271
General Discussion / Re: We're about to overtake NXT here. We're within ~10%
« on: August 21, 2014, 01:15:06 am »
Have we cracked $30M yet?! ..I might go grab some popcorn and watch this play out
![Grin?"><b>< ;D](http://bitsharestalk.org/Smileys/aaron/grin.gif)
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
With BitShares everything becomes much simple, my address is testz
Thanks
same problem here
downloaded the new wallet 0.4.4 couse 0.2.1. and 03.0 said blabla .exe does not work
now the latest version said my crashrpt.1402.dll isnt working
i am ready to give up and wait a month or so till there is a version thats easy to install ( as far as cryptos can be easy)
wasted already 2 days on it
and no i am not a pc beginner
and i wonder why the deinstaller leaves all this files on the pc ?
i had to remove them in the appdata/remote file
and my wallet is still not working
Install version 0.4.4, copy CrashRpt1402.dll (see previous post) into "C:\Program Files (x86)\BitSharesX\bin", run the wallet, should work.
Uninstaller leave files in %APPDATA% because it's your data files (including your wallet).
anyone can release a version of ethereum N.0 for N>1 by making their own additions and giving 0.26x minus mining fees since N-1.0 to their own communities as they deem fit, and if the community deems any implementation technically bad or unfair they can reject it and keep building on the previous instead kinda like a blockchain".
Release a version of ethereum (N.0 for N>1) meaning Version N.0, with N greater than one. This can be taken to mean Ethereum1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 etc...only Ethereum 1.0 has the current obligations. Ethereum version 2.0, 3.0...etc could be created by making your own additions to your version of ethereum (thus making it your 2.0 version of ethereum--there may be many 2.0's).
Giving (.26x - Mining Fees since N-1.0 to their own communities as they deem fit) means to:
"Sharedrop" on holders of your ethereum clone, with (what I would assume) is a total taken from the difference between the .26x inflation with mining fees taken out (so it will be less than the .26x total). This would be intented to keep the supply of YOUR Ethereum clone the same as the original...and you disperse those extra ethereum in whatever way you wish to the holders on your chain.
Hope this helps Delulo. And please feel free to let me know if I am off here guys and gals.
This is exactly what I meant, thank you fuznuts.
So as an update on possible collaboration, I think we agreed that keeping things informal is the best way forward at this point. No official partnerships or mergers of any companies or any coins/projects, and it doesn't really make sense to copy-paste codebases in either direction either. But we are happy to participate in standardization efforts and collaborative discussions on technical issues as long as it's an open tent where any crypto-2.0 project can participate. I think there definitely are a few areas (eg. proof of stake algos, client standardization) where that would be quite beneficial.
Thank you for having us over, Bitshares team! Look forward to talking more online and offline in the future.
Hello Brian,
Thank you for getting in touch with us about your deposit.
I apologize for the inconvenience this may have caused you. The PTS wallet is being worked on by our tier 2 technical support team. The wallet is going through an upgrade which may cause delays in processing PTS transactions including withdrawals. We appreciate your patience as we get the coins moving to you.
Please note that you also have the option to cancel the transaction while waiting for the upgrade to be completed. If you wish to do this, kindly respond to this ticket so I can process a cancellation request for you.
Thank you kindly for your patience and understanding.
Sincerely,
Karen
Cryptsy.com
The input spam caused withdrawals to return "Transaction Too Large"
meaning the size of the transaction ( in kb ) was too large so the blockchain would reject it.
Our system would detect this and try for half that amount. And continue to do so until it is small enough
and accepted by the blockchain.
This concern has been forwarded to tech support team. I will keep you ticket open
and will keep you posted. Thank you so much for your patience. It is highly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Marjorie
Cryptsy.com
Well, obviously mainstream artists, even though that doesn't mean 'good music' so we could easily reach the masses. We also have some artists already embracing bitcoin so we should start with those?
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-mastodon-partners-bitpay-new-album/
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/20lox1/some_artists_on_soundcloud_are_now_accepting/
http://cointelegraph.com/news/111131/grammy_nominated_singer_accepts_bitcoin
http://www.coindesk.com/50-cent-bitcoin-payments-new-album-animal-ambition/
http://bitcoinist.net/nas-invests-into-bitcoin-startups/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAfaI4Ht0qE
http://www.coindesk.com/hip-hop-icon-nas-coinbase-age-of-bitcoin/
This is very good, needs to go on LTB and as many other crypto news sites as possible
You want to quote BitShares (as the economy) or BitShares X (as the
decentralised market place with market pegged assets like
bitUSD? These are two different things to communicate.
BitShares is a brand while BitSharesX is a software/network/blockchain
That is only the half truth I fear.
Taking a closer look at
http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/What_is_BitShares%3F
I'd go for
BitShares does for business what bitcoin did for money by utilizing distributed
consensus technology to create companies that are inherently global,
transparent, trustworthy, efficient and most importantly profitable.
A paradigm shift not just in money ..
Upcoming snapshot at 21/8 for DNS and VOTE