Quote from: vorksholk on December 26, 2013, 04:29:14 pm

Quote from: TiGei99 on December 26, 2013, 03:46:52 pm

Quote from: isaacgoldbourne on December 26, 2013, 03:41:59 pm

Quote from: smokim11 on December 26, 2013, 03:27:12 pm

so waited a few blocks more and seems that my 200 hpm is getting 60 hmp on the pool and making almost 1 MMC from 20 servers (32 cores/server)

Going to give it around 10-15 minutes more, if it stays the same going back to xpool.

Update:

HPM on the site is going down, lol sorry but I lost trust in this pool. if the stats are correct then the 1200 HPM miner must have a 1000 servers running.

Back to xpool.

I trust this, I just imagine its a botnet. If it is a botnet that is approx 6000 bots which is quite easy to get...

I also think it's from a botnet. If you compare the graph from http://agran.net/memorycoin2_calc.html about the difficulty it was raising maybe of one ore more botnets.

It still is quite possible for a person to achieve that kind of speed on EC2, even with a fairly high reject rate. Remember that the higher reject rate doesn't affect faster machines as much as they spend less time on a hash before looking up and acquiring new work.

Currently I'm getting 9.5 - 9.8 hpm on cc2.8xlarge instance, so this would be more than 100 instances.. 5-7  accounts with 2 regions each x10 instances in each region? 

You can request up to 100 of the high-memory (250GB RAM) which has 32 cores (16 physical) per region, although that many never get filled, not even close. However, with just one account, raised limits, and a willingness to pay a pretty penny, it's more than possible. I ran at 900 for a few hours on EC2 until the pool started getting laggy, sending some rejects, and most importantly not providing work fast enough, leaving the miners only using 30-50% of the possible CPU time

Hey glitchboy, you might want to consider opening up another 2nd server running this pool, seems to be getting a bit bogged down.

Quote from: vorksholk on December 26, 2013, 03:30:41 am

Quote from: s4l1h on December 26, 2013, 03:14:55 am

MCzcJ537n5k62rrVpKdDLffVfxYXroACpM   651.94
MTcEYSKqamSVTDEZTqyYBr64Fbv5Y7srv8   616.89
MQdsjzu6KMgqzMAZ7xhmiRbyzTukGcrDPN   437.26
M8d1Lz1dhxiaKJxVB1s6pZ3VghDsCntEw6   369.26
MGKWVo3Uj8NLGLAoUwcvdmzDH5Q25g7CuS   352.61
MLVRxsxpvd6m87s7WBaeZ63ktF44BziadB   346.18
MMTkW4RDPqY63D6B9rLXWBQe8KdXKAZf8P   341.88


Lol all botnets for 600 hpm  need min 200 x E3 server.

Or, you know, around $28/hour worth of EC2.

You have calculator?

see amazon hashpermin :https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=1498.0

Right now I'm paying somewhere around $22/hr-$23/hr for 500 HPM.

Looks like we are at 50% or getting close to it ( pool stats for the 50 addresses it shows : 3091.61 HPM ) , soon more

So far your pool has proved amazingly stable.