Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Agent86 is very persistent and talked with me on Skype last night to argue against negative votes.I do not get the reasoning behind turning it off by default.
The primary argument he made was that abstaining is the responsible thing to do for uninterested users and that large stake holders will be very pro-active.
Small stake holders collectively do not have much influence.
I have decided to make it an option that is easy to turn on in the future with a hard-fork, but off by default. If it becomes a problem then the delegates can vote to support it.
Great!
So I'll recap once again to make sure I understand:
If I make a transaction I'll be able to do ONE of the following:
1 vote positive for up to 101 different delegates
2 vote negative for up to 101 different delegates
3 vote positive for x delegates and vote negative for up to 101 - x delegates (x<101 obviously)
Each 101 blocks votes will be counted like this:
For each delegate candidate the result "vote" will be positive - negative votes for that delegate.
Order candidates by vote and appoint top 101 as next round delegates.
Is this correct?
That was the proposal.
What about limiting the total amount of votes to max 101 different delegates?
Both positive and negative votes limited like this will prevent 51% monopolising all the delegates.
I think negative votes are good addition to approval voting as it gives more flexibility.
I still believe that owners of 51% stake should not get all the delegates!
limiting to 101 ok but really different is practical not possible...
We already limit it to 101 votes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1 delegate cant do much harmWhat about limiting the total amount of votes to max 101 different delegates?
Both positive and negative votes limited like this will prevent 51% monopolising all the delegates.
I think negative votes are good addition to approval voting as it gives more flexibility.
I still believe that owners of 51% stake should not get all the delegates!
I was thinking this too. But I think most companies with shareholders work on 'majority rule' & considering we especially need to keep out minorities that would try to bring 'bad actors' into the system. My thinking now is that majority rule (The majority dictating the majority of the delegates) is probably best.
emski2 (unlocked) >>> info
{
"blockchain_head_block_num": 4440,
"blockchain_head_block_age": "1 second in the future",
"blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "20140709T123630",
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 77.099236641221367,
"blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": 36672310,
"blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 4,
"blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 218,
"blockchain_share_supply": 199682021837085,
"blockchain_random_seed": "b3ab94ad9fb735e1f90d673acfb66918d77ac37d",
"blockchain_database_version": 112,
"blockchain_version": 105,
"network_num_connections": 29,
"network_num_connections_max": 500,
"network_protocol_version": 104,
"ntp_time": "20140709T123629",
"ntp_error": 0.095741000000000007,
"wallet_open": true,
"wallet_unlocked": true,
"wallet_unlocked_until": "17 weeks in the future",
"wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "20141102T023531",
"wallet_block_production_enabled": false,
"wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
"wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null,
"wallet_version": 101
}
emski2 (unlocked) >>> info
{
"blockchain_head_block_num": 4440,
"blockchain_head_block_age": "17 seconds old",
"blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "20140709T123630",
"blockchain_average_delegate_participation": 75.939849624060145,
"blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": 36672310,
"blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 4,
"blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 218,
"blockchain_share_supply": 199682021837085,
"blockchain_random_seed": "b3ab94ad9fb735e1f90d673acfb66918d77ac37d",
"blockchain_database_version": 112,
"blockchain_version": 105,
"network_num_connections": 29,
"network_num_connections_max": 500,
"network_protocol_version": 104,
"ntp_time": "20140709T123647",
"ntp_error": 0.095741000000000007,
"wallet_open": true,
"wallet_unlocked": true,
"wallet_unlocked_until": "17 weeks in the future",
"wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "20141102T023531",
"wallet_block_production_enabled": false,
"wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
"wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null,
"wallet_version": 101
}
"bitshares_git_revision_sha": "36b2cefd77cf13983d3a7b079ef6fe19660b94a2 (different from ours)",
"bitshares_git_revision_unix_timestamp": "20140708T204414",
"bitshares_git_revision_age": "14 hours ago (older than ours)",
"fc_git_revision_sha": "ace06d775c285673d4ade7683e332095d2440646 (different from ours)",
"fc_git_revision_unix_timestamp": "20140704T212347",
"fc_git_revision_age": "5 days ago (older than ours)",
Liondani sent you 10k..
I need some seeds, any ips?
thanks
84.238.140.192:8801
107.170.170.214:8801
79.173.81.171:8764
176.9.234.167:8801
128.199.180.19:8801
176.9.234.166:8801
