BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: bytemaster on October 28, 2015, 10:07:52 pm
-
I am looking for any and all protocols that do not have a core token. Any help doing this research would be appreciated.
So far I have Hyperledger and Interledger and perhaps Tao chain.
-
Wow...sounds like one hell of a brownie quest candidate to me...
What if you award everyone with 50-100 brownies for each unique (and unlisted at the time of posting) tech that this would work well with?
-
BitMessage - p2p messaging network that stores a few days worth of messages in a "blockchain" (term used very loosely here). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitmessage
Twister - p2p version of Twitter. Registers names on a blockchain like Namecoin, but names are registered by proof of work not paying a fee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twister_(software)
Mr Marmot's blockchain I think is tokenless: https://erisindustries.com/
-
ADEPT from IBM seems not to use any token.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/ibm-developing-blockchain-without-bitcoin-for-record-keeping-and-smart-contracts-1442597079
use-case pdf http://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=XB&infotype=PM&htmlfid=GBE03666USEN&attachment=GBE03666USEN.PDF#loaded
Live demo: https://www.theprotocol.tv/adept-demo-ibm-samsung/
Apparently this is the whitepaper: http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/gb/en/gbe03620usen/GBE03620USEN.PDF
-
I think the most interesting thing to understand is why did they pick ether over other systems like bitshares.
-
I think the most interesting thing to understand is why did they pick ether over other systems like bitshares.
Ether the new Unix?
-
Open Transactions (http://opentransactions.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page) perhaps would be of interest to you? Not very 'blockchainy', but I don't know how tightly you want us to fit in with your stated requirements...
-
http://www.skuchain.com/
-
Hyperledger is just marketing on top of the PBFT algorithm. Not novel in terms of consensus systems.
-
I am looking for any and all protocols that do not have a core token. Any help doing this research would be appreciated.
So far I have Hyperledger and Interledger and perhaps Tao chain.
Here is an overview (page 38): http://www.ofnumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Permissioned-distributed-ledgers.pdf
A more detailed description of the different projects that are part of the oerview: Beginning page 29 of the doc above.
Not mentioned in the overview but has no token as far as I know: http://www.multichain.com/ ;
Projects that may have no token (found nothing about whether tokenless or not) and are blockchains / distr. ledgers (whereever that boundary is):
chain.com
peernova.com
linq: http://insidebitcoins.com/news/linq-the-new-nasdaq-blockchain-powered-trading-platform/35526
Setl.io
Not directly to your question but possibly helpful too, an article about the value of tokenless blockchains: http://www.multichain.com/blog/2015/07/bitcoin-vs-blockchain-debate/
-
http://www.rootstock.io
-
http://www.rootstock.io
This is built on top of bitcoin.
-
Tauchain is supposed to interact with Agoras and Agoras has a token. Although it doesn't require a token to run, having a token seems necessary to provide incentive for humans and machines to evolve the network.
-
Permission to Brownify this topic?
Yes or No?
-
I am looking for any and all protocols that do not have a core token. Any help doing this research would be appreciated.
So far I have Hyperledger and Interledger and perhaps Tao chain.
When you say protocol, I think https or wss.
However, here is a "blockchain-less" concept if you're interested:
http://cointelegraph.com/news/115508/iota-a-blockchain-less-gasp-token-for-the-internet-of-things
-
How about Tox?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tox_(protocol)
edit: the forum broke this link. try https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tox_(protocol) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tox_(protocol))
-
I remember there was a concept of a mesh-chain where each account is its own blockchain. I cannot seem to find a link now... help
-
I remember there was a concept of a mesh-chain where each account is its own blockchain. I cannot seem to find a link now... help
raiblocks.net/
Pretty sure you're talking about RaiBlocks.
https://github.com/clemahieu/raiblocks
-
CIYAM .. is doing all stuff tokenless AFAIK!
-
I remember there was a concept of a mesh-chain where each account is its own blockchain. I cannot seem to find a link now... help
See also: http://188.138.57.93/tangle.pdf
http://iotatoken.com/
IOTA/Tangle is slightly similar, but it builds a single transaction tree in which transactions are confirmed more quickly when they increase convergence between the most significant branches. Each transaction references at least 2 existing transactions, similar to TAPOS.
-
IOTA/Tangle is slightly similar, but it builds a single transaction tree in which transactions are confirmed more quickly when they increase convergence between the most significant branches. Each transaction references at least 2 existing transactions, similar to TAPOS.
IOTA has a token. Also, its POW, and not much like TAPOS at all, since TAPOS references a block not a transaction, and is POS not POW :)
-
IOTA/Tangle is slightly similar, but it builds a single transaction tree in which transactions are confirmed more quickly when they increase convergence between the most significant branches. Each transaction references at least 2 existing transactions, similar to TAPOS.
IOTA has a token. Also, its POW, and not much like TAPOS at all, since TAPOS references a block not a transaction, and is POS not POW :)
I like IOTA for many reasons, it just needs some refinements :)
-
IOTA/Tangle is slightly similar, but it builds a single transaction tree in which transactions are confirmed more quickly when they increase convergence between the most significant branches. Each transaction references at least 2 existing transactions, similar to TAPOS.
IOTA has a token. Also, its POW, and not much like TAPOS at all, since TAPOS references a block not a transaction, and is POS not POW :)
I like IOTA for many reasons, it just needs some refinements :)
How does it compare to all the other micro transaction protocols mentioned in this thread?