BitShares Forum
Main => Stakeholder Proposals => Topic started by: ripplexiaoshan on January 28, 2015, 08:15:08 pm
-
There have been almost three weeks since the 100% payrate delegate "blackwavelabs" started producing blocks.
However, so far,
1/No update about any progress
2/ No mentioning of the fund support from BTS community on their website
3/ No mentioning of BTS on their twitter or anywhere else
4/ No client version published (still 0.4.27.2)
5/ No response to all the questioning
6/ Their development product will not be dedicated for BTS, and probably BTS will not benefit most, whereas other competitors will.
-
No response, means no longer need to be paid as a 100% delegate ...
-
No update at all?!
-
+5%
-
+5% +5% +5% :P :P :P
-
Sluggish delegates should be fired +5%
-
Sluggish delegates should be fired +5%
Fired.
-
Sluggish delegates should be fired +5%
Fired.
+5%
-
There have been almost three weeks since the 100% payrate delegate"blackwaveslab" started producing blocks.
You mean blackwavelabs, right?
-
I don't understand why this guy can be a 100% delegate so easy, and keep in the position so long without any response.
we should vote more carefully
I wish this would not happen again
so depressed
-
Fired.
-
There have been almost three weeks since the 100% payrate delegate"blackwaveslab" started producing blocks.
You mean blackwavelabs, right?
http://bitsharesblocks.com/delegates/delegate?name=blackwavelabs
-
I don't understand why this guy can be a 100% delegate so easy, and keep in the position so long without any response.
we should vote more carefully
I wish this would not happen again
so depressed
Luckily they only made ~20k BTS off their delegate when you factor in the cost of registration. But I fully agree with you; we must be more vigilant with our votes!
-
I don't understand why this guy can be a 100% delegate so easy, and keep in the position so long without any response.
we should vote more carefully
I wish this would not happen again
so depressed
Luckily they only made ~20k BTS off their delegate when you factor in the cost of registration. But I fully agree with you; we must be more vigilant with our votes!
It's not completely cut and dried. They said they were going to go ahead with what they were developing, which would have been/is going to be useful for us, whether or not we elected them as a delegate. They just said that the income from a delegate position would enable them to pay for more talent to be put on the development.
And they had more or less given up on getting elected and withdrawn from posting here after a rather scathing assessment of our attitude. But they were then surprised to be actually elected in after having withdrawn. They even missed their first blocks because of that.
-
so we should use vote properly before and after the delegates stand out for a position.
-
There have been almost three weeks since the 100% payrate delegate"blackwaveslab" started producing blocks.
You mean blackwavelabs, right?
http://bitsharesblocks.com/delegates/delegate?name=blackwavelabs
OP has misspelled the name.
-
corrected
-
It seems we made a history record of BTS, the first fired delegate.
If blackwavelabs really make something meaningful to BTS in future, I will be happy to donate to them. However, a delegate has to obey the rule of DPOS, which is the core spirit of BTS
-
I think it's an "iffy" proposition to vote in a delegate whose mission is just to develop one piece of interface technology as a small part of their overall work. For my vote, I want to see that person (or those people) firmly committed to BitShares rather than having a half-baked commitment. I was not convinced (from their own postings) this delegate really believed or wanted this to succeed; certainly they had other interests and commitments. Until the whole voting thing is more nimble and we can make quick changes/substitutions in a less clunky fashion, then I will refrain from voting for anyone who isn't 100% committed to BitShares.
(http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/donald.jpg)
-
delegate registration fee is good measure. +5%. what if it took a year to remove a delegate lol. that would be painful. anyways our voting system will just get better. I have confidence. it's an interesting experiment in progress.
-
Congratulations, the system worked, and it only cost one week of pay. A company I worked for had a PhD new hire come in and work for a month or two before getting fired for not producing anything of value, and even worse, did things that needed to be undone. Sounds like BitShares got off cheaply.
-
for all 100% delegates, please update more offen
especially at this hard time
-
Congratulations, the system worked, and it only cost one week of pay. A company I worked for had a PhD new hire come in and work for a month or two before getting fired for not producing anything of value, and even worse, did things that needed to be undone. Sounds like BitShares got off cheaply.
not only got off cheaply , got in is easy also , if a delegate was fired by btser , he also can gain vote by his contribution to been hired again
-
Congratulations, the system worked, and it only cost one week of pay. A company I worked for had a PhD new hire come in and work for a month or two before getting fired for not producing anything of value, and even worse, did things that needed to be undone. Sounds like BitShares got off cheaply.
not only got off cheaply , got in is easy also , if a delegate was fired by btser , he also can gain vote by his contribution to been hired again
Yes this is true. Though I wonder how forgiving the community will be. I guess time will tell.. but I get a strong impression from the messages posted that this act will not be followed by any altruism unless there is a real 'my dog died' story to explain the vacuum that was left here.
-
Good work. Lets stay vigilant!