Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bitmeat

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 75
706
General Discussion / Re: Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:45:17 pm »
Yes, luckybit is getting it. Lack of scripting will hurt us with the Ethereum launch. However I'd rather have I3 focus on perfecting the prediction market and establish themselves in the field.

Truth is once Ethereum is out, Bitshares X could be scripted in like a week on the Ethereum protocol. But that's just the protocol. If I3 comes out with actual trading software then they will be a few steps ahead of the game.

The reason I think we will need scripting sooner is because for something like a pegged market asset such as BitUSD there is no way human beings are going to be able to monitor for these opportunities. Automation is the only way to make it work that I can see. I also don't think it has to be a complicated scripting language at first but just a way to string together useful commands so that some automation of trading becomes possible such that If event1 then trade x. Maybe add margin trading to the mix and other possibilities soon after.

I don't think Bitshares X should wait for Ethereum in 2015. I think team Bitshares X should automate everything they can as soon as it's worth it to do so because anything which saves investors time will increase efficiency and utility of Bitshares.

You can always script something using the RPC to the client. This doesn't require the effort of I3. Anyone can create tools in this area. The point of Ethereum's scripting is that you can DEFINE contracts that run on the chain itself. I think Ethereum will become bloated because of that however. The right way to do this in my mind is with Smart Delegates that execute contracts offline, unless there is a dispute, then you bring it to the chain.

707
Very much looking forward to your progress.  How may interested parties connect with your efforts?  Are you providing your code for peer review at this time?  Are you willing to share a small subset of your collected data  (perhaps a few rounds)? 

Thanks,
Fox

I plan to make it possible for people to make an API call and use the data however they wish. I'm doing this entirely as a hobby and a pet project at the moment.

708
General Discussion / Re: BTS X is Live
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:08:04 pm »
there's no way to decentralize fiat > crypto

once you have crypto though, everything else can be decentralized. you can have a decentralized crypto exchange (and i'm pretty sure that's actually the plan for bitshares x), there's just no way to get fiat into it.

I think the value of BTC will be that it will always remain the most established gateway for fiat <-> BTC. All the other interesting stuff will be in things like BTC <-> BTSX, BTC <-> Ethereum. Until any of these projects become important enough that the fiat gateways will start using them as well.

709
Perhaps a naive suggestion to address this. 
What about a small area inside the blockchain metadata for this ?

If the blockchain itself records delegate ID's and a few small past-performance parameters ?

The blockchain already has information about the missed blocks. I think this is enough as a start, I'm building some tools to help visualize that.

710
General Discussion / Cold storage?
« on: July 26, 2014, 06:47:14 am »
What is the safest way to store BTSX in a cold storage offline? (in terms of how to generate target address, best way to send, etc.)

711
General Discussion / Re: Has the Matrix changed or is it just me?
« on: July 26, 2014, 06:32:23 am »
Running a delegate is a delicate experience. I gave up on the idea. When you run a delegate, your own transactions didn't work very well, unless you stop producing blocks, rescan and then restart producing. May be they fixed some of these issues, I don't know. All I know is that I would definitely not recommend running a delegate while doing your own transactions.

712
Bter is the best exchange I've used. The problems they had yesterday showed it was a good idea to have a limit to get comfortable & safe with the system.

At the same time there are a lot of buyers who want to buy more BTSX but not until they can withdraw the BTSX they already have on bter off the exchange. So yes it's frustrating :(

Being able to buy so low is frustrating?  :D

I hope it goes down to 0.000012 and even 0.000009, so I can back up the truck.

713
I would recommend they do both deposit and withdrawal limits for newcommers, just to be safe. Not on the total per day but just size of transaction.

714
General Discussion / Re: Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:22:32 am »
Yes, luckybit is getting it. Lack of scripting will hurt us with the Ethereum launch. However I'd rather have I3 focus on perfecting the prediction market and establish themselves in the field.

Truth is once Ethereum is out, Bitshares X could be scripted in like a week on the Ethereum protocol. But that's just the protocol. If I3 comes out with actual trading software then they will be a few steps ahead of the game.

715
General Discussion / Re: Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 26, 2014, 03:19:36 am »
yes I get you can do without actual liquid AGS. I was answering biophil, though.

Totally my bad, didn't even see biophil's post above.

716
General Discussion / Re: Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 26, 2014, 12:53:38 am »
You totally missed my point. Information about AGS donations as per the Feb 28th, ALREADY is in the blockchain. I'm not asking for AGS to be liquid on BTSX (Although I asked for it many times in the past it seems there is an issue making that happen) a 3rd party could make that happen though. It's just a question whether anyone would honor it.

All I'm asking is for them to also include information about the final snapshot, and make it so people could decide how much to air drop when creating new assets.

What I'm asking is incentivize rewards to the snapshot automatically for those creating new assets by giving them discount on the asset creation fee.

Isn't this like an obvious one?

717
General Discussion / Re: Missing 30K - Help troubleshoot this.
« on: July 26, 2014, 12:42:57 am »
These fixes will be in the next release. You guys will have to do a full rescan (backup your wallet first, just in case) and we can see if it fixes your transaction histories.

Do you guys see any improvement using the latest version? https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx/releases/tag/0.2.3

Great! Using wallet_account_history and I now see a correct balance with the missing transactions from before shown as UNKNOWN.

However in the UI the balance column in the transaction history is now completely blank. as in not even numbers are seen there.

I'm closing this issue. I hope exchanges don't ever get to miss a transaction, that would be unfortunate.

718
Awesome news vikram!!!

719
General Discussion / Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 25, 2014, 04:23:45 pm »
I should clarify this is more of a brainstorm than a firm proposal. So if you don't like it - propose an alternative idea. In a brainstorm session there is no right or wrong and no need to get hung up on implementation details until we got something more concrete. I know AGS is not on the chain as an asset. But we could include the data for the last snapshot just like we did the feb 28. Would be nice to not have to reimport over and over again.

720
General Discussion / Future DACs on the BTSX rewards proposal
« on: July 25, 2014, 04:20:45 pm »
Would it be possible to build in AGS rewards into creation of new assets?

Eg:

create_asset MYASSET 1000000 AGS:20%

Would create 1M shares of MYASSET and automatically reward 20% to AGS holders as of last snapshot.

In other words ability to take a snapshot of another asset on the chain.

As a reward - reduce registration fees based on how much AGS is rewarded.

I mean we could create tools to auto distribute the assets, but we can not reduce the fees without intervention in the protocol.

This will spur innovation as well as reward investors automatically.

Pages: 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 75