Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Thom

Pages: 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 105
1426
The new BTS will now be rewarded with 20% dividends of all newly created DACs.

That's the ticket! I wanna see this in writing in the official proposal we'll vote on.

What form will that 20% come in, shares, existing share value, deflationary burn? There are several options and I would like the proposal to be explicit.

1427
General Discussion / Re: Suggested Press Release regarding the merger
« on: October 21, 2014, 05:00:19 am »
Personally, I don't like it. Then again, I am not a marketing guy, but I will give my thoughts anyway.

First, I don't really see the value of the press release for the proposal. Let us first come to an official consensus on the merger with all of the details figured out before publishing anything that sounds official.

Second, AGS is just a ledger not a DAC, and I personally think calling PTS a DAC is even a stretch (although I guess it is just as much of a DAC as Bitcoin is).

Third, the voting mechanism (as far as I am aware) was on future hard forks for new functionality and changes on the hard caps for dilution. While I personally envision a future iteration of this voting mechanism to allow shareholders to vote on future mergers or even splits, I don't think the plan is to use a (yet to be developed?) voting mechanism to decide on this particular merger. As far as I am aware, I3 is the one that will facilitate this merger in a way that will hopefully not displease the community too much and prepare the hard fork clients that the BTSX delegates will hopefully accept and upgrade to.

This last point is the main reason why I do not like this press release. If AGS/PTS was part of a DPOS DAC with shareholder voting functionality, and this voting functionality was also added to BitShares X, and there was a common proposal on both blockchains with majority approval by respective shareholders for a particular merger, then I would feel comfortable calling this a merger between DACs. But with how the implementation of this "merger" appears to be planned (at least from my perspective), I believe the public response will be that this is nothing more special than just a complicated snapshot for a new DAC with a new token (BTS). Not to say that a properly worded press release describing the event after the fact wouldn't be beneficial (in particular the benefits of how it better unites the BitShares community and gives us a stronger network effect), but I am cautious of relating it to a merger of traditional companies when PTS/AGS do not have any board of directors (delegates) or even any mechanism for the "shareholders" to even vote on the decision.

The PR flowed well and looked good in general, but I agree 100% with arhag. Lets not be too hasty until arrive at a consensus.

1428
Wow! how things move fast around here.

I listened to the mumble session and have spent the last 6 hours reading. I hold only BTSX and got in about 2 months ago.

But I haven't really seen the X of BTSX materialize. There is no way to trade other cryptos with BTSX unless you use some OTHER exchange. So there's something quite different about the btsX than all other crypto exchanges available today. There's so much discussed and so many ideas I've practically forgotten about BTSX as an eXchange.

I'm generally in favor of BM's proposal. I do have a question about what I'll be invested in after the merger. When I bought BTSX I thought I was investing in the eXchange, which would become worth more as each new DAC was added. I viewed it similarly to how PTS investors view their share "dividends" accrued with each new DAC launched.

I'm not too sure that was an accurate perspective, but that was my viewpoint. I never felt I had an explicit understanding of how a new DAC would add to my BTSX value.  But I was confident in BM's vision and believed the time was right to get onboard. I've been listening to BM since April.

So what will change after the merger? Will I get any Music, Vote, DNS or XYZ DAC shares, or is my gain more through association like my original impression?

1429
I hear a number of terms thrown around here and I just looked for a glossary or dictionary but didn't find either on this forum. So I went out and googled and couldn't find a concise definition for "snapshot" related to blockchain technology either.

I get the general concept of snapshot as a "moment in time", like a picture of motion is, but I don't understand the concept in terms of the blockchains discussed here. It's almost always used in a context of looking forward to some release of a DAC for example.

I understand AGS & PTS are PoW blockchains and DACs are not, being based on PoS. I just don't get why a frozen ledger (blockchain) relates to a future DAC.

So you have PTS (I'll overlook AGS for the moment but I believe it's the same in this context) being traded, the owners of which get a stake in the new DAC. So is the "snapshot" just to capture who (i.e. account public keys) has PTS shares so those accounts can be credited with their portion of upcoming DAC shares?

There was one other definition I needed: airdrop What does it mean?

1430
General Discussion / Re: VOTE DAC Just Got More Interesting
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:05:47 pm »
Why choose to believe in an objective reality that you cannot prove exists?

I don't really care what people believe in as long as it doesn't affect their behavior in a way that I view as undesirable. I may not agree with all of the beliefs you hold as you have expressed them in these posts, but ultimately I am judging you by your actions and decisions. And what I can say is that I am very impressed and pleased with the decisions you have been making and the way you have been acting in the context of directing this complicated project and ecosystem. And for that reason I am happy to continue supporting this project with you in the leadership position. Now if your beliefs change your behavior considerably, for example if your metaphysical solipsism makes you think you can just will BitShares into a trillion dollar market cap without having to do any real world work as long as you meditate hard enough, then that would be a completely different story. But I see no reason to fear something like that since it would be such a radical departure from how you have been behaving thus far.

But to more directly answer your question, I would respond by asking you why you choose to believe in a subjective reality that you cannot prove exists. I actually know the answer to that question, you already answered it:
So I choose to adopt the views that make life most enjoyable... and I can honestly say that switching perspectives lets you see the world in a whole new way.  The thought of adopting any kind of objective view of reality at this point in time seems painful and "dead".   
And as I said before that is fair. Similarly, I believe in an objective reality because it just makes more sense to me (it is more palatable to me). Ultimately, these beliefs don't really matter because they are in the realm of metaphysics (cannot prove or disprove them). What matters is that which is in the physical realm (the things we can prove or disprove using rationality and the scientific method). This is why I don't really care what you believe as long as it isn't influencing your behavior to be against my own interests.
+5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5% +5%

1431
General Discussion / Re: VOTE DAC Just Got More Interesting
« on: October 20, 2014, 07:01:54 pm »
I too was once a very strong believer in the "absolute truth" of Christianity, and devoted much of my time digging deeply into scriptural wisdom. After about 20 years on that path I began to see the contradictions within that belief system and I came to the realization I could no longer reason those contradictions away or accept them. I came to see them as a self detonating philosophy and belief in the irrational.

I sure wasted a lot of valuable time in pursuit of truth that I'll never get back.

Quote
Why choose to believe in an objective reality that you cannot prove exists?
Your statement is self detonating, if you reject solipsism. Objective reality is what you can prove exists through your senses. Religion, like solipsism, cannot be proven. A negative assertion cannot be proven. Both religion and solipsism have at their core faith that is counter to sense reality.

The Matrix is one of my all time favorite movies. It is very thought provoking. And the idea that what we believe is reality is just an artificial virtual reality is intriguing but has no practical value and no proof in the form of dejavu or a Morpheous who has experienced and has proof for an outer reality. If such evidence existed would it be worth pursuing? How would you know you are finally "out of the matrix"?

The Matrix is a metaphor, and is useful to describe belief systems of all types.

It's interesting that you are leading an effort to engineer a system of measuring and structuring social consensus using objective tools, yet hold a very subjective and self centered perspective of reality. Trying to understand how that can reside in one head causes me cognitive dissonance so how you manage it is beyond my comprehension.

Yet here we are trying to work out consensus and build something of practical value to benefit the majority of participants.

I have decided to begin writing a book about bitshares, and I've set my goal to complete it by 1/1/2015. Out of necessity it will be more visionary than howto, as things in this space move too rapidly for the later. The goal of the book is educate people about the exciting benefits of blockchain technology and describe how DPoS is a sustainable model to achieve those benefits. I hope I can cover the subject well enough to stimulate some interest that will help make this part of our objective, shared reality.   

1432
General Discussion / Re: VOTE DAC Just Got More Interesting
« on: October 20, 2014, 05:19:08 pm »
I love this thread, and this is my first post in it as I have been very busy with other maters and also b/c the conversation has been deep and fast paced I wanted to be sure I understood what's really at play here before jumping in.

I've been somewhat troubled since bytemaster said:
Quote
I attempt to avoid labeling my views as labels carry baggage.

 I submit for your consideration the following unprovable and impossible to disprove hypothesis: there is only one consciousness and that consciousness is me.

As was pointed out previously, this is the philosophy of solipsism, a term I wasn't familiar with though I'm keenly interested in philosophy. As you yourself pointed out bytemaster, it is pointless to argue for or against this perspective. Given what you are doing here it is very surprising you hold this view, and I'm left to ponder how such an intelligent person as you finds value in such a perspective.

Further, you work in a field where labels are everything. Actually that's what language is all about so avoiding the label of solipsism is just a symptom of rejecting objective reality. You defined your belief quite well and that is what everyone accepts as the basic definition of solipsism.

You appeal to this community through rational, objective reason, yet you deny the participants in it our very own autonomous, individual identities.

I am curious about how much of an interest in philosophy you have, and how long you've been pursuing such knowledge.

It appears to me we both share strong libertarian / anarchist perspectives, for which I have grown to have a strong respect for you. However, it's causing me some cognitive dissonance as I am an objectivist and choose to believe in an absolute, objective truth.

I applaud your willingness to put yourself and your beliefs out here and to be vulnerable. You continue to amaze me, as well as puzzle me with how your mind works.

Thank you for sharing.

1433
General Discussion / Re: Forums seem kindof dead today...
« on: October 14, 2014, 03:50:56 pm »
I could be wrong, but don't think so. I think he's referring to this thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9885.0

1434
General Discussion / Forums seem kindof dead today...
« on: October 13, 2014, 07:21:36 pm »
This is the least amount of activity I've seen on this board since getting involved here. Is there something going on I should know about?

1435
I love this talk from Eben Moglen, and this paragraph is particularly topical.  Here's your rebuttal, emphasis mine.

Quote
In other words—though it shouldn't be necessary to demonstrate, though we ought to have taken the bitter experience of American history in the 19th century and the history of the West in the 20th for sufficient demonstration—for those who really do like ignoring the facts and working it out abstractly, with chalk, privacy is a requirement of democratic self-government. The effort to fasten the procedures of pervasive surveillance on human society is the antithesis of liberty. - Eben Moglen from "Snowden and the Future"

What do you mean rebuttal? That quote supports the OP as well as my endorsement of it. Privacy is one important aspect of freedom the masses seem to have forgotten. What, are they all nudists or think like nudists "I've got nothing to hide". Bullshit. They're just fooling themselves, and genitals are just the obvious things. Only the foolish discloses how much money they're worth to a used car salesman.

1436
General Discussion / Re: Song
« on: October 13, 2014, 04:06:32 pm »
Tasteful shit being dropped in this thread. I especially enjoyed listening the queen song, and I've been a Dire Straits fan for many years.

How about...

Make the Money by Macklemore
Taxman by The Beatles
Mr. Banker by Lynyrd Skynard
Eat the Rich by Aerosmith
The Big Money by Rush
Moneytalks by AC/DC

Yeah! Lots of "tasteful shit" happening here!!!

I loved the Elephant revival tune too Riverhead (not so great for BitShares, but lovely to listen to).

1437
General Discussion / Re: Latest Bitcoin news - Caution Alert
« on: October 13, 2014, 03:48:21 pm »
Thanks Fuzz for your voice of reason. You've mentioned unanswered community questions posed to ABL in several of your posts, can you point me to forum threads with them?

I like the balance of your remarks, but to lend credibility to them for the noobs (and I consider myself one of them, since I am not aware of such questions posed to ABL) it would be great to create a post or thread that references those questions.

But I also see truth in what NewMine said below.

1438
Quote
A lot of the so-called leading figureheads in bitcoin have been almost begging for the red-flag laws to be called upon bitcoin and others, like mr BTC-China. Saying stuff like we need legislation that does not stifle or other nonsense like that, because history shows us that is a contradiction in terms. What's the point of making trustless, robust and corruption preventing systems and then asking for legislation, that's just admitting the design is flawed and the experiment has failed.
+5%

Quote
"if there could be a social decentralized network that nobody can spy on you, if you could send money without the need to disclose all your personal information, if you could have an internet that no one can spy your search habits, would you be interested in such services?" the most common answer I get is "NO. Because in the end of the day I am not doing something illegal and have nothing to hide."
Don't fall into depression from such thinking and sentiment. I know it's prevalent and difficult, especially when you're surrounded by it.

Quote
We change it by giving our unique skills to the ecosystem we believe most reflects our own values.  And by being brave enough to make a stand. 
What Fuzz said here is the best answer, and the one thing we can do within our own power to control. Turn your back on "the system" as best you can, and face the challenges of what YOU can do IN YOUR SPHERE OF INFLUENCE to make a different, alternative, better world.

I love threads like this. I feel they're kindof "pep talks" to keep the troops focused on the big picture, the goal we should all be striving for though every effort, coding, marketing, evangelism etc.

As to why people resist and are victims of propaganda and seem to be comfortable with violence (the violence of taxation, which makes the violence of war possible), you need to dig into philosophy and study the nature of man's psyche.

Like Charlie Chaplin said:
Quote
Greed has poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost....
I agree with him there's not enough empathy in the world, but I disagree there's too much thinking. It's NOT THINKING that has allowed the psychopaths to persuade those that DON"T THINK their way is the better way for humanity, all the while they sit in wait as they slowly take control of the fruits of labor everyone else produces but they refuse to.

Don't defer your will to another through authority - take responsibility for your actions and think about their ramifications. Each of us have choices to make in our everyday lives. Make them count for something good, something that will last beyond your brief time of being alive.

I was once an extremely religious person, not pious and seeking leadership but rather always seeking truth. It took decades but truth finally prevailed and I cast off the limiting chains that restricted my freedom to live to my potential. But like so many things, religion has both good and evil elements, and it's important you learn how to discern between them.

Some believe mankind is born evil and must learn to become good. Others the opposite. I believe neither of those are true. We are born as a blank slate, like a fresh new computer without an operating system. Whether that computer does great things or brings the network to it's knees is all a matter of it's software, how it's programmed. The potential for good or evil is in all of us from the beginning. For children their role models dictate their early programming or BIOS, and it isn't within their control to change it. They're caught in the web of dysfunctional history unless they are born to parents that can see through it and make changes to give that new life a better chance take a different path than the trajectory his / her ancestors have placed them in.

So much of life is learning how to do that and learning how to strike a balance. But don't confuse balance with compromise. Stand firm to the principles of truth and let it guide all your decisions. Learn how to find truth, act on it and you will lead a virtuous life and a better place to posterity than you inherited.

For those who wish to pursue the root causes of violence and explore the philosophical basis for what I said above check out http://www.freedomainradio.com/. To stop the cycle of violence lets stop inflicting it on the most helpless among us - children. 

Sorry for the long post. But I get rather passionate with threads like this.

1439
I thought he was extremely articulate without being to nerdy and tech centric. I also thought he did an excellent job of emphasizing by repetition:

1) the need to differentiate bitcoin from standard banking practices (and thus a different gov. response)
2) not rushing to classify bitcoin through detrimental legislation
3) contrasting overwhelming benefits compared to risks
4) Internet evolution to bitcoin evolution

and a number of others. He didn't just put it out there once, but was consistent throughout the testimony. The crypto world couldn't ask for a better spokesperson or presentation from him.

I was also rather surprised by the politicians, who generally sounded positive. Problem with politicians is they're masters of sophism and manipulation and it's nearly impossible to know their motives and true attitude. Looks good, but who the hell knows how many banking interests were represented (i.e. which of them might be bought off by the banking industry) and were present only to mine the testimony for ammo against bitcoin.

1440
General Discussion / Re: Song
« on: October 11, 2014, 06:26:17 pm »
Can't beat the sound and crazy great vocals of Freddy Mercury, but I'll stick with Dire's MFN to be more on point all around.

Great thread! I am wondering tho what the reason for asking is the OP mentioned...

Pages: 1 ... 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 [96] 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 105