BitShares Forum
Main => Stakeholder Proposals => Topic started by: clayop on October 26, 2015, 07:19:32 pm
-
Please set proxy for "clayop" for the growth of our ecosystem. My goals and plans are as follows.
Purpose: To attract new users with reasonable fee-base and to promote healthy network
Goals:
1) To vote for committee members who propose reasonable fee system
2) To vote for diligent witnesses who are very reactive and reliable
3) To vote for talented workers who can expand BitShares ecosystem
Plans:
1) I won't vote for one person as both committee member and witness
2) I will support current 31 witnesses, and may be able to vote for more (maximum 51)
Here's my slate
https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/account/clayop/voting
-
+5%
-
Voted!
Pl issue our claims.
-
As a proxy, I support the BM's proposal (from #2~#5). Regarding the fee, I still support lowering the fee as mentioned in BM's proposal #1.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19890.0.html
-
you're gonna be my proxy for the time being.
-
you're gonna be my proxy for the time being.
Thanks!
-
If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.
-
If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20073.msg258413.html#msg258413
and why - where is the link about your final vote...I know you posted 700 posts of [sometimes changing] opinions.
in other words, as far as proxies go, why did you vote for yourself if no such info was provided?...by yourself
-
If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20073.msg258413.html#msg258413
and why - where is the link about your final vote...I know you posted 700 posts of [sometimes changing] opinions.
in other words, as far as proxies go, why did you vote for yourself if no such info was provided?...by yourself
Did you set proxy to me? I cannot find your account in my follower list
My voting is found here: http://cryptofresh.com/u/clayop
-
Did you set proxy to me? I cannot find your account in my follower list
as you should not! If it was not clear by now.
What an ....
-
I support the worker proposal 1.14.8 created by @wmbutler
He is very enthusiastic, organized, and good at communication. I think the worker proposal will empower the GUI development.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20144.0.html
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14d9bBAyUoB9wcBpFnYoGpE1MF0RnOwMKpF2Z8eh0QkI/edit
-
I reject the below worker proposal because (1) it is too expensive (about $35,000) and (2) it is not a core feature of Bitshares.
IMHO, we now need to use a worker proposal to expand our core functions. But I'm still open to any of your opinion. Please let me know.
-
I fully support svk's worker proposal.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20655.0.html
-
@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
-
@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
In addition of that, I'm very busy these days to visit my family, so the vote already passed.
-
@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
In addition of that, I'm very busy these days to visit my family, so the vote already passed.
Anyway you can still vote now..
-
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.
-
To take it seriously and hopefully increase vote.
-
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.
My previous thought is this proposal should be near zero cost. But I figured out that $300 for stealth is going to go xeroc to maintain the BSIP. That makes sense.
-
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.
My previous thought is this proposal should be near zero cost. But I figured out that $300 for stealth is going to go xeroc to maintain the BSIP. That makes sense.
I think 1.14.17 (Documentation/Technical Support/Python+UI Development) would be voted in for the BSIPs instead of this special one.
-
Update:
I voted down maqifrnswa because this witness is not reactive to yesterday's urgent patch.
And I voted for cass's proposal (1.14.28) and all eight burn/refund workers created by the committee.
-
maqifrnswa doesn't upgrade his node still. He never get my votes in the future.
And I am asking other proxies to vote down him. @bytemaster @bitcrab @xeroc @jakub @Xeldal
-
maqifrnswa doesn't upgrade his node still. He never get my votes in the future.
And I am asking other proxies to vote down him. @bytemaster @bitcrab @xeroc @jakub @Xeldal
He may just be on vacations with poor internet connectivity.
Voted him down Removed my votes for now an awaiting clarification
-
Do you plan to vote for the proposed BSIP worker (1.14.29) ?
I'd appreciate your support for it.
-
@clayop Please vote for the refund or burn workers.
IT'S DANGEROUS NOW.
By now, the refund worker which got highest votes is refund400k (113,325,926 BTS), which means any whale or group of whales or group of proxies who have more than 113K voting power is able to vote in a worker and steal funds from the reserve pool IMMEDIATELY. There is a flaw in the worker system, see https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/565. We(proxies and stake holders) can't all keep watching the worker list 24 hours.