1
MemoryCoin / Re: CPU/GPU mining hardware comparison
« on: January 06, 2014, 07:00:43 pm »
I don't have one of those, i was comparing my 280x to other submitters in this thread.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
MemoryCoin / Re: CPU/GPU mining hardware comparison
« on: January 06, 2014, 05:32:24 am »
Saphire R9 280x - 22.5 WPM // 20 - 23 HPM
Edit: i'm surprised to see that my R9 280x is as good as R9 290 and R9 290x at mining this. not really sure why that is!
Edit: i'm surprised to see that my R9 280x is as good as R9 290 and R9 290x at mining this. not really sure why that is!
3
MemoryCoin / Re: Linux miner crashing on regular basis
« on: December 19, 2013, 11:13:28 pm »
Running memorycoind without the watch scripts and the latest source from github.
The memory leak was not apparent for the first few minutes of running, it was sitting at about 10 GB virtual memory per thread.
Then suddenly it shot up to 16 GB of virtual memory per thread.
Overall, why do the threads use such a small amount of real memory, if this is supposed to be "memory coin". It looks like this is a fork from protoshares, and in protoshares each thread was using roughly 512 Mb of memory. Here we have each thread only using 34MB of memory.
Something still seems wrong here.
The memory leak was not apparent for the first few minutes of running, it was sitting at about 10 GB virtual memory per thread.
Then suddenly it shot up to 16 GB of virtual memory per thread.
Overall, why do the threads use such a small amount of real memory, if this is supposed to be "memory coin". It looks like this is a fork from protoshares, and in protoshares each thread was using roughly 512 Mb of memory. Here we have each thread only using 34MB of memory.
Something still seems wrong here.
4
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 25, 2013, 04:46:30 am »PbNTJpkWTH1bdtfVHdjuJnvMcmSYQT6yQG 1513798 152.814
3/4 of all
should be ~1000 computers
a botnet?
Probably just amazon aws instances.
5
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 25, 2013, 04:16:38 am »Can i still use http://ptsweb.beeeeer.org/user/myaddress even tho i mined with a different miner and pool?Read the first post in this thread again.
6
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Miners are here... if rumors are to be believed!
« on: November 24, 2013, 08:39:56 pm »Python is significantly slower than C. Buyer beware. Personally i would wait for a C implementation than buy a python one.Sorry, but so what? You do not need ultra performance to send 10-20 packets of data/sec over networkMost pools are running python, for that matter.
Anyway, sold.
EDIT: sold exclusively.
Right, and i should take whatever a salesman says at face value too. There's a reason that all decent miners are written in C, and it certainly can't be hand-waved away by some silly argument about network performance.
7
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Miners are here... if rumors are to be believed!
« on: November 24, 2013, 06:08:53 pm »
Python is significantly slower than C. Buyer beware. Personally i would wait for a C implementation than buy a python one.
8
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool Miner CPU Benchmark Thread
« on: November 24, 2013, 06:12:18 am »
Increased my OC to 5Ghz, getting ~200 HPM now.
9
BitShares PTS / Re: About PTSPool's miner
« on: November 24, 2013, 06:02:40 am »
I think ptspool stole beeers miner. So the beeeer guy put specific port and ip into his code. Likely you could just edit that part of the code, and recompile for pts pool.
10
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 23, 2013, 08:25:20 pm »Why no source code for linux？
This binary can't work for me.Code: [Select]./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found (required by ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0)
./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0)
./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0)
./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0)
./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./linux_coyote_miner.0.3.0)
There is source on github. Also those look like missing libraries, google each one, and it is probably a simple: apt-get install libcrypto
type fix.
11
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 23, 2013, 02:09:56 am »How do I use/run it with Mac? I am just getting "Illegal instruction"
this has been answered several times in this thread, also in two different threads on this board. do a quick search or OSX and you will find the fix. Bytemaster really should update the first post in this thread with the solution.
12
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Miners are here... if rumors are to be believed!
« on: November 22, 2013, 08:02:15 pm »
Does this mean someone won the $5000 prize for proving you wrong?
13
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool Miner CPU Benchmark Thread
« on: November 22, 2013, 07:43:39 pm »x58 Foxconn Bloodrage motherboard. L5639's sell for ~$80 on eBay compared with $$$ for a 6 core 980x or 990x. Best 6 core bargain out there however do not work in ALL x58 boards. Only 2x 7950's in this rig, will be adding two more if gpu mining makes sense for PTS. http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2335636
Interesting! thanks for the idea, i might just try that path for my next build. What cooler did you get for your L5639?
14
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool Miner CPU Benchmark Thread
« on: November 22, 2013, 05:10:52 pm »Vista64
Intel L5639 @ 3.52ghz running 11 threads does ~162hpm
I have to keep a thread free for ltc miningI'll try to overclock it a little more tomorrow.
Strange, you're using a Xeon build for GPU mining? what's the motherboard? how many GPUs?
Edit: also, seriously, consider ditching vista, it probably will help your performance, vista was terrible.
15
BitShares PTS / Re: Coyote Pool 2.0 - One Day Rounds Proportional Payout
« on: November 22, 2013, 03:47:19 am »
Is there a specific time of day that the pool reset/payout happens? what time zone?
