Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - NoVaMiner

Pages: [1]
1
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: February 24, 2014, 07:42:46 am »
Quote from: emailtooaj on February 23, 2014, 04:18:37 pm
Thanks NoVaMiner for the reply.
I'm also using NaN's clpts v 0.2.2
Would you mind PM'ing me you batch settings (minus your username)? So I can see how yours set up.
I currently have the 7950's at 1025/1500, 7850 at 975/1300 and the r7's at 875/1000
I would think I could get these over the 6k c/m mark?

The only option I have set is "-t 0,0".  I fiddled with overclocking the processor and memory, but only got minor improvements.  The only setting I change on the card is to run the fan up to 80%.

2
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: February 23, 2014, 03:40:26 pm »
Quote from: emailtooaj on February 23, 2014, 06:07:55 am
Hey all!
I just recently started mining on ypool.
Just wanted to get some feed back please....
I'm averaging about 5,480 collisions/min. I have 2-HD7950's, 1- HD7850 and 2- R7 240's running.
Is this a good collisions/min. for this set up? Or should I be getting higher rates?
I averaged 1.7 Mh/s with other scrypt miners.
I thought I read some where that collisions/min should read like kh/s. Is this tru?
Thanks for any feedback!

Depends on the client.  With NaN's clpts I'm getting ~4325c/m with a single R9-290XOC (mild OC 1100/1400)

3
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 22, 2014, 09:05:20 pm »
NaN,

I get the following with 2.2 running against the 14.x drivers downloaded from AMD under linux (Mint 16/Ubuntu Saucy).

Code: [Select]
*****************************************************************************
** clpts - OpenCL PTS Pool Miner v0.2.2 (ypool.net only)
** by NaN - based on xptMiner by jh00 (clintar's code v1.1)
** If you like this software, please consider sending tips to: opencl.miner@gmail.com
** PTS:  PajuVUWrcPn5ksCFfrBiWQXvpwtE29dcN2
** BTC:  1AumJ5uzz1nuER7pBA6Bh4gNusaxhN85rc
** Your donations will encourage further optimization and development
**
** press CTRL+C to exit
*****************************************************************************

Vendor of used platform (#1 / 1): Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Name of device #1 / 1 (deviceID 0): Hawaii


Fee Percentage:  2.50%. To set, use "-d" flag e.g. "-d 3.5" is 3.5% donation

spawning 2 worker threads
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol


Messages during compilation of program for device 'Hawaii':

LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 162)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 112)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 179)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 169)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 222)
    Unrolled as requested!

WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
xpt: Logged in with cbyter.PTS_1
WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples: 'amdil-pc-unknown-amdopencl' and 'amdil-pc-amdopencl'
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'New block data - height: 55679 tx count: 19
barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!
WARNING: While resolving call to function 'barrier' arguments were dropped!


Messages during compilation of program for device 'Hawaii':

LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 162)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 112)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 179)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 169)
    Unrolled as requested!
LOOP UNROLL: pragma unroll (line 222)
    Unrolled as requested!

collisions/min: 3930.0000 Shares total: 0

4
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 22, 2014, 11:20:05 am »
Quote from: NaN on February 21, 2014, 09:34:13 pm
If you wanna install the Catalyst driver on Ubuntu, then please use the following guide: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubuntu_Saucy_Installation_Guide
Make sure that you run sudo aticonfig --adapter=all --initial after the installation and reboot after that. --buildpkg Ubuntu/saucy has to be replaced by the name of your Ubuntu distro e.g. --buildpkg Ubuntu/raring.

Given the better speeds in Linux, I fought for many hours and finally got up and running thanks to that guide.

I had to use the 14.x Beta drivers because there is no Ubuntu/saucy target in 13.12.

My R9-290X-OC (Asus) is now running 4200c/m consistently under Linux Mint 16.  Very happy. 

Please enjoy your 2.5% NaN!  great work.

5
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 21, 2014, 07:54:24 pm »
Quote from: NaN on February 21, 2014, 04:23:09 pm
Yeah, it's definitely not a restriction of the miner. The next version will introduce multi-pool support and pool fall-back together with a config file so those issues should vanish

I can't wait NaN, that is great news. yPool has been getting killed.  I don't know if they are getting attacked or it's just the load.  Things have been really unstable since they pushed past 20Mc/m.

6
BitShares PTS / Re: best miner for AMD GPU
« on: February 21, 2014, 05:46:05 pm »
ASUS R9-290XOCII 4GB is averaging 3250c/m using clpts in Windows.  Reports are that it's pushing 4500c/m in Linux

7
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 21, 2014, 07:23:34 am »
Quote from: Darkbane on February 21, 2014, 06:29:54 am
Quote from: NoVaMiner on February 21, 2014, 06:07:50 am

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?

I've seen people post 4100-4500 cpm under ubuntu for the R9 290X... they all noticed a huge gain when they switched from windows... I think folks have made the same comment on other cards, but its been less noticeable for most cards, but the 290 series sure does not like windows for some reason...

little off topic... anyone looking to get some smaller cards, I am selling cards to upgrade to other cards... so if you're looking for some smaller R9 270 2GB series cards check out my posting in the other forum here, powered risers can also be included... :)

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=3069.0

That's a huge performance difference, especially with the hit PTS earnings have taken with all the new miners jumping in ypool.  I need the machine running windows (Server 2012r2 actually) during the day.  I'll have to experiment with SMOS tomorrow and see if it supports the MB and NIC.

8
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« on: February 21, 2014, 06:07:50 am »
Quote from: morecpmplz on February 21, 2014, 03:14:40 am
Quote from: NaN on February 21, 2014, 12:15:36 am
@lir111: What are your command line options?


Quote from: battleaxe on February 21, 2014, 12:10:04 am
Ouch meaning what? Sucked he had to have someone else fix it? Or that 14.1 drivers suck?
No, "ouch" because AMD f***ed it up. I hoped that those times were over... That is not the only problem with the Catalyst drivers (e.g. the 290(X) performance inconsistency in Windows and Linux)

I so hope the Windows issue is resolved for the 290x's.  Not sure how long I can stomach Linux's lack of undervolting/clocking tools for these cards.  I can't even see what voltage my cards are running at... :(

Has anyone tried mining with the 14.1 drivers on windows with the 290x's?

I've been reluctant to try the 14.1 drivers because of the significant performance impacts seen with scrypt miners.  I know my performance on the ASUS R9-290XOC is crap (550KH/s) compared to where it should be.

In clpts I'm getting around 3250c/m with the R9-290X under Windows 8.1 and the 13.x AMD drivers.

How much better is it under Linux?

Pages: [1]

Page created in 0.201 seconds with 24 queries.