Good to see the conference went well, I'm glad that core devs were able to attend.

Rather than entirely removing the LTM requirement, what about a minimum BTS balance requirement for referral mechanism access?

Another key factor is that, at that moment, smartcoin rules is not robust enough to resist shorting attack.

Only bitassets which are pegged to external price references cannot resist 'shorting attacks'. Smartcoins like the Norns (https://norns.hertz.network/) are completely resistant to BTS' external price fluctuations. An OMO for them would be far less risky than one for BTS:CNY/USD, imo.

Maybe, however non-committee owned mpa don't get much attention

Would it only focus on core bitassets? Or could private smartcoins like the norns be in scope?

Quote from: startail on July 22, 2019, 08:58:24 am

Why does all the links for the page for "BitShares Asset Exchange" link to Open Ledger?
Currently redirects users to https://bitshares.openledger.info/*

It also links to http://cryptofresh.com/assets, shouldn't this be https://bitshares.org?

It also seems there is a warning posted for all listings for the exchange.

Quote

Please visit the exchange's website for details regarding scheduled downtime.

I'll be reaching out CMC directly using my bitshares.org email on behalf of Move Institute. I'll cc Fabian and Ryan as well. After initial response from them we can organize better who needs to do what. Basically i'll ask for extension, explain our community/holders process (consensus) and force update of data there.

If anyone is against this action, 6 hours from this message complaints are acceptable. We have 11 days left, and I'm not into time-wasting when it comes to something this important.

"Prevent rather than cure".

Chee®s

These proposed CMC changes sound good 👍

Used the wirex card to purchase goods online, very cool. Looking forwards to BTS integration into Wirex 👍