hello
i propose to open a thread where we can put our result by processor
i'm starting :
AMD Phenom II X4 B97 3.2 Ghz : 0.4hs /min 8 thread
AMD Phenom II X4 820 2.87 Ghz : 0.4 hs /min 8 thread
AMD Phenom X4 965 0.58388289 hs /min
i5 2430M 0.83 hpm
I5 2500K : 1.1
My i5 2500k stock clock is running at 1.3 H/m. (idle process)
x2 Intel Xeon L5420 @ 1.22 H/m
i5 2.4ghz 1.523
AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz 1.58HPM
i5 3470@Win7x64 ~ 1.6hash/min
i5 3570k: 1.68 hs /min
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz 4 thread 1.75 hs /min
aws c1.8xlarge Intel Xeon-family / 1.8 hpm
3570k, at 4.2GHz, 1.93 hashes/min.
i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool
Intel i7-3612QM 2.10Ghz : 2.17 hs/min 8 thread
Core i7 3770K : 2.1
fx-6300 @ 3.5GHz - 2.2 hpm
i5-2500k @3.3 GHz (not overclocked) 2,2 HPM
E5620 => 2.3 hpm , 2.4 hpm (8 gb ram)
i7 3610qm - 2,4 (8 thread)
amd fx-8320 2.44
i7-3630QM : 2.48
i7 2600 2.56 hpm
E3 1230 V2 2.9-3.1HPM 8threads
i7-2600 => 2.8 hpm , 2.9 hpm (16 gb ram)
Mac OS X 10.8 x64 (mmcminer): Core i7 3720QM 2.6Ghz - 8 threads, 3.00 hpm.
AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm
E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz => 2.9 hpm, 3.1 hpm (32 gb ram)
3930k @ 3.5Ghz : 3.09
E3-1230 V3 : hashespermin" : 3.09464864
i7-2600k 3.18347856
E5-2650L(Engineering Sample),Max 2.1Ghz(turbo boost mode), 3,2 hpm
3770k @4,2GHz 3,8 h/m Win7 64bit
AMD 3850 @ 4.4 ghz 3.55 hpm, total cost of build 380$
[email protected] GHz - 4
3770K@5 GHz - 4.1
4770k @ 5ghz 4.1
Double Opteron 4356 4.56202554,
2 x L5639 (24 thread) : 5.3 h/m
i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz - 5.3 hpm
aws c3.4xlarge Intel Xeon E5-2680 / 5.4 hpm
Dual L5639(total 12 core 24 thread ) => 5.5 hpm (24 gb ram) => 24 thread
DUAL L5639 OPTIMIZED 6.2 hpm
x2 E5-2640@Win7x64 ~ 6.8hash/min(-t 256)
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8,5 Hs/min 32 threads
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
aws c3.8xlarge Intel Xeon E5-2680 / 10.6 hpm
EC2 cc2.8xlarge E5-2670 @ 2.6GHz (32 vCPU/Windows): ~ 10hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
il you like this tread you can giveaway MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tFin a table display http://mmcwiki.com/memorycoin_mining_intel_hardware_comparison
2 x L5639 (24 thread) : 5.3 h/m
3770K@5 GHz - 4.1
[email protected] GHz - 4
ok i update thread
i7 3610qm - 2,4 (8 thread)
Does your RAM Bus speed make a difference in H/m?
My i5 2500k stock clock is running at 1.3 H/m. (idle process)
x2 Intel Xeon L5420 @ 1.22 H/m
ARM Samsung Exynos 4412 Prime @ 0.09 H/m
E3 1230 V2 2.9-3.1HPM 8threads
E3 1230 V3 3.0-3.3HPM 8threads
AMD 3850 @ 4.4 ghz 3.55 hpm, total cost of build 380$
Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 2.8 GHz - 0.3hpm
aws c3.8xlarge Intel Xeon E5-2680 / 10.6 hpm
aws c3.4xlarge Intel Xeon E5-2680 / 5.4 hpm
aws c1.8xlarge Intel Xeon-family / 1.8 hpm
updated
AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
mainboard?
Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)
---
Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
mainboard?
Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)
---
Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
updated
Quote from: Djemi on December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 AM
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
mainboard?
Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)
---
Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
I have a custom script that prevents 'watch' from abusing resources.
the miner runs as an idle process on linux by default.
I don't believe these older xeons have the AES instruction set.
Quote from: Djemi on December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 AM
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM
4x 4770k @ 5ghz 16.0
mainboard?
Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)
---
Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
MemoryCoin2 Calc: http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html
Quote from: agran on December 22, 2013, 05:22:11 AM
MemoryCoin2 Calc: http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html
thanks for the link agran !
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
Can't believe how expensive that LGA 1366 hardware has gotten- looks like I could sell my 2 year old computer (i7 950) for more than I paid for it...
Quote from: luckye on December 22, 2013, 11:17:18 PM
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 11:28:36 PM
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
They have AES support according to:
http://ark.intel.com/products/48766/Intel-Xeon-Processor-L5638-12M-Cache-2_00-GHz-5_86-GTs-Intel-QPI
Quote2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Please fix:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
Snagged one for $69 from a wholesale dedi host :S
DUAL L5639 OPTIMIZED
(https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50880632/DualL5639.PNG)
Show di you optimize the server. In windows server 2008 r2 it runs from 4.7 band 5 hpm.
I'm using Linux, it always has much better performance.
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...
Quote from: luckye on December 24, 2013, 10:22:22 AM
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...
two blocks from this baby enough?
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10) ???
updated
Quote from: Delinquency on December 24, 2013, 12:22:11 PM
Quote from: luckye on December 24, 2013, 10:22:22 AM
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...
two blocks from this baby enough?
I trust you, I'm only saying that this (huge) difference can't be only referred to the Os efficiency.
I own a Dual Xeon 5670 and I'm getting about 8/9 hs/min under windows.
Maybe the problem is in the windows client...
Quote from: agran on December 22, 2013, 05:22:11 AM
MemoryCoin2 Calc: http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html
URL now redirects to a Russian hosting service. :(
Quote from: BigChase on December 24, 2013, 04:15:13 PM
Quote from: agran on December 22, 2013, 05:22:11 AM
MemoryCoin2 Calc: http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html
URL now redirects to a Russian hosting service. :(
New URL: http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html
Quote from: jpeggt on December 24, 2013, 01:34:05 PM
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10) ???
I got that issue with one of my mining builds too, It's the mainboard. Buy a better mobo!
Quote from: Delinquency on December 24, 2013, 11:14:10 PM
Quote from: jpeggt on December 24, 2013, 01:34:05 PM
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10) ???
I got that issue with one of my mining builds too, It's the mainboard. Buy a better mobo!
I'm using this motherboard "msi 990fxa-gd65". Which I not too fond of since it will only boot with a graphics card attached. Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?
Quote from: jpeggt on December 24, 2013, 11:21:07 PM
Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?
I have ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3 and my AMD 8 Core FX-8350 4.0 Ghz give 3.3 hpm.
Quote from: agran on December 24, 2013, 11:25:50 PM
Quote from: jpeggt on December 24, 2013, 11:21:07 PM
Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?
I have ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3 and my AMD 8 Core FX-8350 4.0 Ghz give 3.3 hpm.
Interesting, that was the board I was going to buy, but decided not to since it has the 760G chipset and everything I read said to get a board with 990 if you want to do any overclocking. I also have a Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 that has a fx-6300 in it, I did try running my fx-8350 on that board but it was very unstable, even at stock clock.
M5A 78L-MLX Plus 54$ at newegg.
i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool
Quote from: TheBeardedMann on December 26, 2013, 05:36:38 AM
i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool
with mmcpool mining on ubuntu 13.10 I'm getting this:
fx-8350 @ 4GHz - 3 hpm
fx-6300 @ 3.5GHz - 2.2 hpm
i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz - 5.3 hpm
Tested Ubuntu +Debian (8 thread)
E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz => 2.9 hpm, 3.1 hpm (32 gb ram)
E5620 => 2.3 hpm , 2.4 hpm (8 gb ram)
i7-2600 => 2.8 hpm , 2.9 hpm (16 gb ram)
8 core AMD Opteron 4171 => 0.9 hpm (14 gb ram)
8 core X5650 => 1.5 hpm (4 gb ram)
Dual L5639(total 12 core 24 thread ) => 5.5 hpm (24 gb ram) => 24 thread
Tested mac os x (8 thread)
i7-3770 => 3.4 hpm,3.5 hpm (8 gb ram)
Mac OS X 10.8 x64 (mmcminer): Core i7 3720QM 2.6Ghz - 8 threads, 3.00 hpm.
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
Quote from: reorder on December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
GPU ?
Quote from: reorder on December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
You've got MMC to mine on a gpu? ???
3770k @4,2GHz 3,8 h/m Win7 64bit
EC2 cc2.8xlarge E5-2670 @ 2.6GHz (32 vCPU/Windows): ~ 10hpm
[17:09:31] Found share ...43e17022aa393528: submitting
[17:09:31] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[17:09:31] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
[17:09:34] Found solution - 8427 / 1968 / 2552121027
[17:09:35] Found solution - 2918 / 1968 / 2626787225
[17:09:37] Found share ...e6282adbcfa91429: submitting
[17:09:37] Stats: 10.068 hash/min
[17:09:37] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
[17:09:39] Found solution - 620 / 1968 / 4175850305
[17:09:40] Found solution - 4261 / 1968 / 4253120609
[17:09:42] Found solution - 856 / 1968 / 181299850
[17:09:42] Found solution - 14702 / 1968 / 2551600901
[17:09:42] Found solution - 15246 / 1968 / 473877606
[17:09:43] Found solution - 3519 / 1968 / 2346623495
[17:09:43] Found share ...a3f785b287402476: submitting
[17:09:43] Stats: 10.068 hash/min
[17:09:44] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
x2 E5-2650 2.0 32 thread only 3
[23:05:36] Found solution - 3441 / 1968 / 1420314637
[23:05:41] Stats: 3.256 hash/min
[23:08:07] Stats: 3.270 hash/min
[23:08:26] Stats: 3.276 hash/min
[23:08:44] Stats: 3.274 hash/min
[23:09:02] Stats: 3.281 hash/min
[23:09:21] Stats: 3.282 hash/min
[23:09:40] Stats: 3.276 hash/min
Do you think have prolem ? I run on virtual .
Updating:
With minerd I'm getting 8,5 hs/min win8 dual xeon 5670 Aes-ni
i5 3470@Win7x64 ~ 1.6hash/min
x2 E5-2640@Win7x64 ~ 6.8hash/min(-t 256)
G1610@Win7x64 ~ 0.375h/min
Macbook Pro 2012 Retna
i7 @ 2.6ghz, 4 threads
~0.76 h/m.
Didn't run it long though, wasn't able to cool the CPU to a reasonable level during the run. Just wanted to see what it would do.
i5-2500k @3.3 GHz (not overclocked)
Windows 7 x64
2.2 HPM
additional info: CPU-MB temp. is around 43-48 C while running 24/7
updated
Quote from: reorder on December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
:'(
AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz 1.58HPM
Quote from: Delinquency on December 29, 2013, 11:22:34 PM
Quote from: reorder on December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 PM
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz
Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
:'(
Don't be sad, it is New Year after all. Anyway, you are better off spending $200 on Radeon than on AWS: in the end you will still have Radeon to play videogames!
And I hope AWS will stop annoying those who need it for real work with ridiculous limits.
macbook pro 13.3" retina haswell i5 2.4ghz
[12:18:28] Stats: 1.523 hash/min
updated
Quote from: trankil on January 02, 2014, 02:55:36 PM
updated
Can you pls change the score of my dual 5670 from 8,5 to 11,2 ?
Thanks
Hi,
Intel i5 4670k @ 4.6Ghz with AV2 = 14.5 HPM
Dell PowerEdge R620
Dual Socket E5-2650 2Ghz 8 core 20M cache with 128GB RAM OS 64Bit Precise
MMC Agg. SPM: 25.937, HPM: 26.591; Rnds C/I: 50616/11839, Don. C/I: 594/138; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 25.937/0.8333, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 26.592/0.8310 51210 rnds AV=1, ART=72203
OpenStack 16 VCPUs 32 GB RAM
MMC Agg. SPM: 21.829, HPM: 22.198; Rnds C/I: 44284/6043, Don. C/I: 474/48; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 21.829/1.3870, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.198/1.3873 44758 rnds AV=2, ART=43248
AMD A8-5557M Quad Core
3 threads running Yam M7m
1.79 hpm
Please also ask for power usage information (if available) for both idle mining, along with hpm. See:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2485.msg30783#msg30783
I like the idea but I am not sure how to answer that on my end.
I get electricity for free. The farm my in-laws own has a methane electricity generation plant that basically makes electricity from poop. I don't have a meter to see what I am pulling from the wall either but once I get a few things done and save up I can get one a find out how much I am pulling.
Quote from: MaxPWR on February 16, 2014, 05:23:38 AM
Please also ask for power usage information (if available) for both idle mining, along with hpm. See:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2485.msg30783#msg30783
At the lower end:
Core2Duo e8400, 3.0GHz, 0.38 hpm with mmcminer
i5-520M, 2.4GHz, ~2.3-2.4 hpm with yam
I do what I can...
hello, I have an i7 3630qm, but I can not do more than 1.4 hpm undermine what should I do??
Dual E5-2650 Xeon (Mac Pro 3,1) OS X 10.9.2
mmcminer 12 threads gets me 1.3 hash/min
It will sometimes spike (in the terminal window), but it doesn't get much above this for the value shown on mmcpool.com
Does anyone know if these results are typical? Also, is there an optima code for my machine? I have 24GB of RAM, and mmcminer uses 1, and I don't see a way to let/tell it to use more
Quote from: p.hawks on May 15, 2014, 08:07:21 PM
Dual E5-2650 Xeon (Mac Pro 3,1) OS X 10.9.2
mmcminer 12 threads gets me 1.3 hash/min
It will sometimes spike (in the terminal window), but it doesn't get much above this for the value shown on mmcpool.com
Does anyone know if these results are typical? Also, is there an optima code for my machine? I have 24GB of RAM, and mmcminer uses 1, and I don't see a way to let/tell it to use more
Download YAM for mining. (find it on mmc-square)