BitShares Forum
Main => Stakeholder Proposals => Topic started by: R on January 15, 2018, 03:17:29 pm
-
I've been working on getting the HERTZ Algorithm Based Asset live on the Bitshares network recently, and ran into problems providing more than 10 private price feed publisher entities (Rather than witness|committee fed).
Would it be possible for the committee to increase the 'maximum_asset_feed_publishers' value from 10 to say 25?
As far as I'm aware, there's no risk associated with increasing this value, right?
Relevant links:
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1025 (https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1025)
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/bitshares-committee-request-increase-the-maximumassetfeedpublishers-value-from-10-to-25 (https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/bitshares-committee-request-increase-the-maximumassetfeedpublishers-value-from-10-to-25)
https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-42-activated-4-more-bitshares-witnesses-to-go-more-hertz-related-updates (https://steemit.com/bitshares/@cm-steem/hertz-42-activated-4-more-bitshares-witnesses-to-go-more-hertz-related-updates)
https://sites.google.com/view/hertz-aba/ (https://sites.google.com/view/hertz-aba/)
Thanks for your time,
CM.
-
I have forwarded your request to the committee telegram group and waiting for replies ..
I personally don't see any issue with this proposal
-
So far, only Bhuz and Jonthan (bunkerchain) have replied .. both are fine with the proposal.
-
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
-
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)
-
Concur, I don't see a problem
-
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)
Can you propose such a change through the GUI? Or is it a CLI only action?
-
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)
Can we build something into the UI where members will receive a yes/no vote option to proposals? Information is scattered everywhere and it would be nice to see what members are quick to take action.
-
@xeroc Thanks for reaching out to the committee regarding this request. Would it be possible to create a proposed transaction so that we can see the ongoing committee vote for this change request? Or does it not work like worker proposals?
Sure, one can propose the change already .. I just don't know why majority of committee members don't even reply to the request :-( .. not sure if they would approve it .. Frustrating to see so little activity from committee members (other than bhuz and bunkerchainlabs)
Can we build something into the UI where members will receive a yes/no vote option to proposals? Information is scattered everywhere and it would be nice to see what members are quick to take action.
It might encourage people to campaign for such committee roles & perhaps speed up the modification of global variables if configurable within the Bitshares UI.
I've enquired about this idea: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-ui/issues/1045
Looking forwards to this passing +5%
-
Proposal created: http://open-explorer.io/#/objects/1.10.7806
CF has a better UI https://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.7806 but it's currently down.
-
Proposal created: http://open-explorer.io/#/objects/1.10.7806
CF has a better UI https://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.7806 but it's currently down.
Thank you very much for creating the proposal for me. :)
-
I have forwarded your request to the committee telegram group and waiting for replies ..
I personally don't see any issue with this proposal
@xeroc Could you please repeat such a telegram group message for voting on the relevant BTS-RFC 1.10.7806 : https://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.7806
Thus far, we have support from @fav, @Chris4210 & @abit. We require 26.1% more by Saturday to succeed.
Thanks +5%
-
done
-
done
Thanks, we're very close to it passing now - only need about 4% more votes to succeed. +5%
-
Bhuz just confirmed so that the proposal has general approval
-
Thanks to all committee members for supporting this change! +5%
-
Proposal created: http://open-explorer.io/#/objects/1.10.7806
CF has a better UI https://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.7806 but it's currently down.
Thanks for previously increasing this, could it be further increased to say 50 the next time similar values are being updated?
Thanks