1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: fee reduction for P2P transactions.
« on: January 05, 2018, 04:48:27 am »http://cryptofresh.com/p/1.10.7232
hi fav, has the changes been approved as it does not show anymore on cryptofresh?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
hi fav, has the changes been approved as it does not show anymore on cryptofresh?
2
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: fee reduction for P2P transactions.
« on: January 01, 2018, 06:02:43 pm »
is there is any way to guarantee that fees will be what is already agreed, and will be adjusted in short periods, while bts goes up in value??
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21368.0.html .
or what will need to be done to so fees are always the same and do not fluctuate with bts. ?
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21368.0.html .
or what will need to be done to so fees are always the same and do not fluctuate with bts. ?
3
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: fee reduction for P2P transactions.
« on: January 01, 2018, 07:10:38 am »hi Ravid
the 2 cent per transaction is ok, but the fees that are for basic transfer are .21 bts which is 10 cents. 10 cents on a 1 dls transaction is 10%.
when you say the fees are the same for everyone, I am confused, as I made a p2p and got .21bts fee.
the question is: how do I get the 2 cent fee without being the lifetime member???
and my company is trying to bring volume and make my clients buy a lot of bitshares as collateral for the pegged asset, and i think that is good for the bitshares community.
4
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: fee reduction for P2P transactions.
« on: January 01, 2018, 12:32:53 am »
Pc, thank you response.
the US$0.02 could work initially . and once I prove sufficient volume and considerable bitshares locked in collateral, I could make a more solid argument to the community to lower it more.
there is only one BIG ISSUE. that fee is for lifetime members, all users for bitMEX will be basic members with standard fee as they will not be traders
is there any way we could consider a US$0.02 for basic members for P2P transfers? it could be only for my "bitMEX" pegged asset if that is even possible.
the US$0.02 could work initially . and once I prove sufficient volume and considerable bitshares locked in collateral, I could make a more solid argument to the community to lower it more.
there is only one BIG ISSUE. that fee is for lifetime members, all users for bitMEX will be basic members with standard fee as they will not be traders
is there any way we could consider a US$0.02 for basic members for P2P transfers? it could be only for my "bitMEX" pegged asset if that is even possible.
5
Stakeholder Proposals / fee reduction for P2P transactions.
« on: December 31, 2017, 03:19:42 pm »Hi, bitshares community, I would like to propose a fee reduction from P2P transactions on the network, currently is at .21bts for NON-members.
The reason: we are a financial institution in Mexico (www.bitpeso.mx), and are looking to create a pegged asset (bitmex) similar to HERO. we have the capacity to make it to mass adoption with our retail network. As well as good support from our current client base and community.
In order to be able to use bitshares for day to day transactions, we need a very low fee for P2P transactions, something like .001 bts.
Why will it be beneficial to the bitshares community?
We think that these new clients that will be using the network for free ( .001), will use other services as trading services to change its bitmex to other assets on the network.
As discussed on the telegram group, bitshares is designed to be a trading platform and not a transaction platform, but with the bandwidth capacity you have, I would say it won't hurt and could bring a lot of benefits.
Pages: [1]
