Thank you everyone for helping me sort all of this out. I appreciate it.

It is nice to have one wallet now instead of four, with each holding different tokens.

Does around 150-180 sound in the ballpark?

I'm talking about the November 5, 2014 snapshot. I guess that is termed the merger. Those with PTS, Vote, DNS were to receive BTSX in their place. In turn, that all becomes Bitshares 2.

Are you talking about the snapshot in February of 2014 where PTS holders got BTSX? Or did I miss something related to Bitshares?

Does anyone know the exchange rate from PTS (including Vote and DNS sharedrops) to BTSX?

I just checked my transaction history. I made one purchase of PTS on 8/20/14 and sold them all after the snapshot on 11/6/14.

What would the exchange rate roughly be given that?

I bought PTS once. It was after the initial btsx sharedrop/dac but before vote, play, music, dns. I held it until the snapshot to determine the bts swap (can't recall that date). Then I sold all of it.

Also, I did not have PTS when BTS was first distributed if for some reason that was considered in the exchange rate of around 600.

Thank you. I do appreciate it.

It seems as though I was successful at getting my PTS wallet into the new Bitshares 2 wallet. However, at around 600 BTS per share of PTS (including DACs) my balance is way off. My current Bitshares balance is above the number of BitsharesX I owned but not near the amount I should have with my PTS shares exchanged for BTS. I also have a vesting balance which is a bit below the 10% mentioned. Of note, in my account under vesting balances, nothing is listed, whereas in the wallet management console, under lookup balances, I can see the balance.

When all of the changes were going on here I stepped away from things and haven't followed what has been happening for quite a while. What can I do to sort all of this out?

Okay. Thank you.

Roughly how many BTS should one receive per PTS (assuming inclusion in the Vote, DNS, and Music snapshots)?

So I should uninstall my old .9.3 wallet, reinstall .9.3 and set it up as a new wallet rather than my existing wallet? Will I be able to import the PTS wallet.dat even though I already imported it into my old .9.3 wallet?

Thank you.

My BTSX wallet did not contain my PTS wallet keys. At the time, I didn't realize that was something I needed to do before upgrading to Bitshares 2.

My Bitshares-PTS wallet contained PTS when the snapshot to transfer PTS to BTS occurred. I have finally set up my Bitshares 2.0 wallet and successfully pulled in my old btsx wallet. However, I can't figure out how to get my old PTS wallet info in to be exchanged for BTS. I went back and imported the PTS wallet.dat into my old Bitshares .9.3 wallet and then tried to reimport that into Bitshares 2 but was unsuccessful. The error was that it had already been imported. 

Quote from: MeTHoDx on November 20, 2014, 10:39:11 PM

Quote from: Murderistic on November 20, 2014, 07:59:53 PM
Mobile Responsive is def important for SEO.  The smaller the site file is the better.  Speed of loading site is equally important.

SEO is a non-issue. Mobile optimization and speed is important if you're targeting long-tail keywords. When people search for "bitshares", bitshares.org will always be the first result in Google.

I would hope that the sum total of the SEO strategy for bitshares.org isn't to rank first for 'bitshares'. Ranking first page for 'bitcoin' would be a far loftier goal that surely would pay dividends.

The home page has formatting and readibility issues. Screenshots below.

Firefox 33 on Windows 7:



Firefox 28 on Android 4.4.2



EDIT: Images now posted.

Quote from: delulo on November 20, 2014, 04:16:06 PM

Quote...but due the new delegate programm and the possibilites, i'm hoping to see dozens of sites out there in a few weeks/month

+5% since there is no invictus anymore. Anyone (those that run as paid delegates would have the ressources) can make a site and promote BitShares to an different target group and make money by being paid as a delegate.

I would LOVE to see Methodx doing that since he has great ideas and a solid practicable perspective on doing business!

Bitshares may be novel ground but how can dozens of potentially conflicting messages be anything but confusing and damaging? I'm interested to know if such a strategy has ever worked successfully?

Here is a piece from today which looks at 'Crypto 2.0' projects. Bitshares 'X' gets a brief mention.

http://tpbit.blogspot.ca/2014/11/open-riptherium-thoughts-on-ultimate.html