If all goes well next week and no unforeseen snags occur,
we think we will be able to announce the start of our 30 day countdown to the BitShares 2.0 Pitchfork.
I only guarantee that our GUI will be better than Ethereum's at launch ;)
I only guarantee that our GUI will be better than Ethereum's at launch ;)
The key word here is "could" ahah I assume then we won't have the wallet ready for 100,00 tps right? I'm not particularly worried about that. Just expect trolls to use that to say BitShares tried to hype, didn't deliver, scam, etc. But if a decent amount of transactions could be proven to be done in the chain, it could ease some minds.
The key word here is "could" ahah I assume then we won't have the wallet ready for 100,00 tps right? I'm not particularly worried about that. Just expect trolls to use that to say BitShares tried to hype, didn't deliver, scam, etc. But if a decent amount of transactions could be proven to be done in the chain, it could ease some minds.
It Bitshares was even to do 1000 tps, it would make a profit from fees of over 17 million dollars in a single day (at 20 cents each). Or 3.5 million if those transactions were all done from lifetime members. That would sure rock the market cap. ;) The TPS bitshares will be able to handle will be scaled up over time as we get more use.
I agree that one of the most important test now is getting load testing going that reaches the 100,000tps range.The key word here is "could" ahah I assume then we won't have the wallet ready for 100,00 tps right? I'm not particularly worried about that. Just expect trolls to use that to say BitShares tried to hype, didn't deliver, scam, etc. But if a decent amount of transactions could be proven to be done in the chain, it could ease some minds.
It Bitshares was even to do 1000 tps, it would make a profit from fees of over 17 million dollars in a single day (at 20 cents each). Or 3.5 million if those transactions were all done from lifetime members. That would sure rock the market cap. ;) The TPS bitshares will be able to handle will be scaled up over time as we get more use.
Yes, I'm not talking about having a high number of transactions, but somehow being able to prove it can handle those number of transactions, because that's where anti-bitshares people will start off. "Big claims, no deliver" and stuff like that.
Btw, I really like those numbers 8)
Having that said, good work guys, it's finally going to pay off! +5%
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
… but by now those stupid BTS should have fallen by more than 50% in CNY terms ( aren’t they BM?) (alternatively BM should have come back to his senses)…but this were the good old days, I guess and I should have been able to make my 100% gain by now.and here
When the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold [edit all my BTS] (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.)
Very nice and timely...
These (even if target time is missed by a week or 2) are very nice news and perfectly coinciding with my prediction for a[edit bout] 50% drop (made here… but by now those stupid BTS should have fallen by more than 50% in CNY terms ( aren’t they BM?) (alternatively BM should have come back to his senses)…but this were the good old days, I guess and I should have been able to make my 100% gain by now.and hereWhen the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold [edit all my BTS] (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.)
In so many words...time to buy back my BTS. And for you to do the same (or even short bitUSD or whatever your risk profile calls for)...
my 2 c - buy Buy BUY :)
Very nice and timely...When Tony says buy you buy.
These (even if target time is missed by a week or 2) are very nice news and perfectly coinciding with my prediction for a[edit bout] 50% drop (made here… but by now those stupid BTS should have fallen by more than 50% in CNY terms ( aren’t they BM?) (alternatively BM should have come back to his senses)…but this were the good old days, I guess and I should have been able to make my 100% gain by now.and hereWhen the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold [edit all my BTS] (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.)
In so many words...time to buy back my BTS. And for you to do the same (or even short bitUSD or whatever your risk profile calls for)...
my 2 c - buy Buy BUY :)
Very nice and timely...When Tony says buy you buy.
These (even if target time is missed by a week or 2) are very nice news and perfectly coinciding with my prediction for a[edit bout] 50% drop (made here… but by now those stupid BTS should have fallen by more than 50% in CNY terms ( aren’t they BM?) (alternatively BM should have come back to his senses)…but this were the good old days, I guess and I should have been able to make my 100% gain by now.and hereWhen the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold [edit all my BTS] (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.)
In so many words...time to buy back my BTS. And for you to do the same (or even short bitUSD or whatever your risk profile calls for)...
my 2 c - buy Buy BUY :)
When Tony says buy you buy.
When Tony says buy you buy.
We've got ourselves a BitShares meme right there
(http://i.imgur.com/59oyMFw.jpg)When Tony says buy you buy.
We've got ourselves a BitShares meme right there
Very nice and timely...
These (even if target time is missed by a week or 2) are very nice news and perfectly coinciding with my prediction for a[edit bout] 50% drop (made here… but by now those stupid BTS should have fallen by more than 50% in CNY terms ( aren’t they BM?) (alternatively BM should have come back to his senses)…but this were the good old days, I guess and I should have been able to make my 100% gain by now.and hereWhen the lead developer of the project wants the BTS price to go down* who am I to argue with him. And as I have no other means to short BTS I did the next best thing - sold [edit all my BTS] (not now but within days of the brownie points announcement) and am waiting for the price to at least cut in half to buy back.)
In so many words...time to buy back my BTS. And for you to do the same (or even short bitUSD or whatever your risk profile calls for)...
my 2 c - buy Buy BUY :)
When Tony says buy you buy.
Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
When Tony says buy you buy.
A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.
I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
+5% the countdown means a lot of work for everyone I guess.
+5% the countdown means a lot of work for everyone I guess.
this :P
+5% the countdown means a lot of work for everyone I guess.
this :P
In a countdown don't you just count backwards? How hard is that?
Just kidding. I'm really tired, and this is probably only funny to me.
this is clearly something for BTS 2.0 undersection so pls can someonw move it.
this is clearly something for BTS 2.0 undersection so pls can someonw move it.
imo it's also a general info .. we can move it later on ... but general is the most viewed board .. thoughts?
this is clearly something for BTS 2.0 undersection so pls can someonw move it.
imo it's also a general info .. we can move it later on ... but general is the most viewed board .. thoughts?
this. it's perfectly fine to start a thread here for the time being. But we need to come to a point where this forum is more structured.
I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
this is clearly something for BTS 2.0 undersection so pls can someonw move it.
imo it's also a general info .. we can move it later on ... but general is the most viewed board .. thoughts?
this. it's perfectly fine to start a thread here for the time being. But we need to come to a point where this forum is more structured.
yeah and mabye we should start a discussion about another forum software again @vikram .. main problem currently IMO … is menpower ...^
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
oct 21th？？？？
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have +5% +5% +5%
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have +5% +5% +5%
Agreed!!
Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...
:)
When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have +5% +5% +5%
Agreed!!
Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...
:)
sorry，I don't understandhttps://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues You can see it here.I saw a lot of problems still have not repaired, we should not rush to publishand they are?
there are only 3 bugs, 2 of them being labeled high-priority. I wouldn't say "a lot of problems" but is not my call anyways.
I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time
谢谢I think, it should be released a DVS client, so that more people to participate in the test, in the final time
There is nothing to stop anyone of us from joining the test net. All are welcome!
Check out https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.0.html and https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18312.0.html.
I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed! +5%
How about all the delegates combine force to do a 'blasting' in order to max out the Internet-based transaction. The devs can possibly do their LAN test since they have the number of computers and a fast gigabit local area network. We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.
How about that, guys? If you are keen, please SAY IT!When Tony says buy you buy.A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
@bytemaster @Stan - to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have +5% +5% +5%
Agreed!!
Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I'm sure it would be appreciated...
:)
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
Can we test the referral system prior to the release?
Any estimation of when we will be able to import our BTS balances to the new chain? Will it be after the countdown begins or only after the 30 days, when the fork happens?New chain will launch after the 30 day .. so you can only import your balancea then
I think this is a nice idea being slowly developed! +5%
LAN test
We will need to co-ordinate the timing here.
How about that, guys? If you are keen, please SAY IT!Good idea. No spare cycles here though, we're pedaling as hard as we can.Agreed!!Please, do this! You know the positive impact it would have +5% +5% +5%A trully elevating feeling to see 2.0 coming of age. :)Yea. I wonder if it is possible to show that we can achieve 100K TPS in a Local Area Network (LAN) and an average maximum speed at XXX TPS for LIVE network due to a limitation of an witness node Internet speed averaged out. This can satisfy our claim that bts can achieve 100K TPS if and when the Internet bandwidth reaches LAN speed.Load testing at 100K TPS will not be viable with standard network connections.I see, thanks for the reply. Well I'm sure as we start to test transactions speed, that even at a relatively low number for BitShares, it's still a huge number compared with other projects
good idea lan Low latency ,Pressure test mining limit and find bottlenecks
to prove it, just take your phone and video record a 1min clip or something showing a split screen. CLI on one side and xeroc's new tps gauge (http://stats.bitshares.eu) on the other side, then post it to the YT 2.0 vids (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjbx3qSmDe7QO5WHjpx6w3o_xQD6JLm4R).
Someone want to take a shot at it?
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3jvo9k/bitshares_says_it_will_be_able_to_complete_100000/?sort=confidence
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3jvo9k/bitshares_says_it_will_be_able_to_complete_100000/?sort=confidence
Toast is out there all alone, to the rescue! On a more serious note, this is to be expected..
Ethereum is very interesting and I like the project but I tend to see the community turning into the next moneros and nxt fanboys.
I would like to help support with some donation. Please pm me with bts address and how much you think you'll need.I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
This is cool! Yes, for those who wish to contribute $$$ instead of time, please do so. We can fund this (both in $$$ and effort/time) and achieve a massive blast (near 100K TPS hopefully) via multiple nodes in LAN and then over the Internet. Donors and volunteers, please SAY I.
@nethybany estimation on how much it would cost in the end?
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@nethyb
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@nethybany estimation on how much it would cost in the end?
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@nethyb
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@nethybany estimation on how much it would cost in the end?
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
Based on nethyb's post of $1.68/hr that would be (at current rates) 362 BTS for each hour, not including time and labor...
I'm willing to chip in min 2500 BTS
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
This is cool! Yes, for those who wish to contribute $$$ instead of time, please do so. We can fund this (both in $$$ and effort/time) and achieve a massive blast (near 100K TPS hopefully) via multiple nodes in LAN and then over the Internet. Donors and volunteers, please SAY I.
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
@nethyb - We need a bid, please.
@kenCode @cube @sudo @phillyguy @emailtooaj @onceuponatime @godzirra @rnglab
It would be great if we could all record it on video with our phones. Split screen CLI an xeroc's tps gauge. Other ideas welcome.
This is 9 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@nethyb
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
Have they announce the release date yet? If not what day this week will they make the announcement?
ANNOUNCEMENT 9 - Pitchfork Countdown Could Begin Next WeekIf all goes well next week and no unforeseen snags occur,...
we think we will be able to announce the start of our 30 day countdown to the BitShares 2.0 Pitchfork.
Our team will make the final call next week, but we feel we are very close. The exact 30-day countdown date will be posted in a follow up announcement at that time. If you are a Partner or 3rd Party developer waiting to begin integration, this is your one week pre-notice to recall your integration teams from summer break in Kokomo and harness them up to their keyboards.
@nethyb
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@bobmaloney 2500 BTS
So you guys are talking about setting up a private network of aws machines in an attempt to push 100k tps? I don't really see the utility, since it's not something we could currently do in the wild. I think we would be better served if we got a large amount of people to join the actual test net and see how high we could get the tps there.
@nethyb
@kenCode @cube @sudo @Akado @phillyguy @emailtooaj
This is 7 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@bobmaloney 2500 BTS
If I could help I would gladly chip in with 2500 btc, just let me know
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
@tonyk 2500 BTSI for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
@nethyb - We need a bid, please.
@kenCode @cube @sudo @phillyguy @emailtooaj @onceuponatime @godzirra @rnglab @bobmaloney @ccedk
Removing the WAN limitations could prove our scalability beyond 100K tps.. I'm looking forward to this AWS test.
It would be great if we could all record it on video with our phones. Split screen CLI and xeroc's tps gauge. Other ideas welcome.
This is 11 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
@tonyk 2500 BTSI for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
@nethyb - We need a bid, please.
@kenCode @cube @sudo @phillyguy @emailtooaj @onceuponatime @godzirra @rnglab @bobmaloney @ccedk
Removing the WAN limitations could prove our scalability beyond 100K tps.. I'm looking forward to this AWS test.
It would be great if we could all record it on video with our phones. Split screen CLI and xeroc's tps gauge. Other ideas welcome.
This is 11 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
Please post on this thread regarding the scalability test! https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18337.msg234804/topicseen.html#msg234804
I for one, would be happy to contribute some resources (donate some BTS) or spin up a number of AWS instances to help with load testing, and I'm sure many others in the community would also help if someone could develop the instructions or scripts to perform a private testnet load/tps test.
Using AWS, you could effectively have a 10Gb private LAN with the ability to spin up a significant number of servers for a short period of time at reasonable cost using spot pricing.
Here is an atricle on how someone has configured AWS instances to achieve 1 Million TPS For Just $1.68/Hour - http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html (http://highscalability.com/blog/2014/8/18/1-aerospike-server-x-1-amazon-ec2-instance-1-million-tps-for.html)
If we chime and say we (as the community) would be willing to fund/support/provide resources for this test - it may encourage one us to take it on...
@nethyb - We need a bid, please.
@kenCode @cube @sudo @phillyguy @emailtooaj @onceuponatime @godzirra @rnglab @bobmaloney @ccedk
Removing the WAN limitations could prove our scalability beyond 100K tps.. I'm looking forward to this AWS test.
It would be great if we could all record it on video with our phones. Split screen CLI and xeroc's tps gauge. Other ideas welcome.
This is 11 people so far willing to put in some BTS for this 100K tps LAN test.
Anybody else?
I hope the team finally gets documentation up to par with the complexity of the codebase. If you want avg joe to jump in you will need the ability to explain every step of the system in simple language with examples and screen shots. It would be "nice" if the web wallet were to have a help system to ease avg joe into bitshares. This is what every other crypto project is missing.
I hope the team finally gets documentation up to par with the complexity of the codebase. If you want avg joe to jump in you will need the ability to explain every step of the system in simple language with examples and screen shots. It would be "nice" if the web wallet were to have a help system to ease avg joe into bitshares. This is what every other crypto project is missing.
I hope the team finally gets documentation up to par with the complexity of the codebase. If you want avg joe to jump in you will need the ability to explain every step of the system in simple language with examples and screen shots. It would be "nice" if the web wallet were to have a help system to ease avg joe into bitshares. This is what every other crypto project is missing.+5% like a simple support chat function .. also for website later on .,.. like a support agent ... paid and porposaled by worker slot
Will we have -even if not at launch- something that could automate a payment for a date in the future? If I'm not mistaken i think that would be something like CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. Would be another nice security factor so if we schedule a payment for a date in the future, even if that wallet gets stolen, we could get our funds back!
I hope the team finally gets documentation up to par with the complexity of the codebase. If you want avg joe to jump in you will need the ability to explain every step of the system in simple language with examples and screen shots. It would be "nice" if the web wallet were to have a help system to ease avg joe into bitshares. This is what every other crypto project is missing.
That would be great to have something like that on bitshares.org.
When I wrote my comment I was about to @cass you but then I though, he is probably very busy and I didn't.That would be great to have something like that on bitshares.org.
guess it will ..
Will we have -even if not at launch- something that could automate a payment for a date in the future? If I'm not mistaken i think that would be something like CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. Would be another nice security factor so if we schedule a payment for a date in the future, even if that wallet gets stolen, we could get our funds back!
With proposals you can do something like that already.
Wasn't there a group photo taken with Dan holding a pitch fork when the bitscape brothers did the tour to Blacksburg, VA?This!
That would be an epic photo to use for this countdown :P
2 days left now. How are you guys feeling about the testnet? On track for friday?
2 days left now. How are you guys feeling about the testnet? On track for friday?
I believe that the test network has proven robust enough to replace the BTS 1.0 network in 30 days.
We have some graceful fallback positions that can be taken without missing the upgrade deadline:
1. If all witnesses are on a single node then the network works perfectly, even with 1 second blocks
2. Have several different witnesses all run from the same Amazon or Digital Ocean location
3. Have all witnesses use a dedicated server to relay messages through while being geographically diverse
4. Have all witnesses use current P2P and reduce block times to 5 seconds
In any event we are confident in the market behavior and evaluation of transactions and see no reason to delay upgrading the protocol simply because of networking/communication issues.
On the user interface side we have a viable wallet that supports:
1. market operations
2. transfers
3. voting
4. backups
Over the course of the next 30 days we will continue to refine the user interface, but at the very least it should be better than BTS 1 long before 30 days is up.
In other words, I am feeling pretty good about having the upgrade date be: Tuesday, October 13th (middle of work week)
In other words, I am feeling pretty good about having the upgrade date be: Tuesday, October 13th (middle of work week)
In other words, I am feeling pretty good about having the upgrade date be: Tuesday, October 13th (middle of work week)
(https://40.media.tumblr.com/6c9469c6cff1eb4333de68c3c2f38ae5/tumblr_nufpocurXm1rtef2wo1_1280.png)
10 Brownie.PTS to first person to call out the "easter egg".
I noticed the address 1013 in the background. Very clever.
For every time one of us has urged you to rush this, you deserve ten big thank you's for the hard work and dedication.