BitShares Forum

Main => General Discussion => Topic started by: Ray on June 20, 2016, 03:10:14 pm

Title: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: Ray on June 20, 2016, 03:10:14 pm

Who is it taking down Ethereum and can it happen to Bitshares?

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: Chronos on June 20, 2016, 03:24:42 pm

Zoom out a bit. Bitshares has already been taken down.  :P

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: xeroc on June 20, 2016, 09:24:18 pm

BTS' smart contract are more secure because they are less flexible .. there is also clear rules that bts will fork to fix bugs if the code doesnt behave as specified.
thats makes it easier to derive a risk for holding assets in bts .. essentially equivalent to holding btc

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: Erlich Bachman on June 21, 2016, 12:50:34 am

I think you mean "what did the DAO fail to learn from BitShares"? 

Can't say that we didn't offer experienced advice from a loving big brother. Do a search and you will see what I mean.

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode on June 21, 2016, 01:29:19 am

Quote from: Erlich Bachman on June 21, 2016, 12:50:34 am

I think you mean "what did the DAO fail to learn from BitShares"? 

Can't say that we didn't offer experienced advice from a loving big brother. Do a search and you will see what I mean.

 +5%

Bitshares is an ocean of knowledge and experience that the rest of crypto seems to keep overlooking.. or purposefully denying.

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: Erlich Bachman on June 21, 2016, 05:11:52 am

And I'm not even talking about Dan's "DAO DOA" post or his "Nubits peg will break when BTC halves"

Remember his " contract free society" diatribe?

Now even the bitcoin faithful are finding it impossible to convince Bernie's Kids that "code is law"

Title: Re: What can Bitshares learn from Ethereum crash?
Post by: btswildpig on June 22, 2016, 03:08:37 am

Quote from: xeroc on June 20, 2016, 09:24:18 pm

BTS' smart contract are more secure because they are less flexible .. there is also clear rules that bts will fork to fix bugs if the code doesnt behave as specified.
thats makes it easier to derive a risk for holding assets in bts .. essentially equivalent to holding btc

not true . 
no computer program is more secure just because "it's less flexible" .
BTS1.0 had a big bug that result in huge transaction fee lost . And that's with "less flexible smart contract" .

Of course , if you're referring to it based on "programming secure" (like argument against some programming language) and not "actually secure" , then i agree.