346
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Business development delegate
« on: July 24, 2015, 11:04:14 pm »
Great example of the buddy system (two individuals doing one delegate) working as it should! Thanks Thom!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I think it is safe to say the fee should never be more than 10% of the value transferred, but must be at least a min amount and at most a max amount.How do you come to the conclusion that it needs an upper limit?
$10 for max fee. $0.01 for min fee and 0.5% otherwise.
That would make it $0.50 to transfer $100.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I dont agree with the percentages, I think the % fee should decrease more drastically with higher volume as very high volume traders have extremely low fees.The actual numbers where just an arbitrary example...
But overall I really like this approach
thanks deludo. I ll try to delete everything other the wallet and chain and see how it goes..Attention: MAKE SURE you actually back up the wallet and the password you use to access the wallet, meaning safing it on a USB stick or something like that! If you do something like delete everything but and then restart the client it could be overwritten, all depending on what you do exactly! So make sure you have safed the two things somewhere else!
it appears completely stuck every time. Like the wallet doesn't work. The command line doesn't respond and the exchange doesn't appear. I think that the solution would be to delete something in the appfile but I don't want to delete something that will make things worst.There are three things worth saving before you delete anything:
hello beautiful people,Might be the solution or not but make sure that the lougout timeout (user, advanced, preferences) is set to 999999 / very high. With me transaction scanning alsways begins at 0 again after having been logged out.
My transactions scanning history is stuck at 0% once I am fully synched. What can I do? I have opened and restarted 10 times..
Thanks
I tried with a few different namesany ports that need to be open for mumble or something?Try with a different username
the weird thing is that it used to work perfectly a year ago.
There is only one type of collateral per bitasset. But different bit assets can have anything as collateral. The issuer picks the collateral type when the symbol is registered.That sounds like it only applies to private bitassets. Or does it also apply to bitassets where witnesses provide the feeds?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As I reminded other people before , mining is not 100% waste .Good points!!
The biggest promotion for bitcoin come from mining machine producers and big miners .
The deep market depth for bitcoin come from mining machine producers and big miners , because they want to sustain the mining business for a long time and actually care if bitcoin lives or dies , for the simple reason that they've invested too much equipment and investment in it .
For machine producers and big miners , if Bitcoin dies , they will suffer great lost . so they have more incentive to keep bitcoin alive . For delegates of bitshares . if BTS dies , they will simply lose a job .
So , what do you think big miners would do ? Promote bitcoin , sustain the market depth ....... At least that's how it works with the big ones .
I know big miners would take out a bank loan to avoid selling Bitcoin at a very disturbing price , would BTS delegates do that ? I highly doubt it .
Without mining , there will be zero those "resource" for bitcoin to begin with .
You can watch the market depth of Doge coin , it's 10 times deeper than BTS , especially since the "merge mining " thing with LTC . Because now LTC miners has incentive to sustain Doge coin as part of their business . This is a perfect example of how mining created a " interest group" that makes the coin harder to die . Of course , ,it has to be the right group . XPM miners can't do that .
So I think the one thing that BTS is lack of right now , is a interest group --------- A group with great power/resources , and would suffer enormous lost if BTS fails or its price drops , and they can't simply say "oops , I can find another job at ....." or "oops , I can sell BTS and buy other coins ". What do we have to offer such a group ? That's what we should think about more .
If we sacrifice broad token distributions, we can gain support from powerful investors and partners who are motivated by owning a bigger than average stake.How would that apply to Bitshares??
Makes sense. My point was though that a highly volatile assets would require more collateral than a not so volatile asset.Quote2. In addition to liquidity assets that may serve as collateral also differ in how volatile they are. How is that taken into account and who decides how much it is taken into account?Afaik there is a maintenance collateral which serves as a minimum amount ..
I downloaded https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares/releases/download/bts%2F0.5.3/bitshares-0.5.3-linux-x86_64.tar.gz which let's me start the bitshares_client right away (no compiling needed). I successfully imported the wallet (passphrase worked). Do I now need to rescan or replay the blockchain or right away update it to 0.9.2?Update: I have replaced the wallet folder again with the wallet folder I backed up month ago. Here my password works again. A solution might be to change the password of the wallet but "File" -> "change password" is grey.Depending on which version you used to do the backup, it may be that the only way to resolve this is to install BitShares in version 0.5.3
https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares/releases/tag/bts%2F0.5.3
import the wallet there, and update the client to 0.9.2 again ..
There is a bug reporting that some backups may not work for newer version .. these bugs can be prevented by importing in a older version ..
maybe move the "chains" folder somewhere else when doing the downgrade so that you don't need to download the chain again after upgrade