Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - openledger

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 75
226
Nanocard / Re: Activation of NanoCard on CCEDK, soon but not yet, sorry
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:47:06 pm »
Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2016, 01:49:24 pm
@ccedk

Hi Ronny,

I have sent you numerous emails about the refund or even better a replacement for the nanocard with the new card from coinsbank. Any news please?

Transaction confirmed
#b31476a63fa9587ea25b141c6e9b9d63d9727277@5483092
TRANSFER   
From   ccedkbts
To   mf-tzo
Amount   0.1 open.BTC
Memo   refund nanocard
Fee   0.1076 OBITS

227
Nanocard / Re: Activation of NanoCard on CCEDK, soon but not yet, sorry
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:42:28 pm »
Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2016, 01:49:24 pm
@ccedk

Hi Ronny,

I have sent you numerous emails about the refund or even better a replacement for the nanocard with the new card from coinsbank. Any news please?

Guess I did not mention that, but the various cards options are fully up an functional on CoinsBank. For the time being evn 6 different types to allow adjustments depending on your geographical location, incl the virtual one.

228
Marketplace / Re: [ANN] COINSBANK.COM launches Universal Crypto Solution at Money2020 Europe
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:27:12 pm »
Quote from: karnal on April 21, 2016, 06:35:05 pm
Is your wallet software open source?

the apps are closed-source and they are not bitcoin wallets like others, in other words it is a native mobile interface to the CoinsBank

mobile apps connected only to CB system via special secured API

229
Marketplace / Re: [ANN] COINSBANK.COM launches Universal Crypto Solution at Money2020 Europe
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:20:47 pm »
Quote from: fav on April 22, 2016, 04:25:35 pm
is this thread only about spamming PR or do you actually answer questions?

Good point, will make sure the questions are also answered :)

230
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 22, 2016, 03:38:11 pm »
Quote from: liondani on April 22, 2016, 10:42:52 am
Quote from: ccedk on April 22, 2016, 08:23:59 am
Just to set things straight here. I was asked weeks ago if I would be ready to have an article put through on STEEM via Forbes. I was also told that OpenLedger was meant to be first platform to trade STEEM.

None of this has happened, and whatever is the reason for BiTTREX to be the first, you all need to take up with the people orchestrating this, meaning @dannotestein @bytemaster @nedscott

I am enjoying to help promote BitShares and OL on top, but as I have mentioned in previous threads whenever there is a hidden agenda and i feel someone here have been playing on many horses and really made a bad impression on it all.

I hope it will improve soon in terms of how communication has been presented, and I hate to waste my own time and anyone else's for that matter thinking we are on the same page, when in fact someone has already witten the end of the story on his own.

@ccedk
Just tell us when deposits and withdrawal's are allowed on OL and we will take of OPEN.STEEM after that... don't worry!

Is it not already? I thought actually it was made possible a few days ago. Pls test it. Its hard for me to do much on this, as I have received very limited information all in all.

231
Nanocard / Re: Activation of NanoCard on CCEDK, soon but not yet, sorry
« on: April 22, 2016, 03:35:01 pm »
Quote from: mf-tzo on April 22, 2016, 01:49:24 pm
@ccedk

Hi Ronny,

I have sent you numerous emails about the refund or even better a replacement for the nanocard with the new card from coinsbank. Any news please?

Hi, Mike I apologize deeply for this. Will send you the funds sometime tonight, just so extremely pressured for time, and forget really thats all, but know you need this solved, so will get to it asap. thanks for your support.

232
General Discussion / Re: STEEM price discussion
« on: April 22, 2016, 08:23:59 am »
Just to set things straight here. I was asked weeks ago if I would be ready to have an article put through on STEEM via Forbes. I was also told that OpenLedger was meant to be first platform to trade STEEM.

None of this has happened, and whatever is the reason for BiTTREX to be the first, you all need to take up with the people orchestrating this, meaning @dannotestein @bytemaster @nedscott

I am enjoying to help promote BitShares and OL on top, but as I have mentioned in previous threads whenever there is a hidden agenda and i feel someone here have been playing on many horses and really made a bad impression on it all.

I hope it will improve soon in terms of how communication has been presented, and I hate to waste my own time and anyone else's for that matter thinking we are on the same page, when in fact someone has already witten the end of the story on his own.

233
General Discussion / Re: Promoting BTS 2.0 platform OpenLedger with DGD presale via CCEDK acount digixdao
« on: April 19, 2016, 09:42:39 pm »
Quote from: bitimaru on April 19, 2016, 03:26:34 pm
Do you think this news have break out to the bitcoin/ethereum/* day traders?
What kind of push does this need to get some new adopters? Daily volume is almost innexistant... Its a shame really!

Personally I am really not so worried. I have already seen there is an interest for it even at mentioned prices. If it drops at luanch it is only to go much higher after, thats my firm belief, so I have no need of selling off at low prices when only 1,7 million are available and they are the tokens representing interest pai out in real gold and later on other precious stones and metal.

On top of all I managed to attract ETH bigger investors coming to BTS platform to buy OBITS, so I have achieved already what I wanted to begin with, to make more people aware of OpenLedger an BTS platform itself.

On top of that OpenLedger and BTS will once again be mentioned in an article on Forbes, as one is about to go live in coming days with DgixDao as the main thing and content.


234
General Discussion / Re: Promoting BTS 2.0 platform OpenLedger with DGD presale via CCEDK acount digixdao
« on: April 18, 2016, 05:10:52 pm »

Market is now up on CMC, starting with BTS
https://coinmarketcap.com/assets/digixdao/#markets

235
General Discussion / Re: So what is everyone's thoughts on the Bitshares platform & ecosystem now?
« on: April 17, 2016, 08:07:37 pm »
I second this and support all progressive actions put towards greater good of the bts platform OpenLedger and by doing so I am promoting not only OpenLedger, but also bts as a currency, bts as a platform and bts as a community hoping that this same community will start thinking less about what others can do to improve it all, and instead start thinking what it could contribute with itself.

Dont forget, together we are much stronger than 3-5000 users all thinking on themselves first and foremost. Together there is not much a community like that could not achieve, and we are already on the way, but less talk about what others did not do, and more about what could be done is what is needed now.

And drop the hidden agendas pls to whomever are carrying those, we really dont need them here.

Rgds

Ronny


236
Technical Support / Re: Openledger - CCEDK deposit - unknown ?????
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:12:49 pm »
yes, it does look strange.

this seems to be something maybe @svk , @xeroc  or @dannotestein  could answer

did you try to do a deep refresh like crtl f5?

237
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] NEW MONEY: The iTunes of Blockchain (powered by Bitshares) + SOLCERT ICO
« on: April 17, 2016, 10:00:46 am »
Quote from: digital_payments on April 17, 2016, 09:37:59 am
Hello,

I am a newbie and I just tried to buy 10,000 SOCERTs with my Airbitz wallet, using BTC.
I followed all of the steps:
  1.) sent 1.485 BTC to the address  12MsrWqBFGt3g4NSciXGW56KLbh35Jm99w,
  2.) opened my new open ledger account,
  3.) tried to send an email to ronny@ccdek.com

Unfortunately, when I send an email to ronny@ccdek.com it is being rejected with the following message:

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     ronny@ccdek.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
DNS Error: 38032026 DNS type 'mx' lookup of ccdek.com responded with code NXDOMAIN
Domain name not found: ccdek.com

Did I just get scammed?

Is the email address correct?  How can I notify Ronny and OpenLedger/CCDEK about my Airbitz wallet transaction hash and the user name of my new OpenLedger account?

please let me know.

Thanks,
M.

Hello, you can send me all details on ronny@ccedk.com, not sure where you have the other e-mail adress, but this one is correct. @SolomonSollarsNSense make sure the e-mail is correct in all forums if this above wrong one is still the adress used.

pls send me transaction Id of the btc transfer. I know that there was quite a few btc deposits held up being confirmer last night but would it expect it all to be solved by now, or at least when the US guys who manages the btc wallets have woken up.

rgds

Ronny Boesing

238
General Discussion / Re: Promoting BTS 2.0 platform OpenLedger with DGD presale via CCEDK acount digixdao
« on: April 15, 2016, 09:32:48 am »
Gold-Backed Crypto Currency, Digix, to Increase Demand for Physical Gold
http://goldstockbull.com/articles/gold-backed-crypto-currency-increase-demand-physical-gold/

239
General Discussion / Re: Promoting BTS 2.0 platform OpenLedger with DGD presale via CCEDK acount digixdao
« on: April 15, 2016, 09:31:53 am »
Quote from: iHodl on April 14, 2016, 08:37:28 pm
So currently only you will be able to sell publicly?

Anyone can put up their own IOU

240
General Discussion / Re: Promoting BTS 2.0 platform OpenLedger with DGD presale via CCEDK acount digixdao
« on: April 14, 2016, 08:27:26 pm »
Quote from: luckybit on April 14, 2016, 08:15:29 pm
Put it on Coinmarketcap.

its already listed, so its just a question of creating some colume and they will show according to roadscape

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/openledger/

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 75

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 23 queries.