEK4yj1Vz
PaUA6ytCVTYBxgjrBbHbKVDEwn1rZaTMBM
PkkaHJzx4SpMRfaLge9rAyBH1PVoBGHJuX
PgCmJMkG8VvEXiHx7mdfe82QdiSYGtLoYq
PhfcTjtCvfTrFkmVwa9VcaqTyCigPu8Gmp
Pr1xJitx6P97sy8Cj2quFNiBVQqhBdW73o
Po1HXF3fSERk57Chfq5ZxJNaBAEXREPbnS
Pd6f4U6QtFq1E6C9B8cXX74V1hpCmSNsEJ
I have just paid out over 550 PTS that was on the balance sheet of the alpha pool at the time I shut it down. To the best of my knowledge all funds have been paid. It might take these transactions a while to propagate through the network because they all build on top of one another. Any other losses or missing PTS will have to considered part of the alpha testing and I am truly sorry for the bugs. Please understand that I have paid out more than I earned on this pool in an attempt to make everyone whole.
Some of you may have been paid twice, consider it your lucky day.
Thanks for helping me test my pool!
I have just paid out over 550 PTS that was on the balance sheet of the alpha pool at the time I shut it down. To the best of my knowledge all funds have been paid. It might take these transactions a while to propagate through the network because they all build on top of one another. Any other losses or missing PTS will have to considered part of the alpha testing and I am truly sorry for the bugs. Please understand that I have paid out more than I earned on this pool in an attempt to make everyone whole.
Some of you may have been paid twice, consider it your lucky day.
Thanks for helping me test my pool!
I sent a transaction to myself as the last trx and have not yet received it. It is taking the network longer than I expected to process these transactions so please be patient and I will let you know when I have received my final transaction.
I have not received payment for 24 houк work. My wallet PqCyB8BTGzWRcnPuA5vCByddGU8hnBwrtj
What happened?
I have slowly been receiving the transactions. The first one came right before my thank you response. I have gotten 8 different payments since (17 total addresses). So I'd guess we are about half way through the payout propogation.
Bytemaster. I just got payment on PfkBrBCfnS5N7pVoCR6fR4YPcjnLQjMUEq Maybe that will help you see where we are.
Thanks again
The slow confirmation times appear to be the result of one or more miners having adopted a policy of refusing to include more than one transaction per block. See here:
http://btsblock.com/chain/ProtoShares
Ypool (the largest pool) appears to be one the bad actors. If you compare block numbers from their stats page to the blockchain explorer, it looks like all of ypool's blocks are only including 1 transaction at most.
Thus, everyone trying to send PTS through the network is having to wait until someone else (such as the beeeeer pool) find a block, at which point a bunch of transactions finally get included in a block.
Why would they refuse transactions?
I hadn't realized this was going on, but was noticing that most of my transactions took 2-4 blocks before getting confirmed, even though I paid the fees. At least now I know why that was happening.
FYI - I have still not received my final transaction, so there are still network propagation delays of epic proportions. Anyone who has received a payout please post so that we can all feel better about these shares in limbo...
./coyote_miner
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Referenced from: /Users/ali/Downloads/./coyote_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
dyld: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Referenced from: /Users/ali/Downloads/./coyote_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
Trace/BPT trap: 5
I get this on OS X Mavericks when trying to execute your binary:Code: [Select]./coyote_miner
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Referenced from: /Users/ali/Downloads/./coyote_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
dyld: Symbol not found: __ZNKSt8__detail20_Prime_rehash_policy11_M_next_bktEm
Referenced from: /Users/ali/Downloads/./coyote_miner
Expected in: /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
Trace/BPT trap: 5