Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - pseudoscops

Pages: [1] 2
1
General Discussion / Vesting balances & whatever happend to CFSGOLD...
« on: March 18, 2017, 04:19:08 pm »
Ok, so I'm pretty sure I didn't ever claim my vesting balances for Bitshares from ages ago.

When I login to my accounts via the web interface none of them show any vesting balances as being owed and there are no transactions showing that they were claimed in the history under the "Withdraw vesting balances" filter.

What have I missed? Was there some kind of expiry date by which I had to claim them by?

Also does anyone know what happened to CFSCOIN or CFSGOLD? I have balances for both, worth together what I think is probably a few hundred dollars.

2
Technical Support / Steemit or Bitshares for my VR/AR project..
« on: July 21, 2016, 02:43:25 pm »
Mulling over the possibility of using some blockchain technology for a VR/AR project that I've been working on for about a year.

My project has some elements that make it a little like an image stock library. I read this article and it got me thinking:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/business/smallbusiness/a-new-wrinkle-in-the-gig-economy-workers-get-most-of-the-money.html?src=me&_r=0


In addition to using something like a UIA to provide value back to content creators like with Stocksy, I'd also like to run some sort of virtual currency scheme for end-users of the platform. How might this work? If using Bitshares then my first thoughts were UIA for shareholders and separate UIA for users that can be bought with BitUSD. It's been so long since I've looked at Bitshares I'm not even sure if what I'm suggesting is possible (i.e. buying UIA tokens/shares with BitUSD).

If I wanted to do something along these lines and partner with a number of content producers which platform, STEEM or Bitshares, would seem like the best fit to mirror what Stocksy have done? How might things change if I want to add end-users with a virtual currency to the mix.

I've barely paid attention to STEEM apart from swapping some of my BTS holdings for some STEEM. It appears to be getting a lot of traction at the moment. I read a post from Dan about it being a bit of a Trojan horse for other applications that could run on the Steem blockchain. So I'm confused as to whether I should be looking towards STEEM as a platform for my project instead of Bitshares. Certainly looks to be rocketing up at the moment.

Oh, and despite quite a long break from posting here, I was wondering, considering I'm not a complete noob,  if someone could please send me an invite to Steemit?

I've been trying to register for the last few days since I've been thinking about using it as platform to document my project rather than setting up a separate blog.

3
Okay, so I've got an existing backup JSON file from one of the later Bitshares2 clients on Linux, but I can't remember which > 0.8 I think. This wallet backup file was exported via the GUI. Is there a way for me to figure out which version of the GUI client I used and is this likely to be important for when I try to get back up and running and synced with the current live chain?

I do have a Linux system with the Bitshares 2 client running - it has version 0.9.2 installed. But the install is a bit screwed up and I can only login in via the terminal. Something has gone awry with XFCE4 and it's not a simple fix. I mention this in case you guys think it makes sense to re-export my wallet before trying to import my keys into the new blockchain. Given the lack of GUI I'll have to use the bitshares-cli for this and so any pointers on the sequence of commands I'll need in order to export a wallet backup from the CLI would be great (i.e. unlock wallet, export commands etc etc).

Next, what are my choices for a GUI client for the new block chain? Ideally, I'd like to keep a GUI based client on an offline ARM based machine, I have a spare Raspberry Pi 2 but could buy an Odroid C2 if more RAM is required (it has 2GB), I'd create a new account here on this machine and move most of my holdings from my old account to  this account and then unplug the machine. I'd then like to transfer some funds to a new account in a new hot wallet that will remain connected to the internet. I think I saw mention of web-based wallets and that also some form of mobile app was in the pipeline. If so what strategy would you guys recommend? I like the idea of this wallet being on my phone.

I do want to become more familiar with the CLI, because I'm working on some projects where integration with Bitshares could be possible. Is there an easy way for me to use Bitshares with Python at the moment. Any wrapper libs for python being maintained?

Also, can someone point me to a summary of what is going on with Bitshares at the moment and what the state of play is? I tried to catch up the other day and it seemed like development focus in Blacksburg, in part at least, had now moved to trying to build a Reddit clone on top of the new chain? Are not the DEX and pegged currencies a primary focus anymore? Or are they considered finished now? Perhaps, someone else picked up this side of things and started to run with it? These two things were what I was hoping would turn into the Bitshares Killer App.

Sorry about all the question, it's just I've been out of the loop for a while.

Eagerly awaiting advice on all the above, but especially keen to get my account up and running on the current live blockchain.

Thanks in advance for any help !

5
Nanocard / Nano card advice...
« on: September 19, 2015, 11:30:20 am »
I want to start doing some of my day to day spending with a BitShares backed card. Can I get a Nano card yet or should I just go with a Bit-X card? From CCEDK Nano page:

Quote
If a customer feels he or she cannot wait, it is possible already now to pick up the similar Bitcoin Debit Card NanoCard from our partner site at Bit-x. It is available Now.

Bit-X site looks slicker and so this entices me in a little more than the CCEDK, wondering if I'll miss out on any features that Nano provides if I just go with the Bit-X card. Are the same guys behind CCEDK behind the Bit-x card? I'm in the UK - I'm assuming that either can be applied for and used in the UK. What information do I have to give in order to get one - are there any 'Know your customer' procedures in place as part of the application process for the card - I'm assuming there will be...?

Also, although I'd still like to to get a card for experimenting, I've noticed on http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/views/all/ that BitUSD is running well of the peg - as I write this coinmarket cap reports $1.21 at the moment. Is this correct? If so then this might mean that spending is not viable as the peg is so far from reality. Sorry I've been away for a while busy with other projects, but can someone point me to why this is the case when the peg used to hold very close to $1 on lower volume than we've seen over the last week.

6
General Discussion / PR opportunity on WSJ...
« on: March 02, 2015, 01:45:08 pm »
The counterargument part of the this WSJ article appears to hinge on the fact that Bitcoin is volatile and not backed by anything:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/do-cryptocurrencies-such-as-bitcoin-have-a-future-1425269375?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_tech

There are only 4 comments in the comment section at present. If someone has a WSJ account then perhaps it might be worth logging in and mentioning how BitShares solves the volatility problem. I expect this will get a lot of eyes today in light of the the imminent release of Barry Silbert's Bitcoin Investment Trust.

7
I'm looking for a bit of advice here. I usually build the wallet on Linux myself, but I've decided that it'd be easier to do upgrades if I could just update using the yaourt package manager on Arch instead of going through the tedious process of building it myself. I find I don't go in to the wallet as much as I should because I'm on a old version and can't be bothered to upgrade. I just want to be able to type yaourt -Syu and know that BitShares will get updated along with everything else in the Arch rolling release.

This is the BitShares package on the AUR:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitshares/

What slightly concerns me is that the sha256sums has 'SKIP' in it:

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bi/bitshares/PKGBUILD


I've built it and it loads up fine, just wondering whether I should push the button and restore my keys from a backup.

What do you guys think..? Safe or not safe?

8
I'm going to be setting up some development and server infrastructure for a BitShares project I have in mind that I hope will help grow the BitShares ecosystem. It'll be a web based project and may incorporate some WebVR technology for parts of what I have in mind. I’m planning on changing things up a bit compared to the way I usually develop and deploy things.

This new setup will need to do double duty for a hardware based cloud connected side-project I'm working on too, a project that I also hope to someday connect with the BitShares ecosystem. I am aiming to move away from largely Ruby/Rails focussed developer environments running directly on OSX , with Heroku being used as the main server/production environment.

I want to move to a Docker based workflow that uses Docker containers for local development of apps and for remote developer desktops too. I also want to use Docker on the server sometimes with Docker on its own (see ARM notes belwo) and sometimes by way of CoreOS and http://deis.io/ running on a dedicated baremetal server cluster I am setting up. As mentioned I'm am keen to Dockerise (or possibly Rocketise) the development environment and this needs to go as far as having dockerised dev envrionments with full XFCE4 installed that can be VNC'd in to from anywhere (see how Sony do it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9hBsRUeRdg).

My go to linux distro at the moment is Arch Linux and I have some development only Docker containers on my local dev machine and also separate EC2 AMIs (not-Docker) for remote developer desktops that are based off of it. These remote AMI based desktops allow me to take advantage of fast GPU EC2 instances to run 3d modelling apps over VirtualGL/TurboVNC. This allows me to avoid outlaying lots of cash on GPU hardware and also frees me up to model, in real-time, on my Macbook Air anywhere where I have a reasonably fast internet connection. The Arch based AMIs for remote GPU work took quite a while to setup and get working. I had Nvidia driver issues when I first tried to get things working with Ubunutu on EC2. The thing is - I really really love Arch and one of the main reasons for this is the Arch Wiki. It really helps me to better understand linux and spells out exactly how to get most things I want to get done on linux done. The Arch Wiki is light years ahead of Ubuntu support channels I experienced prior to discovering Arch (i.e. Googling or searching StackOverflow for seemingly random and conflicting opinions and approaches).

ARM support is very important too as my other project is hardware based and I'd like to run docker on the embedded ARM hardware there instead of running my code directly on baremetal Raspian/ArchArm. I'll be upgrading all of my ARM hardware in my prototypes to Rasberry Pi 2 or, more likely the Odroid-C1, and so this opens the doors to debian/ubunutu as they are ARMv7-A compatible. I'd also like to have the ability to deploy Docker containers to online.net upcoming ARM based server platform (http://labs.online.net/) and so this is another reason that ARM is important too outside of my hardware based project. Arch has archlinuxarm.org which is great in my experience so far, but archlinuxarm.org is maintained by a separate group of people, not the same as the the core Arch linux maintainers, as far as I’m aware.  So I'm wondering if baked in ARM support at the main distro level is the way to go and I’m not sure which distros support ARM out of the box?

So I guess my big dilemma is whether to continue to use Arch linux anywhere within the mix. For my Docker developer instances I'm trying to decide whether to stick with Arch, or possibly Manjaro based no Arch. Further is there anyone out there who uses an Arch based distro for server duty? I'm pretty sure the answer to that from you all will be - 'Are you crazy!’ In light of all of the above, and perhaps to stop me jumping around more than one distro, what distro(s) would you recommend I take a look at? If someone can recommend one distro I can run across all of these platforms that has documentation to rival the Arch Wiki then I am all ears!

Package availability is also important. I don't want to have to build absolutely everything from scratch. Also I like that Arch gives me the latest of everything due to rolling release, but obviously this is where the downsides come when you start to consider it as a server platform for server deployments. A distribution that gets the balance right between bleeding edge and being stuck in the dark ages would be great!

Basically this post http://sjoerd.luon.net/posts/2015/02/debian-jessie-on-rpi2/ got me wondering about all this and whether I should just standardise everything on Debian.

Discuss...... :-)

9
Trying to get someone to create an account so I can pay them for some work in BitUSD. They just tried to install on a Mac and got this message:

Adobe Application Manager plug-in is installed on this computer at /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/AdobeAAMDetect.plugin. This plug-in crashes when loaded into BitShares. Please remove this plug-in and restart BitShares.

Anyone know what the deal is here? I can't ask them to uninstall and so not sure if there is an easy answer apart from me paying them in Bitcoins instead...

10
General Discussion / Bytemaster's blog suddenly borked in Firefox...
« on: January 09, 2015, 12:31:06 pm »
Has the layout code changed? Right hand column way too big in FF 34.0.5 OSX Mavericks. Seems fine in Chrome.

11
Just posted this comment to hackernews in light of the trouble BitStamp appears to be having:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8838957


I can already see boost in traffic to the bithshares.org site. Just goes to show how a well placed and well timed comment can boost traffic/exposure to BitShares:

https://clicky.com/stats/?site_id=100787377

Live traffic as it comes in here:

https://clicky.com/stats/spy?site_id=100787377


Feel free to add your own comments bigging up BitShares to pull that part of the thread back up to the top of the HN comment stream :-)

On a side note I couldn't happen but notice that the homepage does not seem to make much mention of how BitShares is a distributed exchange and the advantages that this brings. Surly this should be front and centre on the homepage since it's one of our biggest unique selling points?

12
For those that want to see live(and historic) stats for bitshares.org visit:

https://clicky.com/stats/?site_id=100787377

No conversion goals added yet. They are in the pipeline. For background on this read:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11023.0

Also I have suggested MethodX edit links on recent reddit initiative to go to the download site at bitshares.org insted of github so that we can see traffic coming in from his initiative in realtime  :).

My thoughts/reccomendations over in MethodX's thread: https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11991.msg158360#msg158360


13
Not a huge amount of funds (2634.1766BTS) but just realized today that the funds sent below never turned up. Today I'm wanting to send 1BTC to BTER so I can invest a little in the Music pre-sale. I'm worried about the funds not turning up again if I do. I remember reading of at least one other who's funds did not turn up at BTER.



Anyone got any advice. As far as I know their support is in Chinese :(

14
I want to have two portable BitShares wallets that I keep offline when not in use and that are not used for any other computing tasks.

Will the current wallet build and run on ARM based hardware? And if so can I run it on the new Pi Model A+:


https://www.modmypi.com/shop/raspberry-pi-model-a-plus


I've installed and built http://archlinuxarm.org/ on an old B Pi, but I'm using that for something else. The reason I ask is I remember reading somewhere about someone struggling to get the wallet to run in anything with less than 2GB in linux (it might even perhaps have been less than 4GB of RAM). If the Pi A+ is not up to the job (256MB of RAM) then what spec do I need to be looking for? I'm really keen to run my wallet on ARM based hardware.

The reason I want two machines is that I'd like to have one that I carry with me when traveling etc and one that I have permanently at home for easy access if the other one is lost. Obviously I password protect my wallet at the moment (in fact I think it's required with the new BitShares client). I'd like to password protect my two new wallets with exactly the same password. But I'm unsure for certain how the passwords work - I'm guessing the password does not live on the blockchain. Can anyone confirm? So if I lost one of my new A+ Pi wallets (assuming they can be used) am I right in thinking that if I changed the password on the one I didn't loose then the lost wallet would still retain the old password? I guess what I'm getting at is that a lost wallet cannot have it's password remotely changed via the blockchain. The password is local and stored with the instance of the wallet correct?

Any clarity someone can shine on my lack of understanding here would be most helpful.

15
How will we measure the effectiveness of marketing and PR by members of the community?

Proposal - We need to set up a system that reports on and recognises success from individuals and teams that generate awareness about BitShares. That system needs to be open, transparent and accessible by all members of the BitShares community. I think this starts with the community having access to public facing web traffic stats, but over time it will need to become much more than this. Those that can demonstrate success in increasing awareness are then in a position to be rewarded (tips, donations, fund-raising etc). If they are particularity effective they may attract enough attention and goodwill in order to get voted in as a marketing delegate paid by the DAC.  I'd like to lead this initiative if people think it's a good idea. I've also already set up a public facing GetClicky traffic stats profile for http://bitshares.org - just need someone to post the tracking code on to the live site and we'd be golden. I've got a few more thoughts on the mechanics of how we could track things below.

In order to coordinate our marketing effort I think it's important that we try and funnel people/prospects to one place and one place only:

http://bitshares.org/

With the BitShares SuperDAC almost upon us it would seem sensible to have the re-branded BitShares SuperDAC client software downloadable from http://bitshares.org. In light of the re-brand I'm assuming we'll ditch http://bitshares-x.info in favour of the above and this would be a very good thing IMHO. Can someone in the know provide clarity on what the plan is here?  Later when there are other more specialised/focused software clients interfacing with the BitShares API I think it will become necessary to also have some form of client/app directory feature on http://bitshares.org.

This suggestion does not stop members of the community building their own websites or apps that drive traffic to http://bitshares.org (i.e. creating a marketing node higher up the funnel). MethodX and others have already been very successful at this whilst trying to market the old BitSharesX brand/DAC. I just want to highlight the need to focus energies and traffic towards one place - this will be important going forward.

I haven't heard much suggestion of things being otherwise, but having one endpoint for all marketing activities has lots of obvious and practical benefits, perhaps SEO being the main one - don't dilute your Pagerank score across multiple domains. If the community agrees that this is the way to go then it would also allow us to quite quickly try to put in place some way of capturing and then measuring who is being the most effective at providing inbound traffic and thus awareness about BitShares. This could be measured by simply using your BitShares username as a referral ID whenever you are engaged in sending traffic to the BitShares site, whether that's just a simple signature on the forums or a full blown mini campaign (e.g. your referral link would look like this http://www.bitshares.com?citizen=psuedoscops). Further down the line, individuals could register domains that could also be picked up and associated with individual BitShares user IDs - thus negating some need for ugly params in the URL when doing bigger campaigns. I heard mentioned that someone was building a site that would allow delegates to register? Perhaps as part of the registration process they would be give a unique URL http://www.bitshares.com?citizen=delegate.xeroc)and maybe an embeddable html widget. Delegates and others could then use it when linking to the site and engaging in marketing activity related to BitShares. There's no need to set anything up or register though, in order for it to work you can just substitute your own BitShares ID in the link ans start sending traffic. More on how we can easily track this in the short term below.

In order to see if marketing efforts are being effective I think we need to have some public facing live web statistics for http://bitshares.org that we can access and use to measure success. I've used a number of services in the past Google Analytics, GetClicky, MixPanel and KissMetrics. Sometimes it's worth using a combination of them. GetClicky is probably the most accessible and therefore a good candidate for public facing stats for BitShares, it would also allow us to detect the referral ID mentioned above and have a league table of sorts that show who is generating the most awareness. GetClicky would also allow us to see where traffic is currently being referred from elsewhere on the web. They also provide heatmaps and a live view of current users to the site and where they are coming from is depicted on a nice world map. I think it would be really helpful for the DAC if those wanting to add to the marketing push had insight in to all of these kind of things, and some deeper stats stuff too, via a public facing BitShares traffic portal. It would allow us all to see what is currently driving the most traffic and those with the skills will be able to identify what is working and also identify where we might have some shortcomings. I recognise that GetClicky is not open source, I'd be happy to consider open source options providing it competes on features with GetClicky.

Assuming BM and the team approve of this it can be set up almost immediately by installing the following code I've pasted below on the main site. Just add it to the main WorPress template before the closing body tag. I understand if someone else wants to set this up, my post count is perhaps not high enough to be trusted yet, but I do already have a fairly dormant paid GetClicky account and so it would seem sensible to put it to good use. The code below is the asynchronous JavaScript ans so should not impact page load times at all. It has already been set to be public facing and the URL for access is here:

https://clicky.com/stats/?site_id=100787377

It would be great if the public stats could be collected from the day that the new BitShares SuperDAC was born. Just paste it in and public facing stats becomes live  :)

Code: [Select]
<script type="text/javascript">
var clicky_site_ids = clicky_site_ids || [];
clicky_site_ids.push(100787377);
(function() {
  var s = document.createElement('script');
  s.type = 'text/javascript';
  s.async = true;
  s.src = '//static.getclicky.com/js';
  ( document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0] ).appendChild( s );
})();
</script>
<noscript><p><img alt="Clicky" width="1" height="1" src="//in.getclicky.com/100787377ns.gif" /></p></noscript>

</body>
</html>

Going forward from this I think we need to focus on measurement and reporting of two things:

Awareness
Conversion Goals

My proposal above deals more with awareness. Conversion goal measurement might require some more definition, thought and would probably require a bit more implementation to implement. I'm guessing we could consider the download of the client software and creation of an account to be a successful conversion, but I think that it should be extended beyond that with multiple 'Stretch Goals' (i.e. how much BTSX/BitAsset is held in their account after one month etc etc, a $1m vs a $10 conversion may be given different weighting)

Pages: [1] 2