Post em here..
http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/forget-logging-facebook-bitid-lets-sign-bitcoin-address/2014/05/05
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-future-of-the-blockchain-2014-4
In addition this major news article links to
http://bitshares.org/exchange/
http://bitshares.org/voting/
http://bitshares.org/music/
But these subsections are horrible.
We always need to trace connections: where do people come from, what are they likely to click, what will they then see.
+1
More pressure on brian+greg to get the new site up!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
Quote from: toast on May 15, 2014, 08:54:55 PM
+1
More pressure on brian+greg to get the new site up!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
a NEW site or a pimped (with content) site?
Quote from: xeroc on May 16, 2014, 07:15:13 AM
Quote from: toast on May 15, 2014, 08:54:55 PM
+1
More pressure on brian+greg to get the new site up!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
a NEW site or a pimped (with content) site?
(New site on wp base)
A Little more patience - new site is on the Way and will launched soon...
C
Quote from: cassiopaia on May 16, 2014, 01:09:29 PM
(New site on wp base)
A Little more patience - new site is on the Way and will launched soon...
wp == wordpress?
So a few more community members could get read/write access to articles to that we can work that site, too?
I personally, like static (s)HTML pages more but for collaboration WP might be a better choice!
Thanks for keeping us posted
Quote from: xeroc on May 16, 2014, 01:14:32 PM
Quote from: cassiopaia on May 16, 2014, 01:09:29 PM
(New site on wp base)
A Little more patience - new site is on the Way and will launched soon...
wp == wordpress?
So a few more community members could get read/write access to articles to that we can work that site, too?
I personally, like static (s)HTML pages more but for collaboration WP might be a better choice!
Thanks for keeping us posted
Yup exactly wp = wordpress
Yes indeed i like static site even more, but for less technical Users i guess wordpress is easier to Control und also to push new Content ..
Quote from: cassiopaia on May 16, 2014, 01:16:50 PM
Quote from: xeroc on May 16, 2014, 01:14:32 PM
Quote from: cassiopaia on May 16, 2014, 01:09:29 PM
(New site on wp base)
A Little more patience - new site is on the Way and will launched soon...
wp == wordpress?
So a few more community members could get read/write access to articles to that we can work that site, too?
I personally, like static (s)HTML pages more but for collaboration WP might be a better choice!
Thanks for keeping us posted
Yup exactly wp = wordpress
Yes indeed i like static site even more, but for less technical Users i guess wordpress is easier to Control und also to push new Content ..
In the name of delegation I let Brian, Gregory, and Stan decide. Obviously I like the static content because it was easier for me and community members to fix. But it was impossible for Stan, Gregory, or Brian to handle raw HTML.
I suggest taking a look at something newer like: http://buildwithcraft.com/
A more modern version of a content management system.
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoins-predict-future/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=584703.0
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D using Tapatalk
FYI
[Events] Ether Square founder Vitalik visit Nakamoto Square tomorrow night chat two
http://bbs.ybcoin.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1821
http://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/28acmc/eris_a_dao_making_platform_by_project_douglas/
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112052/the-race-to-the-moon-blackcoin-and-nxt-compete-for-crypto-20-crown#comment-1479614434
This is a very important thread and thanks for starting it. We should all check this regularly and contribute to posting responses to these articles. Some, like that Cointelegraph one (to which I've been posting as G.A. Soros) are terribly inaccurate pieces of "journalism". Readers deserve some rebuttal so they can form a clearer picture of what's going on in 2.0.
Quote from: donkeypong on July 11, 2014, 01:14:37 AM
This is a very important thread and thanks for starting it. We should all check this regularly and contribute to posting responses to these articles. Some, like that Cointelegraph one (to which I've been posting as G.A. Soros) are terribly inaccurate pieces of "journalism". Readers deserve some rebuttal so they can form a clearer picture of what's going on in 2.0.
+5% Solaire also suggested one here
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2ad0j7/if_bitcoin_can_replace_the_federal_reserve_why/
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5449.15
Let's post the articles in one place and sticky it. I'd particularly like to thank everyone who is chiming in on Reddit lately. My handle there is LetsSeeWhatsUpThere. There have been times when just two or three of us have tried to carry a Reddit posting in the right direction. Now it seems like there are far more friendlies posting there from the BitShares community; it's starting to look like we have a pulse! Thanks and keep up the good work.
Quote from: donkeypong on July 11, 2014, 02:03:20 AM
Let's post the articles in one place and sticky it. I'd particularly like to thank everyone who is chiming in on Reddit lately. My handle there is LetsSeeWhatsUpThere. There have been times when just two or three of us have tried to carry a Reddit posting in the right direction. Now it seems like there are far more friendlies posting there from the BitShares community; it's starting to look like we have a pulse! Thanks and keep up the good work.
+1
Quote from: donkeypong on July 11, 2014, 02:03:20 AM
Let's post the articles in one place and sticky it. I'd particularly like to thank everyone who is chiming in on Reddit lately. My handle there is LetsSeeWhatsUpThere. There have been times when just two or three of us have tried to carry a Reddit posting in the right direction. Now it seems like there are far more friendlies posting there from the BitShares community; it's starting to look like we have a pulse! Thanks and keep up the good work.
+5%
My understanding is that reddit has put a lot of work to detect bots/people who are upvoting their own stuff. You can't just game the system like you would be able to do on a forum like Bitcointalk. So the more legitimate people the far better results we should have.
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112077/the-new-frontier-after-cryptocurrency-cryptoequity
this. upvote my camilla post
How does one 'upvote' on that site? Part of my split personality (G.A. Soros) has commented there also.
Quote from: donkeypong on July 16, 2014, 04:37:14 AM
How does one 'upvote' on that site? Part of my split personality (G.A. Soros) has commented there also.
Up and down arrows that are more like rotated ><'s at the bottom of each post.
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112077/the-new-frontier-after-cryptocurrency-cryptoequity
Voted.
Upvoted, currently at 12 votes.