BitShares Forum
Other => Graveyard => MemoryCoin => Topic started by: KillerByte on December 24, 2013, 07:01:03 am
-
Windows miner available! Download easy from the pool: http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer-win.zip
The pool is now stable. There are still some very minor issues that need fixing, but it is good to mine on! Lets mine some blocks!
There is (still) a 800 client limit on the pool! We still have room!
This is the offical announcement for the XRamPool (or just XPool).
POOL LINK: http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
MINING PROGRAM:
Source code (Github, stay updated!): https://github.com/KillerByte/memoryminer (see build instructions below)
Windows Precompiled: http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer-win.zip
EXTRA MINING SCRIPT (made by s4l1h, allows you to run it in the background):
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1608.0
Features:
* First MMC Pool
* Stability Tested by Hundreds of Users
* A 2% Pool fee
* Payout transaction fees are not taken from miners' balances
* Block transaction fees go to miners
* A high variance payment system
* Payouts at a personal balance of 0.5 MMC
* 60 Confirmation blocks
* Individual block rankings for all miners
* Room to grow
* Two admins (Eadword and KillerByte)
MINING BUILD TUTORIAL (for both windows and linux):
http://mmcwiki.com/memoryminer (curtosy of s4l1h, thanks!!)
-
any plans on making miner for windows as well? :)
-
yes, hopefully there will be a miner for windows within 12 hours from now.
-
thanks:)
-
it does nothing for me, except return 111's
-
it does nothing for me, except return 111's
yes, that is because the pool is down due to crashing.
It was working great earlier today... but then it crashed and I cant get it going again.
-
hi killer,
are you working on the pool down, will connected miners still work? because some of my miner still doing 100% load
thanks for pool.
-
i want to buy mmc send pm!!!
-
hi killer,
are you working on the pool down, will connected miners still work? because some of my miner still doing 100% load
thanks for pool.
yes, I am still working on fixing it.
If your miner is still doing 100% load, it is probobly still trying to mine the block it last recieved. If you let it keep running, when I fix the pool it will automatically connect again once I finally get it back up.
-
The server just worked for a few seconds, many mienrs connected, but then a JSON-RPC command was executed and it crashed.
I believe I have fixed the problem regarding the rogue command. Now we just have to wait for it to start up again...
Thanks for the patience! This is where being a pool operator is very stressful.
-
it does nothing for me, except return 111's
yes, that is because the pool is down due to crashing.
It was working great earlier today... but then it crashed and I cant get it going again.
Can you annunce when is possible try it?
Thanks
-
it does nothing for me, except return 111's
yes, that is because the pool is down due to crashing.
It was working great earlier today... but then it crashed and I cant get it going again.
Can you annunce when is possible try it?
Thanks
Absolutely. I will make sure to make a post and do some updates to the forum post while I am at it.
-
Just to update, the blockchain was corrupted, so I uploaded a copy from my computer and hopefully that will fix things.
-
The pool is now up and running again, hopefully for the night because I have to go!
Individual stats is having some issues. Just remember that whatever is said in the blocks is what counts! i will have these bugs fixed up tomorrow.
Shares are saved every 30 seconds, and balances are saved immediately, so nothing should be lost. Backups occour regularly. In my 3 pools I run now, I have never lost share records :)
Happy mining.
-
tks killer, cheers
-
I saw the pool very slowly right ?
-
I saw the pool very slowly right ?
the pool has frozen... restarting. Then I GTG... sry.
I will fix lots of bugs tomorrow! :D
-
seem it down again :D
-
Great Job! Thank u
I'm getting error
hash generated - 3051 / 1968 / 201500555
hash generated - 15403 / 1968 / 2805352040
hash generated - 5294 / 1968 / 4240529587
hash generated - 6322 / 1968 / 2394177526
hash generated - 1162 / 1968 / 1273493512
hash generated - 15526 / 1968 / 1418334613
hash generated - 9332 / 1968 / 268003090
hash generated - 11311 / 1968 / 1493975858
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::thread_resource_error> >'
what(): boost::thread_resource_error: Resource temporarily unavailable
Aborted
-
Damn, hoping mine would be first. Can anyone confirm this as working?
-
I unzip and after call ./memoryminer with parameter but
./memoryminer: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.54.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
ls
jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h-linux64-corei7sse4 memoryminer
jhprotominer-yvg1900-M7h-linux64-corei7sse4.tgz memoryminer.zip
what is wrong?
-
This is my procedure
only if necessary "sudo apt-get install zip unzip"
wget http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.zip
unzip memoryminer
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<address>
but error
-
This is my procedure
only if necessary "sudo apt-get install zip unzip"
wget http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.zip
unzip memoryminer
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<address>
but error
Try this:
Not sure if this works on Linux but I use this for Ubuntu to install everything needed to mine with PTS and other coins also doing it for MMC
sudo apt-get -y install git build-essential htop libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev git
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
make -f makefile.unix
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<your MMC wallet address> -genproclimit=<number of cpus>
-
How do I work on windows ?
-
How do I work on windows ?
Its not out yet, you'll need to wait a day or 2 for the windows version.
I got it running on Ubuntu 13.0 its working smoothly now.
Thanks guys.
Will start adding more hashpower now to the pool for a few hours. Will go full load once the pool is stable and good to go.
Update:
Finding shares now, we should see a noticeable increase in hashpower in the next few days :D
Update:
Using a 32 core server, averaging about 1 share per core so around 30-40 shares/h.
-
Try this:
Not sure if this works on Linux but I use this for Ubuntu to install everything needed to mine with PTS and other coins also doing it for MMC
sudo apt-get -y install git build-essential htop libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev git
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
make -f makefile.unix
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<your MMC wallet address> -genproclimit=<number of cpus>
this work.
thanks
-
The pool is "prop" or ?
-
The pool is "prop" or ?
What do you mean by prop?
-
Looks like its doing great, we found 2 blocks pretty quick around 18 minutes between each.
Got 10 servers mining on this now we should be finding blocks faster now.
-
time to time I see a "force reconnect if possible!" ... is it asking me to kill it and reconnect or is it telling me that it reconnected?
-
The pool is "prop" or ?
What do you mean by prop?
proportional?
-
time to time I see a "force reconnect if possible!" ... is it asking me to kill it and reconnect or is it telling me that it reconnected?
I think it reconnects automatically, i got something like that but it just reconnected and started mining again.
-
Win7 64bit binaries if someone can provide will be thankful...
-
pool down I think we will have to wait till KB comes back.
-
I can't access to http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/ is it down again?
Some of my miners are running fine but others can't connect.
-
too many
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
-
too many
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
Same here but others are running:
hash generated - 5478 / 1968 / 1671571089
hash generated - 7860 / 1968 / 122435842
submit: 0d380afd70b254068c131359b863984f6073d9ae8435a2b04ae9487d54f258ff
hash generated - 5177 / 1968 / 2103039203
submit: 0c3c0bfd7f66abaabaac47489c9310ea9011a7f1d72a5dd485fa4384590ac5cd
hash generated - 4015 / 1968 / 3549854178
hash generated - 15321 / 1968 / 2740331292
-
down for me...
-
My miners just died now
-
Thanks so much for creating this pool!
After dying soloing, i received my very first 0.10 MMC :) YES!
Like others I am getting
"system:111" on one of my pcs. on the other one it works. any fix :) ?
And again: Thank you !
-
Try this:
Not sure if this works on Linux but I use this for Ubuntu to install everything needed to mine with PTS and other coins also doing it for MMC
sudo apt-get -y install git build-essential htop libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev git
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
make -f makefile.unix
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<your MMC wallet address> -genproclimit=<number of cpus>
this work.
thanks
My screen show "connecting to 162.243.216.74:1399" system:111
is it right
-
My screen show "connecting to 162.243.216.74:1399" system:111
is it right
pool is down i think.
is correct
-
this is awsome. plz get it back up and running. merry christmas
-
pool is down i think.
is correct
But i am still connected with one PC and it keeps mining.. !?!
-
pool is down i think.
is correct
But i am still connected with one PC and it keeps mining.. !?!
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
-
pool is down i think.
is correct
But i am still connected with one PC and it keeps mining.. !?!
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
don't think so
-
Now site seems to be up, but I cant connect with the miner
-
Thanks for getting this pool going, even if its a little flakey at the moment :)
I've been noticing the occasional "segmentation fault" from the miner, anyone else seeing this? (its happened at least once on all the machines I've run it on).
-
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
Well I got one ... like 1 hour ago...since then.. nothing..
A few minutes ago, this happened:
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/j6ooq8.jpg)
What does "submit" mean?
-
Pool is not working even if the site loads, its frozen. KB has to restart it again but I think he's sleeping now.
I think just stick to solo mining for now until KB wakes up and fixes everything so the pool runs smoothly.
You'll notice the site loads but no stats are displayed nor blocks found.
-
killerbyte, any news on system:111 issue!? Can you pls give a short feedback about, cause its to expensive for me if all instances not able to connect.
Thx for your reply
-
killerbyte, any news on system:111 issue!? Can you pls give a short feedback about, cause its to expensive for me if all instances not able to connect.
Thx for your reply
He went to sleep. That system:111 issue means the pool is frozen he has to restart the server manually but I think tomorrow he's going to fix the pool so it runs smoothly.
Try mining solo for now or another coin until he fixes the issue your going to be mining nothing for hours if you stay on his pool.
-
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:10061
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:10061
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
I'm getting a different error, anyone know anything about this error? Or is it because of the pool that is offline?
-
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
Well I got one ... like 1 hour ago...since then.. nothing..
A few minutes ago, this happened:
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/j6ooq8.jpg)
What does "submit" mean?
What does "submit" mean?
and hash generate?
-
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
Well I got one ... like 1 hour ago...since then.. nothing..
A few minutes ago, this happened:
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/j6ooq8.jpg)
What does "submit" mean?
I'm gonna check the source of the miner, all seems a little fishy. Anyone received a payout yet?
What does "submit" mean?
and hash generate?
-
Is pool online or offline ?
On ubuntu:
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
-
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
Well I got one ... like 1 hour ago...since then.. nothing..
A few minutes ago, this happened:
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/j6ooq8.jpg)
What does "submit" mean?
I'm gonna check the source of the miner, all seems a little fishy. Anyone received a payout yet?
What does "submit" mean?
and hash generate?
Hi isaac,
The miner was hastily built. The hash generated means exactly what it says... I dont know how else to describe it.
The submit means the hash was low enough to submit.
Unfortunately, the pool froze at that point. Normally, you would be seeing a report right after that which says weather or not the server accepted the share. I will be fixing that issue within the next few hours.
And yes, payouts should execute this morning for all who have mined on the pool at all really... get ready :)
Also, are you running windows? If you have a compilation of the miner, could you provide it to the rest of the world? that would help me alot. Thanks!
Is pool online or offline ?
On ubuntu:
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
System 111 means pool offline! Maby I should just put that on the FAQ or something.... :)
-
And why is offline ? :-[
-
And why is offline ? :-[
It has probobly been offline for a long time now... the pool code has a freezing issue which I am going to resolve today and then the pool should work much better.
-
Ok, we are waiting ;)
-
Ok, we are waiting ;)
I know, the HTTP server is going nuts! :) I had to stop it to rebuild the server.
-
And are you getting payments to your wallet since it's down?
Well I got one ... like 1 hour ago...since then.. nothing..
A few minutes ago, this happened:
(http://oi40.tinypic.com/j6ooq8.jpg)
What does "submit" mean?
I'm gonna check the source of the miner, all seems a little fishy. Anyone received a payout yet?
What does "submit" mean?
and hash generate?
Hi isaac,
The miner was hastily built. The hash generated means exactly what it says... I dont know how else to describe it.
The submit means the hash was low enough to submit.
Unfortunately, the pool froze at that point. Normally, you would be seeing a report right after that which says weather or not the server accepted the share. I will be fixing that issue within the next few hours.
And yes, payouts should execute this morning for all who have mined on the pool at all really... get ready :)
Also, are you running windows? If you have a compilation of the miner, could you provide it to the rest of the world? that would help me alot. Thanks!
Is pool online or offline ?
On ubuntu:
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
System 111 means pool offline! Maby I should just put that on the FAQ or something.... :)
for the pool is sufficient the hash or the submit?
-
some of my miner still show 100% CPU load, does the mining server still work?
-
some of my miner still show 100% CPU load, does the mining server still work?
I just now got the server up again.
UPDATE: Looks like 5 blocks have been mined by the server!!! I only knew of 2. THe most recent 3 are still immature.
Payouts will start this morning as soon as I fix a couple more bugs.
-
for the pool is sufficient the hash or the submit?
THe submit, which is only 1 out of every 16 generated hashes on average. each share is worth about 0.25 MMC at this time though on an average block.
-
is pool online ???
-
is pool online ???
I just now got the server up again.
Happy mining! :)
Also, about payouts:
If you look on the server and put your address in, it should show your confirmed balance. This will be payed within 40 more blocks tops, some of the blocks matured prematurely (wow, that makes no sense) and so we need to wait. You can, however, see your balance if you look.
-
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1387904223-clip-1kb.png?nocache=1)
system:10061
it is means error ?
-
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1387904223-clip-1kb.png?nocache=1)
system:10061
it is means error ?
From my research, that error is explained here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13995830/windows-boost-asio-10061-in-async-receive-from-on-on-async-send-to
I would try reconnecting... if that still doesnt work, I will look into it soon. If you have a firewall that could block it... unblock it.
-
numbers of threads can put 4,5-... or like in memorycoin wallet only 2,4,8 .... ?
-
How do you know how much power is being generated and when the share is valid?
-
numbers of threads can put 4,5-... or like in memorycoin wallet only 2,4,8 .... ?
like the memorycoin wallet, 2, 4, or 8, or 16, or 32, or 64 :)
How do you know how much power is being generated and when the share is valid?
when the share is sent to the server, the proof of work is checked to ensure it is valid. Then it is checked again to see if it would work for a block. :)
The web server is a little overloaded rigt now, I am currently compiling a new version of the pool, so that is why.
-
i compiled 32bit version for windows... testing now... have some bugs.. when close miner with ctrl+c Miner crash.. 64bit version still can not compile (
-
i compiled 32bit version for windows... testing now... have some bugs.. when close miner with ctrl+c Miner crash.. 64bit version still can not compile (
OK. I will get the mienr on github and start working on these things.
If you can provide the 32 bit miner as it is though (those bugs are minor), it would me out. Thanks!
-
no it does not accept 64, it says max 32
Could you please unlock 32 threads limit!
do you have an idea about segv problem ?
-
numbers of threads can put 4,5-... or like in memorycoin wallet only 2,4,8 .... ?
like the memorycoin wallet, 2, 4, or 8, or 16, or 32, or 64 :)
I set the genproclimit to 8, but when I start it says this:
spawning the worker
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
Shouldn't it show WORKER0, WORKER1 etc being spawned? I'm not sure it's using more than one process. Thanks.
-
What /h is everyone getting,
Getting 13.6/h on my overclocked I5 2500k
-
what is the MMC address when block is sent ? So we can see all blocks founded.
-
numbers of threads can put 4,5-... or like in memorycoin wallet only 2,4,8 .... ?
like the memorycoin wallet, 2, 4, or 8, or 16, or 32, or 64 :)
I set the genproclimit to 8, but when I start it says this:
spawning the worker
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
Shouldn't it show WORKER0, WORKER1 etc being spawned? I'm not sure it's using more than one process. Thanks.
The reason for that is because the memorycoin miner splits into multiple threads. If you look at the CPU, it should be 100% used up in all cores though. The miner just works a little different.
What /h is everyone getting,
Getting 13.6/h on my overclocked I5 2500k
I do not know the hashrate, I will be implementing the calculation functions very soon onto the pool so everyone will know though.
what is the MMC address when block is sent ? So we can see all blocks founded.
the address is: M9pqFh5wiUUF65GM4wgUKMEbH2exDQXnLg
it has found 5 blocks, which will be payed within an hour or so to all people who helped mined them.
EDIT: Proof on chain browser: http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/address/M9pqFh5wiUUF65GM4wgUKMEbH2exDQXnLg/
-
I've added link to this great pool on www.MemoryCoin.info Good job, KillerByte!
-
Why miner says that:
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14465 / 1968 / 2693691348
hash generated - 11043 / 1968 / 1569375147
hash generated - 9890 / 1968 / 2339786459
submit: 0f928a48727a389ebdee05742bc1cd7e9398d2b9adaa50fb226f08d35feeb4df
hash generated - 14707 / 1968 / 2473709066
submit: 012882c049f1a8014888d01e1dbc3fcd8edc9473ddb05bf2659cc26110d4723c
hash generated - 6374 / 1968 / 767933619
submit: 0f2294de973702299c66667770e8b281de31b6faeb1d206551385df8b8cacf0f
but in stats there are 0 shares ?
-
just get paid from your pool killerbyte, tks for the pool
-
Just received my first payout!
Thank you :)
Keep up the great work
-
Just received my first payout!
Thank you :)
Keep up the great work
great! I was just about to announce it, but you beat me :)
If anyone did not get their first payout and they had 0.5 MMC on the pool, let me know. I am pretty sure all worked well though.
-
for the pool is sufficient the hash or the submit?
THe submit, which is only 1 out of every 16 generated hashes on average. each share is worth about 0.25 MMC at this time though on an average block.
My stat is
This Round Shares: 150
This Round Estimated Payout: 9.500113
9.5 < 150 *
-
Guys anybody facing Segmentation fault periodically ? ::)
-
Guys anybody facing Segmentation fault periodically ? ::)
sorry, missed your post.
How often does it occour? I actually get some segfaults on my personal miner sometimes as well, but they are rare and far between, usually I just use a supervisor or something to keep it going.
-
Why miner says that:
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14465 / 1968 / 2693691348
hash generated - 11043 / 1968 / 1569375147
hash generated - 9890 / 1968 / 2339786459
submit: 0f928a48727a389ebdee05742bc1cd7e9398d2b9adaa50fb226f08d35feeb4df
hash generated - 14707 / 1968 / 2473709066
submit: 012882c049f1a8014888d01e1dbc3fcd8edc9473ddb05bf2659cc26110d4723c
hash generated - 6374 / 1968 / 767933619
submit: 0f2294de973702299c66667770e8b281de31b6faeb1d206551385df8b8cacf0f
but in stats there are 0 shares ?
-
Why miner says that:
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14465 / 1968 / 2693691348
hash generated - 11043 / 1968 / 1569375147
hash generated - 9890 / 1968 / 2339786459
submit: 0f928a48727a389ebdee05742bc1cd7e9398d2b9adaa50fb226f08d35feeb4df
hash generated - 14707 / 1968 / 2473709066
submit: 012882c049f1a8014888d01e1dbc3fcd8edc9473ddb05bf2659cc26110d4723c
hash generated - 6374 / 1968 / 767933619
submit: 0f2294de973702299c66667770e8b281de31b6faeb1d206551385df8b8cacf0f
but in stats there are 0 shares ?
try restarting the miner... it seems to have disconnected to the pool and not been able to reconnect (even though it should have)...
I am still working on improving the miner, it is by far the thing that could use the most improvement on the pool.
-
Guys anybody facing Segmentation fault periodically ? ::)
sorry, missed your post.
How often does it occour? I actually get some segfaults on my personal miner sometimes as well, but they are rare and far between, usually I just use a supervisor or something to keep it going.
Thank you for your answer! Yeah they are quite rare, but code fail after it, I need to figure-out how to restart it automatically after it, coz I wanna mine continuously. The problem is I have few servers, and this error makes my life hard
-
seem we've just got another block http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/address/M9pqFh5wiUUF65GM4wgUKMEbH2exDQXnLg/ :P
-
seem we've just got another block http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/address/M9pqFh5wiUUF65GM4wgUKMEbH2exDQXnLg/ :P
the pool block finding address just recieved 29 MMC... was that a donation or an accident? The donation address is listed on the front page, that is where you should donate if that is the case :) but thank you.
FYI, that was not a block. we are getting unlucky this round. When a block is found, it is displayed on the front page.
Guys anybody facing Segmentation fault periodically ? ::)
sorry, missed your post.
How often does it occour? I actually get some segfaults on my personal miner sometimes as well, but they are rare and far between, usually I just use a supervisor or something to keep it going.
Thank you for your answer! Yeah they are quite rare, but code fail after it, I need to figure-out how to restart it automatically after it, coz I wanna mine continuously. The problem is I have few servers, and this error makes my life hard
try looking at this tutorial for primecoin, it is relevant for this miner. Look at how it runs the supervisor:
http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=1431.0
-
Guys,
This statistic is OK ?
This Round Shares: 183
This Round Estimated Payout: 10.391401
-
Guys,
This statistic is OK ?
This Round Shares: 183
This Round Estimated Payout: 10.391401
yes, it is telling you how much MMC you will get when a block is finally mined by the server.
-
Guys any idea how to restart apps in linux automatically after crush ? Use cron ?
-
Guys any idea how to restart apps in linux automatically after crush ? Use cron ?
try looking at this tutorial for primecoin, it is relevant for this miner. Look at how it runs the supervisor:
http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=1431.0
-
If anyone did not get their first payout and they had 0.5 MMC on the pool, let me know. I am pretty sure all worked well though.
you register the single hash generated or thwe submit? in a few words what helps, what is counted?
because i have smal hash rate, some hash genrate, few submit, but Always reject.
-
If anyone did not get their first payout and they had 0.5 MMC on the pool, let me know. I am pretty sure all worked well though.
you register the single hash generated or thwe submit? in a few words what helps, what is counted?
because i have smal hash rate, some hash genrate, few submit, but Always reject.
really? always reject? Only the submits are counted. If they are always rejected, thats a problem with the miner (aka, my problem which I have to fix)
-
If anyone did not get their first payout and they had 0.5 MMC on the pool, let me know. I am pretty sure all worked well though.
you register the single hash generated or thwe submit? in a few words what helps, what is counted?
because i have smal hash rate, some hash genrate, few submit, but Always reject.
really? always reject? Only the submits are counted. If they are always rejected, thats a problem with the miner (aka, my problem which I have to fix)
I am beginning to notice there are alot of rejects right now. I think it is a miner problem with syncing once work is recieved. Again, I have some work to do. :)
-
For help
hash generated - 12534 / 1968 / 2944922888
submit: 099760adacb8e9582f2684d50d460c7034c330c9212fc07f1d67db3605895a41
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-24 18:06:58 | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 2 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 11093 / 1968 / 1734373309
hash generated - 7841 / 1968 / 4189931107
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 4273 / 1968 / 1508949334
hash generated - 1200 / 1968 / 337166522
hash generated - 12683 / 1968 / 2868996195
hash generated - 2003 / 1968 / 785581784
hash generated - 12014 / 1968 / 2889015281
hash generated - 12682 / 1968 / 2137610654
hash generated - 13967 / 1968 / 692948015
hash generated - 14007 / 1968 / 1860550491
hash generated - 8709 / 1968 / 1747654688
hash generated - 10982 / 1968 / 2802570904
hash generated - 4414 / 1968 / 1863700950
hash generated - 14160 / 1968 / 1449285667
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
[MASTER] work received
submit: 0bb1aaaf50e3e56e361c42a6ac94c2127af4d61f8524d244c067681ac686a980
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-24 18:24:07 | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 3 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 8685 / 1968 / 3409534613
hash generated - 6229 / 1968 / 1533530126
hash generated - 10622 / 1968 / 1948533180
hash generated - 3161 / 1968 / 2549316853
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 10924 / 1968 / 71272094
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 9705 / 1968 / 987249324
hash generated - 7859 / 1968 / 76363563
hash generated - 5207 / 1968 / 1584071637
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 12858 / 1968 / 677190189
[MASTER] work received
-
NOW we just found a block. Check the front page to see payouts!
-
really? always reject? Only the submits are counted. If they are always rejected, thats a problem with the miner (aka, my problem which I have to fix)
when submit? this means if you have smal hashrate is not good pool? something 1.2 h/m is not for the pool?
-
NOW we just found a block. Check the front page to see payouts!
cheers :P
-
really? always reject? Only the submits are counted. If they are always rejected, thats a problem with the miner (aka, my problem which I have to fix)
when submit? this means if you have smal hashrate is not good pool? something 1.2 h/m is not for the pool?
At this time, probobly not. Once I fix the miner and the rejects, this will not be a problem again.
-
on some pc with windows work fine...
but.. on one pc dont want start....
i7-3770k os server 2008 64bit.. ((
get error
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1387910950-clip-5kb.png?nocache=1)
-
maybe little fix
net.cpp
1653
setsockopt(hListenSocket, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, (void *)&nOne, sizeof(int));change to
setsockopt(hListenSocket, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, (char *)&nOne, sizeof(int));after that dont crash when close miner with ctrl+c
-
on some pc with windows work fine...
Please upload win binary.
-
i compile success memoryminer on centos
1. su root
2.
yum install gcc-c++ m4 openssl-devel db4-devel boost-devel
3.
wget http://mirrors.kernel.org/gnu/gmp/gmp-5.1.2.tar.bz2
tar xjvf gmp-5.1.2.tar.bz2
cd gmp-5.1.2
./configure --enable-cxx
make
sudo make install
4.
wget ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz
tar xzvf openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz
cd openssl-1.0.1e
./config shared --prefix=/usr/local --libdir=lib
make
sudo make install
5.
wget http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/files/download.php?file=miniupnpc-1.6.20120509.tar.gz
tar xzvf miniupnpc-1.6.20120509.tar.gz
cd miniupnpc-1.6.20120509
make
sudo INSTALLPREFIX=/usr/local make install
6.
wget http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.zip/download
unzip boost_1_55_0.zip
cd boost_1_55_0
./bootstrap.sh
./b2
./b2 install
7.
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
you need use makefile.my
make -f makefile.my
makefile.my can download from
http://pan.baidu.com/s/1o64mIqI
MMC Tipļ¼MAFj3TrDPjWTHnNcAwGxcnYodGm3chDz3U
makefile.my diff to makefile.unix
< DEFS += $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR) $(CURDIR)/obj /usr/local/include $(BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH) $(BDB_INCLUDE_PATH) $(OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH))
< LIBS = $(addprefix -L,/usr/local/lib $(BOOST_LIB_PATH) $(BDB_LIB_PATH) $(OPENSSL_LIB_PATH))
---
> DEFS += $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR) $(CURDIR)/obj $(BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH) $(BDB_INCLUDE_PATH) $(OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH))
> LIBS = $(addprefix -L,$(BOOST_LIB_PATH) $(BDB_LIB_PATH) $(OPENSSL_LIB_PATH))
111c111
< xLDFLAGS=$(LDHARDENING) -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib $(LDFLAGS)
---
> xLDFLAGS=$(LDHARDENING) $(LDFLAGS)
-
thanks moutaint,
ave an 64 cores server with 32 GB RAM running CentOS on the way setup
-
really? always reject? Only the submits are counted. If they are always rejected, thats a problem with the miner (aka, my problem which I have to fix)
when submit? this means if you have smal hashrate is not good pool? something 1.2 h/m is not for the pool?
At this time, probobly not. Once I fix the miner and the rejects, this will not be a problem again.
this is a part of log
hash generated - 9383 / 1968 / 1639964439
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 7549 / 1968 / 1978336682
hash generated - 3927 / 1968 / 2885070531
hash generated - 12051 / 1968 / 1826227974
hash generated - 9732 / 1968 / 64316306
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 8888 / 1968 / 685722513
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 5800 / 1968 / 3993334750
hash generated - 15003 / 1968 / 3180590008
hash generated - 11931 / 1968 / 2507474543
hash generated - 36 / 1968 / 285867282
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 4551 / 1968 / 444344028
hash generated - 14335 / 1968 / 2927823906
hash generated - 14483 / 1968 / 3237400281
hash generated - 4136 / 1968 / 2355620138
hash generated - 12287 / 1968 / 1546347787
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 351 / 1968 / 146721966
hash generated - 6794 / 1968 / 897471897
hash generated - 1792 / 1968 / 31209543
hash generated - 2605 / 1968 / 4290791516
hash generated - 13570 / 1968 / 3439297709
hash generated - 13660 / 1968 / 620898492
hash generated - 12710 / 1968 / 4014125105
hash generated - 10140 / 1968 / 2548006674
hash generated - 6919 / 1968 / 1050233351
hash generated - 2715 / 1968 / 377855834
hash generated - 11799 / 1968 / 479260344
hash generated - 15722 / 1968 / 643669159
hash generated - 6092 / 1968 / 2296420467
hash generated - 12395 / 1968 / 914289421
hash generated - 10220 / 1968 / 826681932
hash generated - 11885 / 1968 / 4018757205
hash generated - 16018 / 1968 / 3487102927
hash generated - 4949 / 1968 / 2295093273
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 3506 / 1968 / 596241083
submit: 018c73f70ff2b86a483f00afdd5ac95c49437cc3a5ac433f5c35c92cbe7eca39
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-24 19:07:45 | VL: 0 (0.0%), RJ: 4 (100.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 5281 / 1968 / 1118291289
hash generated - 4680 / 1968 / 1677219454
hash generated - 9195 / 1968 / 62032561
hash generated - 7077 / 1968 / 4124192672
hash generated - 16225 / 1968 / 424474309
hash generated - 937 / 1968 / 2265969843
hash generated - 632 / 1968 / 2746277832
hash generated - 5065 / 1968 / 918535928
hash generated - 8554 / 1968 / 864771429
hash generated - 6702 / 1968 / 3703329169
hash generated - 7740 / 1968 / 421179786
hash generated - 10296 / 1968 / 3379927745
hash generated - 15712 / 1968 / 893687493
hash generated - 7562 / 1968 / 1058617586
hash generated - 928 / 1968 / 150131157
hash generated - 16122 / 1968 / 1620269985
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 9326 / 1968 / 1560287996
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 11903 / 1968 / 1446743801
hash generated - 10906 / 1968 / 168626912
hash generated - 7978 / 1968 / 2779805904
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 5092 / 1968 / 982033437
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 12308 / 1968 / 4004276001
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 4916 / 1968 / 1553380007
hash generated - 13812 / 1968 / 3684082505
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 9347 / 1968 / 2729573739
hash generated - 13870 / 1968 / 3019631243
hash generated - 10649 / 1968 / 1601920478
hash generated - 4614 / 1968 / 897499174
submit: 0f7708ff6a486fccb4546fc218d8e51cf9f45e953e3069747e93be508009d1af
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-24 19:34:13 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 0.6/h), VL: 1 (20.0%), RJ: 4 (80.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
many hash, but only two submit, why? I am ignorant about it, I try to understand.
-
I'm mining for? I do not see my address in rank
(http://i.imgur.com/3zMTzLG.png)
-
releasing a linux miner before windows miner encourages VPS and botnet users.
-
to POOL OWNER , please upgrade server , it is getting slow ;)
-
to POOL OWNER , please upgrade server , it is getting slow ;)
And now it's down again...
-
i thnk first of all pool owner must get the bounty of 1000+ MMC, then sell for $ to get money to upgrade the server ;D
-
to POOL OWNER , please upgrade server , it is getting slow ;)
+1 :)
-
is the first pool mmc, and whether it was easy there were already many. Hopefully that will be resolved.
-
Any estimates as to when the server is coming back up...?
I need some sleep :)
-
I would gladly host this for you OP as your server can't handle it.
-
hey all, sorry I had to go about 2 hours ago.
Server froze. Restarting... and then everything will be good again.
-
to POOL OWNER , please upgrade server , it is getting slow ;)
+1 :)
Server will be upgraded, you are right. Working very hard on it.
Let me at least get out of beta first :)
-
@KillerByte - is that a hw or sw issue?
-
Unconfirmed and balance become zero... BTW some block were found.
-
@KillerByte - is that a hw or sw issue?
software issue most likely... caused by deadlock within threads.
Unconfirmed and balance become zero... BTW some block were found.
also a software issue. Fixing right now... (literally)
-
balance 0 )) nice pool))
-
Fixed the unconfirmed user balances issue.
SERVER UPGRADE:
It has been scheduled! Will require downtime in 9 hours from now. This upgrade will signiffigantly improve the server speed.
Thanks for all the support, we are mining blocks really fast now!
-
Fixed the unconfirmed user balances issue.
Great!
-
Fixed the unconfirmed user balances issue.
SERVER UPGRADE:
It has been scheduled! Will require downtime in 9 hours from now. This upgrade will signiffigantly improve the server speed.
Thanks for all the support, we are mining blocks really fast now!
(http://i.imgur.com/3zMTzLG.png)
I'm mining for? I do not see my address in rank
-
Fixed the unconfirmed user balances issue.
SERVER UPGRADE:
It has been scheduled! Will require downtime in 9 hours from now. This upgrade will signiffigantly improve the server speed.
Thanks for all the support, we are mining blocks really fast now!
(http://i.imgur.com/3zMTzLG.png)
I'm mining for? I do not see my address in rank
That looks like a primecoin miner... not the memorycoin miner.!
-
That looks like a primecoin miner... not the memorycoin miner.!
Translate
Has memorycoin mining for windows?
-
That looks like a primecoin miner... not the memorycoin miner.!
Translate
Has memorycoin mining for windows?
One person managed to compile it, but I have not been able to make it yet (as in I havent successfully done so)
If anyone has this miner compiled for windows, it would be great if you could share it :)
-
Please change forum link on the home page to point this thread.
-
Please change forum link on the home page to point this thread.
Thank you for reminding me :)
-
Thank you, i just brought all my buddies to mine here, so we NEED something STABLE ;)
Fixed the unconfirmed user balances issue.
SERVER UPGRADE:
It has been scheduled! Will require downtime in 9 hours from now. This upgrade will signiffigantly improve the server speed.
Thanks for all the support, we are mining blocks really fast now!
-
Trying to find some software to setup the pool. Is this pool's software publicly available?
-
Is usefull have a port like 8080 for bypass firewall for mining. It is not an immediate need
-
It looks like it died again ;/
-
I am starting for mining 3 server but pool is need stable :)
-
It's still a beta pool, and the first one at that. It's going to need tweaks and updates; and it's going to be up and down. So expect occasional downtime.
I don't run the pool nor am I affiliated with it, but it needed to be said.
-
+1
-
working now. Its going to be alittle bumpy I guess until the new server arrives.
-
can anyone write more about the commands to put in for cpu usage. don't get 100% load.
-
can anyone write more about the commands to put in for cpu usage. don't get 100% load.
-genproclimit=<number of cpus>
-
Hey guys I was wondering if anyone could help me out.
I'm mining on amazon servers using Ubuntu as the OS. I created an image that has everything set for mining all I need to do is launch an instance (server), SSH into that server and type in:
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=.......................etc
Is there anyway to make the miner start automatically without having to SSH into each server?
I was thinking of adding that command in the "Advanced details" at the bottom of the page where you set your max spot price and other options.
Would that work?
Thanks.
-
Hey guys I was wondering if anyone could help me out.
I'm mining on amazon servers using Ubuntu as the OS. I created an image that has everything set for mining all I need to do is launch an instance (server), SSH into that server and type in:
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=.......................etc
Is there anyway to make the miner start automatically without having to SSH into each server?
I was thinking of adding that command in the "Advanced details" at the bottom of the page where you set your max spot price and other options.
Would that work?
Thanks.
sudo crontab -e
then add
@reboot /path/to/memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<your MMC wallet address> -genproclimit=<number of cpus>
Press F2 to save and every time the machine boots the command will be ran.
-
can anyone write more about the commands to put in for cpu usage. don't get 100% load.
-genproclimit=<number of cpus>
numbers of cpu or cores?
-
Hey guys I was wondering if anyone could help me out.
I'm mining on amazon servers using Ubuntu as the OS. I created an image that has everything set for mining all I need to do is launch an instance (server), SSH into that server and type in:
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=.......................etc
Is there anyway to make the miner start automatically without having to SSH into each server?
I was thinking of adding that command in the "Advanced details" at the bottom of the page where you set your max spot price and other options.
Would that work?
Thanks.
sudo crontab -e
then add
@reboot /path/to/memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=<your MMC wallet address> -genproclimit=<number of cpus>
Press F2 to save and every time the machine boots the command will be ran.
Thanks!
Here's 1 MMC for your help :)
-
if you can auto restart miner on error.
/usr/bin/screen -dmS miner1 bash -c 'until memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MQoJDguWCMAug2J2rRUEsZPC9UjdSCppkS -genproclimit=8 && false; do echo "Error, restarting...";done'
MQoJDguWCMAug2J2rRUEsZPC9UjdSCppkS change wallet adress.
-
Its been awhile since we found a block, diff didn't go up that much for it to take this long. Currently at 23000+ shares. Could it be do due to connection problems that happening?
-
finally get out Ć² stuck block, 33k shares, incredible
-
I am beginning to worry there is an exploit with the pool share system...which allows miners to submit valid shares more than once. I had code to stop this since the beginning, but it may not be working. I doubt this is the case, but I will shrewdly observe this problem as soon as I get home tonight.
The server upgrade is coming in 3 hours tonight, should improve server uptime quite a bit.
For those helping others on the forums while I am not here, thanks!
-
I've noticed some rather odd behavior- when you have two miners using same address one of them seems to fall behind quite a bit(identical machines). I'm going to switch to two addresses and see if it straightens out....
-
Immediately after I start the miner it works for about 2 minutes. Here's an example:
submit: 020d527e6d7ae2dbe41fdcb2ac1892ed349ef426356a2680fbac1d5ff371d2ea
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:07:28 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 52.9/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 8206 / 1968 / 3410774748
hash generated - 3065 / 1968 / 3346170544
hash generated - 1418 / 1968 / 4147674291
[MASTER] work received
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
It submits a couple of shares within the first minute or 2 then seems to get disconnected. After that it will submit more shares, but won't receive any response, and won't work until I start again. Checking if anyone else has this issue.
-
Hi, KillerByte, Thanks for you effort for the pool
I got following output in my miner, it looks like it's sending the same share within a short time. The first is accepted and the second is rejected. Does that mean some duplicate work is in different threads? Maybe you can fix it to make the miner more efficient.
hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:32:58 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 144.0/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 9188 / 1968 / 1831948737
hash generated - 9578 / 1968 / 3607491106
hash generated - 8598 / 1968 / 811137229
hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:33:16 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 105.9/h), VL: 2 (66.7%), RJ: 1
(33.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 2666 / 1968 / 3113632687
hash generated - 13359 / 1968 / 3249895379
-
i compile success memoryminer on centos
1. su root
2.
yum install gcc-c++ m4 openssl-devel db4-devel boost-devel
3.
wget http://mirrors.kernel.org/gnu/gmp/gmp-5.1.2.tar.bz2
tar xjvf gmp-5.1.2.tar.bz2
cd gmp-5.1.2
./configure --enable-cxx
make
sudo make install
4.
wget ftp://ftp.pca.dfn.de/pub/tools/net/openssl/source/openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz
tar xzvf openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz
cd openssl-1.0.1e
./config shared --prefix=/usr/local --libdir=lib
make
sudo make install
5.
wget http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/files/download.php?file=miniupnpc-1.6.20120509.tar.gz
tar xzvf miniupnpc-1.6.20120509.tar.gz
cd miniupnpc-1.6.20120509
make
sudo INSTALLPREFIX=/usr/local make install
6.
wget http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.55.0/boost_1_55_0.zip/download
unzip boost_1_55_0.zip
cd boost_1_55_0
./bootstrap.sh
./b2
./b2 install
7.
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
you need use makefile.my
make -f makefile.my
MMC Tipļ¼MAFj3TrDPjWTHnNcAwGxcnYodGm3chDz3U
makefile.my diff to makefile.unix
< DEFS += $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR) $(CURDIR)/obj /usr/local/include $(BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH) $(BDB_INCLUDE_PATH) $(OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH))
< LIBS = $(addprefix -L,/usr/local/lib $(BOOST_LIB_PATH) $(BDB_LIB_PATH) $(OPENSSL_LIB_PATH))
---
> DEFS += $(addprefix -I,$(CURDIR) $(CURDIR)/obj $(BOOST_INCLUDE_PATH) $(BDB_INCLUDE_PATH) $(OPENSSL_INCLUDE_PATH))
> LIBS = $(addprefix -L,$(BOOST_LIB_PATH) $(BDB_LIB_PATH) $(OPENSSL_LIB_PATH))
111c111
< xLDFLAGS=$(LDHARDENING) -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib $(LDFLAGS)
---
> xLDFLAGS=$(LDHARDENING) $(LDFLAGS)
hi moutain,
could you post your makefile.my?
-
pool down again?
-
GET http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/ajax/stats
500 Internal Server Error
-
pool down again?
It seems that way.
Guys the System:111 error means that the pool is down but also means everything is working correctly except a valid connection to the pool.
I think this should be solved after server migration in a few hours so sit tight and wait until the new server comes in.
-
Immediately after I start the miner it works for about 2 minutes. Here's an example:
submit: 020d527e6d7ae2dbe41fdcb2ac1892ed349ef426356a2680fbac1d5ff371d2ea
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:07:28 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 52.9/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 8206 / 1968 / 3410774748
hash generated - 3065 / 1968 / 3346170544
hash generated - 1418 / 1968 / 4147674291
[MASTER] work received
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
It submits a couple of shares within the first minute or 2 then seems to get disconnected. After that it will submit more shares, but won't receive any response, and won't work until I start again. Checking if anyone else has this issue.
Thanks for your insight on this.
Hi, KillerByte, Thanks for you effort for the pool
I got following output in my miner, it looks like it's sending the same share within a short time. The first is accepted and the second is rejected. Does that mean some duplicate work is in different threads? Maybe you can fix it to make the miner more efficient.
hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:32:58 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 144.0/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 9188 / 1968 / 1831948737
hash generated - 9578 / 1968 / 3607491106
hash generated - 8598 / 1968 / 811137229
hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:33:16 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 105.9/h), VL: 2 (66.7%), RJ: 1
(33.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 2666 / 1968 / 3113632687
hash generated - 13359 / 1968 / 3249895379
Different keys are aupposed to be sent to each client, maybe there is a problem with the key pool for memorycoin?
-
@moutain: makefile.my:150: *** missing separator :'(
which version of centos are you using, i'm currently on centos 5.10, that's bad :'(
-
@moutain: makefile.my:150: *** missing separator :'(
which version of centos are you using, i'm currently on centos 5.10, that's bad :'(
you cat get it from http://pan.baidu.com/s/1o64mIqI
-
tks moutujan,
still have some errors, but i give up, will ask the provider to re-install to ubuntu one, that one i'm familiar with. :-[
tks for your support
-
We Need Windows Version!!!!!
-
We Need Windows Version!!!!!
Really it's so. We don't want to assemble/compile, make/install, errors with missing libs and other linux brainfu*king stuff.
-
you guys may try to compile on windows with mingw, i;ve done before with compile bitcoin and litecoin on windows, just for practice only.
google for compile bitcoin/litecoin on windows, it may be the same with this
-
you guys may try to compile on windows with mingw, i;ve done before with compile bitcoin and litecoin on windows, just for practice only.
google for compile bitcoin/litecoin on windows, it may be the same with this
>src/main.cpp:1925: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
>src/main.cpp:5723: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
> 1925 if(vtx[0].GetValueOut()!=73366415666531){
> 5723 int64 bottomOfThePollAmount=9223372036854775807;
That's what I mean. Excuse me, I'm not a programmer.
-
Server upgrade starts now!
-
killerbyte, this is GREAT Xmas's present ever!
tks
-
killerbyte, this is GREAT Xmas's present ever!
tks
well, there will still be bugs to fix, so dont get TOO excited... :)
-
Well, I also have another question. Is this coin can utilize much more memory than 1 GB? If I have 32 GB could I use them all?
-
Well, I also have another question. Is this coin can utilize much more memory than 1 GB? If I have 32 GB could I use them all?
It should only use 1GB no matter how many threads you have.
I will now address the maximum threads limit problem... do my best to fix it. Stay tuned!
EDIT: Pool just crashed. I will fix!!!
-
hi Killer,
how long does the upgrade take? it's only upgrade the front web server or also mining server? will minging will stop while upgrading?
-
windows greatly ignored
-
windows greatly ignored
please dont look at is ignored, the pool is still in ultra-heavy development as it is. I still have not been able to figure out how to provide for windows.
To everyone else, the pool hardware (previously said software, no, it was hardware) update is complete. The pool is having crashing issues, so I am fixing right now. Should be fixed soon hopefully.
-
FaSan seem so quite on the plan of his pool :D
-
Whats up with the payout?
-
Whats up with the payout?
The pool is pretty much down right now... so payouts cannot occour. I am still working on figuring out why it is freezing... some JSON-RPC issue or something.
-
Pool is back online
Sorry for the downtime. I think I might have finally nailed the freezing bug. Either way... notice the speed improvement! The pool is loading much faster now and can process more shares quickly.
Tomorrow is Christmas, so I will not be working on the code in the morning. Also, a potential huge miner improvement may be coming! (like, a huge improvement that will fix the issues with Windows, not accepted shares, and show stats).
Anyway, sorry about the tough server upgrade.
Payouts should execute within 30 minutes so long as the pool doesnt crash. 800+ MMC is ready to do so. :)
-
Killer, Merry Xmas!
-
Merry Xmas Guy,
How to remove 1GB limit, I have match more!
-
Merry Xmas Guy,
How to remove 1GB limit, I have match more!
I do not believe that it will improve your speed to raise the limit. That would be a question for FreeTrade since I am not an expert on the mining process.
-
Man...if you had windows support - i would have brought in around 1000 HPM within a few hours :/
-
Merry Xmas Guy,
How to remove 1GB limit, I have match more!
I do not believe that it will improve your speed to raise the limit. That would be a question for FreeTrade since I am not an expert on the mining process.
I thought it should utilize memory hardly.
-
YEA BABY!
2 blocks in a row :)
-
Man...if you had windows support - i would have brought in around 1000 HPM within a few hours :/
sorry :(
Miners who need more than 32 threads:
The bug has been fixed! You can now mine with more than 32 threads (the limit was set to 128, I hope that is sufficient!).
The new source code is also in a Github repo. You should be able to pull. Give it a try! https://github.com/KillerByte/memoryminer
YEA BABY!
2 blocks in a row :)
ALSO: We just mined 2 blocks in a row. Hooray!
ALSO2: We have a little problem with payouts which will delay them until tomorrow. The user balances seem to be incorrect, so they will be recalculated. Sorry for the delay.
-
KillerByte thank you for the update!!!
Man...if you had windows support - i would have brought in around 1000 HPM within a few hours :/
is it a big problem to compile under windows ?
-
KillerByte thank you for the update!!!
Man...if you had windows support - i would have brought in around 1000 HPM within a few hours :/
is it a big problem to compile under windows ?
yes, I have no experience with cross compiling, and I have been asking people who have successfully done it with their windows machines to provide a binary... it would help me alot...
-
Guys,
question, i have a server which has only 2 CPUs. But i can run -genproclimit=20. If i set like that does it has advantage or just same as running -genproclimit=2?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
-
Guys,
question, i have a server which has only 2 CPUs. But i can run -genproclimit=20. If i set like that does it has advantage or just same as running -genproclimit=2?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
most of the time it just causes a slowdown a believe, that is my experience with XPM. If you have an intel processor with hyperthreading though, make sure to use all the cores.
-
Guys,
question, i have a server which has only 2 CPUs. But i can run -genproclimit=20. If i set like that does it has advantage or just same as running -genproclimit=2?
Thanks in advance,
Mike
most of the time it just causes a slowdown a believe, that is my experience with XPM. If you have an intel processor with hyperthreading though, make sure to use all the cores.
thankyou for your fast reply killerbyte,
Can you help me the best -genproclimit=?? set
below is my server CPUs
root@MMC3-8:~/memoryminer/src# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 2
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 2
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.0
stepping : 3
microcode : 0x1
cpu MHz : 1999.999
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm rep_good nopl pni vmx cx16 popcnt hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 3999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Thanks again,
Mike
-
thankyou for your fast reply killerbyte,
Can you help me the best -genproclimit=?? set
looks like a dual core... so you would be most efficient setting -genproclimit=2
-
thankyou for your fast reply killerbyte,
Can you help me the best -genproclimit=?? set
looks like a dual core... so you would be most efficient setting -genproclimit=2
thank you very much killerByte :)
-
Are payouts handled automatically? FAQ says about 0.5 MMC but right now I have greater amount on balance. Could you please clarify this?
-
Please also change XPM to MMC in the following text on FAQ page "The balance is the amount of XPM mined on blocks...".
-
[STATS] 2013-12-25 08:41:07 | SHARES: 51 (100.0% | 8.7/h), VL: 51 (72.9%), RJ: 19 (27.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
too much RJ, the miner need to optimize sometime :-\
-
I am unsure how to replace my miner on cloud with new miner... can I get a direct link like on OP to new miner as I am unsure how to unzip file properly
-
Solo mining is still profitable:
http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/tx/f0142a62e091c6def4c265da6aa6d092daae33712a3ed23f7ba44c68440ed9e8/
1.22 H/m finds two blocks in 3 days.
-
Solo mining is still profitable:
http://www.chainbrowser.com/memorycoin/tx/f0142a62e091c6def4c265da6aa6d092daae33712a3ed23f7ba44c68440ed9e8/
1.22 H/m finds two blocks in 3 days.
Well... A lot of people have been mining with a lot more than 1.22H/m for a lot longer than 3d and found nothing...
so if your're lucky.. yeah it can be profitable
-
The trick to mining solo is Persistence =)
I'm completely risk free (no clouds) running a total of 30 H/m
-
ALSO2: We have a little problem with payouts which will delay them until tomorrow. The user balances seem to be incorrect, so they will be recalculated. Sorry for the delay.
estimated payout appears tied to 280 as a reward, not to the actual reward. (as of right now, I'm hashing 10% of the pool, and the estimated reward shown as calculated was 28.0) not sure if it's related or just a reporting issue on the individual stats page
edit: (for clarity, I mean the "This Round Estimated Payout" value on the individual stats page)
-
getting an error sometimes on some of my servers and mining stops.
Segmentation error: Core Dumped.
Anyway around that so I don't have to restart it manually?
Thanks.
-
Please release a windows miner..
-
getting an error sometimes on some of my servers and mining stops.
Segmentation error: Core Dumped.
Anyway around that so I don't have to restart it manually?
Thanks.
Create a .sh file and run it instead of calling the miner directly:
echo '#! /bin/bash' > run.sh
echo 'while true; do ./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN -genproclimit=32; sleep 1; done' >> run.sh
chmod +x run.sh
nohup ./run.sh &
Hope it helps..
MMC: MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN
-
getting an error sometimes on some of my servers and mining stops.
Segmentation error: Core Dumped.
Anyway around that so I don't have to restart it manually?
Thanks.
Create a .sh file and run it instead of calling the miner directly:
echo '#! /bin/bash' > run.sh
echo 'while true; do ./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN -genproclimit=32; sleep 1; done' >> run.sh
chmod +x run.sh
nohup ./run.sh &
Hope it helps..
MMC: MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN
That will work with Ubuntu 13.0 right?
Should I enter those commands in the miner/src dir or root?
I entered it in the miner dir and got this:
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ echo '#! /bin/bash' > run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ echo 'while true; do ./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MJaEYRNmKg7CH11sAX8swDcMhdAbY4KnqE -genproclimit=32; sleep 1; done' >> run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ chmod +x run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ nohup ./run.sh &
[3] 74238
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ nohup: ignoring input and appending output to ānohup.outā
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$
Did that work? Should it run the miner or do I now just enter the miner command to run it?
Thanks.
-
I'v started mining on WINDOWS7 using the primeminer for XPM (the 32bit version, because the 64bit one crashes) and it seem to WORK - I'm getting shares, but I don't know if I will get paid or smth :? so someone can answer me - should I continue with this or w8 for a proper miner for Windows???
(http://store.picbg.net/pubpic/88/B1/7afe8c2b095988b1.jpg)
-
getting an error sometimes on some of my servers and mining stops.
Segmentation error: Core Dumped.
Anyway around that so I don't have to restart it manually?
Thanks.
Create a .sh file and run it instead of calling the miner directly:
echo '#! /bin/bash' > run.sh
echo 'while true; do ./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN -genproclimit=32; sleep 1; done' >> run.sh
chmod +x run.sh
nohup ./run.sh &
Hope it helps..
MMC: MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN
That will work with Ubuntu 13.0 right?
Should I enter those commands in the miner/src dir or root?
I entered it in the miner dir and got this:
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ echo '#! /bin/bash' > run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ echo 'while true; do ./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MJaEYRNmKg7CH11sAX8swDcMhdAbY4KnqE -genproclimit=32; sleep 1; done' >> run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ chmod +x run.sh
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ nohup ./run.sh &
[3] 74238
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$ nohup: ignoring input and appending output to ānohup.outā
ubuntu@ip-10-237-131-99:~/memoryminer/src$
Did that work? Should it run the miner or do I now just enter the miner command to run it?
Thanks.
Yep, it probably worked. You can press enter and then call less nohup.out to see the miner's progress.
Then you can leave the console freely without killing the process
-
Cloud mining guide for the pool:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1612.0
-
I'v started mining on WINDOWS7 using the primeminer for XPM (the 32bit version, because the 64bit one crashes) and it seem to WORK - I'm getting shares, but I don't know if I will get paid or smth :? so someone can answer me - should I continue with this or w8 for a proper miner for Windows???
I don't think it will work, mining MMC is different than mining XPM. I wouldn't waste using that unless you want to test it and wait until we find the next block. Look for your wallet address in the payout list if its not their than it doesn't work.
@itsik78
Thanks its working I guess it doesn't show the miner working until you request to see it. I checked the cpu usage using the htop command and happy to see 100% across all 32 cores :)
Thanks for the help. 2 MMC for your help!
-
@itsik78
Thanks its working I guess it doesn't show the miner working until you request to see it. I checked the cpu usage using the htop command and happy to see 100% across all 32 cores :)
Thanks for the help. 2 MMC for your help!
Yep, as I said, you can see the progress in the nohup.out file (it prints everything there instead of directly on the console).
I suggest you take a look at the file with the command I gave you just to make sure :)
Thanks for the tip!
EDIT: OH! Forgot to tell you that in the "less nohup.out" screen you need to press shift+f in order to scroll down to the bottom of the file and see the live progress :) (and ctrl+c >> q to quit)
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 11570 / 1968 / 303079896
hash generated - 4827 / 1968 / 910974120
hash generated - 8228 / 1968 / 2431904866
hash generated - 15772 / 1968 / 3861104560
hash generated - 11306 / 1968 / 209050519
hash generated - 6014 / 1968 / 787888148
hash generated - 6025 / 1968 / 192069345
hash generated - 4731 / 1968 / 908893491
hash generated - 906 / 1968 / 1802277146
hash generated - 6497 / 1968 / 2469177481
hash generated - 1081 / 1968 / 2618521548
hash generated - 10189 / 1968 / 2131177348
hash generated - 746 / 1968 / 253564879
hash generated - 7678 / 1968 / 1412918082
hash generated - 15125 / 1968 / 1104544894
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
-
It seems the pool is down again. :'(
-
pool down again.... very unstable
-
yes down :( , system:111
Mike
-
KillerByte thank you for the update!!!
Man...if you had windows support - i would have brought in around 1000 HPM within a few hours :/
is it a big problem to compile under windows ?
i compiled for windows but only 32bit version ... and miner work very unstable... if you give me little donation I will post link to windows miner
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
-
What is the complete command crontab on ubuntu to reload (or load) miner every hour ?
-
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
you can give me little donation MVTEcnoTrUAeYrd3yzXm3nd4S73yACDtMa
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
No.
"getmininginfo" only works in solo mining.
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
No.
"getmininginfo" only works in solo mining.
thx!!
but how can i get the hash when i use the program mining in the pool?
i use vmware to build ubuntu, i dont know whether it works normally..
hash generated - 3920 / 1968 / 3548334053
hash generated - 14755 / 1968 / 4051026021
hash generated - 12156 / 1968 / 4042046436
hash generated - 9504 / 1968 / 2717896679
hash generated - 14327 / 1968 / 1523562764
submit: 0ebb088aff6a4ddb4caebe24a8e48b9668a7c515e07da1ab308483178a3703df
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 11:26:19 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 5.0/h), VL: 9 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 12717 / 1968 / 3332454946
hash generated - 7116 / 1968 / 2471827524
hash generated - 4638 / 1968 / 1550370564
hash generated - 2691 / 1968 / 1569100094
hash generated - 8408 / 1968 / 2217560168
hash generated - 13069 / 1968 / 1422704249
-
what a loooooooooong block, 6k1 share already :-\
-
maybe because the pool is down...
hash generated - 7327 / 1968 / 3091515341
hash generated - 7327 / 1968 / 3091515341
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
-
got only 3 rejected shares :S
-
I was mining all the night with 6 computers and I didn't receive anything...why?
-
On some of my computers I keep losing connection and getting the "force reconnect" message. It's like it just stops receiving work.
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
No.
"getmininginfo" only works in solo mining.
thx!!
but how can i get the hash when i use the program mining in the pool?
i use vmware to build ubuntu, i dont know whether it works normally..
hash generated - 3920 / 1968 / 3548334053
hash generated - 14755 / 1968 / 4051026021
hash generated - 12156 / 1968 / 4042046436
hash generated - 9504 / 1968 / 2717896679
hash generated - 14327 / 1968 / 1523562764
submit: 0ebb088aff6a4ddb4caebe24a8e48b9668a7c515e07da1ab308483178a3703df
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 11:26:19 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 5.0/h), VL: 9 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 12717 / 1968 / 3332454946
hash generated - 7116 / 1968 / 2471827524
hash generated - 4638 / 1968 / 1550370564
hash generated - 2691 / 1968 / 1569100094
hash generated - 8408 / 1968 / 2217560168
hash generated - 13069 / 1968 / 1422704249
It works perfectly. 5 shares per hour is not bad for a normal computer.
-
Are you getting payments from the pool?
-
I was mining all the night with 6 computers and I didn't receive anything...why?
Pool mining or solo? It's normal for solo, but should not have no shares if you are using this pool.
-
I was mining all the night with 6 computers and I didn't receive anything...why?
Pool mining or solo? It's normal for solo, but should not have no shares if you are using this pool.
I mean in this pool, 6 machines mining all the night and received 0
-
I was mining all the night with 6 computers and I didn't receive anything...why?
Pool mining or solo? It's normal for solo, but should not have no shares if you are using this pool.
I mean in this pool, 6 machines mining all the night and received 0
Check your balance here:
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/individual
He said he will pay in a few hours as there was a problem with the earnings calculations.
-
The same problem for me ... I didn't receive anything...why
The mining command line:
./memoryminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 -pooluser=MRmtccS9jbJHcPa4wF8frmNuMsZSryNqtM -genproclimit=16
And the output :
********************************************
*** running time: 0.581h
***
*** valid: 0 (0.000%)
*** rejects: 0 (0.000%)
*** stale: 0 (0.000%)
********************************************
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
No.
"getmininginfo" only works in solo mining.
thx!!
but how can i get the hash when i use the program mining in the pool?
i use vmware to build ubuntu, i dont know whether it works normally..
hash generated - 3920 / 1968 / 3548334053
hash generated - 14755 / 1968 / 4051026021
hash generated - 12156 / 1968 / 4042046436
hash generated - 9504 / 1968 / 2717896679
hash generated - 14327 / 1968 / 1523562764
submit: 0ebb088aff6a4ddb4caebe24a8e48b9668a7c515e07da1ab308483178a3703df
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 11:26:19 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 5.0/h), VL: 9 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 12717 / 1968 / 3332454946
hash generated - 7116 / 1968 / 2471827524
hash generated - 4638 / 1968 / 1550370564
hash generated - 2691 / 1968 / 1569100094
hash generated - 8408 / 1968 / 2217560168
hash generated - 13069 / 1968 / 1422704249
It works perfectly. 5 shares per hour is not bad for a normal computer.
Thx!!!
-
hi, I'm a new miner, using ubuntu built by vmware
my cpu is e3-1230v2
i dont know the hash is correct or not
could someone help me check the hash is normalļ¼thxļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
Push "getmininginfo" into console (it's in "About" menu of wallet). For your CPU hashrate = 1hpm looks like real value.
the wallet shows it is not mining after the words pushed in..
when i am mining in the pool ,does the wallet show mining condition?
No.
"getmininginfo" only works in solo mining.
thx!!
but how can i get the hash when i use the program mining in the pool?
i use vmware to build ubuntu, i dont know whether it works normally..
hash generated - 3920 / 1968 / 3548334053
hash generated - 14755 / 1968 / 4051026021
hash generated - 12156 / 1968 / 4042046436
hash generated - 9504 / 1968 / 2717896679
hash generated - 14327 / 1968 / 1523562764
submit: 0ebb088aff6a4ddb4caebe24a8e48b9668a7c515e07da1ab308483178a3703df
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 11:26:19 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 5.0/h), VL: 9 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 12717 / 1968 / 3332454946
hash generated - 7116 / 1968 / 2471827524
hash generated - 4638 / 1968 / 1550370564
hash generated - 2691 / 1968 / 1569100094
hash generated - 8408 / 1968 / 2217560168
hash generated - 13069 / 1968 / 1422704249
It works perfectly. 5 shares per hour is not bad for a normal computer.
have you received any MMC in this pool i mean after a period time of mining i get no MMC in my wallet with about 20 shares
-
Constantly losing connection to the pool making me generate useless hashes...
-
Constantly losing connection to the pool making me generate useless hashes...
what is the error? Standard 111 or something else?
have you received any MMC in this pool i mean after a period time of mining i get no MMC in my wallet with about 20 shares
Couple things:
1. Shares become value in blocks once they are mined
2. Then the block must be confirmed. This is something required by the network and is pretty much out of my control
3. Then the balance must reach 0.5 MMC
4. Then you will be payed.
Additionally, the payouts are currently stalled due to a little problem in the system. You will be payed today.
One payout has already been executed, so this one has just been delayed. Sorry about that.
Has anyone been experiencing lower reject rates with the new server? My computer has not had a single reject all night.
-
It's just hashing forever and not receiving any new "[Master] Work received". Then after a while it will go "force reconnect".
The round shares on this block is pretty nuts btw... I don't get it.
-
It's just hashing forever and not receiving any new "[Master] Work received". Then after a while it will go "force reconnect".
The round shares on this block is pretty nuts btw... I don't get it.
Same here, and lots of REJECTS
Attached screenshot, 10 instance of 2CPUs
http://gigamike.net/mmc-mining.png
This is may 3rd creation of instance coz 3 hours ago pool was down (system:111).
Mike
-
20000k shares??? wtf?
-
It looks like the pool get stuck in current round, now it's >20k shares.
Not sure if this is a real difficult block or a pool error.
Difficulty: 0.000009 Round Shares: 20112
-
...
hash generated - 5083 / 1968 / 926409133
hash generated - 7521 / 1968 / 1235348378
hash generated - 6158 / 1968 / 1230314980
hash generated - 9613 / 1968 / 2298206264
hash generated - 10136 / 1968 / 4224117508
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14839 / 1968 / 1271190545
hash generated - 2521 / 1968 / 784314886
hash generated - 12998 / 1968 / 2434724883
submit: 04515c4ce9ab3ebdaf47eea4e4bc7b8283ba3a1a0192d5ab1f4dff551ab62fd9
hash generated - 1610 / 1968 / 683861551
hash generated - 8359 / 1968 / 151815384
hash generated - 5642 / 1968 / 3949467009
hash generated - 7694 / 1968 / 3906161130
hash generated - 12015 / 1968 / 2877861309
submit: 0deb426e37d00e446ae9dd90549c3bcf6a716726d58f2e137f36c1dff757ca6e
---------
...
hash generated - 7862 / 1968 / 363362621
hash generated - 6927 / 1968 / 3940664704
hash generated - 15608 / 1968 / 1294154513
hash generated - 6283 / 1968 / 1813826823
hash generated - 4354 / 1968 / 2845300199
hash generated - 2903 / 1968 / 1896438483
hash generated - 1588 / 1968 / 2485581397
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 6381 / 1968 / 1642720956
hash generated - 5818 / 1968 / 680210766
hash generated - 14235 / 1968 / 976458958
hash generated - 7881 / 1968 / 946934172
hash generated - 2846 / 1968 / 2287189723
submit: 05395e320e40a06981721fa5979d4487a7c71d6aa7b101613bc7b4903d57cda4
hash generated - 2565 / 1968 / 554308537
hash generated - 4909 / 1968 / 2734194562
hash generated - 5217 / 1968 / 2924256714
hash generated - 5479 / 1968 / 3364435499
On two different computers. It'll work for a bit then just stops receiving work.
-
...
hash generated - 5083 / 1968 / 926409133
hash generated - 7521 / 1968 / 1235348378
hash generated - 6158 / 1968 / 1230314980
hash generated - 9613 / 1968 / 2298206264
hash generated - 10136 / 1968 / 4224117508
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14839 / 1968 / 1271190545
hash generated - 2521 / 1968 / 784314886
hash generated - 12998 / 1968 / 2434724883
submit: 04515c4ce9ab3ebdaf47eea4e4bc7b8283ba3a1a0192d5ab1f4dff551ab62fd9
hash generated - 1610 / 1968 / 683861551
hash generated - 8359 / 1968 / 151815384
hash generated - 5642 / 1968 / 3949467009
hash generated - 7694 / 1968 / 3906161130
hash generated - 12015 / 1968 / 2877861309
submit: 0deb426e37d00e446ae9dd90549c3bcf6a716726d58f2e137f36c1dff757ca6e
---------
...
hash generated - 7862 / 1968 / 363362621
hash generated - 6927 / 1968 / 3940664704
hash generated - 15608 / 1968 / 1294154513
hash generated - 6283 / 1968 / 1813826823
hash generated - 4354 / 1968 / 2845300199
hash generated - 2903 / 1968 / 1896438483
hash generated - 1588 / 1968 / 2485581397
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 6381 / 1968 / 1642720956
hash generated - 5818 / 1968 / 680210766
hash generated - 14235 / 1968 / 976458958
hash generated - 7881 / 1968 / 946934172
hash generated - 2846 / 1968 / 2287189723
submit: 05395e320e40a06981721fa5979d4487a7c71d6aa7b101613bc7b4903d57cda4
hash generated - 2565 / 1968 / 554308537
hash generated - 4909 / 1968 / 2734194562
hash generated - 5217 / 1968 / 2924256714
hash generated - 5479 / 1968 / 3364435499
On two different computers. It'll work for a bit then just stops receiving work.
This looks more like a firewall issue as it doesn't submit anything and loses connection...
Check that the needed port is open
-
HI,NICE JOB FOR MAKING THIS POOL
I have a question for wihch version of Linux is the best one for runing this miner? waiting for your reply
-
HI,NICE JOB FOR MAKING THIS POOL
I have a question for wihch version of Linux is the best one for runing this miner? waiting for your reply
any lightweight linux distro would probobly be best. Ubuntu would work fine, so would Linux Mint. If you really want to optimize it, Arch Linux if you can figure it out... does that help? :)
Glad you enjoy the pool (I still have work to do :) )
-
Killerbyte,
what about the payments?
I haven't received payment since 10 hours and having more than 30 MMC in balance....
-
...
hash generated - 5083 / 1968 / 926409133
hash generated - 7521 / 1968 / 1235348378
hash generated - 6158 / 1968 / 1230314980
hash generated - 9613 / 1968 / 2298206264
hash generated - 10136 / 1968 / 4224117508
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 14839 / 1968 / 1271190545
hash generated - 2521 / 1968 / 784314886
hash generated - 12998 / 1968 / 2434724883
submit: 04515c4ce9ab3ebdaf47eea4e4bc7b8283ba3a1a0192d5ab1f4dff551ab62fd9
hash generated - 1610 / 1968 / 683861551
hash generated - 8359 / 1968 / 151815384
hash generated - 5642 / 1968 / 3949467009
hash generated - 7694 / 1968 / 3906161130
hash generated - 12015 / 1968 / 2877861309
submit: 0deb426e37d00e446ae9dd90549c3bcf6a716726d58f2e137f36c1dff757ca6e
---------
...
hash generated - 7862 / 1968 / 363362621
hash generated - 6927 / 1968 / 3940664704
hash generated - 15608 / 1968 / 1294154513
hash generated - 6283 / 1968 / 1813826823
hash generated - 4354 / 1968 / 2845300199
hash generated - 2903 / 1968 / 1896438483
hash generated - 1588 / 1968 / 2485581397
force reconnect if possible!
hash generated - 6381 / 1968 / 1642720956
hash generated - 5818 / 1968 / 680210766
hash generated - 14235 / 1968 / 976458958
hash generated - 7881 / 1968 / 946934172
hash generated - 2846 / 1968 / 2287189723
submit: 05395e320e40a06981721fa5979d4487a7c71d6aa7b101613bc7b4903d57cda4
hash generated - 2565 / 1968 / 554308537
hash generated - 4909 / 1968 / 2734194562
hash generated - 5217 / 1968 / 2924256714
hash generated - 5479 / 1968 / 3364435499
On two different computers. It'll work for a bit then just stops receiving work.
This looks more like a firewall issue as it doesn't submit anything and loses connection...
Check that the needed port is open
That's what I also thought but there's no firewall at all running. Completely open to the net. It's running on Microsoft's cloud service. Plus it works at first then the TCP connection must drop or something.
-
pool seem down again, stuck and down :-\
-
pool seem down again, stuck and down :-\
thanks for the heads up. On it now.
-
Killerbyte,
what about the payments?
I haven't received payment since 10 hours and having more than 30 MMC in balance....
-
Killerbyte,
what about the payments?
I haven't received payment since 10 hours and having more than 30 MMC in balance....
they were delayed last night due to a problem with the payout system. I am trying to alvoid sending out payouts that should not happen, that is all.
Your payouts will happen later today, no more than 6 more hours most likely. Sorry about the delay.
-
Killerbyte,
what about the payments?
I haven't received payment since 10 hours and having more than 30 MMC in balance....
they were delayed last night due to a problem with the payout system. I am trying to alvoid sending out payouts that should not happen, that is all.
Your payouts will happen later today, no more than 6 more hours most likely. Sorry about the delay.
Thanks.
-
Messing up payments is something you can't fix- take your time.
-
How do we know if the pool is up and running? I'm using the Windows version and I see:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:05:34 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 109.1/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 1794 / 1968 / 941093257
hash generated - 3637 / 1968 / 1879161239
hash generated - 9001 / 1968 / 1713224746
hash generated - 764 / 1968 / 1702702240
submit: 07d8a1f15a610e698c866000a3e3bc4bd1ba7667a303aa4059b800689da6aa10
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:08:05 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 39.1/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0
(0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
But I don't see any info on http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
And is my individual hash rate listed there in that information? Is there some way to get that?
-
How do we know if the pool is up and running? I'm using the Windows version and I see:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:05:34 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 109.1/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 1794 / 1968 / 941093257
hash generated - 3637 / 1968 / 1879161239
hash generated - 9001 / 1968 / 1713224746
hash generated - 764 / 1968 / 1702702240
submit: 07d8a1f15a610e698c866000a3e3bc4bd1ba7667a303aa4059b800689da6aa10
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:08:05 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 39.1/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0
(0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
But I don't see any info on http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
And is my individual hash rate listed there in that information? Is there some way to get that?
hey badbonez,
if you see this:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:08:05 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 39.1/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0
(0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
it means that the share was taken by the server and it is valid.
I am not sure why the website would not be working for you though... unless the pool crashed again and I was not aware. It should automatically restart.
-
Messing up payments is something you can't fix- take your time.
seconded. no rush.
-
How do we know if the pool is up and running? I'm using the Windows version and I see:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:05:34 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 109.1/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 1794 / 1968 / 941093257
hash generated - 3637 / 1968 / 1879161239
hash generated - 9001 / 1968 / 1713224746
hash generated - 764 / 1968 / 1702702240
submit: 07d8a1f15a610e698c866000a3e3bc4bd1ba7667a303aa4059b800689da6aa10
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:08:05 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 39.1/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0
(0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
But I don't see any info on http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
And is my individual hash rate listed there in that information? Is there some way to get that?
hey badbonez,
if you see this:
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 17:08:05 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 39.1/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0
(0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
it means that the share was taken by the server and it is valid.
I am not sure why the website would not be working for you though... unless the pool crashed again and I was not aware. It should automatically restart.
Thanks. And sorry, I wasn't precise. What I meant was I don't see any "Top Miners" listed. Maybe that's a WIP.
What does it mean when it says
hash generated - 6226 / 1968 / 3314930639
I'm still new to mining and linux. Thanks!
-
personal stat on website does not work
-
the pool seems to be down now...
-
the pool seems to be down now...
we now have over 1k miners connecting... which is causing some known problems.
I am already on to fixing. Should not be too long.
I guess I am underestimating the number of people connecting...
-
may be we can help you with a good hosting, we really need it to be fast!
-
may be we can help you with a good hosting, we really need it to be fast!
no, its a software issue. the hosting is good... trust me.
-
KillerByte this miner is compatible with your pool https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1585.0
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
-
KillerByte this miner is compatible with your pool https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1585.0
Are you sure? I dont see how that could be... this pool is not getwork compatible.
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
ulimit -n 500000; ./poolstart
also this helps
echo 1000 65535 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
will help you.
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
ulimit -n 500000; ./poolstart
also this helps
echo 1000 65535 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
will help you.
I was getting into that. Unfortunately, the hard limit must be increased. I just edited /etc/sysctl.conf, hopefully the restart will fix.
EDIT: that was not the limits file... so I just found out it is somewhere else :)
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
open /etc/security/limits.conf and change pool software user limit.
Example:
www-data soft nofile 750000
www-data hard nofile 750000
root soft nofile 750000
root hard nofile 750000
What is pool software?
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
open /etc/security/limits.conf and change pool software user limit.
Example:
www-data soft nofile 750000
www-data hard nofile 750000
root soft nofile 750000
root hard nofile 750000
What is pool software?
its just C++ code with boost.
I think that will work. Thanks for the help. Do you think a restart is needed?
-
if you edint any .conf file - the settings will be triggered after reboot.
just in case also apply the port range that I've given also.
This will increase the possible simultaneous connections to the server.
you can paste here the result of cat /proc/net/sockstat once the server is up and running for at least 10-20 minutes, so we can see what is the load and if you are near some limit.
-
KilleByte will you publish the code so that more people can contribute? I guess it will have positive effect on quality.
-
OK, I might have finally found the reason why the pool keeps crashing!
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::system::system_error> >'
what(): accept: Too many open files
Does this mean that the server has reached its limit?
Figured I would post this and let everyone know. It has finally been found!
open /etc/security/limits.conf and change pool software user limit.
Example:
www-data soft nofile 750000
www-data hard nofile 750000
root soft nofile 750000
root hard nofile 750000
What is pool software?
its just C++ code with boost.
I think that will work. Thanks for the help. Do you think a restart is needed?
Not need but pool server need optimize /etc/sysctl.conf keepalive time out vs..
see file: https://github.com/GTRsdk/mmcFE/blob/master/scripts/linux-tune.sh
-
KilleByte will you publish the code so that more people can contribute? I guess it will have positive effect on quality.
I have been considering it... but then everyone else will just open their own pool :)
This wasnt even a software bug, so a code change would not have helped.
if you edint any .conf file - the settings will be triggered after reboot.
just in case also apply the port range that I've given also.
This will increase the possible simultaneous connections to the server.
you can paste here the result of cat /proc/net/sockstat once the server is up and running for at least 10-20 minutes, so we can see what is the load and if you are near some limit.
Great. Thanks for your help... donation address maby?
s4l1h... I am still reading your post.
-
Something's strange...
It says that a block was found a few minutes ago and yet the share count wasn't zeroed out
-
MK6kyLAgPzRo5RXkkVFZz9Jv1i4PvXWAhQ
only if the advices are helping you :)
-
Something's strange...
It says that a block was found a few minutes ago and yet the share count wasn't zeroed out
I just noticed. Probobly has to do with the server crashes... I am trying to decide if it matters to reset or not. I think it is fine to leave it, just so long as it resets next block.
MK6kyLAgPzRo5RXkkVFZz9Jv1i4PvXWAhQ
only if the advices are helping you :)
they were really helpful, thanks.
-
pool is on, but very slow now
-
MK6kyLAgPzRo5RXkkVFZz9Jv1i4PvXWAhQ
only if the advices are helping you :)
Thanks, if you feel that you are again reaching some default linux limits I can help, because I'm everyday into optimising linux for many sockets/connections.
-
pool is on, but very slow now
does not seem slow to me. Internet lag maby?
Not need but pool server need optimize /etc/sysctl.conf keepalive time out vs..
see file: https://github.com/GTRsdk/mmcFE/blob/master/scripts/linux-tune.sh
This is also helpful. The pool is not at all pushpool based, but I probobly will implement it. Thanks!
-
10 times slower then hour ago, before it was around 50h for me, now 5, I have 65 threads
-
KillerByte this miner is compatible with your pool https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1585.0
Are you sure? I dont see how that could be... this pool is not getwork compatible.
it is was question not affirmation ))
-
I don't quite understand your post... 10x slower?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
I don't quite understand your post... 10x slower?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
like this :)
10 times slower then hour ago, before it was around 50h for me, now 5, I have 64 cores
-
KillerByte this miner is compatible with your pool https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1585.0
Are you sure? I dont see how that could be... this pool is not getwork compatible.
it is was question not affirmation ))
OK, sorry for the confusion :)
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
it It seems it getting faster :)
-
pool is on, but very slow now
does not seem slow to me. Internet lag maby?
Not need but pool server need optimize /etc/sysctl.conf keepalive time out vs..
see file: https://github.com/GTRsdk/mmcFE/blob/master/scripts/linux-tune.sh
This is also helpful. The pool is not at all pushpool based, but I probobly will implement it. Thanks!
These are the proper settings
/etc/sysctl.conf
net.core.rmem_max = 16777216
net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 50576 64768 98152
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 2500
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = 1048576
-
it It seems it getting faster :)
Oh, got it.
Well, the server was upgraded. There are less rejects it seems.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
stats for 64 core and 64 threads
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:23:21 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 5 (62.5%), RJ: 3 (37.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
stats for 64 core and 64 threads
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:23:21 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 5 (62.5%), RJ: 3 (37.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
I think you have to keep it running for some time to get proper stats, because there is some luck involved also... as far as I know.
Otherwise REJECTS are not good to have... it happens to me also.
-
stats for 64 core and 64 threads
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:23:21 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 5 (62.5%), RJ: 3 (37.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
I think you have to keep it running for some time to get proper stats, because there is some luck involved also... as far as I know.
Otherwise REJECTS are not good to have... it happens to me also.
Is there a way to get stats while the miner is running?
-
stats for 64 core and 64 threads
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:23:21 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 5 (62.5%), RJ: 3 (37.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
what proc are you using?
-
4 * 16 cores AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6282 SE
-
Some nodes doing well:
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:28:03 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 37.4/h), VL: 5 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:32:50 | SHARES: 6 (100.0% | 28.1/h), VL: 6 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:37:59 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 62.1/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:39:03 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 59.0/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:40:29 | SHARES: 3 (100.0% | 51.9/h), VL: 3 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:44:28 | SHARES: 4 (100.0% | 32.2/h), VL: 4 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:45:51 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 34.0/h), VL: 5 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:48:01 | SHARES: 6 (100.0% | 32.7/h), VL: 6 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:48:37 | SHARES: 7 (100.0% | 36.2/h), VL: 7 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:49:14 | SHARES: 7 (100.0% | 34.4/h), VL: 7 (87.5%), RJ: 1 (12.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:50:49 | SHARES: 8 (100.0% | 34.8/h), VL: 8 (88.9%), RJ: 1 (11.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:51:11 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 38.1/h), VL: 9 (90.0%), RJ: 1 (10.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:51:31 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 37.2/h), VL: 9 (81.8%), RJ: 2 (18.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:53:31 | SHARES: 10 (100.0% | 36.4/h), VL: 10 (83.3%), RJ: 2 (16.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:53:52 | SHARES: 11 (100.0% | 39.2/h), VL: 11 (84.6%), RJ: 2 (15.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:54:13 | SHARES: 11 (100.0% | 38.4/h), VL: 11 (78.6%), RJ: 3 (21.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:56:14 | SHARES: 12 (100.0% | 37.5/h), VL: 12 (80.0%), RJ: 3 (20.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:56:45 | SHARES: 13 (100.0% | 39.5/h), VL: 13 (81.2%), RJ: 3 (18.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
some of them not
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:30:45 | SHARES: 9 (100.0% | 8.6/h), VL: 9 (75.0%), RJ: 3 (25.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:33:06 | SHARES: 10 (100.0% | 9.2/h), VL: 10 (76.9%), RJ: 3 (23.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:33:16 | SHARES: 11 (100.0% | 10.1/h), VL: 11 (78.6%), RJ: 3 (21.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:33:27 | SHARES: 11 (100.0% | 10.1/h), VL: 11 (73.3%), RJ: 4 (26.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:36:14 | SHARES: 12 (100.0% | 10.6/h), VL: 12 (75.0%), RJ: 4 (25.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:39:01 | SHARES: 13 (100.0% | 11.0/h), VL: 13 (76.5%), RJ: 4 (23.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:41:58 | SHARES: 14 (100.0% | 11.4/h), VL: 14 (77.8%), RJ: 4 (22.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:44:56 | SHARES: 15 (100.0% | 11.7/h), VL: 15 (78.9%), RJ: 4 (21.1%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:45:17 | SHARES: 16 (100.0% | 12.4/h), VL: 16 (80.0%), RJ: 4 (20.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:46:04 | SHARES: 17 (100.0% | 13.1/h), VL: 17 (81.0%), RJ: 4 (19.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:48:32 | SHARES: 18 (100.0% | 13.4/h), VL: 18 (81.8%), RJ: 4 (18.2%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:48:36 | SHARES: 19 (100.0% | 14.1/h), VL: 19 (82.6%), RJ: 4 (17.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:48:57 | SHARES: 20 (100.0% | 14.8/h), VL: 20 (83.3%), RJ: 4 (16.7%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:50:26 | SHARES: 21 (100.0% | 15.3/h), VL: 21 (84.0%), RJ: 4 (16.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:52:24 | SHARES: 22 (100.0% | 15.6/h), VL: 22 (84.6%), RJ: 4 (15.4%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:58:16 | SHARES: 23 (100.0% | 15.3/h), VL: 23 (85.2%), RJ: 4 (14.8%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
-
is this normal? i mean the duplicates... what does the first number actually mean?
hash generated - 7502 / 1968 / 3640808312
hash generated - 10725 / 1968 / 3757984692
hash generated - 13317 / 1968 / 2492638785
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 12510 / 1968 / 3560445581
-
system:111
hash generated - 10273 / 1968 / 992674184
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
hash generated - 988 / 1968 / 732418756
this is what happens with my node
-
is this normal? i mean the duplicates... what does the first number actually mean?
hash generated - 7502 / 1968 / 3640808312
hash generated - 10725 / 1968 / 3757984692
hash generated - 13317 / 1968 / 2492638785
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 12510 / 1968 / 3560445581
I have never seen that before... do you hash quickly?
are you submitting double shares?
system:111
hash generated - 10273 / 1968 / 992674184
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
hash generated - 988 / 1968 / 732418756
this is what happens with my node
yeah, thats because it just crashed... again :( debugging....
EDIT: 1000+ clients connecting. That is probobly part of why. I have the debugger running. ready for another error.
EDIT: *** buffer overflow detected ***: memorypool terminated
I think I know the fix... but any ideas while I am at it?
-
EDIT: 1000+ clients connecting. That is probobly part of why. I have the debugger running. ready for another error.
Good problem to have actually :)
-
stats for 64 core and 64 threads
[STATS] 2013-12-25 19:23:21 | SHARES: 5 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 5 (62.5%), RJ: 3 (37.5%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
I think you have to keep it running for some time to get proper stats, because there is some luck involved also... as far as I know.
Otherwise REJECTS are not good to have... it happens to me also.
yes, most likely because the server crashes. Thanks for the report though.
My computer at home has 0 rejects when the server works... :)
-
Also, we have 25k shares without a block :(
there are a lot of solo miners i think
-
is this normal? i mean the duplicates... what does the first number actually mean?
hash generated - 7502 / 1968 / 3640808312
hash generated - 10725 / 1968 / 3757984692
hash generated - 13317 / 1968 / 2492638785
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 12510 / 1968 / 3560445581
I have never seen that before... do you hash quickly?
are you submitting double shares?
hmm, probably around 10 hpm.
regarding submitting double shares, it sometimes happens that the miner submits one or two shares and right after that tries to submit another one or two shares which then get rejected...
-
any ideas on the buffer overflow message?
*** buffer overflow detected ***: memorypool terminated
-
is this normal? i mean the duplicates... what does the first number actually mean?
hash generated - 7502 / 1968 / 3640808312
hash generated - 10725 / 1968 / 3757984692
hash generated - 13317 / 1968 / 2492638785
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 12666 / 1968 / 2015562052
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 14294 / 1968 / 3536542128
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 13666 / 1968 / 1088440815
hash generated - 12510 / 1968 / 3560445581
I have never seen that before... do you hash quickly?
are you submitting double shares?
hmm, probably around 10 hpm.
regarding submitting double shares, it sometimes happens that the miner submits one or two shares and right after that tries to submit another one or two shares which then get rejected...
maby that is the cause of those rejects?
that is an issue I could fix with the miner.
-
any ideas on the buffer overflow message?
*** buffer overflow detected ***: memorypool terminated
some attack directed to the port on which the pool is running?
-
any ideas on the buffer overflow message?
*** buffer overflow detected ***: memorypool terminated
some attack directed to the port on which the pool is running?
I doubt... I think it is another system limit or something...
I just backtraced it and it was not from any of my pool functions...
-
what is there in kernel log?
dmesg -T | tail
or only
dmesg
?
-
dmesg -T | tail
[Wed Dec 25 20:17:24 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 211571354 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Deleted empty journal /var/log/journal/bb9d0a52a41243829ecd729b40ac0bce/user-1000@c4ef46c298b543f9ab9fbe27625479c4-0000000000000000-0000000000000000.journal (3735552 bytes).
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Vacuuming done, freed 3735552 bytes
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 237032090 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
... and that message is repeated many times.
-
dmesg -T | tail
[Wed Dec 25 20:17:24 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 211571354 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Deleted empty journal /var/log/journal/bb9d0a52a41243829ecd729b40ac0bce/user-1000@c4ef46c298b543f9ab9fbe27625479c4-0000000000000000-0000000000000000.journal (3735552 bytes).
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Vacuuming done, freed 3735552 bytes
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 237032090 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
... and that message is repeated many times.
Hmm I don't think it's related to the software buffer overflow error.
-
agreed... but there is nothing online about how to fix it.
the backtrace does not show anything useful either... maby its a bug in the memorycoin client that only comes from great stress?
-
what is the OS (linux flavour) used?
-
what is the OS (linux flavour) used?
arch linux, updated
I am going to focus on getting those payouts going... get your wallets ready.
-
From the error, at a google-glance, are you running out of memory or temp space?
-
dmesg -T | tail
[Wed Dec 25 20:17:24 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 211571354 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Deleted empty journal /var/log/journal/bb9d0a52a41243829ecd729b40ac0bce/user-1000@c4ef46c298b543f9ab9fbe27625479c4-0000000000000000-0000000000000000.journal (3735552 bytes).
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Vacuuming done, freed 3735552 bytes
[Wed Dec 25 20:19:02 2013] systemd-journald[101]: Failed to write entry (25 items, 237032090 bytes) despite vacuuming, ignoring: Argument list too long
... and that message is repeated many times.
One thing you can check is the 'SystemMaxUse' in '/etc/system/systemd-journald.conf' to see how much memory journald has allocated.
(taken from https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=150704)
-
hash generated - 2805 / 1968 / 2228977017
submit: 036d3929486b4ba07dbc68f6a172a5456216c3b82cc5e87d83a589d68c8e8113
hash generated - 13053 / 1968 / 3171305550
I think there is still some pools issue - with Submits,
the response from the server is missing after "submit" message
EDIT: down again
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
-
The crash always happens on net.cpp, line 980 on the standard memorycoind...
bug in memorycoind?
From the error, at a google-glance, are you running out of memory or temp space?
nope, the temp memory isnt even used and there is plenty enough RAM...
-
I have a question. After being mining almost a day during the uptime I checked my stats and see that I had 0,03 MMC confirmed and 0,07 MMC unconfirmed.
Are those stats correct, if it is I don't think that worth the effort :/
Mining with 40 Cores in 6 computers...
-
I have a question. After being mining almost a day during the uptime I checked my stats and see that I had 0,03 MMC confirmed and 0,07 MMC unconfirmed.
Are those stats correct, if it is I don't think that worth the effort :/
Mining with 40 Cores in 6 computers...
only 0.03, 0.07?
what is your normal hashrate for one of those machines when you mine solo?
-
I have a question. After being mining almost a day during the uptime I checked my stats and see that I had 0,03 MMC confirmed and 0,07 MMC unconfirmed.
Are those stats correct, if it is I don't think that worth the effort :/
Mining with 40 Cores in 6 computers...
Dude, I have also issue with the rate, I have more cores. With this difficulty and comp power we should have definitely more coins
-
what is the OS (linux flavour) used?
arch linux, updated
I am going to focus on getting those payouts going... get your wallets ready.
Waiting.. MAQ5SK33KVcDrAmWHHEAGJ35uTv8wkcWJy
-
I have a question. After being mining almost a day during the uptime I checked my stats and see that I had 0,03 MMC confirmed and 0,07 MMC unconfirmed.
Are those stats correct, if it is I don't think that worth the effort :/
Mining with 40 Cores in 6 computers...
only 0.03, 0.07?
what is your normal hashrate for one of those machines when you mine solo?
I have 4 8core machines at 1hpm and 2 4 core machines at .5 hpm each one more or less.
-
if i use different mining pc is necessary different pooluser? i prefer only one, but you add? is problem different ip?
-
if i use different mining pc is necessary different pooluser? i prefer only one, but you add? is problem different ip?
no, not at all.
-
i take it main_poolminer is the actual miner? I'm looking to start fiddling. Which line has the memory limit?
-
problem miner stop running on all 3 centos 6.4 servers
system:111
submit: 09608ec60edcc1a5a4a026ec55bba36d8d4f559bd69fc94450fe4a5dd80f18be
hash generated - 4074 / 1968 / 3352696207
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
how to fix ?
-
pretty sure the pool is down right now
-
see: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1628.0
-
pool has been restored finally.
NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.
I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.
Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)
EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
-
pool has been restored finally.
NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.
I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.
Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)
EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
it shows 807 workers, u sure it's limited? :)
-
pool has been restored finally.
NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.
I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.
Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)
EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
it shows 807 workers, u sure it's limited? :)
I am, sometimes it lets in a few extra workers, but I have not seen it go above 820.
-
pool has been restored finally.
NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.
I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.
Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)
EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
why not duplicate server for port 8080? what you think?
-
pool has been restored finally.
NEW: Client limit. Has been set to 800 for the time being. If you cant connect and the website works, that is why. First come first serve.
I did this because the pool handles that amount properly, but add much more, and problems occour.
Payouts should occour within 30 minutes... hopefully that happens :)
EDIT: Check out the website, now shows the number of clients, so you know when to connect.
why not duplicate server for port 8080? what you think?
I could give it a try... But let's wait a day for that...:-)
-
Pool payouts did not execute as they were supposed to. Let me check the balances.
-
Hell yeah! Primeminer shows 2-3 primes/s. WTF? Wallet told me, I was mining (for test) in speed ~3.17 h/m.
-
Hell yeah! Primeminer shows 2-3 primes/s. WTF? Wallet told me, I was mining (for test) in speed ~3.17 h/m.
This is memoryminer, not primeminer... did you download the right source?
-
hi guys, how do i know this works, im just getting this:
********************************************
*** Memorycoin Pool Miner v0.8 RC1
*** by KillerByte - xpool.xram.co
***
*** Thanks to xolokram (www.beeeeer.org)
*** press CTRL+C to exit
********************************************
MANvmACxSgJ71q971AR4fphCVDYYJLdgmp
spawning the worker
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
MemoryCoinMiner started
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
anyone has working win 64 miner please?
-
Hell yeah! Primeminer shows 2-3 primes/s. WTF? Wallet told me, I was mining (for test) in speed ~3.17 h/m.
are you in the right thread here? Title is: mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool
-
for me the payouts is secondary. :D
how much ram the server have?
-
I downloaded wallet src, but rode, there is completed wallet for Windows and downloaded it.
And there: http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/
"./primeminer -poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co -poolport=1339 "
So I thought, mmc is mining by primeminer.
Can you give link? And how to compile src file to exe?
@edit
Ok, someone gave link: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1630.0
-
Someone can tell me what is this: Foun solution - xxxx/xxxx/xxxx? Know what share is (is there diffrent value of shares, or every are the same?), but what is this solution? And nice, have bigger hash/m than on solo with wallet.
-
Someone can tell me what is this: Foun solution - xxxx/xxxx/xxxx? Know what share is (is there diffrent value of shares, or every are the same?), but what is this solution? And nice, have bigger hash/m than on solo with wallet.
A share is when the miner prints "submit: " and then a hash... found hash just says when your computer makes a hash. One out of every 16 shares are taken.
-
I think it died.. :D
-
no payout.. no pool....
-
Someone can tell me what is this: Foun solution - xxxx/xxxx/xxxx? Know what share is (is there diffrent value of shares, or every are the same?), but what is this solution? And nice, have bigger hash/m than on solo with wallet.
A share is when the miner prints "submit: " and then a hash... found hash just says when your computer makes a hash. One out of every 16 shares are taken.
I should rephrase - one out of every 16 hashes are taken
also, pool was restarted to make a fix to the payouts... to try to get them to execute.
whats annoying is that payouts were already working... now they are not.... figuring this out :)
-
found another pool, with client, working good so far but new, hopefully it will work
http://mmcpool.com/
-
Hope is for payouts to execute on block 2560.
-
Someone can tell me what is this: Foun solution - xxxx/xxxx/xxxx? Know what share is (is there diffrent value of shares, or every are the same?), but what is this solution? And nice, have bigger hash/m than on solo with wallet.
A share is when the miner prints "submit: " and then a hash... found hash just says when your computer makes a hash. One out of every 16 shares are taken.
why every 16? is possible that change work during mining
-
Someone can tell me what is this: Foun solution - xxxx/xxxx/xxxx? Know what share is (is there diffrent value of shares, or every are the same?), but what is this solution? And nice, have bigger hash/m than on solo with wallet.
A share is when the miner prints "submit: " and then a hash... found hash just says when your computer makes a hash. One out of every 16 shares are taken.
everyone has to follow this policy. It makes it so that all shares are equally valued.
why every 16? is possible that change work during mining
-
you are right, but why not submit every 8?
-
you are right, but why not submit every 8?
because then the server would have to process double the shares, which is more load.
Also, each share would be worth only half.
-
Now it is difficult even with the pools :(
-
Now it is difficult even with the pools :(
how long does your computer take to make a hash? Sounds like you should make one every 16 mins.
-
1.4 h/m, attend port 8080 for other pc 2.4 h/m and the stability for a amazon 24 core istance. But usually I can add machines 1.4 h/m
-
Now it is difficult even with the pools :(
how long does your computer take to make a hash? Sounds like you should make one every 16 mins.
I was talking about the fact that the last block is 2517 and now there is 2576
-
Statistics for MKiSSTcn8nyq5ecdjjUVsvP1cqoCMbLaiQ
Balance: 39.784913
Unconfirmed: 16.566739
This Round Shares: 849
why i get nothing!!!
my Wallet is nothing!!!
-
everyone has to follow this policy. It makes it so that all shares are equally valued.
why every 16? is possible that change work during mining
Sorry, this doesn't make sense to me. Why isn't every hash submitted? My 8-core machine only had 5 and 13 hashes between the last two "[MASTER] work received", are they wasted? Sorry if these are slightly newbie questions, I have done pool mining before, I just want to know the meaning of these outputs, its a change from what xolokram's pts miner reports!
-
Statistics for MKiSSTcn8nyq5ecdjjUVsvP1cqoCMbLaiQ
Balance: 39.784913
Unconfirmed: 16.566739
This Round Shares: 849
why i get nothing!!!
my Wallet is nothing!!!
your balance is an indication we still need to pay you.
I have been working all night trying to figure out why the server is complaining about insufficient funds... everything works out.
You will get payed, even if I have to go through every address manually, everyone will get payed.
everyone has to follow this policy. It makes it so that all shares are equally valued.
why every 16? is possible that change work during mining
Sorry, this doesn't make sense to me. Why isn't every hash submitted? My 8-core machine only had 5 and 13 hashes between the last two "[MASTER] work received", are they wasted? Sorry if these are slightly newbie questions, I have done pool mining before, I just want to know the meaning of these outputs, its a change from what xolokram's pts miner reports!
the hashes are not wasted.
Think bitcoin mining: your ASIC goes through billions of hashes a second. Does it submit every single hash? No, just the ones that meet the target set by the server.
Does that help? :)
-
the hashes are not wasted.
Think bitcoin mining: your ASIC goes through billions of hashes a second. Does it submit every single hash? No, just the ones that meet the target set by the server.
Does that help? :)
Yes, thanks Killer, although it doesn't explain why one out of 16 hashes are taken, or is that a probability?
I'm now getting system:111 messages, this is my output for the previous block:
[MASTER] work received
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
hash generated - 15802 / 1968 / 1683025740
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
[MASTER] work received
Edit: those messages have stopped for now, they are intermittent.
-
the hashes are not wasted.
Think bitcoin mining: your ASIC goes through billions of hashes a second. Does it submit every single hash? No, just the ones that meet the target set by the server.
Does that help? :)
Yes, thanks Killer, although it doesn't explain why one out of 16 hashes are taken, or is that a probability?
I'm now getting system:111 messages, this is my output for the previous block:
[MASTER] work received
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
hash generated - 15802 / 1968 / 1683025740
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
[MASTER] work received
you got it, its a probability.
Sorry about the 111 errors, that is a server restart, which causes downtime.
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
without windows client
this pool is died
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
hey, here is the announcement:
Starting tomorrow, payouts will be manually executed. Your balance will go to 0, but shortly after you should recieve your payment.
Also, if this happens again and I cant figure out why, the pool is done.
I am sorry for all the delays, downtime, and else of the pool. I am sorry that there is no windows client. I am sorry for any other confusion.
Thanks for all the support as well, even though I have been a fail of a pool operator :)
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
without windows client
this pool is died
Windows 32 bit:
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
you can give me little donation MVTEcnoTrUAeYrd3yzXm3nd4S73yACDtMa
It works pretty well.
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
hey, here is the announcement:
Starting tomorrow, payouts will be manually executed. Your balance will go to 0, but shortly after you should recieve your payment.
Also, if this happens again and I cant figure out why, the pool is done.
I am sorry for all the delays, downtime, and else of the pool. I am sorry that there is no windows client. I am sorry for any other confusion.
Thanks for all the support as well, even though I have been a fail of a pool operator :)
hey KillByte,
you dont need too much "sorry", you're very good one and have a very good support on MemoryCoin by adding the first pool on the market.
Also you have put lot of efforts on the pool to make it better day by day.
The point is cause this is the first pool so lot of hashing power, lot of connections that you're may not expected...
So, after all, thanks you. Hopefully someone else can take care your pool.
@Just dont make its code too public, you know what i mean, mushrooms after rains...., diff to the moon.... normal users leave.... coin go nowhere :-X
-
To start, I'm a linux noob so these may be basic questions, but please answer if you can.
Using the directions listed earlier in the thread I've loaded this miner onto a few free cloud servers and got it running. But under individual stats, the pool does not appear to be updating my work from these servers. In my window I see:
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
MemoryCoinMiner started
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 2643 / 1968 / 924297987
hash generated - 3318 / 1968 / 3458445307
This is on an 8CPU compute with AES capabilities. Questions:
1) Does the output look right? Am I mining? I have several of these servers and not one has submitted anything.
2) Is there a command to give that tells me what hash rate I am getting while mining?
3) What does: 'hash generated - 14067 / 1968 / 2427032049' mean? I'd like to understand this output.
Thanks. And big thanks for putting this pool up!
-
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
hey, here is the announcement:
Starting tomorrow, payouts will be manually executed. Your balance will go to 0, but shortly after you should recieve your payment.
Also, if this happens again and I cant figure out why, the pool is done.
I am sorry for all the delays, downtime, and else of the pool. I am sorry that there is no windows client. I am sorry for any other confusion.
Thanks for all the support as well, even though I have been a fail of a pool operator :)
hey KillByte,
you dont need too much "sorry", you're very good one and have a very good support on MemoryCoin by adding the first pool on the market.
Also you have put lot of efforts on the pool to make it better day by day.
The point is cause this is the first pool so lot of hashing power, lot of connections that you're may not expected...
So, after all, thanks you. Hopefully someone else can take care your pool.
@Just dont make its code too public, you know what i mean, mushrooms after rains...., diff to the moon.... normal users leave.... coin go nowhere :-X
Don't worry, I have officially decided against sharing the pool code.
I really do appreciate the words of encouragement. I am easily discouraged :)
hi KillerByte,
are you working on the pool server issues or on the payout, when will the payouts will happen? i got almost 1k MMC in your pool ;D
without windows client
this pool is died
Windows 32 bit:
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
you can give me little donation MVTEcnoTrUAeYrd3yzXm3nd4S73yACDtMa
It works pretty well.
Thanks! This will help a lot.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
To start, I'm a linux noob so these may be basic questions, but please answer if you can.
Using the directions listed earlier in the thread I've loaded this miner onto a few free cloud servers and got it running. But under individual stats, the pool does not appear to be updating my work from these servers. In my window I see:
[WORKER0] Hello, World!
[WORKER0] GoGoGo!
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
MemoryCoinMiner started
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
[MASTER] work received
hash generated - 2643 / 1968 / 924297987
hash generated - 3318 / 1968 / 3458445307
This is on an 8CPU compute with AES capabilities. Questions:
1) Does the output look right? Am I mining? I have several of these servers and not one has submitted anything.
2) Is there a command to give that tells me what hash rate I am getting while mining?
3) What does: 'hash generated - 14067 / 1968 / 2427032049' mean? I'd like to understand this output.
Thanks. And big thanks for putting this pool up!
Hey badbonez,
sorry, I almost missed your post!
1. Looks like you are mining OK to me, maby not very quickly however.
2. Currently, there is no command. It should match your hashrate when solo mining though.
3. Hash generated means that you have successfully made a hash. On average, one out of every 16 of those messages, a share will be submitted to the pool.
-
Pool was restarted a couple times to implement a new feature to allow for estimating the pool hashrate.
Hope to implement this by tomorrow.
-
Here is a short description to run memoryminer as a daemon service for Ubuntu and to log the output. Advantage is it will be started automatically during startup of system and keeps running if your ssh session is terminated or the process is killed
First install memoryminer for example under /root
cd /root
sudo apt-get -y install git build-essential htop libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
make -f makefile.unix
Second step create the daemon script and daemon service
vi /etc/init/memoryminerpress key i to switch into insert mode in vi
Add following content below but change following for your situation:
- user=<your user>
- home=<home directory of your user>
- pooluser=<your wallet address>
- genproclimit=<number of CPU cores>
#!/bin/sh
#this is the content of the script file /etc/init/memoryminer
user=root
home=/$user
pooluser=MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq
genproclimit=3
cmd=$home/memoryminer/src/memoryminer
poolip=mmc.xpool.xram.co
poolport=1339
logfile=$home/memoryminer/memoryminer.log
exec $cmd -poolip=$poolip -poolport=$poolport -pooluser=$pooluser -genproclimit=$genproclimit > $logfile 2>&1
To save now in vi press ESC and then press [SHIFT] and both times Z ([SHIFT]+ZZ)
chmod u+x /etc/init/memoryminer
vi /etc/init/memoryminer.confpress key i to switch into insert mode in vi
Add following content below but change following for your situation:
- user=<your user>
- home=<home directory of your user>
description "memoryminer"
#this is the code for config file /etc/init/memoryminer.conf
start on filesystem
stop on runlevel [!2345]
oom never
expect daemon
respawn
respawn limit 10 60 # 10 times in 60 seconds
script
user=root
home=/$user
cmd=/etc/init/memoryminer
pidfile=$home/memoryminer/memoryminer.pid
# Don't change anything below here unless you know what you're doing
[[ -e $pidfile && ! -d "/proc/$(cat $pidfile)" ]] && rm $pidfile
[[ -e $pidfile && "$(cat /proc/$(cat $pidfile)/cmdline)" != $cmd* ]] && rm $pidfile
exec start-stop-daemon --start -c $user --chdir $home --pidfile $pidfile --startas $cmd -b -m
end script
Now do following:
sudo initctl reload-configuration
Third step commands to start/stop/monitor the daemon
To start memoryminer:
sudo start memoryminer
To stop memoryminer:
sudo stop memoryminer
To monitor the memoryminer:
tail -f /root/memoryminer/memoryminer.log
For tips you can use MDp6AbARFnh68S8jURM4T8WBWudY5caMPq 8)
-
KillerByte how about payouts?)))
-
I installed the error is not required to pre-install some software?
-
I installed the error is not required to pre-install some software?
I have changed my description above. At first you have to do following before setup the daemon
cd /root
sudo apt-get -y install git build-essential htop libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev
sudo apt-get -y install libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
wget "http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/assets/files/memoryminer.tar.bz2"
bzip2 -d memoryminer.tar.bz2
tar xvf memoryminer.tar
cd memoryminer
cd src
make -f makefile.unix
-
I was mining on xpool from 18 to 19 (time of forum) and where is my mined coins? Difficult was 0.000009xx so I'mined a lot.
-
I'd also like to hear back from KillerByte regarding payouts. And I think in this situation it's much wiser to open up the code to community. We need to split powers between more pools and make it stable enough.
-
KillerByte how about payouts?)))
+1 8)
-
+1 :D
-
yea..
-
KillerByte how about payouts?)))
+1 8)
+1476 :)
Too long now
-
What's happening with the Windows miner release?
-
Hello,
#include <boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp>
^
compilation terminated.
Ubuntu 13.10
:'(
edit: nvm im retarded
-
Are payouts being fixed?
-
Hello,
#include <boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp>
^
compilation terminated.
Ubuntu 13.10
:'(
edit: nvm im retarded
which error?
-
Is anybody actually getting any payout from this pool? Nothing was paid to my wallet since yesterday 4pm.
Owner is not responding here and despite the new blocks are found, there is no change in unconfirmed amount.
This is not a way reliable pool should work like. We need more of them but with stronger support and good communication.
This pool was first and I'd like to see it back. If somebody has the information, please share.
-
guys i got a question, actually a few
1. every time i compile this, i keep getting an error: "missing openssl/crypto.h" which then leads to installing several more packages, maybe add that to the miner package ?
2. the miner reports 11 shares submitted after quite a bit of running, but the stats update and show only 1 new share :( why the difference ? maybe make the miner submit each share as it finds it ? why does it collect shares and then submits ?
please advise,
best,
noob
-
guys i got a question, actually a few
1. every time i compile this, i keep getting an error: "missing openssl/crypto.h" which then leads to installing several more packages, maybe add that to the miner package ?
2. the miner reports 11 shares submitted after quite a bit of running, but the stats update and show only 1 new share :( why the difference ? maybe make the miner submit each share as it finds it ? why does it collect shares and then submits ?
please advise,
best,
noob
hello,
for compiling, make sure that you have installed libssl-dev (I believe that is the package for ubuntu) so your install command is this:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
if it gives you choices, choose the openssl one.
You should then be able to compile the miner.
To the rest...
I am starting the payouts now. your account balance will become 0, but within 3 hours, you should recieve the amount listed.
-
pool is down?
-
guys i got a question, actually a few
1. every time i compile this, i keep getting an error: "missing openssl/crypto.h" which then leads to installing several more packages, maybe add that to the miner package ?
2. the miner reports 11 shares submitted after quite a bit of running, but the stats update and show only 1 new share :( why the difference ? maybe make the miner submit each share as it finds it ? why does it collect shares and then submits ?
please advise,
best,
noob
hello,
for compiling, make sure that you have installed libssl-dev (I believe that is the package for ubuntu) so your install command is this:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
if it gives you choices, choose the openssl one.
You should then be able to compile the miner.
To the rest...
I am starting the payouts now. your account balance will become 0, but within 3 hours, you should recieve the amount listed.
thanks, don't give up!
-
almost 7k MMC just (finally) left the server.
Check your wallets!
-
Paid, awesome! Thank you.
-
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
-
Paid. Thankyou!
-
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
-
killer, thats the thing the libs were there, i had em for pts and xpm mining, but i had to add a bunch of other libs before it complied, it did in the end; i will compile some more tonight/tomorrow and report back
btw any way to check miner speed from within linux ? at stop it says 1.249/h ? that cant be h/m ?
-
just tried on fresh install, installed the libb first and compile threw this at me
db.h:14:20: fatal error: db_cxx.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
to fix that i have to install "sudo apt-get install libdb++-dev"
then I get a new error: "fatal error: miniupnpc/miniwget.h: No such file or directory"
so now i need miniupnpc, same story last night, my main idea is maybe add these lib requirements and miniupnpc to the guide ? for debian wheezy users at least, since this distro needs it
to install mini: sudo apt-get install libminiupnpc-dev
since you know linx better, let me know what you think, but i def needed to install all of these to make it complie on wheezy
-
I had 267-268MMC in Balance, yet i received only 168MMC in payout, how do you explain this ???????
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
-
I had 267-268MMC in Balance, yet i received only 168MMC in payout, how do you explain this ???????
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
there were more blocks payed out than I thought there were, so the web balance was showing the wrong thing basically.
The server has little extra available funds (not counting fees), and the server payed more blocks than I thought, so that is why.
There might have been one block that was not payed out, and I will investigate this afternoon. I belive everything should be correct though.
-
This isn't correct, i had 200 workers on your pool for few hours and balance said 267-268, how come 100MMC just mysteriously disappear ?
I had 267-268MMC in Balance, yet i received only 168MMC in payout, how do you explain this ???????
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
there were more blocks payed out than I thought there were, so the web balance was showing the wrong thing basically.
The server has little extra available funds (not counting fees), and the server payed more blocks than I thought, so that is why.
There might have been one block that was not payed out, and I will investigate this afternoon. I belive everything should be correct though.
-
This isn't correct, i had 200 workers on your pool for few hours and balance said 267-268, how come 100MMC just mysteriously disappear ?
I had 267-268MMC in Balance, yet i received only 168MMC in payout, how do you explain this ???????
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
there were more blocks payed out than I thought there were, so the web balance was showing the wrong thing basically.
The server has little extra available funds (not counting fees), and the server payed more blocks than I thought, so that is why.
There might have been one block that was not payed out, and I will investigate this afternoon. I belive everything should be correct though.
What the website said you had in your balance was wrong before. What it gave you today was correct.
If you want me to, I can investigate in detail the situation and see why.
But I must first ask this question: What is your address? I will look at the payouts sent to you and see what payments have been made, and see if that is how much you deserved for the shares you submitted.
-
I did not get anyone of my MMC from Xpool. My balance is still 0.000000000000000 and no deposit in my wallet from Xpool. My address: MBWeWjuemELSKiRHXaqQ6hXs5Jgx1vMJEr
The time when I was mining: difficult was about 0.000009/8. I was mining for an hour and then moved to mmcpool.
-
I did not get anyone of my MMC from Xpool. My balance is still 0.000000000000000 and no deposit in my wallet from Xpool. My address: MBWeWjuemELSKiRHXaqQ6hXs5Jgx1vMJEr
The time when I was mining: difficult was about 0.000009/8. I was mining for an hour and then moved to mmcpool.
Hmmm... that address is not listed anywhere on the server, neither in a transaction, nor in the balances database, nor in a blocks file.
Did you submit any shares? None of my pools have never had an issue remembering shares for any user.
-
me too, i have almost 1k MMC, but only paid 823 MMC, so disappointed :-\
-
so, time to move on, the mmcpool seem smoothly payment and mining.
consider to join XRam dtc pool but still afraid :-X
-
me too, i have almost 1k MMC, but only paid 823 MMC, so disappointed
Sorry about that :(
so, time to move on, the mmcpool seem smoothly payment and mining.
consider to join XRam dtc pool but still afraid :-X
the DTC pool has been working perfectly for a few days now.
There is also an XPM pool which operates successfully as well.
I dont know why MMC has been so hard :)
-
yeah, will shot a try on dtc pool when i can figure out how to build primeminer on CentOS 5.x, getting some errors :-\
-
yeah, will shot a try on dtc pool when i can figure out how to build primeminer on CentOS 5.x, getting some errors :-\
The primeminer was not coded by me, it requres libgmp if that helps.
-
gmp, openssl, miniupnpc... all those installed :-\
-
gmp, openssl, miniupnpc... all those installed :-\
whats the error?
-
gmp, openssl, miniupnpc... all those installed :-\
whats the error?
i figure out that i'm using old version of leveldb that missing some functions,
compiling db 4.8....
-
re libs, id say add these 3 lines as optional commands before compiling
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev
sudo apt-get install libdb++-dev
sudo apt-get install libminiupnpc-dev
I have def needed all 3 on 3 diff machines before I could compile
-
no really ...
"[STATS] 2013-12-27 07:58:59 | SHARES: 49 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 49 (90.7%), RJ: 5 (9.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)"
8hrs work, 49shares, yet the web interface updates and says 1 share this round and that's all ?
1 share this round says only the shares contributed THIS round, not others :)
Take a look at the unconfirmed balance, it should say something... if not, check the block listings on the front page. You should see your address is listed with some money.
-
no really ...
"[STATS] 2013-12-27 07:58:59 | SHARES: 49 (100.0% | 5.4/h), VL: 49 (90.7%), RJ: 5 (9.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)"
8hrs work, 49shares, yet the web interface updates and says 1 share this round and that's all ?
1 share this round says only the shares contributed THIS round, not others :)
Take a look at the unconfirmed balance, it should say something... if not, check the block listings on the front page. You should see your address is listed with some money.
yap. I edited this bit out already :)) figured the rounds are loooooong sometimes, added 8 more cores to help :D
note, the libs bit I am totally right on, on 3 machines and all needed the extra libs I mentioned in my prev post, im sure others will need em too, with some googlin they can find them, but maybe make a sidenote that some may need these 3 libs, actually one command can install all 3 and save ppl a lot of trouble:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
if they have these libs, nix will just say nothing to update, if they don't need em for some reason, they cant hurt em much, what 15mbs or something
-
btw since I cant figure speeds, im tryin to reach 15-20coins a day, how many nehalem cores at 2ghz ea would I need you figure ? ballpark figure would work :)
-
Did you submit any shares?
Yeah, of course! That was time, when rejected shares was as exceptions. That was time, when your pool didn't count for everybody (that's why from 800 ppl on xpool, have made 300 and they go to mmcpool).
-
My address is : MAdsSiaXsynLcrT31fqVz9pbiG2Gr8QUFT
Please check,
Thanks,
Dima
This isn't correct, i had 200 workers on your pool for few hours and balance said 267-268, how come 100MMC just mysteriously disappear ?
I had 267-268MMC in Balance, yet i received only 168MMC in payout, how do you explain this ???????
Avesome :-)
Better check the balances
My Balance went to 0, and i got paid my 4.8, then my balance went up to 4.8 again,
think its an error, and i dont want you to loose money by paying me twice ;)
MKtvzCc6yuz76jHvwNaxxxKeN1oAnHi7V7
Thanks for pointing out. There is no way the server would have payed the 7k again (it does not have the money), so I am not worried about that. I dont know why it didn't reset, but I think I just fixed it so it should not happen again.
there were more blocks payed out than I thought there were, so the web balance was showing the wrong thing basically.
The server has little extra available funds (not counting fees), and the server payed more blocks than I thought, so that is why.
There might have been one block that was not payed out, and I will investigate this afternoon. I belive everything should be correct though.
What the website said you had in your balance was wrong before. What it gave you today was correct.
If you want me to, I can investigate in detail the situation and see why.
But I must first ask this question: What is your address? I will look at the payouts sent to you and see what payments have been made, and see if that is how much you deserved for the shares you submitted.
-
I've mined all night with a i5 machine on Ubuntu 64, however got only 0.046 MMC.
And when I checked just now, the 0.046 MMC also disappeared: my balance in the pool is 0 now, but I didn't receive any coin.
Did I miss something or it's a bug?
-
seems they love more cores and such, I had a 4 core overnight and it yielded 0.59 :( which was paid though
slow machines (which apparently a 4 core is, mines an older Nehalem i5) don't catch up in time and work on shares for nothing, though I didn't see that many stales from what I recall
now two 8core boxes, 16 cores total and things look far better :
Balance: 0.272825
Unconfirmed: 8.007509
This Round Shares: 48
This Round Estimated Payout: 5.310154
if by tonight I get paid 15+ MMC I will be a pretty happy camper
-
Please KillerByte ... take a look to my account ... about 5 MMC hold 2 days ....
MJf2aL2WYZqJvMAPEpufbvoQRW2tHiRZ48
Thankyou
-
KillerByte please check your server.. you have the same blocks found like on mmcpool.com!!
-
KillerByte please check your server.. you have the same blocks found like on mmcpool.com!!
I have checked, and made a post on the MMCPool thread. All of our blocks are valid and not orphans.
Please KillerByte ... take a look to my account ... about 5 MMC hold 2 days ....
MJf2aL2WYZqJvMAPEpufbvoQRW2tHiRZ48
Thankyou
It didn't get sent to you? OK, let me look at the payouts again I guess. Thanks for the report.
-
Can't you confirm which pool these are going to from blockchain explorer? What address is your pool using?
-
killer, when are autopays scheduled ? im up to 14coins lol :))
-
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000
-
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000
I can:
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541
...oh, that was revealing... the block number is off :) I dont understand though... I fixed that bug ages ago.
Oh well, makes almost no difference. I will fix that though.
-
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000
I can:
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541
...oh, that was revealing... the block number is off :) I dont understand though... I fixed that bug ages ago.
Oh well, makes almost no difference. I will fix that though.
its good news for miners who mine on you pool)) that means pool isnt on fork...
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7 3027
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541 3001
-
killerbyte can you post block hash 3026 3000
I can:
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541
...oh, that was revealing... the block number is off :) I dont understand though... I fixed that bug ages ago.
Oh well, makes almost no difference. I will fix that though.
its good news for miners who mine on you pool)) that means pool isnt on fork...
00005dc64788dcc719525582c846d156f666cf95a5de41a6d8716aecf7a2cfa7 3027
0000926cf4505ac2c8c255d5ba6151a710128dc80bd220136ac8ed3eb5cc7541 3001
I think I have had every problem possible with memorycoin now. My datacoin and primecoin pools are quite peaceful and operate jubilently on a daily basis... :), but my memorycoin pool always lacks stability.
-
hmm... well fun being ignored ..
-
Getting good throughput on your pool, seems like most bugs worked out.
-
we need win64 miner for this pool))
-
KillerByte, are you still having to manually trigger payouts? I am showing a balance of 6. Would feel better about staying on your pool if I actually get a payout.
MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
-
hmm... well fun being ignored ..
Did I miss a post of yours?
KillerByte, are you still having to manually trigger payouts? I am showing a balance of 6. Would feel better about staying on your pool if I actually get a payout.
MFu6BAaEtcaEi7QV7fn9eLce1uELtrJFdP
yes, I am unfortunately. I think it may have something to do with the fact that my pool is off one block with the confirmation time. I wil lfix now, and reset user balances. estimated time of fixes: 2 hours.
-
pool is restarting to fix the block offset bug, any future blocks mined will not have this issue.
-
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong
first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what
second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?
keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)
-
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong
first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what
second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?
keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)
1. The miner is not easy to compile I agree. I will look into it.. but I am overloaded
2. Payouts are supposed to happen every 30 minutes, but that has not been working out recently because balances have been getting off and payouts have been having errors. I have been trying to fix it for days now
3. Glad you support this pool :)
-
Seems like the restart fixed the bug with balance not being subtracted from unconfirmed, but still wrong block on front page. Is that value stored somewhere in the db?
-
Seems like the restart fixed the bug with balance not being subtracted from unconfirmed, but still wrong block on front page. Is that value stored somewhere in the db?
yes, the fix only applies for newly found blocks. Those blocks are stored in the database, and would be a pain to change :)
-
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong
first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what
second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?
keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)
1. The miner is not easy to compile I agree. I will look into it.. but I am overloaded
2. Payouts are supposed to happen every 30 minutes, but that has not been working out recently because balances have been getting off and payouts have been having errors. I have been trying to fix it for days now
3. Glad you support this pool :)
heya,
1. well i posted the fix ;) add this line as an optional for ppl who have problems and are missing libs:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
this installs 3 things that were missing
2. ah, well looking forward to when it works :))
3. sure thing man, i aim to keep supporting it
-
several man and im merely trying to be supportive here, i think having over 51% hashing power on the other pool is just wrong
first post was with the linux libs, I added the absolutely necessary libs for a clean debian wheezy to compile the miner, really 3 machines couldnt compile without them no matter what
second was a question, when are payouts scheduled ? is there a time ? im up to confirmed 8 coins so im loving that but im curious if there is a time schedule ? or something like that ?
keep up the good work, i will do my best to support and spread the word on overclocking forums, you know we have quite an interest from overclockers ;)
1. The miner is not easy to compile I agree. I will look into it.. but I am overloaded
2. Payouts are supposed to happen every 30 minutes, but that has not been working out recently because balances have been getting off and payouts have been having errors. I have been trying to fix it for days now
3. Glad you support this pool :)
heya,
1. well i posted the fix ;) add this line as an optional for ppl who have problems and are missing libs:
sudo apt-get install libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev
this installs 3 things that were missing
2. ah, well looking forward to when it works :))
3. sure thing man, i aim to keep supporting it
1. will add to main post in a sec, as soon as forum stops delaying my posts 60 seconds :)Thanks for the fix.
-
sounds good :) keep up the good work man ! needs to be smooth as butter and fast, we're all in for the money after all and the first will make the most ;)
-
Just got payout :)
-
Just got payout :)
+1 yay !
killer the stats still show the same balance though, needs attention :)
-
Just got payout :)
+1 yay !
killer the stats still show the same balance though, needs attention :)
thanks for the reports. Has been fixed. Sorry about the delay! :)
All balances reset to 0, I will resolve any payouts that were pending a little later :( Sorry about that, but the payouts bug seems to be identified.
-
UPDATE: The latest confirmed block will be payed out again, since there are extra funds sitting on the pool. Hopefully this will make up for any lost funds. Enjoy!
-
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
. . .
It works pretty well.
Rlly? For me, it reads:
16 miner threads started, using MMC Momentum Proof-of-Work algorithm.
. . . and offers no further feedback or indication that it is actually mining anything, and my CPU activity meters barely fluctuate at all.
Is it actually doing anything (is it mining)? The command I used to run it was:
minerd.exe --url http://mmc.xpool.xram.co:1339 --user MyMMCaddressBlahBlahBlahBlahBlahBl -D -P --threads 16
-
https://mega.co.nz/#!ydhjharY!SS3CQCt_4OSev2XiaDZ2bnCNf94WHFNN8ZLsSVYp4cw windows 32bit version miner for pool (unstable version)
. . .
It works pretty well.
Rlly? For me, it reads:
16 miner threads started, using MMC Momentum Proof-of-Work algorithm.
. . . and offers no further feedback or indication that it is actually mining anything, and my CPU activity meters barely fluctuate at all.
Is it actually doing anything (is it mining)? The command I used to run it was:
minerd.exe --url http://mmc.xpool.xram.co:1339 --user MyMMCaddressBlahBlahBlahBlahBlahBl -D -P --threads 16
uh... nvm, if that is the mining client for the other pool, then maby not... maby the person posted on the wrong thread.?
-
MFsEpEcBu1U5SQ24vigzL6YWqCSJUwaVE8
My address already has
Balance: 0.643257 Unconfirmed: 2.219012
but I haven't revicived 0.643257 in my wallet,may I ask why? thanks.
yes, balances have been fixed, and everything. Its still not working. It seems that the server thinks it does not have enough balance, yet it has plenty of MMC for the payouts... so yeah. frusturated.
-
There we go! Check your wallets! Payouts just worked, and balances just reset like they were supposed to.
We are good to go!
-
Now just make the pool find a block and your done for the day ;)
-
uh... nvm, if that is the mining client for the other pool, then maby not... maby the person posted on the wrong thread.?
Huh?
I'm not entirely certain, but I believe the same miner can (or apparently should be able to) mine at various pools?
I got it to work at a brand-spanking-new other pool with this command:
minerd.exe --url http://extasie.net:8337/ --user myUserName.1 --pass x --threads 16
--and it periodically displayed a hash rate, and found a share! :)
I couldn't get it to do any hashing for the pool in subject of this thread. I think it's the pool's fault :/
-
uh... nvm, if that is the mining client for the other pool, then maby not... maby the person posted on the wrong thread.?
Huh?
I'm not entirely certain, but I believe the same miner can (or apparently should be able to) mine at various pools?
I got it to work at a brand-spanking-new other pool with this command:
minerd.exe --url http://extasie.net:8337/ --user myUserName.1 --pass x --threads 16
--and it periodically displayed a hash rate, and found a share! :)
I couldn't get it to do any hashing for the pool in subject of this thread. I think it's the pool's fault :/
Actually this pool uses a custom protocol. All the others are using getwork and have the same compatible miner. This pool requires the custom miner.
-
Pool has been working very steady so I had some time to implement a feature!:
List of top 5 miners (not 50 ;) ) has been added to the main page. Enjoy!
-
maybe someone can help me... to explain this error.. or how i can fix this
i try compile 64 bit version from source miner for this pool
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388231233-clip-42kb.png?nocache=1)
-
maybe someone can help me... to explain this error.. or how i can fix this
i try compile 64 bit version from source miner for this pool
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388231233-clip-42kb.png?nocache=1)
What is your boost version? Seems like an odd error.
-
1.54.0
-
1.54.0
ok... are you just using the standard mingw compiler? I dont know why it would not be working...
-
1.54.0
ok... are you just using the standard mingw compiler? I dont know why it would not be working...
solved this problem and compiled binary for win64
so ... this is link to binary win32 and win64 miner for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!fFZXSICC!eg1JfHV46rGQzT9Q44gk6jK10T0cUGGiiNLNYYZ3wB8
enjoy ))
-
1.54.0
ok... are you just using the standard mingw compiler? I dont know why it would not be working...
solved this problem and compiled binary for win64
so ... this is link to binary win32 and win64 miner for this pool
https://mega.co.nz/#!fFZXSICC!eg1JfHV46rGQzT9Q44gk6jK10T0cUGGiiNLNYYZ3wB8
enjoy ))
This is great! Will put it on our server for download and update the main post as soon as I get home. Thanks again for the dedication!
Also, what is your donation address... We do not see it.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
Windows miner (both bits) added to the pool. Can be easily downloaded from the pool if you look at the front page, or the first post :)
Thanks again, ig0tik3d.
-
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
-
little update of miner for this pool based on commit https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer/commit/f43718aa6e569fd8545a05bb4813fdd1ede9f708 ...
allow any number of threads .. now you can set -genproclimit=1,2,3,4,5....128.
archive include several version of miner.
miner64th.exe -generic 64bit version.
miner64th-adm-aes.exe - amd with aes support
miner64th-i7aes.exe - i7 with aes support
miner64th-aes.exe - generic 64bit for processors with aes support
https://mega.co.nz/#!mUJkELwJ!HxEOunGYH4cs6QH9JLNM7VORncgRxPhwcgKj-WGv19g
-
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
you didnt get a payout? They only reset if they were successfully sent. Check your wallet again, and make sure it is synced.
little update of miner for this pool based on commit https://github.com/glitchman/mmcminer/commit/f43718aa6e569fd8545a05bb4813fdd1ede9f708 ...
allow any number of threads .. now you can set -genproclimit=1,2,3,4,5....128.
archive include several version of miner.
miner64th.exe -generic 64bit version.
miner64th-adm-aes.exe - amd with aes support
miner64th-i7aes.exe - i7 with aes support
miner64th-aes.exe - generic 64bit for processors with aes support
https://mega.co.nz/#!mUJkELwJ!HxEOunGYH4cs6QH9JLNM7VORncgRxPhwcgKj-WGv19g
supports this pool? Great! I put on the pool as soon as I am sure.
-
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
you didnt get a payout? They only reset if they were successfully sent. Check your wallet again, and make sure it is synced.
yap, it reset to 0 but nothing came in, now later in the day a new balance showed and eventually paid, but the morning one seems to have gone missing, odd stuff man
-
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
you didnt get a payout? They only reset if they were successfully sent. Check your wallet again, and make sure it is synced.
yap, it reset to 0 but nothing came in, now later in the day a new balance showed and eventually paid, but the morning one seems to have gone missing, odd stuff man
here is the transaction ID of the most recent payout:
d54f5347d50c2b98d0f2338e37d7d14b76c5323d340627a55618d14fe9080f9e
What was your balance before then? anyone else experiencing the same problem?
-
on my amd A10-5800k (with support aes) os win7 64bit
with miner64th (3 threads) get
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388342628-clip-6kb.png?nocache=1)
with miner64th-amd-aes (3 threads) get
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388343393-clip-4kb.png?nocache=1)
but need more time to test ))
anyone else experiencing the same problem?
yes.. something wrong with balance statistic... maybe i wrong... check my address MVTEcnoTrUAeYrd3yzXm3nd4S73yACDtMa
-
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
you didnt get a payout? They only reset if they were successfully sent. Check your wallet again, and make sure it is synced.
yap, it reset to 0 but nothing came in, now later in the day a new balance showed and eventually paid, but the morning one seems to have gone missing, odd stuff man
here is the transaction ID of the most recent payout:
d54f5347d50c2b98d0f2338e37d7d14b76c5323d340627a55618d14fe9080f9e
What was your balance before then? anyone else experiencing the same problem?
yap, this one just showed up an hr ago, but it was several hours earlier, about an hr before I posted that I saw my balance go to zero and i had a bit more that time, something over a coin i think, not a big deal, i just mean seems something is off with the payment system ?
-
on my amd A10-5800k (with support aes) os win7 64bit
with miner64th (3 threads) get
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388342628-clip-6kb.png?nocache=1)
with miner64th-amd-aes (3 threads) get
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388343393-clip-4kb.png?nocache=1)
but need more time to test ))
Thats great! Optimized miners would really help this pool out. keep me posted. Also, can you provide sources? I will put them on github. Thanks!
bro whats up ? all balances went to zero, but payments no show :(
tell me its just a delay thing, its been over an hour i think now..
you didnt get a payout? They only reset if they were successfully sent. Check your wallet again, and make sure it is synced.
yap, it reset to 0 but nothing came in, now later in the day a new balance showed and eventually paid, but the morning one seems to have gone missing, odd stuff man
here is the transaction ID of the most recent payout:
d54f5347d50c2b98d0f2338e37d7d14b76c5323d340627a55618d14fe9080f9e
What was your balance before then? anyone else experiencing the same problem?
yap, this one just showed up an hr ago, but it was several hours earlier, about an hr before I posted that I saw my balance go to zero and i had a bit more that time, something over a coin i think, not a big deal, i just mean seems something is off with the payment system ?
maby... or maby there is something wrong with the website in what it says your balance is.
-
could be, but then youd be saying that an 8core ran half a day and made 0.59 mmc, which is a bit hard to believe :)
-
could be, but then youd be saying that an 8core ran half a day and made 0.59 mmc, which is a bit hard to believe :)
true, but we got kind of unlucky yesterday as a pool.
well, thanks for the report. there has been something going a little wierd with the payouts still (not much, but it is wierd)... so I will look into it.
is anyone else having this issue? It would help me debug it. Thanks.
-
what is the approximate pool speed?
-
thx killer, do take a look
-
what is the approximate pool speed?
let me calculate.... this is probobly low:
208 H/m, based on number of shares per minute submitted over the last 2 minutes...
here is a simple way to calculate it:
get 2 numbers, refresh the front page for the first one and wait 2 minutes for the AJAX to update for the second
then subtract the 2 numbers, then multiply by 8... that will give you the approximite pool hashrate.
-
killer u fix something ? a new payment just showed up out of nowhere ..
-
I had the assumption that the owner of the pool http://mmcpool.com/ in the same time is the owner of a botnet )))
-
I had the assumption that the owner of the pool http://mmcpool.com/ in the same time is the owner of a botnet )))
...what?
killer u fix something ? a new payment just showed up out of nowhere ..
Is that the payment you were looking for? :D
-
not really sure, maybe, probably i guess, because where else could it have come from, but weird how it came after the payment that was issued later by the pool or should have been lol .. odd stuff :D
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396333-clip-3kb.png?nocache=1)
))
killerbyte what you think about this ? ))
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396425-clip-13kb.png?nocache=1)
and why you don't update windows binary or new version doesn't work properly?
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
Under DDOS? :o
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
Under DDOS? :o
Not that I am aware...
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396333-clip-3kb.png?nocache=1)
))
killerbyte what you think about this ? ))
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396425-clip-13kb.png?nocache=1)
and why you don't update windows binary or new version doesn't work properly?
hey I just woke up, noticed that there were 610 miners on the pool, didnt last long though. I woke up last night finding out there was some commotion about DDoSses... did this pool get DDoSsed actually? I have no evidence it was.
Does the windows binary not work? I tested it with Wine... let me fix the website as you suggested too.
-
Pool is at a low of 250 miners right now... whats going on? :)
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396333-clip-3kb.png?nocache=1)
))
killerbyte what you think about this ? ))
(http://clip2net.com/clip/m0/1388396425-clip-13kb.png?nocache=1)
and why you don't update windows binary or new version doesn't work properly?
hey I just woke up, noticed that there were 610 miners on the pool, didnt last long though. I woke up last night finding out there was some commotion about DDoSses... did this pool get DDoSsed actually? I have no evidence it was.
Does the windows binary not work? I tested it with Wine... let me fix the website as you suggested too.
Killerbyte, maybe you can make the payouts automatically paid upon reaching your payout theeshold. This might 1 factor on why some miners didnt last long specially for new ones. In my case i was following this thread so till up to now i have 40 cores mining at your pool :)...just a suggestion.
Mike
-
agreed, payouts are still weird
-
Killerbyte, maybe you can make the payouts automatically paid upon reaching your payout theeshold. This might 1 factor on why some miners didnt last long specially for new ones. In my case i was following this thread so till up to now i have 40 cores mining at your pool :)...just a suggestion.
Mike
The payouts are supposed to happen automatically every 30 minutes... or every 5 blocks... the do appear to have not payed out as you said though.
There is one more block until it is scheduled to payout. If it does not payout then, something is definitely wrong.
-
Killerbyte, maybe you can make the payouts automatically paid upon reaching your payout theeshold. This might 1 factor on why some miners didnt last long specially for new ones. In my case i was following this thread so till up to now i have 40 cores mining at your pool :)...just a suggestion.
Mike
The payouts are supposed to happen automatically every 30 minutes... or every 5 blocks... the do appear to have not payed out as you said though.
There is one more block until it is scheduled to payout. If it does not payout then, something is definitely wrong.
Pls check there should be payouts by now i guess
-
long now .. something is def up
-
long now .. something is def up
yes, you are right. Investigating again.... I will find out what the problem is now.
-
long now .. something is def up
yes, you are right. Investigating again.... I will find out what the problem is now.
killerbyte, i you can also check the REJECT rate, i think its too many on my end im not sure with others.
Thanks,
Mike
-
long now .. something is def up
yes, you are right. Investigating again.... I will find out what the problem is now.
killerbyte, i you can also check the REJECT rate, i think its too many on my end im not sure with others.
Thanks,
Mike
what is your reject rate and has it always been this way? The pool was just down and that may have contributed.
-
long now .. something is def up
yes, you are right. Investigating again.... I will find out what the problem is now.
killerbyte, i you can also check the REJECT rate, i think its too many on my end im not sure with others.
Thanks,
Mike
what is your reject rate and has it always been this way? The pool was just down and that may have contributed.
Almost 10 out of 20 servers has a reject...any updates on payouts by the way?
Thanks,
Mike
-
long now .. something is def up
yes, you are right. Investigating again.... I will find out what the problem is now.
killerbyte, i you can also check the REJECT rate, i think its too many on my end im not sure with others.
Thanks,
Mike
what is your reject rate and has it always been this way? The pool was just down and that may have contributed.
Almost 10 out of 20 servers has a reject...any updates on payouts by the way?
Thanks,
Mike
On the payouts: Still not working... May have something to do with a crash that occoured that I didn't catch or something... I might have to recalculate payouts again... Grr.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
-
Continuous work day, and displays the results as follows:
Balance: 0.072987
Unconfirmed: 10.731204
When can pay to my wallet?
-
Continuous work day, and displays the results as follows:
Balance: 0.072987
Unconfirmed: 10.731204
When can pay to my wallet?
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/faq
When do I get paid?
Payments are made when the confirmed balance is above 0.5 MMC
I hope this helps
Mike
-
Continuous work day, and displays the results as follows:
Balance: 0.072987
Unconfirmed: 10.731204
When can pay to my wallet?
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/faq
When do I get paid?
Payments are made when the confirmed balance is above 0.5 MMC
I hope this helps
Mike
I am in full compliance with the conditions of the.
But a busy day, so far I have not yet received MMC wallet.
Why is this?
-
Continuous work day, and displays the results as follows:
Balance: 0.072987
Unconfirmed: 10.731204
When can pay to my wallet?
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/faq
When do I get paid?
Payments are made when the confirmed balance is above 0.5 MMC
I hope this helps
Mike
I am in full compliance with the conditions of the.
But a busy day, so far I have not yet received MMC wallet.
Why is this?
0.07 < 0.5
-
Continuous work day, and displays the results as follows:
Balance: 0.072987
Unconfirmed: 10.731204
When can pay to my wallet?
http://mmc.xpool.xram.co/faq
When do I get paid?
Payments are made when the confirmed balance is above 0.5 MMC
I hope this helps
Mike
I am in full compliance with the conditions of the.
But a busy day, so far I have not yet received MMC wallet.
Why is this?
0.07 < 0.5
The current display is already the caseļ¼
Balance: 10.731204
-
I have been completely over 0.5 MMC.
System does not automatically pay for it?
-
@randygong Oh man, look at this:
(http://img.leprosorium.com/2055113.png) (http://img.leprosorium.com/2055112)
I'm really newbie in cryptomining, but feels like nothing happens with payouts...
-
hey all, I just found out payouts were executed. here is the transaction ID: 482db6765e9343a3db2e2505c60cf5efbc8fca1f0b55adc43043503c33130139
-
hey all, I just found out payouts were executed. here is the transaction ID: 482db6765e9343a3db2e2505c60cf5efbc8fca1f0b55adc43043503c33130139
now, at the same time, there might have been problems with the payouts... some balances still seem high. I dont know how this keeps happening, but I might have to reset user balances... or just close down the pool since I cant figure these things out :)
Anyway, there is 282 on the pool to be payed out still... that is at least one block. so I will find out why.
-
@randygong Oh man, look at this:
(http://img.leprosorium.com/2055113.png) (http://img.leprosorium.com/2055112)
I'm really newbie in cryptomining, but feels like nothing happens with payouts...
How many cores you are running?
-
hey all, I just found out payouts were executed. here is the transaction ID: 482db6765e9343a3db2e2505c60cf5efbc8fca1f0b55adc43043503c33130139
Seems to be fine at my end, payouts has been sent
-
How many cores you are running?
It depends. A couple of 70 PCs right now from around of 400 available.
I was switched from XPM mining two days ago, that brings me 0.1BTC/day for reaching more ;D
-
How many cores you are running?
It depends. A couple of 70 PCs right now from around of 400 available.
I was switched from XPM mining two days ago, that brings me 0.1BTC/day for reaching more ;D
Cool :)
-
Well... I'll keep my fingers crossed for payout 8) to MSp2XeZBFvWYWnFPZqMWxvi58sjSy2qBVF
-
Well... I'll keep my fingers crossed for payout 8) to MSp2XeZBFvWYWnFPZqMWxvi58sjSy2qBVF
Thanks for the address... I will do a manual payout if all doesnt work... the server has plenty to pay... but it still doesnt work for some reason. Irritating.
Your unconfirmed balance is a lie BTW... there is a bug in the pool where it does not refresh unconfirmed balances after moving to confirmed. Sorry about that.
-
Well... I'll keep my fingers crossed for payout 8) to MSp2XeZBFvWYWnFPZqMWxvi58sjSy2qBVF
Thanks for the address... I will do a manual payout if all doesnt work... the server has plenty to pay... but it still doesnt work for some reason. Irritating.
Your unconfirmed balance is a lie BTW... there is a bug in the pool where it does not refresh unconfirmed balances after moving to confirmed. Sorry about that.
Do you mean to say that now unconfirmed data is illusion?
-
Now all payments must be paid by the artificial to the wallet?
The system can not be done automatically pay it?