BAIP6(https://github.com/bitshares/baips/blob/master/baip-0006.md) is a new drafted proposal that consist of the updated Market Making contest(Ordering Mining) rule and some other parts, the purpose is to cultivate the market depth and the trading activeness in BTS-DEX through a task distribution mechanism, and to increase the system income to buy back BTS to create value for BTS stake holders.

Now 2 poll workers have been created:

1.14.260 Poll-BAIP6-Implement BTS-DEX economic model
1.14.261 Poll-BAIP6-Do Not Implement BTS-DEX economic model

According to BAIP procedure definition, the BAIP6 will be considered approved while below 3 criteria are met:

1.worker 1.14.260 get more voting power than 1.14.261 worker.
2.worker 1.14.260 get more voting power than BAIP-Threshold Worker 1.14.236.
3.Both No.1 & 2 above last for three consecutive days.

Kindly Reminder:

BTS-DEX try to make sure，but do not guarantee that the listed gateways always provide liable service and is not legally responsible for that, users need to judge the service liability of the gateways by him/herself.

As RuDEX and XBTSX claimed not to participate the subsequent Ordering Mining, at the beginning only GDEX is included in the gateway list,  however any qualified gateway is welcomed to join after the Ordering Mining begin if the gateway accept the mentioned conditions in the BAIP.

Please vote according to your opinion.

Placing additional burden on the actual value creators in the network, especially in this hard time, is irrational. This is another attempt in a series of failures at financial engineering and makes further -90% drop in the price of BTS likely. How much more money do you need to lose before you admit failure and reverse course? Rejected.

Yes, please! The more coins the merrier.

Here's an article from February 26, 2017 from Harvard Digital Innovation and Transformation Course about GXB.

After updating the API connection menu showed up. Many thanks!

I don't believe so. There is a difference between a wallet and an account:

Account: An account is similar to a deposit box and should be registered on the blockchain
Every transactions to your account name is sent to an address which is
controlled by a derived key from the account private key

Wallet: The wallet is a set of account names and corresponding private keys.
When you first created an account name, the private key for that account key
is derived from the wallet private key and can thus be recalculated from the wallet private key.

What I'm essentially asking is if it's possible to decouple a registered account from the wallet file and transfer it into another, newly created wallet file.

After installing version 0.6.1 I used the "File -> Import Wallet" menu multiple times trying to import the JSON backup file. Each and every time it failed resulting in Error: invalid password (20001) notification, although the password was correct. The JSON backup file was created using Bitshares X software version 0.4.7.

Hello, in August last year I downloaded the Bitshares X software and registered my account. After that I backed up the JSON wallet file on external thumb dive. Recently I wanted to access my account and therefore I downloaded the latest Bitshares software version 0.6.1. After installation I tried to import the wallet but received an error notification: (...) Error: invalid password (20001). Since I wrote the password down in my notebook I was sure that the password is right, but the software keeps rejecting it. What are my options in order to regain access to my account or retrieve or break the password to the backup file?

Please someone explain to me who is going to trade FOREX using Bitshares blockchain, taking into consideration how narrow the profit margins for intra fiat currency trading are, moreoever with the requirement of holding twice the reserves on the account.