BitShares Forum
Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: abit on January 28, 2016, 11:36:17 pm
-
All seed nodes, witnesses please update.
git checkout bitshares
git pull
make witness_node
Or new clone:
git clone https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2.git
git submodule update --init --recursive
cmake .
make witness_node
=======original post==========
{
head_block_num: 3,067,958
head_block_age: 21 minutes ago
}
2016-01-28T23:15:09 th_a:invoke handle_block handle_block ] Got block: #3067957 time: 2016-01-28T23:15:09 latency: 368 ms from
: delegate-1.lafona irreversible: 3067935 (-22) application.cpp:496
2016-01-28T23:15:10 th_a:invoke handle_transaction handle_transaction ] Got 1 transactions from network applic
ation.cpp:545
2016-01-28T23:15:12 th_a:Witness Block Production block_production_loo ] Generated block #3067958 with timestamp 2016-01-28T23:15:12 a
t time 2016-01-28T23:15:12 witness.cpp:185
2016-01-28T23:16:27 th_a:Witness Block Production block_production_loo ] Got exception while generating block:
3030007 insufficient_fee: insufficient fee
Insufficient Fee Paid
{"core_fee_paid":0,"required":10000}
th_a evaluator.hpp:230 evaluate
{}
th_a evaluator.cpp:46 start_evaluate
{}
th_a db_block.cpp:653 apply_operation
{"next_block.block_num()":3067959}
th_a db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block
-
It seems that this transaction is unable to be included into the chain:
{"ref_block_num":53301,"ref_block_prefix":3943068053,"expiration":"2016-01-28T23:15:39","operations":[[2,{"fee":{"amount":10000,"asset_id":"1.3.0"},"fee_paying_account":"1.2.97184","order":"1.7.31917","extensions":[]}]],"extensions":[],"signatures":["201c4f122098dba6a959035c686b260b46018c4fd1c3bae71a1a087640cbea174a575391f56afa8a3b145e2790821fbc407fa904fb7acb2dcd5f04ca1e9b921314"],"operation_results":[[2,{"amount":1,"asset_id":"1.3.781"}]]}
-
I am looking into the problem now... any help or proposed fixes welcome.
-
So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958
-
So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958
Nobody guessed I think. But he is already rewarded :)
-
So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958
Yeah.. so far a handful of witnesses are now trying to coordinate to fix the situation.
-
Could this be a fee pool issue? The asset in question has an empty fee pool (https://cryptofresh.com/a/ABTSLA) and otherwise the trx looks fine.. and the account has enough balance to pay the fee as far as i can tell
-
(http://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMy0wMWFiNTFkNmMwMTFjYWI3.png)
-
So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958
Me for one... but I am weird that way... the masses (and BM included btw) think speaking positively is the only way to "help"
...well besides selling their BTS...
@fuzzy
I also like the name... #1asshole beats it but I think it is not a vary valid name in bts... 2.0.
-
The fee pool balance is 1 satoshi (0.00001 BTS).. might that have some significance?
get_object 2.3.781
get_object 2.3.781
[{
"id": "2.3.781",
"current_supply": 2000000000,
"confidential_supply": 0,
"accumulated_fees": 2500000,
"fee_pool": 1
}
]
-
Update: I tried to generate an empty block but failed. Why still need fee?
2112038ms th_a db_block.cpp:195 _push_block ] Failed to push new block: [114/1936]
3030007 insufficient_fee: insufficient fee
Insufficient Fee Paid
{"core_fee_paid":0,"required":10000}
th_a evaluator.hpp:230 evaluate
{}
th_a evaluator.cpp:46 start_evaluate
{}
th_a db_block.cpp:653 apply_operation
{"next_block.block_num()":3067959}
th_a db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block
2112038ms th_a witness.cpp:178 block_production_loo ] Got exception while generating block:
3030007 insufficient_fee: insufficient fee
Insufficient Fee Paid
{"core_fee_paid":0,"required":10000}
th_a evaluator.hpp:230 evaluate
{}
th_a evaluator.cpp:46 start_evaluate
{}
th_a db_block.cpp:653 apply_operation
{"next_block.block_num()":3067959}
th_a db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block
{"new_block":{"previous":"002ed036dea60c5872751faccc904c4c04d8edc0","timestamp":"2016-01-29T00:35:12","witness":"1.6.35","transact
ion_merkle_root":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000","extensions":[],"witness_signature":"1f2eb9e040001a6aee45bdf4dbc0845c00d91
b0418cd5eaa577643a8b72bc7f73838f904a2dc23d40dc8a36f224b5c63205200f9ade4d195baed079d9ec14375a9","transactions":[]}}
th_a db_block.cpp:201 _push_block
{"witness_id":"1.6.35"}
th_a db_block.cpp:405 _generate_block
-
The fee pool balance is 1 satoshi (0.00001 BTS).. might that have some significance?
get_object 2.3.781
get_object 2.3.781
[{
"id": "2.3.781",
"current_supply": 2000000000,
"confidential_supply": 0,
"accumulated_fees": 2500000,
"fee_pool": 1
}
]
Can the fees have a precision beyond the asset?
-
I have identified the problem, fix to be pushed shortly.
-
Fix is in.. several witnesses are building right now and should be back online shortly.
-
bump
-
Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
-
So this means asshole1 who is trying to get the fees from the UIAs is actually helping the network by finding issues? Who would have guessed.
http://cryptofresh.com/b/3067958
Me for one... but I am weird that way... the masses (and BM included btw) think speaking positively is the only way to "help"
...well besides selling their BTS...
@fuzzy
I also like the name... #1asshole beats it but I think it is not a vary valid name in bts... 2.0.
tony...i have no clue why you continue assuming you know so much about me. at some point lieing about people starts seeming like slander. in fact your willingness to do this to me made me put you on ignore because to be frank im really busy trying to make our community wealthier and more able to help change a world gone to shit. I honestly dont have time for this and the only reason I know about it this time is because apparently you so miss my responses that you felt it necessary to mention me.
the funny thing is at first i thought you were being super cool and mentioning me in a discussion we should be having tomorrow...which would have been cool because it would have been overtly helpful.
Then i had to continue reading....LOL
-
Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)
-
>70% participation now, growing as western witnesses wakes up. The fix is working good so far.
-
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
-
Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)
+ 100%
-
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.
-
Network is back in action.. still waiting for more witnesses to update.
Well done guys ..
Downtime still was in the line of bitcoins waiting time for your transaction :)
Haha.. we can call these our bitcoin moments. :)
-
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.
I can confirm there was some kind of fork, because metaexchange sent transactions which never arrived.
-
Would this issue have caused a fork, or just a network stall?
No fork so far.
I can confirm there was some kind of fork, because metaexchange sent transactions which never arrived.
All nodes have been restarted, all transactions in the cache are gone. If you have a backup of your transactions, try broadcast them again.
There were network splits for sure, upgraded nodes in a network, and un-upgraded nodes in the other, but no fork since the un-upgraded nodes are unable to produce blocks.