Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cube

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 94
1066
General Discussion / Re: Baby Bo was born yesterday
« on: December 23, 2014, 02:36:31 am »
Congratulations!  Baby Bo is in time for the Christmas celebration. :)

1067
General Discussion / Re: New Blog Post - Join the BitShares Community!
« on: December 23, 2014, 02:24:30 am »
My honest opinion: I am biased on the tone of this post.  Examples:

Quote
...while making everyone in the community a ton of money.

Quote
You can help by lending our community your money

Quote
Would you be willing to skip a couple of meals to help create a better world?

Clearly stating what the possibility (incl. the financial ones) are to get involved makes sense so that people know what their possibilities are but the message the above statements can convey (to me, totally subjective, maybe its a European perspective): It is about making money, not about changing the world. We want your money for our purposes. Cheesy. 

Instead the money making possibility could be introduced in subtle way (not that blunt/cheesy) and the reader should make the conclusion himself that money can be made here.

BM's unique attributes - direct, outfront, honest. We should keep the original masterpiece. :)

1068
General Discussion / Re: Delegate temporary absence
« on: December 22, 2014, 12:10:12 pm »
I think a way for delegate to perform maintenance is needed. This should keep delegate's votes and position but transfer the delegate's slot to another delegate.

For example:
Delegate signs a transaction that marks him inactive for certain period. Nothing changes except his place is taken by 102nd delegate for the time of the maintenance.
This allows delegates to plan maintenance windows without disrupting the network and getting negative statistics. (And without setting up a backup delegate)

EDIT: It could be used if any issue arises that prevents delegate from performing optimally. For example lawsuit, vacation, security issue etc...

I think this is a neat idea.

1069
Free Russia.  Way to go!

1070
BitShares PTS / Re: Registering with a new account
« on: December 22, 2014, 02:26:32 am »
Are you using version 2.0.1 of the wallet? If not please upgrade.
That was it. Thanks. I originally downloaded the 2.0 wallet here:
https://github.com/PTS-DPOS/PTS/releases
- ? windows link needs updating
Anyway, working just fine now with 2.0.1.
Hoping bter will restore things soon - looks like they need to tweak a few things with deposits/withdrawals.

The windows link is the same but users need to get the latest version v2.0.1.  There was a major upgrade from v2.0 to v2.0.1.  v2.0 wallet should not be used anymore.

1071
Beyond Bitcoin [closed] / Re: Edited* Beyond Bitcoin Hangout 12/19/2014
« on: December 20, 2014, 03:04:53 pm »
Thanks for the work.  I am downloading.  First time using an .ogg format.

1072
BitShares PTS / Re: Where are my coins???
« on: December 20, 2014, 12:07:07 pm »
Ok then I won't worry too much about it until they get it figured out.  I was just thrown off by the wallet which I'm unfamiliar with.

Are you using the latest wallet? 



I downloaded the wallet after the snapshot so one would think that it was the new wallet. The version I downloaded was PTS v2.0.1 -0.0.9-x86.  I did have one small test transaction of 50 PTS go through so my wallet balance is now 25 pts, not quite enough to register my name.  Now it seems that about 72,000 PTS have vanished. Nothing from Poloniex in two days.

Your wallet is good.  You need to check with poloniex on your transaction.  The destination address for Poloniex outgoing transaction may have to be a registered Account Name and not a public address (as what you did).  If your transactions are stuck somewhere in poloniex because of this, their support staff can cancel those transactions and you can resubmit the withdrawal.  The most effective way to get support from poloniex is to raise a support ticket with their helpdesk system.
I would like to register my name but to register an account name costs PTS which if you can't withdraw from the exchange you can't have in your wallet. The first thing I did was open a support ticket.

Have poloniex replied?

As pc mentioned, PTS2.0 implemented a new transfer command which can send PTS to public address in addition to a registered Account Name.  You need to check with poloniex if they support this public-address-capable transfer command. 

1073
BitShares PTS / Re: Where are my coins???
« on: December 19, 2014, 02:58:37 pm »
Ok then I won't worry too much about it until they get it figured out.  I was just thrown off by the wallet which I'm unfamiliar with.

Are you using the latest wallet? 



I downloaded the wallet after the snapshot so one would think that it was the new wallet. The version I downloaded was PTS v2.0.1 -0.0.9-x86.  I did have one small test transaction of 50 PTS go through so my wallet balance is now 25 pts, not quite enough to register my name.  Now it seems that about 72,000 PTS have vanished. Nothing from Poloniex in two days.

Your wallet is good.  You need to check with poloniex on your transaction.  The destination address for Poloniex outgoing transaction may have to be a registered Account Name and not a public address (as what you did).  If your transactions are stuck somewhere in poloniex because of this, their support staff can cancel those transactions and you can resubmit the withdrawal.  The most effective way to get support from poloniex is to raise a support ticket with their helpdesk system.

1074
..
The faucet was suspended during the latest frantic delegate upgrade to 0.4.25, downgrade to 0.4.24.1 and upgrade to 0.4.26.  This delegate upgrade exercise is completed and the faucet's operation is resumed.

The latest upgrade version 0.4.27.1 seems stable.  The faucet has reopened. :)

http://freebts.cubeconnex.com:3333

1075
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] BitShares PTS - new chain is launched!!!
« on: December 19, 2014, 09:31:04 am »
...

* The original sharedrop token - check
* DAC-agnostic implementation of DPoS - check
* Provably fair 100% proof of work distribution - check
* Deflationary protocol - check

 8)

It is a dream coin comes true. :)

1076
You have a total of 20232PTS in your new PTS wallet.  That is Twenty Thousand Two Hundred and Thirty Two PTS.

What is the amount that you lost?

1077
General Discussion / Re: What is BitShares?
« on: December 18, 2014, 04:48:14 pm »
I like the onion.  And we have the finest. :)

1078
BitShares PTS / Re: Where are my coins???
« on: December 18, 2014, 07:04:15 am »
Ok then I won't worry too much about it until they get it figured out.  I was just thrown off by the wallet which I'm unfamiliar with.

Are you using the latest wallet?  If you are running Windows wallet, check that your setup file is PTS-v2.0.1-0.0.9-x86.exe. If not, you can download from

https://github.com/PTS-DPOS/PTS/releases/download/v2.0.1/PTS-v2.0.1-0.0.9-x86.exe

1079
General Discussion / Re: Charles Hoskinson - Business Development Delegate
« on: December 18, 2014, 06:55:01 am »

Succinctly, I don't have any intentions to run a delegate for three reasons. First, the board of Invictus made a decision without debate or my input back in October of last year that my services were no longer required. I really don't think I can have an effective working relationship with the people who made that decision moving forward. I'd be happy to collaborate where it makes sense and I always promote good technology if it's open source, high quality and solves real problems. Thus I'd be happy to pitch Bitshares as it evolves just like I do Eris, Counterparty and other platforms.

Second, I'm currently involved in several ventures as an adviser and I'm also starting an education venture in 2015 that requires some degree of objectivity. To avoid conflicts of interest, I can't really take a paid advocacy role.

Third, after spending roughly $250,000 on US legal research via Pryor Cashman while at Ethereum, I've come to the opinion that ICOs like angelshares pass the Howey test and thus agents of the company are exposed to unnecessary legal liability. Delegates as fiduciaries are not immune to this liability and it isn't just a fine from the SEC. Furthermore, even if AGS is considered a donation, it seems to me to be a donation solicited with an implicit expectation of return, yet without any accountability from the solicitor (as evidenced by numerous examples, the most recent being the Brian Page audit thread). As I've written in my recent whitepaper, I feel these events are predatory and result in bad outcomes.     

As bitshares the technology gets further disintermediated from I3 the company, then I'd be happy to become more involved. This will no doubt happen over the coming months and years and I believe everyone is in this for the long haul anyway. Anyway, thanks again for the consideration.

Where can we find out more information?  I would appreciate any pointers to it.

1080
Updated to v0.4.27.  I am fortunate not to have chain issue.

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 94