BitShares Forum

Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: emski on October 04, 2014, 02:06:16 pm

Title: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: emski on October 04, 2014, 02:06:16 pm
http://www.bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=655151
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: Ggozzo on October 04, 2014, 02:14:45 pm
Looks like they are all price feeds from the delegate who owns "coin" and all the delegate sub-accounts.
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: emski on October 04, 2014, 02:17:31 pm
Quote from: skyscraperfarms on October 04, 2014, 02:14:45 pm
Looks like they are all price feeds from the delegate who owns "coin" and all the delegate sub-accounts.
Still the highest transactions number I've seen.
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: Ggozzo on October 04, 2014, 02:22:52 pm
Quote from: emski on October 04, 2014, 02:17:31 pm
Quote from: skyscraperfarms on October 04, 2014, 02:14:45 pm
Looks like they are all price feeds from the delegate who owns "coin" and all the delegate sub-accounts.
Still the highest transactions number I've seen.
Yeah it is pretty impressive.
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: BTSdac on October 05, 2014, 08:58:24 am
11.8 TPS,   +5%  cool
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: xeroc on October 05, 2014, 03:37:27 pm
Quote from: BTSdac on October 05, 2014, 08:58:24 am
11.8 TPS,   +5%  cool
Awesome interpretation!!
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: ozvic on October 06, 2014, 05:00:54 am
And still only 18k in size.

 +5%
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: liondani on October 06, 2014, 08:51:46 am
A stupid question:

At the time the transactions happened could it be that some forks have been created?
(Because I remember from the Dry Runs that this was the case when we pushed the network too much....)
Title: Re: 118 Transactions in single block
Post by: emski on October 06, 2014, 09:16:01 am
Quote from: liondani on October 06, 2014, 08:51:46 am
A stupid question:

At the time the transactions happened could it be that some forks have been created?
(Because I remember from the Dry Runs that this was the case when we pushed the network too much....)

Doesn't look like there are forks at that particular moment. Forks in the dry runs were during significant network load for longer periods. However I think even that was fixed.