Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
i wil say it again - this is not a merger.
all the DNS buyers on BTER got screwed big time. only BTSX are cared, but we only do it because bytemaster was on the move to VOTE. sorry i don't buy it. i just lost a big junk of my invested money without need. i invested in AGS because i liked the competing DACs. My bad, that most of my money was invested after the BTSX snapshot. So my portion in BTSX was small. I bought a couple of BTSX on BTER.
So i was just happy to see my taken risk gotten be rewarded with the coming DACs DNS and Vote , Music as well. Play will come and now we "vote" to merge. But my stakes has no votes. i am delitued the most.
- my after the BTSX AGS snapshot got not much
- my DNS are valued nothing
- my VOTE are valued nothing
question is why we are doing this? just to simplify anything? sorry i don't buy it. the whole merger is in big favor of all the supporters before the BTSX snapshot.
why not just throw BTSX away take a fair AGS Snapshot and allocte PTS in some way?
i can tell, because it will upset the big fish who are invested before the BTSX snapshot and will get in the new BTS chain less then now.
don't call it a merger - it is not!
every promise was broken.
i am in favor of the idea, but how the AGS/PTS + DNS + VOTES are treated is shameful.
on this emerging mumble session bytemaster said "no, only AGS and PTS will be merged with BTSX" just a couple hours BTSX is thucking everything in.
sry, that i am upset, but if you "merge" someone has to lose and that's me.
I understand how you feel. There are no easy answers, but the best I have for you is this: BTSX could have evolved without giving DNS anything and then competed with DNS. No merger, no buy out, just competition in a free market. Would that have been breaking any promises? Would you have lost more or less money as a result?
P.S. flydragon are you asking for help to get the wallet stable or to register a delegate? I couldn't register a delegate with the GUI, and had to do it through the console. The first command I used charged a transaction fee but didn't register me. I got it to work in the end, I think I had to put:
wallet_account_register <account_name> <pay_from_account> [public_data] [delegate_pay_rate]
so for you this may look something like:
wallet_account_register nihao nihao null 100
P.P.S. After hassling toast and gamey, I thought I should contribute something, so I've tried to think of ideas for an improved model for the DAC. I'm gonna create a new topic with some suggestions, hopefully later today if I have time.
