Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kimchi-king

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: October 10, 2018, 08:48:30 pm »
I've added our votes to the new 201810-bitshares-org Worker Proposal.

You can learn more about it here: https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2018-10-bitshares-org

2
Voted

3
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: October 07, 2018, 01:11:00 pm »
I've pulled our votes for the "Spokesperson" worker proposal due to a recent discovery that she is a member of the DASCOIN team and actively promoted DASCOIN instead of BitShares at the recent Bitfest.

4
General Discussion / Re: Consider derailing feed price
« on: October 01, 2018, 09:18:19 am »
@George_Bitspark Thank you for providing your fantastic input. I couldn't agree more with everything you shared.

5
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: September 18, 2018, 10:00:13 am »
I've added our votes for the following:

Poll - BSIP42 - Adjust price feed dynamically
      But your feed price is still very low.

I've updated our votes for the NO adjustment option.

6
Nope, not a good idea at all.

End of story.

7
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: September 03, 2018, 12:29:55 pm »
@kimchi-king
Hello kimchi-king, this is our product download link http://ios.btspp.io/, would you like to add btspp-witness to your list? More introduction: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=26903.0

I've added our votes to your witness account. Thanks for your support.

8
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness proposal] btspp-witness(双语)
« on: September 03, 2018, 12:28:38 pm »
Voted. Keep up the great work and thanks for your support to the community.

9
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: August 29, 2018, 08:29:54 pm »
I've added our votes for the following worker proposal.

201808-bsip40-1
https://www.bitshares.foundation/workers/2018-08-23-bsip40-1

10
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: August 25, 2018, 12:43:55 pm »
I've added our votes for the following:

Poll - BSIP42 - NO adjustment to price feed

12
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: August 22, 2018, 09:25:28 am »
I've added our votes for the following:

Witness
zapata42-witness

Worker Proposals
201808-trusty-community-ui-p1
Refund100K

13
Voted.

Keep up the great work.

14
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Proxy] kimchi-king - Journal
« on: August 16, 2018, 11:30:52 am »
Due to the following witnesses taking it upon themselves to change their SQP (Short Squeeze Position) settings without consensus, I've decided to withdraw our support.

Go here for more details on what the SQP does. http://docs.bitshares.org/bitshares/user/dex-short.html

witness.yao
delegate.freedom
magicwallet.witness
gdex-witness

15
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Worker Proposal] Bitshares UI Renewal
« on: August 09, 2018, 12:21:26 pm »
I fully support this worker proposal, it's highly productive and allows for community oriented bounty claims.

@kimchi-king - I don't get how you can claim this is misspent money nor how you've failed to noticed any of the changes that this worker has brought to the reference wallet implementation. I've easily had 10+ of my own issues addressed and resolved via the bitshares-ui repo/worker in the last year, plus the UI has undergone large changes (see tradingview charts, ant design, increased responsiveness/efficiency, new modal pop-up modules, etc).

---

If I were to provide one suggestion for improvement, it'd be that bug reporters aught to get a very small % of issue bounty reward, for bringing an issue to the table that was worthy of implementation. It'd attract functional testers and encourage more users to report their annoyances with the UI if they knew they'd get a couple bucks for their time writing up the issue.

You just need to ask the community how they feel about the progress made thus far and you will quickly learn how disappointed people are. They are expecting UI/UX changes to be made that allow the wallet to be easier to use which will lead to greater adoption. Instead we get a bunch of resolved bugs, but very few design changes that offer a better user experience. I know the reference wallet is supposed to present all features offered, but why not bring back a well designed "Easy" wallet version?

You talk about TradingView which took forever and a day to be implemented. We're glad to see it added to the wallet, but without a complete redesign of the rest of the wallet the addition of TradingView doesn't really help very much. It's like adding a really nice paint job to an old car without first ensuring the body is without dents or rust spots. it looks cool at first, but then people start noticing that things aren't as nice as they could be.

I've recently discovered that they lacked designers and developers which explains why certain things fell off the table, but the lack of transparency only made our negative perception that much worse. Let's see what Startail and his team can do during the coming months.

Pages: [1] 2 3