Your vesting balance isn't yet available.
Import for DNS wallet is also TBD.

Thanks. Can you tell me approximately  when I can import my AGS and PTS to BTS?  since I do not want to keep so many wallets <grin>

I am not sure how long CA gov will need to finish their internal discussion. maybe another 3-5 years. but it is a good showing to public

 Count me in ,i have servers in Amazon

good work

Hi Bymaster, just wondering if you are working on  BTS Light Weight Client . I hardly open my windows version bts wallet due to I hardly find any wallet is worse than   BTS.   

Quote from: BTSdac on April 25, 2014, 10:17:02 am

Quote from: bytemaster on April 25, 2014, 04:31:07 am

With Bitcoin light weight clients rely entirely on proof-of-work validation in combination with a trusted node.  So long as the cost of faking the proof-of-work is higher than the value of the transaction you can generally trust that your transaction is valid and included in the official chain.

On the other hand POS coins whether peer coin or Nxt have no such metric.  The only way to validate the chain is to have a full copy of the chain or to fully trust someone who does.

Fortunately with DPOS we once again have a means of deterring and punishing those who could potentially lie to a light weight client.  If the delegate signs a statement that the transaction was valid and confirmed and it turns out to be false, then that signed statement can be used to unilaterally fire the delegate.   This means that light weight validation of small transactions can now be validated with the same weight as POW based light weight validation.

Great 
if delegate can get profit by statement a invalid translation ?

Correct... signing that something was valid, when in fact it was invalid would be grounds to provably and immediately fire a delegate.    In fact, we could allow anyone to enter this business provided they post a bond.

try to keep some btc. not sure how high it will go this time

"earning yummy interest while pocket has money  "  ---bitUSD

Quote from: Frodo on November 07, 2014, 08:49:05 am

I'm not sure, but I could see some confusion coming from the whole "loan" / "lending" terminology. I don't think that all users are aware how lending is connected to creation of USD or bitUSD. That might give some people the idea that we have something implemented like the lending DAC functionality.

When people think of "banking" they normally think:  I deposit money, the bank lends money to others, and I get a cut of the interest.   

More sophisticated above average "normal" people might consider whether or not a bank is holding subprime loans and over leveraged or whether it is holding high quality loans and thus solvent. 

If people ask about getting a loan the answer is very clear, "we only lend against BTS" do you have any collateral?   As a result the average man will say, oh I guess I cannot get a mortgage with you.   Which is FINE!   If you go to average bank and ask for a loan collateralized by something non-standard such as stocks, gold, silver, etc they will make it very clear.

If BitShares is working as intended then there is very little difference between BitUSD and USD other than the name of the institution that is promising to pay a USD worth of value.   So for the primary value proposition we want to avoid introducing unfamiliar terms or concepts.   

Bitcoin has NOTHING to do with the service provided by BitShares and thus we should not sell BitShares based on this.  There will need to be a "Technology" page that describes the power of the technology and mentions bitcoin.  This page would mostly be for "investors" and "very curious" individuals.