Is there an issue with using the initial delegate name (the one with initial-delegate-xx) in the future and even for the real network?

Can anyone explain the difference in blockchain_head_block_num?

I'm getting some strange results:

** Inactive:
1           init-delegate-1          0.747238 %
299         spartako                 0.056 %
emski2 (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_account_record init-delegate-1
{
  "id": 1,
  "name": "init-delegate-1",
  "public_data": null,
  "owner_key": "XTS6TMMu8B5MBEgj2kg9pGF8dzrWBtj5CpKHHQxM3x4EsvD4mJMUK",
  "active_key_history": [[
      "19700101T000000",
      "XTS6TMMu8B5MBEgj2kg9pGF8dzrWBtj5CpKHHQxM3x4EsvD4mJMUK"
    ]
  ],
  "delegate_info": {
    "votes_for": 74723633553,
    "votes_against": 0,
    "blocks_produced": 28,
    "blocks_missed": 14,
    "pay_balance": 394708,
    "next_secret_hash": "2933b4ccec300ee301fcbf749fc1c7f1e6df32a6",
    "last_block_num_produced": 1409
  },
  "registration_date": "20140601T000000",
  "last_update": "20140601T000000",
  "meta_data": null
}

delegate1 is shown as inactive, but he produces the same amount of blocks like others.
Any other of my delegates have > 1.00 % NET VOTES. They are running on the same machine and on the same process.
All of them behave almost identically except for the low NET VOTES count on delegate1 (and it is shown as inactive while producing the same amount of blocks).

Not a question here... just reporting what it seems like strange behavior for me.

Quote from: sfinder on June 09, 2014, 03:33:00 am

daniel@ubuntu:~/bitshares_toolkit$ cmake /V
cmake version 2.8.12.2

Quote from: toast on June 09, 2014, 03:31:00 am

What is your cmake --version?

Code: [Select]

cmake version 2.8.12.2

May need to Temporarily set CURSES_USE_NCURSES to TRUE to force the use of NCURSES, rather than letting CMake try to find CURSES.

When I use "cmake ." try to build bitshare toolkit,  I met the problem" Could not find Curses(missing: CURESES_LIBRARY CURSES_INCLUDE_PATH)
How can I fix it ?
How to set CURSES_USE_NCURSES to TRUE?

Try to checkout this revision: 035357b7ffbcc394236fec5e2cb8d0e9bf707c97  .
It works for me without modifications.

I might be able to provide such node (on separate ISP than the delegate).
However I need to know all ports required for this to function.
Is it OK if I just forward 8765 ?
Do I need real IP address ?

After checking the reply of puppies I noticed that the seed node is running revision 34f677e17217a1a1f0eb17f6aaa9296bf259b217 of github repo (github.com/BitShares/bitshares_toolki).
Which is different than the latest in master.
I did a checkout of that specific revision and everything seems to be working fine now.

I would really like to see the exact revision you are going to use next time. It will save me some time troubleshooting.

Got the following error:

established outbound connection to 107.170.30.182:8764                      node.cpp:488
Sent "hello" to peer 107.170.30.182:8764                    node.cpp:2042
The hello message I just sent contains connection information: my_ip: XXXXXXXXXXX, my_outbound_port: 5678, my_inbound_port: 5678

Received a rejection from 107.170.30.182:8764 in response to my "hello", reason: "You're on a different chain than I am.  I'm on 3b7df0e87c4f3b1ff36f48f4f374ea6c52355626c31962e50c73552390704e67 and you're on 5b4b4e70614f80b5b88392ff33ebf194e53e4ed9bf2fd43c233c1f7e470a2981"

What can I do about this?

I've updated and rebuilt according to instructions.

I've also tried titan branch:

1618537ms       th_a on_connection_reject ] Received a rejection in response to my "hello"                      node.cpp:1257
1618537ms       th_a            read_loop ] disconnected eof
End of file
    {"message":"End of file"}
    asio  asio.cpp:22 read_write_handler

    {"len":16}
    th_a  stcp_socket.cpp:73 readsome                   message_oriented_connection.cpp:130
1618537ms       th_a on_connection_closed ] Remote peer 107.170.30.182:8764 closed their connection to us                       node.cpp:1608

These are the public keys generated from bts_create_key

XTS6TMMu8B5MBEgj2kg9pGF8dzrWBtj5CpKHHQxM3x4EsvD4mJMUK
XTS7diW1nWPWrxkwuqXkwmxFN4qrQ7jyVNcRhqGqrriVvK2udynhD
XTS7bUdQ41J4vhNVBkmbqDKGiftrmQNrL1vCx881Fg4R2hE5r6P2Z
XTS6XtS7F5Fy3dUVSUKHJHN1dC66VaruRFkKmo8um6QB24Xsf2mzF
XTS8ZhbpwEgwgV1gjCNrYfMDxsB6diofNtsg1m4yN62Zii1EwpK7B

Node address is (emski edit: IP can be resolved from address, so its removed) (IP: toast edit: I removed your IP because I'm dumb and shouldn't have asked for it).
Name: Mavenfrog
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Hardware:
i7 3770
32 GB ddr3 1600mhz ram
240GB SSD
4x1 TB HDD in HW RAID

Software:
Running VMWare ESXi 5.5.0 Hypervisor
Guest VM - 4 virtual CPU cores and 8 GB of ram reserved for the node (can increase this if required)
OS Ubuntu server 14.04

* backup internet connection, UPS

GL & HF to everyone