Quote

Total  budget:
   30,600 USD (215,179 CNY)

Please quote additional budget requirements for the same worker, except no restrictions on gateways providers: GDEX, RUDEX, XBTSX, DEEX, etc.

Quote

There is no such need that private owned for-profit companies such as gateways are listing nodes for public access.

The nature of the argument: "gateways should be self funded because they keep all their profits", is no longer relevant with BSIP86.

These are no longer "independent for profit entities"; they are now taxed subjects of state.



If there is to be taxation; a qualification of the inherent power to do so, is that the proceeds of such levy, should provide for the general welfare of the taxed parties.   This should include both listing on the reference UI and access worker-funded public API nodes.

As revenue raised - for the chain - by gateways will increase with their increased traffic.  I propose explicitly excluding gateways from "commercial use".    While current traffic is low, perhaps this means this worker should include a budget for "potential" increase in load handling of gateway traffic; to be return to chain in the event it is not needed.

Quote from: Dinko on February 20, 2019, 10:03:56 pm

yes but BitShares community is sleeping since 2015 as well binance dex will be the end of our beloved exchange. the leaders of this community are too busy sponsoring overpaid ''spokes people'' and approving BSIPs that make the decentralized exchange pretty centralized. 

Alright... I looked at your account and you started here in 2017. Don’t know how you know if it was sleeping since 2015.

We are approving things that get BitShares good publicity, like having a spokesperson who is knowledgeable and reliable.

Before making accusations of BitShares being centralized, please bring evidence. That is just FUD with no information. Very immature to just make statements in this community without evidence and only post 15 times over 2 years.

3) I do encourage BitAssets. As John Robert (Conlin), Alex and everyone who has 2 gram of brain does. Compared to all of Stan's other projects, i consider personally bitHero his greatest and most legal achievement in BitShares.

...and if doable - Move Institute will be happy to transfer ownership to itself for mentioned asset with prior to that signed agreement with whoever is original asset issuer. We can turn it to very normal asset with very decent campaign, legal to

BUSINESS REQUEST:

Committee - to explain decision made in the background and to wait with decision against issuer.
Issuer (Cryptonomex if I understand this well) - To contact me or Move Institute (Zavod Premik) for legal discussion and arrangements for transferring ownership (threshold) for the Asset.

Offcourse unless there is proof that BitHero was illegally used or harmed blockchain in any way. Will wait Committee for answer.