Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bytemaster

Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 656
451
General Discussion / Re: Looking for All Blockchain Technologies without a Token
« on: October 30, 2015, 09:05:31 pm »
Quote from: monsterer on October 30, 2015, 08:26:09 pm
Quote from: Troglodactyl on October 30, 2015, 02:46:49 pm
IOTA/Tangle is slightly similar, but it builds a single transaction tree in which transactions are confirmed more quickly when they increase convergence between the most significant branches.  Each transaction references at least 2 existing transactions, similar to TAPOS.

IOTA has a token. Also, its POW, and not much like TAPOS at all, since TAPOS references a block not a transaction, and is POS not POW :)

I like IOTA for many reasons, it just needs some refinements :)

452
General Discussion / Re: Looking for All Blockchain Technologies without a Token
« on: October 30, 2015, 02:03:14 pm »
I remember there was a concept of a mesh-chain where each account is its own blockchain.   I cannot seem to find a link now... help

453
General Discussion / Re: Looking for All Blockchain Technologies without a Token
« on: October 29, 2015, 08:28:42 pm »
Quote from: CoinHoarder on October 29, 2015, 03:53:02 pm
http://www.rootstock.io

This is built on top of bitcoin.

454
General Discussion / Looking for All Blockchain Technologies without a Token
« on: October 28, 2015, 10:07:52 pm »
I am looking for any and all protocols that do not have a core token.  Any help doing this research would be appreciated.

So far I have Hyperledger and Interledger and perhaps Tao chain.

455
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Worker Proposal - Asset pool fee funding
« on: October 28, 2015, 09:42:02 pm »
Quote from: mindphlux on October 28, 2015, 09:06:07 pm
Dear stakeholders,

I have funded the asset pool funds today, for the second time.

We're funding a total of 14000 BTS per day (4000 CNY, 4000 USD, 2000 EUR, 2000 GOLD, 2000 SILVER), but unfortnatually I made a mistake in my calculation and set the daily payrate to only 10000 BTS. As a result, the worker funds will not last until the projected end. Also this proposal was voted in 6 days after the initial start date, so that further decreases available funds. The funds are projected to last until November 12. I have uploaded a file for you to review here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_so41Ogm44a871ZVjIWyZXhQptGi7i0dNFvfeyY8gng/edit#gid=0

I'm in the process of writing a script that automatically fills the pools, which should be ready by the weekend. Until then I will fill the pool manually.

Thank you,

Best regards
mindphlux

Great job on transparency!

456
General Discussion / Re: Fix for Loss of Consensus with Withdraw Vesting Balance
« on: October 28, 2015, 06:43:57 pm »
Quote from: abit on October 28, 2015, 02:20:27 pm
Quote from: maqifrnswa on October 28, 2015, 02:13:46 pm
Are the tags correct?
2.0.151027 is a lower version number than the previous release 2.15.294

that causes problems for people with automated version checking, and is different than the previously announced versioning system
Apparently 294 which is day-of-year is harder to read. 151027 is a date but easier to read.
I wonder why not use 2.15.1027 for better compatibility.

We would like to reserve the 2.X  as the hard fork number. 

457
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: October 28, 2015, 06:38:36 pm »
Quote from: topcandle on October 28, 2015, 03:33:15 pm
It doesn't help that nobody is trying to get btc38 online.  This is a big reason for the downtrend.

I am more than willing to help.   Show me a question they have asked that hasn't been answered.

458
General Discussion / Re: Fix for Loss of Consensus with Withdraw Vesting Balance
« on: October 28, 2015, 12:51:15 pm »
Quote from: xeroc on October 28, 2015, 09:07:00 am
Those are supposedly RUB and SEK .. It may have been caused by a malious price from yahoo but I can't tell for sure ..

Total amount of value involved in those swans is less than $10.   

459
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Invest in metaexchange!
« on: October 27, 2015, 10:52:09 pm »
Quote from: monsterer on October 27, 2015, 10:00:06 pm
Quote from: bytemaster on October 27, 2015, 09:50:02 pm
Please give us a pull request with your wallet integration components!   I really want to see this well integrated.

I love the business model!

Thanks :)

I sent you a PM with a patch in, did you get it?


Probably fell through the cracks... create an issue on github with the patch. 

460
General Discussion / Re: Any block explorer site that can look up a transaction by txid?
« on: October 27, 2015, 10:49:40 pm »
Quote from: roadscape on October 27, 2015, 10:34:54 pm
Ok.. txs can now be looked up by hash (if they were included in a block):

http://cryptofresh.com/tx/a5fea9b2abaaededabd4bd9af22e1e95da9f8ef2

I still don't get why get_block returns the hash but NOT the id... and get_object(1.11.x) returns the id and block_num but NOT the hash.
Is there any way to get the tx id and hash in the same call?

Great work but it should probably include the block number the transaction was included in as well.

Also, the URL should support the confirmation ID format used in the GUI

#c0099400499b5a18c383916c56240871906bf686@92856

461
General Discussion / Re: Witness Alerts and Status
« on: October 27, 2015, 10:45:06 pm »
All full nodes should be restarted with --replay-blockchain until a patch can be released.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19538.msg250655.html#msg250655

Failure to replay on startup may cause your node to fork when a vesting balance is claimed.

462
General Discussion / Fix for Loss of Consensus with Withdraw Vesting Balance
« on: October 27, 2015, 10:42:31 pm »
Ben and I have discovered the root cause for the loss of consensus and have a temporary fix that can be used by all witnesses.

The problem was a single field which we failed to serialize when saving chain state to disk.  Any node that didn't replay the chain on startup would have this field reset to 0.

We will be releasing a fix for this along with several other fixes by the end of the week.   In the meantime, all full nodes should always replay the blockchain on startup by using the --replay-chain argument.


463
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Invest in metaexchange!
« on: October 27, 2015, 09:50:02 pm »
Please give us a pull request with your wallet integration components!   I really want to see this well integrated.

I love the business model!

464
General Discussion / Re: [python] bts_tools witness monitoring tools for BitShares 2.0
« on: October 27, 2015, 09:49:00 pm »
Great work!  Very excited! Much Wow!

465
General Discussion / Re: We'll be able to compare ourselves vs Nasdaq
« on: October 27, 2015, 09:45:37 pm »
Soon BitShares will also support proxy voting for UIAs  (Thanks Follow My Vote)


Pages: 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 656

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 24 queries.