Is this why current feed price is 14 usd cents, while the market price is around 11.5 usd cents. Please enlighten me.

Quote from: vegolino on November 25, 2017, 12:35:25 pm

I remember that CoinHoarder use to be supporter of BTS.
What happened?   

Meh, kind of a lot of reasons.

- I realized the Larimers are greedy when they stopped sharedropping PTS/AGS, due to the stuff with the Bitshares DAC mergers, and how the Steem project started.
- I disagreed with the lack of development (pretty much only GUI work done since Dan left)
- I felt like my opinions and ideas weren't taken seriously by the community.
- I realized there are better designed DEXs that will eventually come to fruition that don't use IOUs or derivatives.
- Tether kicked bitUSD's butt.
- The proliferation of Bitshares vaporware fork scams that never seem to come to fuition (or at least to their full potential) by "community" members.

Even with all that stuff, I still root for Bitshares because I was such an avid supporter in its beginning. Some people bought BTS because of my advice, so I want Bitshares to succeed. I just dont own any anymore. I have always been a Bitshares supporter, but I am more honest and blunt than most, so my posts may not come off that way.

Am I the only one here that thinks tether usd has become total scam ?

"Poloniex wallet issue" is bullshit in my opinion. There is a near 3 cent price difference now, with respect to other exchanges. I would not be surprised if it turns out that they buying bts themselves at this supressed price. They would be effectively buying the competitor.

The low you see is actually correct but only for very small residual (i.e. 0.0001 bitusd) transactions. It happens  when some transaction is filled but a residual amount remains unfilled.It gets to be filled later.
  Blockchain operates on integers. When the amount is so small, that kind of rounding problems occur. 

It is 14th and still not delisted. Something fishy going on?

Still 150 mil BTS in bittrex..wtf... What are people waiting for? I am surprised that users don't experience problems withdrawing their bts last minute. Or do they experience withdrawal issues?

or.... did bittrex buy them?

wow, such blood on the street. it is almost buy time

I think there should be a decided, known placewhere these bug fixes / hard forks are announced, with a "please speak now or forever hold your peace" kind of setup. If there is a big controversy about something, then we can take it to stakeholder vote. If not, then the update can be done without it.

Ideally, this should be done on-chain. This is how I imagine it:

1. A committee member creates a "hard fork proposal", which includes a brief description of the problem to be fixed or feature to be implemented.

2. At this stage, other committee members are assumed to a "yes" vote and must veto to "no" proactively. Otherwise, the feature is green-lighted to be developed after a certain amount of time, perhaps 15 days. If shareholders don't like the proposal and there are not enough vetos, then they can vote in committee members that agree with them.

3. After the feature/bugfix is developed and a release candidate is created, a committee member creates a "hard fork commitment proposal" which references the previous "hard fork proposal", and also includes the release hash and block number for the fork.

4. Witnesses commit to this, and when a supermajority of witnesses do, then the hard fork will activate at the block number.

that must be the blockchain itself