Good job! Fast and delivered as advertised!
#sharebits “mindphlux“ 1 CHATEAUX
+5%what should you do if selfless Chinese don't do this?will you cry? my little baby
let's see if our selfless ChineseWhalesCommittee members are going to vote for this.
+5%what should you do if selfless Chinese don't do this?will you cry? my little baby
let's see if our selfless ChineseWhalesCommittee members are going to vote for this.
I ask to disable the forum admin from this kid
+5%what should you do if selfless Chinese don't do this?will you cry? my little baby
let's see if our selfless ChineseWhalesCommittee members are going to vote for this.
I ask to disable the forum admin from this kid
+5%what should you do if selfless Chinese don't do this?will you cry? my little baby
let's see if our selfless ChineseWhalesCommittee members are going to vote for this.
I ask to disable the forum admin from this kid
this is shameless alt, I did not know you are an idiot.
don't you hear taunt from him?+5%what should you do if selfless Chinese don't do this?will you cry? my little baby
let's see if our selfless ChineseWhalesCommittee members are going to vote for this.
I ask to disable the forum admin from this kid
this is shameless alt, I did not know you are an idiot.
I encourage someone else to come up with an alternative price feed script so we can get some diversity.
Dear community,
Today, we tested the new version of xeroc's price script and have fine-tuned the configuration and the reported CNY price is VERY close to the real counterpart. All other asset prices have been improved too. Thank you very much to @cube @Bhuz and @xeroc for spending so much time yesterday and today for making it possible!
All witnesses have been instructed to upgrade to the newest pricefeed version.
This means we can finally re-enable the force settlement function and have done so in http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.19
Best regards
mindphlux
PS: Committee members who support this motion, please post here as well.
Update: after theoretical has confirmed that GRAPHENE_DEFAULT_FORCE_SETTLEMENT_MAX_VOLUME is indeed set to 20%, the committee has worked with the devs to create another update asset proposal to change the value to 2%.
We set the expiredate to the same as the other proposal, so both parameter changes will go live in roughly 14 hours from now.
You can review the proposal here: http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.21
Thx to @roadscape for quickly adding this new view!
Thx to @theoretical for reacting so quickly and creating the asset proposal!
2%Update: after theoretical has confirmed that GRAPHENE_DEFAULT_FORCE_SETTLEMENT_MAX_VOLUME is indeed set to 20%, the committee has worked with the devs to create another update asset proposal to change the value to 2%.
We set the expiredate to the same as the other proposal, so both parameter changes will go live in roughly 14 hours from now.
You can review the proposal here: http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.21
Thx to @roadscape for quickly adding this new view!
Thx to @theoretical for reacting so quickly and creating the asset proposal!
Why is this being done so quickly without much discussion here? Has @bytemaster even indicated whether this setting was intended to be 2% or 20%?
2%Update: after theoretical has confirmed that GRAPHENE_DEFAULT_FORCE_SETTLEMENT_MAX_VOLUME is indeed set to 20%, the committee has worked with the devs to create another update asset proposal to change the value to 2%.
We set the expiredate to the same as the other proposal, so both parameter changes will go live in roughly 14 hours from now.
You can review the proposal here: http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.21
Thx to @roadscape for quickly adding this new view!
Thx to @theoretical for reacting so quickly and creating the asset proposal!
Why is this being done so quickly without much discussion here? Has @bytemaster even indicated whether this setting was intended to be 2% or 20%?
2%Update: after theoretical has confirmed that GRAPHENE_DEFAULT_FORCE_SETTLEMENT_MAX_VOLUME is indeed set to 20%, the committee has worked with the devs to create another update asset proposal to change the value to 2%.
We set the expiredate to the same as the other proposal, so both parameter changes will go live in roughly 14 hours from now.
You can review the proposal here: http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.21
Thx to @roadscape for quickly adding this new view!
Thx to @theoretical for reacting so quickly and creating the asset proposal!
Why is this being done so quickly without much discussion here? Has @bytemaster even indicated whether this setting was intended to be 2% or 20%?
Where did he say that? I have no strong feelings about this setting one way or the other, but I think we need to stop making such rash decisions.
I missed that post from bytemaster. And cryptofresh doesn't seem to indicate who created the proposal. It would have been nice for committee members to be explicit about this as their rationale for quickly voting the 20%-->2% change, otherwise it looks to stakeholders like you're not being deliberate enough, especially after the previous controversial proposal that was voted through. Anyway, it looks like things are falling into place. Thanks.Thanks for your feedback.
I missed that post from bytemaster. And cryptofresh doesn't seem to indicate who created the proposal. It would have been nice for committee members to be explicit about this as their rationale for quickly voting the 20%-->2% change, otherwise it looks to stakeholders like you're not being deliberate enough, especially after the previous controversial proposal that was voted through. Anyway, it looks like things are falling into place. Thanks.Thanks for your feedback.
Off topic, I think your inputs on GUI are really important and valuable. Can you look into new GUI and make comments on here or github?
I encourage someone else to come up with an alternative price feed script so we can get some diversity.^^ This!
I think wackou has another price feed script (don't you? @wackou ).
I encourage someone else to come up with an alternative price feed script so we can get some diversity.^^ This!