Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
1
General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to prevent bad debt (black swan)
« Last post by FractalNode on October 20, 2018, 08:45:03 pm »
in my opinion, we should redirect revenue from the transaction fee that is currently being transferred into the committee-trade account and return it to MPA Shorters (and MPA holders), at the same time we should start implementing BSIP 0019 and BSIP 0020. These features should be the heart of BitShares from the very beginning available to every user.

related thread
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26072.msg321168#msg321168
2
General Discussion / Re: suggestion on a bounty based marketing worker proposal
« Last post by armin on October 20, 2018, 07:25:44 pm »
I think bitcrab is not trying to just pay people to "list tokens", instead he wants lobbyist to explain to the exchanges what's the benefit of listing the token for THEMSELVES, that will result in a much better chance of having the token listed for a long time because the exchanges understand that it benefits them greatly
3
In a decentralized exchange you can't get your money back if you lose your private key
4
I welcome you, dear witnesses and members of the Committee!

I appeal to you on the recommendation of one of your colleagues under the nickname "Xeroc". I need your urgent help in this situation.

17-th october.2018 I agreed with" Bugaga " (this is his username in the telegram) to buy 634.71 bitUSD from him for rubles and mistakenly gave him the wrong address of my account. Instead of "zubcoin66" which I control, I wrote him "seyseich66". And when I realized I'd made a mistake, it was too late. He has already sent 634.71 bitUSD from his "buritto-forrest" bitshares account.

Despite the fact that the account "seyseich66" is  also registered by me about a year ago, I do not have a saved password to access it. How can I prove to you that it is my account? Indirect proof is that the login "seyseich66" is unique on the Internet.

Please look my profiles (they all are older than a year) at social networks:

- https://vk.com/seyseich66
- https://www.facebook.com/seyseich66
- https://twitter.com/seyseich66

My email address is also [email protected]

And I can easily prove that I control all these accounts with a private reply message. But I have no control over seyseich66's account in bitshares network because it was just a first try of the registration (test) and I didn't save the password. And you all may wonder: "Why then did you give the sender this address?". And I say, "Because I'm positioned as "seyseich66" everywhere except bitshares network, so it was a mistake simply due to my inattention, forgetfulness and hurry.

It will not be difficult to verify that this account is "dead", that is, for him throughout the time since his registration there are no transactions, except for one incoming 634.71 bitUSD.

And I kindly want to ask you, who have such a power, to do one of two possible actions:
1) Sending back 634.71 bitUSD to the sender;
2) in any way give me access to the seyseich66 account.

I decided to appeal to you, because for me 634.71 bitUSD is a significant summ of money, and I can not afford to lose it. After all, in any case it is my mistake, and I have to pay the sender the equivalent of this amount in rubles. While he is waiting for the resolution of the situation with your help and he is ready to confirm that he really transferred me the above amount from his account "buritto-forrest" in this forum topic.

Thank you in advance and waiting for an answer.
5
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] blckchnd
« Last post by blockchained on October 20, 2018, 06:19:00 pm »
TT (Travelchain) Delisting Announcement can be found HERE
6
General Discussion / Re: suggestion on a bounty based marketing worker proposal
« Last post by Customminer on October 20, 2018, 01:32:47 pm »
Quote from: customminer
...otherwise what's preventing these exchanges from simply delisting these tokens in a few months due to a lack of liquidity like multiple CEX have done in the past?

Have other exchanges listed bitUSD and bitCNY historically?
Yes, and removed them due to low liquidity.
7
General Discussion / Re: suggestion on a bounty based marketing worker proposal
« Last post by matle85 on October 20, 2018, 01:30:35 pm »

...otherwise what's preventing these exchanges from simply delisting these tokens in a few months due to a lack of liquidity like multiple CEX have done in the past?
[/quote]

Have other exchanges listed bitUSD and bitCNY historically?

8
B
Blockchain Solutions World закончился, встречайте OpenLedger на трьох событиях в следующем месяце



16-18 октября команда OpenLedger приняла участие в Blockchain Solutions World . Многочисленные участники из разных стран прибыли в Барселону, Испания, чтобы присоединиться к мероприятию, посвященному блочной цепи и криптоэкономике.


Ведущие эксперты в области блокчейн в мире освещали практические примеры использования и высказывали свое мнение о роли блокчейна в разных вертикальных отраслях: здравоохранении, энергетике, производстве и цепочках поставок и многом другом. Участники также принимали участие в панельных дискуссиях, мастер-сессиях и презентациях, среди других мероприятий.


Генеральный директор OpenLedger Ронни Босинг представил свой доклад «Как  BlockChain может помочь ООН в  достижении своих глобальных целей к 2030 году», и Юрий Чернявский , вице-президент по развитию бизнеса, рассказал о DAO Space OpenLedger - блок-цепочке, лежащей в основе бизнес-операций.

Благодаря организаторам мероприятия для отличных сетевых возможностей и особой благодарности всем, кто пришел на стенд OpenLedger, чтобы пообщаться с нами.



В следующем месяце OpenLedger собирается посетить три других мероприятия:


* Malta Blockchain Summit 1/2-го ноября .
* Blockchain Life 2018 в ноябре 7-8 (Санкт-Петербург,Россия).
* Blockchain Expo North America 28-29 ноября (
Кремниевая долина, Сан-Франциско, Калифорния, США).





Следите за  OpenLedger в соц.сетях!

:: Twitter ::
:: Facebook::
:: LinkedIn ::
:: YouTube ::
:: Telegram ::
:: SubReddit::
:: Twitter handle ::

9
General Discussion / Re: suggestion on a bounty based marketing worker proposal
« Last post by Customminer on October 20, 2018, 12:18:15 pm »
Simply adding a smartcoin isn't that impressive a feat for a centralized exchange, I'd fully support these bounties for CEX which allow borrowing bitCNY using BTS from the CEX interface resulting in BTS returning from CEX to the BTS DEX whilst providing BTS buy pressure and bitCNY liquidity within the CEX. Alternatively, if these large exchanges are convinced to create a BTS DEX gateway or bridge, that'd be far more valuable than a single token being added to a CEX.

https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2017-10-compliance Already covers this topic, no? "$50,000 worth of BTS in each case we convince an exchange (i.e. Kraken, bitstamp, coinbase, bitcoin.de) to list any asset (pair) that is primarily hosted on BitShares."

I don't think 'Bitfinex' should count, aren't they behind Tether & thus a direct competitor? If Tether collapses then won't Bitfinex too?

Binance doesn't charge for addition anymore, couldn't a community based application suffice?

it add much complex for CEXs to build a BTS DEX gateway or enable borrowing from BTS DEX, if some CEX are interested in this it can be handled in a single event.

bounty means "if you make something done, you will get the reward", so it doesn't matter if it is impossible for Bitfinex to adopt smartcoin, what happend recently to USDT hurt the reputation of Tether greatly, but I believe Bitfinex will continue be one of the most important CEX in this area.

the bounty is not for paying to CEX for listing, it is pay for the lobbyists that can make things happen, I believe CEXs like binance or huobi have some other concerns which are more important than charge: supply, pegging accuracy, remittence service..etc, the bounty is to hire salesperson actually.

Indeed it adds complexity for an CEX to add bitasset borrowing using BTS on their platform, but otherwise what's preventing these exchanges from simply delisting these tokens in a few months due to a lack of liquidity like multiple CEX have done in the past? Increased demand for bitassets does not improve supply nor pegging accuracy.

I realize that this is for paying the lobbyists, not paying the CEX a listing fee/bribe; I simply don't believe that adding a single token is worth distributing such large bounties for. That said, successfully lobbying CEX to add full bitasset borrowing capabilities to their CEX UI (increasing bitasset availability on CEX & returning BTS to the DEX from CEX - 2 birds with one stone) or getting a top CEX to run their own BTS DEX gateway/bridge services would be far more beneficial and worthwhile objectives for the BTS DEX than simply adding a single token to a CEX (anyone can fill out an application form...).

I highly doubt that if Tether collapses Bitfinex will continue to exist. They have multiple competing products to the BTS DEX, so they'd probably end up being a negative influence, no?
10
Meta / Re: @Mods
« Last post by Customminer on October 20, 2018, 11:59:51 am »
On the topic of reporting/deleting spam, if these accounts are all inactive non-approved accounts from way back, perhaps accounts should be purged if they've never posted in over a year? Or perhaps if you've not logged in for a year you should need to confirm your email or something? These spammers are persistent  :(
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10