BitShares Forum
Main => Stakeholder Proposals => Topic started by: santaclause102 on December 20, 2014, 01:55:40 pm
-
I didn't see this direction propagated on this forum so here it is :) Here https://www.dropbox.com/s/0m0plhj8ggw2pi9/Mumble%20Chat%2012_19_2014%20with%20intro.ogg?dl=0 around minute 12 BM made clear what delegates are supposed to do in case of a fork.
-
Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.
-
Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.
It is not only forked network. The security is much lower if delegates are able to easily sign 2 chains.
How can you be sure that your chain is OK even with 60% delegate participation ?
Who will prove to you that these delegates are not signing other chains with higher participation ?
-
Yes! Slower confirmation time is much better than a forked network! In the future, double-producing blocks could get your delegate account fired and retracted.
It is not only forked network. The security is much lower if delegates are able to easily sign 2 chains.
How can you be sure that your chain is OK even with 60% delegate participation ?
Who will prove to you that these delegates are not signing other chains with higher participation ?
same concerns here...
Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D