1126
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: First PeerTracks gathering
« on: November 24, 2014, 06:06:27 am »
It is exciting seeing you guys brainstorming and coming out with good practical ideas. Keep it up!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1127
General Discussion / Re: Outside analysis of POW
« on: November 19, 2014, 12:12:10 pm »
This is roughly my impression. It is sad but true. He gets a bit lost talking about the stone people but I think hes fairly correct on everything else.
While btc looks centralized it can be split up quite quickly if people are properly motivated. It isn't like the centralization in btc has a huge overhead in being broken up.
Yea. The miners can easily switch to other pools, if and when they wanted to.
1128
General Discussion / Re: Airdrop 100% profit to bitsharestalk.org (1110 1280 BTSX)
« on: November 17, 2014, 12:52:06 pm »
Please add ID: bitcube
Thanks!
Thanks!
1129
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: BitShares Music non-technical paper. Updated.
« on: November 15, 2014, 11:29:33 am »What determines the price of a song?
The artist.
What determines the price of an Iphone cover on ebay? The seller!
ebay has no say in how much a product sells for on their platform.
I think this decision could be a mistake. The market should determine the price of a product or service rather than the seller. I do understand why you would want artists to try and determine it but it's likely that if the artists get it wrong then it would encourage piracy or fans simply wont buy it at all.
Can we have a market based option for artists who want to let the market or the fans determine the price?
I believe each artist would make a realistic price. If he/she prices the song high, he/she will have less sales but higher margin (and getting high-spenders). In the end, the market demand will influence the artist in his/her pricing decision. And the artists can select the market segment they like to serve.
1130
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 受托人bts.fordream拉票~(Vote for delegate bts.fordream !!!)
« on: November 15, 2014, 11:22:33 am »
支持。 感谢你们为社区的贡献。
1131
General Discussion / Re: Is now the best time to buy BTS? Would you take out a loan to do it?
« on: November 15, 2014, 11:14:50 am »
Crypto-investment is a high risk one. You will never know how the project turns out and what happen to dear regulators. Invest at your risk-comfort level.
1132
General Discussion / Re: Approve my 100% pay rate delegate
« on: November 15, 2014, 11:09:13 am »Publish your version, toast! Don't want to find you're on v0.4.12!
Feeds ready to go?
Up-voted with my meagre stake.
Perhaps fix this so that the version is auto-published to the blockchain.
1133
General Discussion / Re: Should I even consider running a 100% pay delegate.
« on: November 15, 2014, 09:05:27 am »tonyk could offer to not post anything anymore and thus create value if elected.
And this forum would have less of the fun.
1134
General Discussion / Re: We passed the 1 million block ! Another milestone! Exciting times !
« on: November 14, 2014, 05:51:09 pm »
Congratulations to the bts team! A toast to all. 
1135
General Discussion / Re: Approve my 100% pay rate delegate
« on: November 13, 2014, 09:02:55 pm »
You have my vote for sure
1136
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks
« on: November 13, 2014, 03:12:34 pm »
You have taken a big step forward. Congratulations!
I saw your short-term plan for open-sourcing front-end. Do you plan to open-source the back-end too?
I saw your short-term plan for open-sourcing front-end. Do you plan to open-source the back-end too?
1137
General Discussion / Re: PTS Mining Giveaway - 300 PTS TRX fees -$100 per transaction, 10+ transactions.
« on: November 13, 2014, 01:13:07 pm »
I am joining in the fun with my old 58xx radeons.
1138
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 3I是要退还之前捐赠的PTS吗？表示很不理解
« on: November 13, 2014, 11:56:15 am »画蛇添足，多此一举，根本没必要退还，既然3I声明给PTS拍了遗照，让PTS自生自灭就行了。
英文版有会员想复活PTS，但提出如果改成DPOS的话，3i依然持有大比例的PTS，这样他没有动力去复活，因为如果复活后，3i还持有大量PTS的话，那么复活后的受托人席位肯定就全部被3i拿走。暂时不清楚是否跟这个事有关联，只是提供信息。
You are absolutely right. By returning the donated PTS, I3 solved a major centralisation issue with the new PTS DPOS. Please see http://pts.cubeconnex.com/index.php?topic=19.0
1139
中文 (Chinese) / Re: PTS去哪儿？(Where should PTS go?)
« on: November 13, 2014, 08:31:51 am »随便吧，我再坚持也没用啊。3i的想法，甚至说这个社区的想法 就是想抛弃PTS。
我还有什么好说的。
Translations from cn-members :
Anyway , no thing I say can change anything . I3 or the whole community want to abandon PTS . Why do I bother to say anything ?
PTS is not abandoned. There is an independent effort to upgrade PTS to PTS DPOS. You may check out their work at http://pts.cubeconnex.com
1140
General Discussion / Re: Should we kill the DACronym?
« on: November 11, 2014, 10:52:01 am »...
You know you're doing something right when your adversaries begin to attack you. If you're at war what do you do when the enemy attacks? You fight harder! You find more effective strategies or you employ camouflage or flee to fight another day in another way.
Got your passport ready?
..
Are you serious?
