Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - monsterer

Pages: 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125
1816
General Discussion / Re: Expanding the use cases for DACs - Using DPoS delegates as trusted third parties
« on: October 14, 2014, 10:24:27 am »
Why would you be more inclined to trust a completely anonymous entity (a delegate) over a registered company running a centralised service?

1817
Marketplace / Re: Bitshares Faucet Request for Proposal [1000 PTS]
« on: October 14, 2014, 10:15:01 am »
Sorry, didn't realise I was digging up a dead thread :)

1818
Marketplace / Re: Bitshares Faucet Request for Proposal [1000 PTS]
« on: October 14, 2014, 09:52:19 am »
For the sake of devils advocate - who is going to want to use a faucet which forces you to give away personal details? I wouldn't even dream of giving my phone number to a bitcoin faucet.

What is the reasoning behind that requirement?

1819
Technical Support / [Feature Request] How to handle an online wallet; for developers
« on: October 14, 2014, 08:44:26 am »
We could really do with a FAQ on how developers should handle wallets where they hold customer funds, so that exchange owners and the like can get all the info they need in one place.

Cheers, Paul.

1820
Technical Support / Re: blockchain_market_order_book stopped returning any shorts
« on: October 13, 2014, 09:19:33 pm »
Code: [Select]
blockchain_market_list_shorts USD returns loads of shorts, but
Code: [Select]
blockchain_market_order_book USD BTSX returns none.

1821
General Discussion / Re: MirrorChain--to solve the security threat during the new DACs distribution
« on: October 13, 2014, 06:10:09 pm »
Quote from: gamey on May 27, 2014, 06:42:10 am
I don't think everyone would wish to release the source to their DACs.

They might as well, since the DAC will run on anyone's machine it will just get disassembled anyway if there's no source.

1822
Technical Support / Re: blockchain_market_price_history returns price from quote but volume from base
« on: October 13, 2014, 02:43:50 pm »
Quote from: modprobe on October 13, 2014, 01:24:22 pm
Yes. Volume measurements are always given in the base asset.

You're right - I was confused.

1823
Technical Support / Re: blockchain_market_price_history last parameter accepts only 0->2 [solved]
« on: October 13, 2014, 02:43:09 pm »
Quote from: modprobe on October 13, 2014, 01:26:57 pm
Yes, to get fc to interpret the enum name as the appropriate value, it must be enclosed in double-quotes. This is a quirk of how we do the argument parsing (everything is JSON) and there's no good way to fix it.

Why not just auto enclose all parameters in quotes when they're received?

1824
General Discussion / Re: If you need BTSX to finish the registration, Just post your account key here
« on: October 12, 2014, 08:06:23 pm »
BTSX8RwSWSFcnzWLBfXuvG4XkqSqeuDaqMzoMr6V5LRX2ietxF8APy

Thanks!

1825
Technical Support / Re: What is the short wall?
« on: October 12, 2014, 05:07:45 pm »
Quote from: xeroc on October 12, 2014, 10:25:27 am
http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/Bitshares-x-Short#Market_Rules_for_Shorts
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9587.msg115919;topicseen#new

edit: be reminded that the current engine is slightly different and will hardfork to the rules above soonish (tm)
the difference now is that shorts are prioritized by collateral .. as of later they will be by interest rate payed

Thanks - although I was more after the part which explained exactly what the pricing rule was for shorts and how that worked against the market feed average.

I understand this is all subject to change - just would be nice to have an official explanation of the 'now'. :)

1826
Technical Support / blockchain_market_order_book stopped returning any shorts
« on: October 12, 2014, 11:42:02 am »
Today, blockchain_market_order_book RPC call isn't listing any shorts for the BTSX/USD market. Previously it was fine and I was getting short_order and cover_order types. Today, I only have cover_order.

The command line for blockchain_market_order_book *is* showing shorts, but I have no idea where it is getting this information from, as it isn't coming back from the RPC call.

Looking at the web_wallet in github, it seems this RPC isn't used. Is it fully working?

Cheers, Paul.

1827
Technical Support / Re: What is the short wall?
« on: October 12, 2014, 10:22:27 am »
Quote from: xeroc on October 12, 2014, 10:15:53 am
AFAIK, the shortwall is just the collection of all shorts in the order book because all shorts have the same price (the price feed)

Oh wow, ok - is this documented anywhere that you know of?

1828
Technical Support / What is the short wall?
« on: October 11, 2014, 11:40:09 pm »
I can't find a reference to what the short wall is?

There is a massive buy order called the short wall right now in BTSX/USD market at the top of the book.

1829
Technical Support / Re: Should shorts be included with asks, and covers in bids?
« on: October 11, 2014, 09:23:19 pm »
Quote from: tonyk on October 11, 2014, 05:21:27 pm
In real life I tend to think like you, but in blockchain_market_order_history 'short order' is actually a buy order for BTSX.

Hmmm, and I take it then, cover must be a sell?

Is there any deeper explanation of why this seems to be backwards?

1830
Technical Support / Re: Should shorts be included with asks, and covers in bids?
« on: October 11, 2014, 05:15:33 pm »
Well, I ask because looking at blockchain_market_order_history, I've got 'short_order' appearing in 'bid_type', which doesn't make any sense to me, since a short order is a sell order and bid is buy....?

Pages: 1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 17 queries.