Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fav

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 286
391
General Discussion / Re: BCH or BCC in dex?
« on: August 24, 2017, 04:57:21 am »
you can add bcash as MPA, sure. no one can stop you

392
General Discussion / Re: Request for shareholder opinion
« on: August 23, 2017, 07:56:43 pm »
features that require a hard fork or general rule changes - yes.

bugfixes - no

393
Technical Support / MOVED: Transaction does not pay enough
« on: August 23, 2017, 06:19:37 am »

394
General Discussion / Re: omisego - a bitshares competitor ?
« on: August 21, 2017, 03:33:43 pm »
How other oracles on ETH go around this (augur etc)?

they don't

396
General Discussion / Re: omisego - a bitshares competitor ?
« on: August 20, 2017, 07:27:11 am »
Quote
Another question I have is if they are going to implement pegged currencies, because that's what makes this DEX a lot better than some others.

It is surprising why nobody made this on ethereum yet?

on eth trx costs are so high that the total cost for price feed transactions is going to be huge.

a transaction on ethereum cost about 4cent USD
this is really tiny

are you lying or is there a misunderstanding ?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6cg4zj/ethereum_tx_costs_45_cents/

398
Openledger / Re: Deposit of SBD through openledger gateway doesn't work
« on: August 19, 2017, 02:55:53 pm »
what's the actual problem? you've been told that openledger support is taking care of it

399
Quote
Can you elaborate on this?

Over the 30 year buy back period we expect all/most of the property to appreciate substantially in value with inflation etc. What if we split this property price inflation 50/50. It would be one huge payout. Makes the token sale more appealing?

As a last bagholder payment? Sounds good

400
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Hardfork schedule proposal
« on: August 19, 2017, 07:25:38 am »
my principle for the core:
1. keep logic as simple as possible.
2. every change should have enough good reason, because we don't know if other business depend on this.
    without a good reason, we even don't need to waste time to review.

so althrough we have pay for this worker, I don't agree to merge this feature, and don't want to review it.

I don't remember this one, however if stakeholders voted for it it's not up for debate. It has to be Integrated

401
General Discussion / Re: omisego - a bitshares competitor ?
« on: August 18, 2017, 05:24:07 am »
not operating/vapor

402
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Please vote MUSE witness: muse-now
« on: August 17, 2017, 03:45:24 pm »
what's the new wallet adr?
https://wallet.museblockchain.com/#/wallet

registration impossible, it doesn't know how to interpret country sms codes it seems.

403
Muse/SoundDAC / Re: Please vote MUSE witness: muse-now
« on: August 17, 2017, 12:04:34 pm »
what's the new wallet adr?

404
General Discussion / Re: Beyond Bitcoin Whaleshares coins
« on: August 17, 2017, 12:02:49 pm »
Create a new account using my ref link http://bit.ly/2vlYj6X , upgrade it to lifetime member and I'll give you 70% back.

you only earn 60% FYI.

405
Graveyard / Re: Buy CVCOIN. becomes more expensive
« on: August 17, 2017, 12:00:51 pm »
no begging.

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 286