https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases
Windows binaries will be posted shortly.
+5%
Quote from: bytemaster on February 16, 2016, 08:56:11 PM
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases
Windows binaries will be posted shortly.
You should use here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,7067.0.html
Quote from: clayop on February 17, 2016, 06:42:50 AM
Quote from: bytemaster on February 16, 2016, 08:56:11 PM
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/releases
Windows binaries will be posted shortly.
You should use here:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,7067.0.html
That thread has been abandoned for a long time.
Check this: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19040.0.html
Have all the exchanges been notified?
Why cant we hype our releases with hip names? Ethereum calls their releases things like "Homestead" - ive no idea what it means but it sounds important. Ive even seen people on Polo chat about what Homestead will do to the price.
We could have called this release Stealthy Salamander or something but we called it 2.0.160216
Quote from: speedy on February 17, 2016, 11:38:42 PM
Why cant we hype our releases with hip names? Ethereum calls their releases things like "Homestead" - ive no idea what it means but it sounds important. Ive even seen people on Polo chat about what Homestead will do to the price.
We could have called this release Stealthy Salamander or something but we called it 2.0.160216
This one's called "Hard Fork". ;)
Quote from: speedy on February 17, 2016, 11:38:42 PM
Why cant we hype our releases with hip names? Ethereum calls their releases things like "Homestead" - ive no idea what it means but it sounds important. Ive even seen people on Polo chat about what Homestead will do to the price.
We could have called this release Stealthy Salamander or something but we called it 2.0.160216
Wish granted...
(http://i68.tinypic.com/zugrgk.jpg)
I didn't like Stealthy Salamander .. I think a chameleon is more ideal to describe Privacy Mode.. so I went ahead and made another meme.. Introducing... Covert Chameleon Release! :)
(http://i67.tinypic.com/24viq78.jpg)
The upcoming "Chameleon Release" of BitShares2.0 with Privacy Mode
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 01:53:37 AM
The upcoming "Chameleon Release" of BitShares2.0 with Privacy Mode
Awesome... if anybody wants to you can tweet and share that image all you like.. just vote for Datasecuritynode for Witness :)
Here is another customized version:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/rsu6pg.jpg)
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 03:27:49 AM
Here is another customized version:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/rsu6pg.jpg)
Thanks a lot for your help!
First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?
The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line:
BitShares 2.0 with Privacy ModeI think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 03:27:49 AM
Here is another customized version:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/rsu6pg.jpg)
Fantastic. I know onceaponatime has some change requests but personally I like it the way it is. The blending supports the stealthiness IMHO. Also, it wasn't until my third for forth viewing that I saw the lizard. Nature win.
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your help!
First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?
The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy Mode
I think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.
(http://i67.tinypic.com/33ayxw1.jpg)
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 04:16:44 AM
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your help!
First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?
The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy Mode
I think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.
(http://i67.tinypic.com/33ayxw1.jpg)
I really like it!! Thank you!!!
@JonnyBitcoin Can you get this image into the DailyDecrypt once or twice before Feb 23?
Chameleon is actually a cool name. I think this is the kind of little things that in the end can make the difference. They seem insignificant but can definitely have an impact.
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 04:16:44 AM
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your help!
First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?
The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy Mode
I think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.
(http://i67.tinypic.com/33ayxw1.jpg)
Better remove '2.0.160216' IMO..
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 04:50:55 AM
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 04:16:44 AM
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Thanks a lot for your help!
First line is not legible enough. Could you outline it, or darken it or somehow make it stand out just a little more? And the "a"s and "o"s appear to be virtually the same. Can they be more distinguishable?
The whole thing is too "busy". Please try combining 3rd line into 2nd line, drop the "now", and make the 2nd line's font size smaller than top line: BitShares 2.0 with Privacy Mode
I think that would do it. I appreciate your efforts!
I tried a few different fonts regarding the A and O but nothing looked better.. In the end I spaced it out a bit more and I think it helps define them. Also darkened the background like u asked and everything else.
(http://i67.tinypic.com/33ayxw1.jpg)
I really like it!! Thank you!!!
@JonnyBitcoin Can you get this image into the DailyDecrypt once or twice before Feb 23?
Any chance someone could tweet it with this image embedded, and let me have a link or eveb tweet with @CCEDK_ mentioned, and I would lik to give it some twitter love
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 PM
Have all the exchanges been notified?
I just wrote
- poloniex
- bittrex
- yunbi
- ccedk
- shapeshift
- btc38
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 AM
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 PM
Have all the exchanges been notified?
I just wrote
- poloniex
- bittrex
- yunbi
- ccedk
- shapeshift
- btc38
Did you asked about confirmation from their site, that they received and read an email?
Quote from: noisy on February 18, 2016, 12:04:22 PM
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 AM
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 PM
Have all the exchanges been notified?
I just wrote
- poloniex
- bittrex
- yunbi
- ccedk
- shapeshift
- btc38
Did you asked about confirmation from their site, that they received and read an email?
I did not .. most of them are idling in a skype announcement group particularily for that use case ..
Quote from: ccedk on February 18, 2016, 10:50:44 AM
Any chance someone could tweet it with this image embedded, and let me have a link or eveb tweet with @CCEDK_ mentioned, and I would lik to give it some twitter love
Done, sir ...just blasted out to the tweetverse
Quote from: Akado on February 18, 2016, 10:38:54 AM
Chameleon is actually a cool name. I think this is the kind of little things that in the end can make the difference. They seem insignificant but can definitely have an impact.
+5%
Yep remove '2.0.160216'
Quote from: liondani on February 18, 2016, 04:37:16 PM
Quote from: Akado on February 18, 2016, 10:38:54 AM
Chameleon is actually a cool name. I think this is the kind of little things that in the end can make the difference. They seem insignificant but can definitely have an impact.
+5%
Yep remove '2.0.160216'
We can keep the '2.0.160216' for ourselves, but adopt other names for general public and marketing.
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 AM
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 PM
Have all the exchanges been notified?
I just wrote
- poloniex
- bittrex
- yunbi
- ccedk
- shapeshift
- btc38
We (metaexchange) already know about this, but we'd still appreciate being notified officially :)
Here is a version with just the Coming message as some requested:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2gviqf8.jpg)
Quote from: monsterer on February 18, 2016, 08:47:38 PM
Quote from: xeroc on February 18, 2016, 11:03:02 AM
Quote from: puppies on February 17, 2016, 06:45:28 PM
Have all the exchanges been notified?
I just wrote
- poloniex
- bittrex
- yunbi
- ccedk
- shapeshift
- btc38
We (metaexchange) already know about this, but we'd still appreciate being notified officially :)
Do i have your skype or mailadress?
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 09:29:49 PM
Here is a version with just the Coming message as some requested:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2gviqf8.jpg)
Best one yet. The Bunker produces!
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 18, 2016, 11:27:19 PM
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 09:29:49 PM
Here is a version with just the Coming message as some requested:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/2gviqf8.jpg)
Best one yet. The Bunker produces!
Yea, absolutely brilliant bunker! Love it!
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 AM
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...
even general overview stuff would be cool
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on February 19, 2016, 03:20:24 AM
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 AM
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...
even general overview stuff would be cool
I think I recall Ken mentioning Xeroc was working on those. Not sure though.
Quote from: Akado on February 20, 2016, 02:32:36 PM
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on February 19, 2016, 03:20:24 AM
Quote from: Brekyrself on February 19, 2016, 03:04:02 AM
Is there final documentation on the stealth implementation specifics? How it works, capabilities, best practices etc...
even general overview stuff would be cool
I think I recall Ken mentioning Xeroc was working on those. Not sure though.
cool, ultimately we need trading "experts" or the guru types that sell trading systems for all sorts of things in other financial markets to start doing the same for our markets. Here's the future i see:
-noise retail traders from all over the word trading 24/7/365 on the DEX
-boutique financial groups springing up to channel non-crypto savvy savers to park funds in our bond markets for yield
-trading bots galore trolling the DEX, providing liquidity and doing all sorts of algo trading
-small businesses around the world using our DEX for IPOs, SEOs, and debt offerings
at present, our devs have kicked a$$ creating the trading platform; the next step is to create all sorts of docs and tutorials for how to use it...not just technically how to place orders, but how to profit.
Where can I learn more about the new api?
Quote from: mostar on February 21, 2016, 07:53:15 PM
Where can I learn more about the new api?
Here's part of it, at least: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/blob/f7bfcea355b77cd07d0eee0963e8dea0935d3dbc/libraries/app/include/graphene/app/database_api.hpp#L365-L400
Quote from: roadscape on February 22, 2016, 04:35:17 PM
Quote from: mostar on February 21, 2016, 07:53:15 PM
Where can I learn more about the new api?
Here's part of it, at least: https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/blob/f7bfcea355b77cd07d0eee0963e8dea0935d3dbc/libraries/app/include/graphene/app/database_api.hpp#L365-L400
But don't try to use get_ticker yet, it's bugged and unusable in its current state. I have an issue open about it.
Haven't tried the others yet so can't say if they're broken as well or not.
Quote from: BunkerChain Labs on February 18, 2016, 03:27:49 AM
Here is another customized version:
(http://i67.tinypic.com/rsu6pg.jpg)
My I suggest the
Apatetic update
seed04.bitsharesnodes.com,
seed05.bitsharesnodes.com,
seed06.bitsharesnodes.com,
seed07.bitsharesnodes.com
have all been upgraded to the BitShares 2.0.160216-1-g2a5c6a3 release, including witness verbaltech2.
I know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...
Quote from: monsterer on February 23, 2016, 04:12:43 PM
I know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...
about
Quote from: puppies on February 23, 2016, 04:20:25 PM
Quote from: monsterer on February 23, 2016, 04:12:43 PM
I know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...
about
Perfect, thanks :)
Quote from: puppies on February 23, 2016, 04:20:25 PM
Quote from: monsterer on February 23, 2016, 04:12:43 PM
I know I ask this every time, but how can I confirm I'm running the latest version? The info command doesn't tell me...
about
It's silliness like this that makes learning our API's code such a pain in the ass. Why is basic info like this not in a single place / API?
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 AM
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 25, 2016, 01:30:33 AM
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 AM
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.
Awesome! is that maybe the reason why it took quite a few hours to receive my BTS on OpenLedger from Poloniex? Just wondering
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:54:42 AM
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 25, 2016, 01:30:33 AM
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 AM
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.
Awesome! is that maybe the reason why it took quite a few hours to receive my BTS on OpenLedger from Poloniex? Just wondering
I don't think so. I think your issue may be with Poloniex.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21479.msg281767.html#new
Congratulations. Show this post - Stealth Transfers (http://bitsharesblog.com/stealth-transfers-feature-added-to-bitshares/) - some love via a Tweet or other social media and help spread the word about this exciting new feature. Thanks
https://twitter.com/News_BitShares/status/702672109877596161
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitShares/comments/47gkjz/the_hard_fork_enabling_privacy_mode_stealth_was/
Quote from: onceuponatime on February 25, 2016, 01:30:33 AM
Quote from: Fiazk on February 25, 2016, 01:25:36 AM
Was the Chamelon release delayed?
The hard fork enabling Privacy Mode was successfully completed. It is now undergoing extensive testing. We are waiting on Ben to give the "all clear" from his testing activities.
Looking forward to hearing about the test results.