BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: bytemaster on December 23, 2015, 08:57:40 pm
-
The STEALTH proposal has been widely accepted by the community with almost 13% of total stake (~330M BTS) voting to implement the proposal. Very view people actively rejected it.
-
Good news .
-
In some cases (like mine) it got approved because there is currently no other proposal put forward by CNX.
E.g. if you turned Market Maker Incentivization (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0006.md) into a worker proposal, I'd vote for it instead of the stealth proposal.
-
In some cases (like mine) it got approved because there is currently no other proposal put forward by CNX.
E.g. if you turned Market Maker Incentivization (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0006.md) into a worker proposal, I'd vote for it instead of the stealth proposal.
Why couldn't you vote for both?
-
In some cases (like mine) it got approved because there is currently no other proposal put forward by CNX.
E.g. if you turned Market Maker Incentivization (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0006.md) into a worker proposal, I'd vote for it instead of the stealth proposal.
Why couldn't you vote for both?
Because I know CNX resources are limited so voting for Liquidity and not voting for Stealth would be my way to prioritize Liquidity over Stealth.
But eventually I would support Stealth, just not now.
Actually having just one CNX is currently a serious bottleneck slowing down BitShares and causing quite unproductive debates on the forum.
So it's not financial limits (the blockchain has the funds and I guess is willing to spend them) but limited human resources that slow us down.
It's a big opportunity for other blockchain software companies (@Rune) but sadly it's not happening yet.
-
In some cases (like mine) it got approved because there is currently no other proposal put forward by CNX.
E.g. if you turned Market Maker Incentivization (https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/blob/master/bsip-0006.md) into a worker proposal, I'd vote for it instead of the stealth proposal.
+5% +5% +5%
-
The STEALTH proposal has been widely accepted by the community with almost 13% of total stake (~330M BTS) voting to implement the proposal. Very view people actively rejected it.
+5% - Go forth and create this STEALH that you speak of!!
-
The STEALTH proposal has been widely accepted by the community with almost 13% of total stake (~330M BTS) voting to implement the proposal. Very view people actively rejected it.
well, actively rejecting it is just not a wise game strategy [as of right now]
so yes I am actively voting for it!!!
Is this approval something to celebrate and pride yourself...
well you think it is, so enjoy it....
hahaha
-
+5%
This is why I like voting by stake, its shows real stakeholders opinion without any noise.
hahaha
-
+5%
This is why I like voting by stake, its shows real stakeholders opinion without any noise.
hahaha
+1
-
10% is from BM alone...so I would not really say "widely accepted by the community"
Anyway, the only thing to do at this point is to hope that this feature will bring lots of new users and adoption for BTS sake...
-
10% is from BM alone...so I would not really say "widely accepted by the community"
Anyway, the only thing to do at this point is to hope that this feature will bring lots of new users and adoption for BTS sake...
No, it's not alone. BM is a proxy, he has many followers.