There are several things going on here.

1.  Given a Transaction ID you want to find the Transaction.
2.  You want to know which Block the transaction was included in.

It would be relatively simple to add this to the existing API *except* that the node running with this feature enabled would require extra RAM.

Looks like everyone is in!

I will now turn off my seed nodes as they have still not been included in the default list of seed nodes.

I still would like to offer this service to the bitshares community, so once they will be included in the bitshares client, I will bring them back up (I need about 20 minutes to do that).

My bad.  I haven't gotten around to adding them back.   If someone can compile a list of all seed nodes I have missed, I will add them to the client.  Better yet, submit a pull request!

damn shit... it even works worse than the BTS2.0 wallet.

I see the notes but i cannot claim them because there is no account in the drop down menu.  I dont understand it... I created a second account but it still doesnt work. Hopefully poloniex will add notes soon, so i can drop that bag there.

Refresh the page.

Quote from: tbone on October 26, 2015, 07:58:08 pm

I don't know the exact ramifications of that.  All I know at this point is that one of the great features of the Bitshares exchange network is pooled liquidity.  But if every exchange that joins the network has their own versions of currencies that each form a new set of trading pairs entirely separate from the trading pairs formed by the versions of the same currencies issued by other participating exchanges, it would seem to negate the pooled liquidity aspect of the exchange network.  Am I wrong about this?

Ripple works the same way.

It doesn't negate the shared liquidity because arbitrage is instant and even atomic.   

The chain is up and running. 

Seed node 54.165.143.33:5197

@bytemaster, funny you mentioned the different versions if BTC on the dex.  I've been thinking about these different versions and how, as you know, currently they form their own pairs and therefore their own order books.  I think it would be very beneficial for liquidity if they could be combined into one order book.  What would it take to accomplish this?  And perhaps solving this problem would also help solve your CMC problem?

It could be combined in the wallet, but it wouldn't actually be combined when you place an order.   The assets for OPEN.BTC and TRADE.BTC are fundamentally different because of the different issuers.