BitShares Forum
Main => Stakeholder Proposals => Topic started by: Chronos on May 24, 2016, 07:26:20 pm
-
First, let me introduce myself. I've been around Bitshares since late 2014, back when workers and witnesses were combined as "delegates", and we ran v0.9 as a desktop client. Then in the summer of 2015, I contracted directly for Cryptonomex for a couple months, doing UI work for the light wallet. I've always been fascinated by the tech behind Bitshares.
As a corollary to my work to produce Bitshares videos (https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22487.0.html), I would be interested to take a volunteer position with the Bitshares committee.
As a committee member, my priorities are as follows:
- Offer low transaction fees to attract consumers, merchants, and traders to the platform
- Improve liquidity in the DEX, focusing on the BTS trading pairs against BitUSD, BitCNY, and BitBTC
- Keep Lifetime Membership relevant by having certain network actions require it
- Maintain network security by keeping witness pay at or above the cost of running a robust full node
- Enact popular protocol changes that are shown to have super-majority support through worker role voting
Please cast your vote for chronos-youtube for committee member!
-
Hi cronos,
Do you hwve a plan to increase liquidity in dex, if so could you please talk about?
In my opinion i would even pay a market maker using a work proposal to bring great liquidity to dex....but i wouldnt extrapolate much more than 100k bts splitted around all workers so we could keep development, maintenance, low inflation, n wont hurt tbe market trowing a lot of bts on the market daily....it must be sustainable n focus on development n new features should be on what can bring profit to shareholder in the long run.
Would like to hear your plans for ltm n what your ideas about what can bring a increase in revenues n profit to shareholders
Regards
-
Hi @bitsharesbrazil, I don't have a specific plan that I would put forward, but it is a priority to me. Committee members are responsible for only a few network parameters, and liquidity subsidies would not fall under their jurisdiction. That would be the role of a worker proposal.
One change that I would consider as a committee member would be to require a LTM account for asset creation, but that idea would need more discussion.