1
YOYOW / Re: YOYOW的见证人设计
« on: August 16, 2017, 07:08:36 pm »
NICE。 
。
。
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
3
General Discussion / Re: transwiser BTS API server launched
« on: September 03, 2016, 02:30:55 am »
4
General Discussion / Re: New API Gateways ---Double servers---Load Balancing---powered by btsabc
« on: September 03, 2016, 02:30:28 am »
5
General Discussion / Re: we have some problems, the ID of the mechanism can add a new category account?
« on: September 02, 2016, 10:26:22 am »
Imagine a scenario.
I asked three blockchain consulting corporation, chosen B, and then give up because of the ID, not impossible.
The company ID fraud?ID the price too high?ID was lost?
I asked three blockchain consulting corporation, chosen B, and then give up because of the ID, not impossible.
The company ID fraud?ID the price too high?ID was lost?
6
General Discussion / we have some problems, the ID of the mechanism can add a new category account?
« on: September 02, 2016, 08:19:57 am »
Hello, I think we have some problems, the ID of the mechanism can add a new category account?
Purpose is to make a long time of a large number of hoarding is becoming more expensive.
Has someone started a lot of brush account.
Whether we can add enterprise ID?Monthly deduction, need a certain margin.
For example, C.XXXX (COMPANY.OPENLEDGER)
We may be dried up, the ID of the resources may hinder some enterprises to enter the threshold of the BTS startup, I think it is necessary to discuss this problem, thank you.
Purpose is to make a long time of a large number of hoarding is becoming more expensive.
Has someone started a lot of brush account.
Whether we can add enterprise ID?Monthly deduction, need a certain margin.
For example, C.XXXX (COMPANY.OPENLEDGER)
We may be dried up, the ID of the resources may hinder some enterprises to enter the threshold of the BTS startup, I think it is necessary to discuss this problem, thank you.
7
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD needs liquidity for those that want to buy it.
« on: August 06, 2016, 03:28:51 am »
1%compensation is not theft, it encourages the transaction bitusd-bts, do not encourage people to mortgage production bitusd damage.
8
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD needs liquidity for those that want to buy it.
« on: August 05, 2016, 06:49:47 pm »
I mean, bitcrab's proposal is good for the system to be used and to increase the customer.
9
General Discussion / Re: BitUSD needs liquidity for those that want to buy it.
« on: August 05, 2016, 06:47:55 pm »
You think the perfect solution, means that can not be promoted. I don't believe that windows is weaker than mac.
Please pay attention to what the negative rate of steem brings. Bitshares reduce the transfer fee with what.
Please pay attention to what the negative rate of steem brings. Bitshares reduce the transfer fee with what.
10
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 28, 2016, 03:20:29 pm »
Chinese community members of BM serious dissatisfaction 
11
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 如果你能决定，你希望现在的转账费用是多少
« on: January 27, 2016, 04:31:01 pm »
内盘交易额已经没谁了，2.0的高速功能到底为谁开发的。
Pages: [1]
