BitShares Forum
		Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: noisy on October 29, 2015, 09:30:18 pm
		
			
			- 
				In github community, only projects which has a lot of stars are considered as "worth of attention".
Here are main bitshares repositories:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui
I think I should also recommend very helpful repository: https://github.com/xeroc/bitshares-docker
(http://i.imgur.com/bkjSNJc.png)
			 
			
			- 
				+ 6 Stars  +5%
			
 
			
			- 
				Dont forget about
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse-ui
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse
			 
			
			- 
				 +5% Done!
			
 
			
			- 
				 +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%
			
 
			
			- 
				 good call! +5%
			
 
			
			- 
				
Dont forget about
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse-ui
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse
Actually muse just a copy, it cannot been considered a good project with on chain code ,
			 
			
			- 
				 +5%
			
 
			
			- 
				Done  :)
			
 
			
			- 
				Just for your information and future reference, current status:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 - 63 stars
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui - 34 stars
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene - 91 stars
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui - 38 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse-ui - 15 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse - 27 stars 
:)
			 
			
			- 
				 +5% Done
			
 
			
			- 
				Done too +5% +5%
			
 
			
			- 
				Done. 
How does it help?
			 
			
			- 
				
Done. 
How does it help?
This is the matter of reputation. It is much easier to attract attention of open-source developer when your project is considered as important and innovative. In my opinion, a lot of stars do not help much... but lack of them is very suspicious.
I know that this may seem to be silly, but a lot of developers care about reputation of project to which they want to contribute 
			 
			
			- 
				
Done. 
How does it help?
This is the matter of reputation. It is much easier to attract attention of open-source developer when your project is considered as important and innovative. In my opinion, a lot of stars do not help much... but lack of them is very suspicious.
I know that this may seem to be silly, but a lot of developers care about reputation of project to which they want to contribute
 +5% Totally agree.
BTW this crypto coins overview site count developers activity such as stars, etc: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitshares
			 
			
			- 
				
 +5% Totally agree.
BTW this crypto coins overview site count developers activity such as stars, etc: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitshares
Exactly. However I have just noticed, that they have wrong numbers, and not updated information... so I sent them this email: 
 
(http://i.imgur.com/A2dp4f7s.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/A2dp4f7.png)
			 
			
			- 
				FYI:
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitshares have now proper information about Bitshares :)
(http://i.imgur.com/4ThSECHl.jpg) (http://i.imgur.com/4ThSECH.png)
			 
			
			- 
				
FYI:
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/bitshares have now proper information about Bitshares :)
 +5%
			 
			
			- 
				
Just for your information and future reference, current status:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 - 63 stars
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui - 34 stars
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene - 91 stars
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui - 38 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse-ui - 15 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse - 27 stars 
:)
Current stats:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2 - 72 stars
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui - 41 stars
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene - 100 stars 
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui - 43 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse-ui - 19 stars
https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse - 32 stars 
:)
			 
			
			- 
				 +5%