Print Page - Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.

Title: Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.
Post by: dcchong on July 23, 2014, 01:16:01 AM

>> blockchain_get_account mister

Name: mister
Registered: 2014-07-21T17:38:00
Last Updated: 30 hours ago
Owner Key: BTSX8MEuq1syB8vrawERGB9kAHCsFsg4bpA1caCeojTKrYLaCqN5md
Active Key History:
- BTSX8MEuq1syB8vrawERGB9kAHCsFsg4bpA1caCeojTKrYLaCqN5md, last used 32 hours ago

ID    NAME (* next in line)           APPROVAL       PRODUCED MISSED   RELIABILITY   PAY RATE PAY BALANCE         LAST BLOCK
============================================================================================================================
8294  mister                          4.5625706965 % 0        41       0.00 %        50 %     0.00000 BTSX        NONE      

Public Data:
{
  "gravatarID": "166969478dfff463361e3002e027ab34"
}

Code Select

>> blockchain_get_account viv

Name: viv
Registered: 2014-07-20T02:23:50
Last Updated: 70 hours ago
Owner Key: BTSX6p9qqjko43bCrDZPXQPS6hPGyv4pstAyYyDSigTRJyWprZ2mzD
Active Key History:
- BTSX6p9qqjko43bCrDZPXQPS6hPGyv4pstAyYyDSigTRJyWprZ2mzD, last used 71 hours ago

ID    NAME (* next in line)           APPROVAL       PRODUCED MISSED   RELIABILITY   PAY RATE PAY BALANCE         LAST BLOCK
============================================================================================================================
2588  viv                             4.7326236055 % 8        87       8.42 %        1 %      0.18160 BTSX        31117     

Public Data:
{
  "gravatarID": ""
}

Title: Re: Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.
Post by: liondani on July 23, 2014, 01:34:40 AM

that's why the system should replace delegates like them with stand by delegates from the top of the list, when reliability is for example under 50% after x blocks...

Title: Re: Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.
Post by: puppies on July 23, 2014, 01:45:05 AM

Quote from: liondani on July 23, 2014, 01:34:40 AM
that's why the system should replace delegates like them with stand by delegates from the top of the list, when reliability is for example under 50% after x blocks...

I'd prefer automated voting built into the wallet that the user can set to remove support from delegates that aren't performing.

If you need a good replacement delegate I would suggest

Code Select


>> blockchain_get_account dele-puppy

Name: dele-puppy
Registered: 2014-07-19T20:26:10
Last Updated: 77 hours ago
Owner Key: BTSX75xxKG4ZeztPpnhmFch99smunUWMvDy9mB6Le497vpAA3XUXaD
Active Key History:
- BTSX75xxKG4ZeztPpnhmFch99smunUWMvDy9mB6Le497vpAA3XUXaD, last used 77 hours ago

ID    NAME (* next in line)           APPROVAL       PRODUCED MISSED   RELIABILITY   PAY RATE PAY BALANCE         LAST BLOCK
============================================================================================================================
1193  dele-puppy                      1.9265633438 % 79       4        95.18 %       10 %     18.11360 BTSX       29751

Title: Re: Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.
Post by: santaclause102 on July 23, 2014, 01:51:34 AM

QuoteI'd prefer automated voting built into the wallet that the user can set to remove support from delegates that aren't performing.

Is that implemented atm? It was always talked about...

Title: Re: Please vote against for delegate mister and viv.
Post by: puppies on July 23, 2014, 01:53:40 AM

Quote from: delulo on July 23, 2014, 01:51:34 AM
QuoteI'd prefer automated voting built into the wallet that the user can set to remove support from delegates that aren't performing.
Is that implemented atm? It was always talked about...

I don't think its implemented yet. I think it got put on the back burner when voting was switched to approval voting.

BitShares Forum

Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: dcchong on July 23, 2014, 01:16:01 AM