BitShares Forum

Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 07:50:32 am

Title: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 07:50:32 am

CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework) is very suitable to build a desktop application with all chrome browser features, it is a C++ lib, supports windows/linux/mac platforms.
The performance of CEF based application is quite the same as Chrome itself

Project home
https://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/ (https://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/)

Downloads
http://cefbuilds.com/ (http://cefbuilds.com/)

Documents
http://magpcss.org/ceforum/apidocs3/ (http://magpcss.org/ceforum/apidocs3/)

A simple demo is provided in the downloaded package, in folder "cefsimple", it looks quite simple and easy to start with.

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: cn-members on January 13, 2015, 07:58:55 am

 +5%

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: BTServiceGroup on January 13, 2015, 10:41:16 am

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

hint : this guy maybe earning 10X than the protocol is providing .

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:23:54 pm

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:24:44 pm

Quote from: BTServiceGroup on January 13, 2015, 10:41:16 am

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

hint : this guy maybe earning 10X than the protocol is providing .

 :) I am looking forward to such a day.

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 12:44:58 pm

Quote from: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:23:54 pm

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet

sweet .. +5%!!

Title: Re: Is it better to use CEF instead of QT for BTS wallet GUI?
Post by: sudo on January 13, 2015, 02:29:47 pm

Quote from: gordonhucn on January 13, 2015, 12:23:54 pm

Quote from: xeroc on January 13, 2015, 10:03:07 am

hint: do it your self and get #paidbyprotocol :)

thanks for the hint, I will test CEF when I have time.

I will try the performance for all cases below:
1. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use chrome
2. start the QT wallet
3. start bitshares_client with htdoc set to web wallet, then use the CEF application

for CASE 3 I will test as many functions as possible and see if it works ok and compare its performance to Chrome and QT wallet

 +5% +5% awesome